AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 1 124-F131, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Evidence for transcellular osmotic water flow in rat proximal tubules

P. A. Preisig and C. A. Berry

To determine the predominant pathway for transepithelial osmotic water flow, the transepithelial osmotic water permeability [Pf(TE)] and the apparent dimensions of paracellular pores and slits were determined in rat proximal convoluted tubules microperfused in vivo. To measure Pf(TE), tubules were perfused with a hyposmotic, cyanide-containing solution. Pf(TE), calculated from the observed volume flux in response to the measured log mean osmotic gradient, was 0.12-0.15 cm/s, assuming sigmaNaCl equal to 1.0-0.7, respectively. The dimensions of the paracellular pathways were determined using measured sucrose and mannitol permeabilities (nonelectrolytes confined to the extracellular space). These were 0.43 and 0.87 X 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. By using the ratio of these permeabilities, their respective free solution diffusion coefficients and molecular radii, and the Renkin equation, the radius of the nonelectrolyte-permeable pores and the total pore area/cm2 surface area/channel length were calculated to be 1.4 nm and 3.56 cm-1, respectively. Similar calculations for slits yielded a slit half-width of 0.8 nm and a total slit area/cm2 surface area/channel length of 3.16 cm-1. The osmotic water permeability of these nonelectrolyte-permeable pathways was calculated by Poiseuille's law to be 0.0018 cm/s (pores) or 0.0014 cm/s (slits), at most 2% of Pf(TE). We conclude that the nonelectrolyte-permeable pathway in the tight junctions is not the major route of transepithelial osmotic water flow in the rat proximal tubule.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Baum and R. Quigley Proximal tubule water transport-lessons from aquaporin knockout mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): F1193 - F1194. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Guo, A. M. Weinstein, and S. Weinbaum A dual-pathway ultrastructural model for the tight junction of rat proximal tubule epithelium Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): F241 - F257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Weinstein Mathematical models of renal fluid and electrolyte transport: acknowledging our uncertainty Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): F871 - F884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Quigley and M. Baum Water transport in neonatal and adult rabbit proximal tubules Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): F280 - F285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chen and J. M. Simard Cell Swelling and a Nonselective Cation Channel Regulated by Internal Ca2+ and ATP in Native Reactive Astrocytes from Adult Rat Brain J. Neurosci., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 6512 - 6521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Quigley, A. Lisec, and M. Baum Ontogeny of rabbit proximal tubule urea permeability Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): R1713 - R1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bodega, L. Zocchi, and E. Agostoni Macromolecule transfer through mesothelium and connective tissue J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2165 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Agostoni, F. Bodega, and L. Zocchi Equivalent radius of paracellular "pores" of the mesothelium J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1999; 87(2): 538 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Schnermann, C.-L. Chou, T. Ma, T. Traynor, M. A. Knepper, and A. S. Verkman Defective proximal tubular fluid reabsorption in transgenic aquaporin-1 null mice PNAS, August 4, 1998; 95(16): 9660 - 9664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Garcia, C. R. Ramsey, and F. G. Knox Understanding the Role of Paracellular Transport in the Proximal Tubule Physiology, February 1, 1998; 13(1): 38 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]