AJP - Renal Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 238: F107-F111, 1980;
0363-6127/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirschenbaum, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Serros, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirschenbaum, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Serros, E. R.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 238, Issue 2 107-F111, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of alterations in urine flow rate on prostaglandin E excretion in conscious dogs

M. A. Kirschenbaum and E. R. Serros

The relationships between urinary prostaglandin E excretion and urine flow rate were evaluated in 11 conscious mongrel dogs during antidiuresis, maximal water loading, vasopressin administration during maximal water loading, and mannitol infusion. Urine flow rates between 0.21 and 15.1 ml/min were achieved. Urinary prostaglandin E excretion rates, determined by a membrane receptor assay, varied directly with urine flow rates (r = 0.908). Vasopressin administration (34--540 microU . kg-1 . min-1) resulted in a fall, rather than the expected rise, in urinary prostaglandin E excretion. When the concentration of prostaglandin E in the urine was plotted against urine flow rate, the demonstrated relationship appeared most consistent with passive diffusion. Mannitol infusion increased urine flow rates to levels comparable to the levels seen with maximal water loading but did not result in a fall in plasma osmolality. Urinary prostaglandin E excretion rates, however, were not distinguishable from those in the previous group. These data demonstrate that urinary prostaglandin E excretion rates are determined, to a great extent, by urine flow rate and that the significance of the interpretation of elevated excretion levels of these lipids in diuretic states may have to be reevaluated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online