AJP - Renal AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 250: F66-F69, 1986;
0363-6127/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Toto, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Toto, R. D.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 250, Issue 1 66-F69, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Lack of a direct effect of atrial natriuretic factor in the rabbit proximal tubule

M. Baum and R. D. Toto

Whole animal clearance studies and in vitro microperfusion studies were performed to examine the effect of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) on the rabbit proximal tubule. Infusion of ANF into rabbits resulted in an increase in glomerular filtration rate and a natriuresis and diuresis. To determine whether ANF has a direct proximal tubule effect to account for part of the observed natriuresis, proximal convoluted tubules (PCT) and proximal straight tubules (PST) were perfused in vitro. Addition of 10(-9) M ANF, a concentration recently measured in vivo during volume expansion, to the bathing solution of PCT caused no significant change in volume absorption. Addition of a pharmacological concentration of ANF (10(-7) M) to either the bathing solution or the luminal perfusate of PCT resulted in no change in volume absorption. When added to the bathing solution of PST, 10(-7) M ANF did not have an effect on volume absorption. ANF did not affect the transepithelial potential difference in any protocol. In conclusion, these data show that ANF does not affect transport directly in the proximal tubule.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online