AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 249: F524-F531, 1985;
0363-6127/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boberg, U.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boberg, U.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, A. E.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 4 524-F531, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Tubuloglomerular feedback during elevated renal venous pressure

U. Boberg and A. E. Persson

Interstitial hydrostatic and oncotic pressures are believed to influence the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) control. To further investigate this hypothesis, three groups of experiments with elevated renal venous pressure (Prv) were conducted. We investigated 1) the stop-flow pressure (Psf) feedback response; 2) urine flow rate, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), subcapsular interstitial hydrostatic pressure (Psc), and interstitial oncotic pressure (pi int); and 3) the proximal-distal single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR). The results showed that the Psf feedback response was unaffected by Prv elevation. Psc increased from 0.5 to 3.5 mmHg and pi int increased from 2.1 to 5.8 mmHg; thus, no change in net interstitial pressure (Psc - pi int) was found during elevated Prv. There was a significant proximal-distal SNGFR difference during both control and elevated Prv (8.0 and 6.3 nl/min, respectively). A 20% reduction in total GFR and SNGFR was observed at increased Prv. In separate experiments using the same protocol, a 5% body wt/h volume expansion with saline was induced before Prv was elevated. During volume expansion, TGF sensitivity declined and net interstitial pressure increased, both of which were normalized by increasing Prv. The results show that the TGF sensitivity is normal during elevated Prv to 20 mmHg and that the increase in Psc during this condition is counter-balanced by an increase in pi int. In addition, the decrease in GFR and SNGFR during increased Prv cannot be explained by a change in TGF activity. However, these findings indicate that both interstitial hydrostatic and oncotic pressures may influence the resetting of the TGF sensitivity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
L. Rosivall, S. Mirzahosseini, I. Toma, A. Sipos, and J. Peti-Peterdi
Fluid flow in the juxtaglomerular interstitium visualized in vivo
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): F1241 - F1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. Komlosi, J. Peti-Peterdi, A. L. Fuson, A. Fintha, L. Rosivall, and P. D. Bell
Macula densa basolateral ATP release is regulated by luminal [NaCl] and dietary salt intake
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1054 - F1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online