AJP - Renal Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (June 17, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00197.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/3/F802    most recent
00197.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, D.
Submitted on April 8, 2009
Revised on June 12, 2009
Accepted on June 12, 2009

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade and calcium channel blockade have different renoprotective effects on glomerular and interstitial injury in rats

Jun Du1, Yu-Yan Fan1, Hirofumi Hitomi1, Hideyasu Kiyomoto1, Shoji Kimura2, Chui-Ze Kong3, Takahisa Noma1, Masakazu Kohno1, Akira Nishiyama1, and Daisuke Nakano1*

1 Kagawa University
2 Kagawa University Medical School
3 First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dnakano{at}med.kagawa-u.ac.jp.

We hypothesized that combination treatment with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, and the calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, elicits better renoprotective effects than monotherapy with either drug, via different mechanisms in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) hypertensive rats. DS rats were fed a high salt diet (4% NaCl) for 10 weeks and were treated with vehicle (n=12), eplerenone (50 mg/kg/day, p.o., n=12), amlodipine (3 mg/kg/day, p.o., n=12), or eplerenone plus amlodipine (n=12), after 2 weeks' salt feeding. Vehicle-treated DS rats developed proteinuria, which was attenuated by eplerenone or amlodipine. Interestingly, eplerenone attenuated the glomerulosclerosis and podocyte injury, but amlodipine did not. Conversely, treatment with amlodipine markedly improved the interstitial fibrosis, while the effect of eplerenone was minimal. Combination treatment markedly improved the proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, podocyte injury and interstitial fibrosis in DS rats. Renal hypoxia estimated by pimonidazole, vascular endothelial growth factor expression and density of peritubular endothelial cells was exacerbated by salt feeding. Amlodipine, either as monotherapy or in combination, ameliorated the renal hypoxia, whereas eplerenone treatment had no effect. In conclusion, both eplerenone and amlodipine attenuated renal injuries in high salt-fed DS rats, but the targets for renoprotection differed between these two drugs, with eplerenone predominantly acting on glomeruli and amlodipine acting on interstitium. Combination of eplerenone and amlodipine improved the renal injury more effectively than either monotherapy in high salt-fed DS rats, presumably by achieving their own renoprotective effects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.