AJP - Renal AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 253: F563-F575, 1987;
0363-6127/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. C., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, J. A.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 3 563-F575, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

A model of osmotic and hydrostatic pressure effects on volume absorption in the proximal tubule

J. C. Williams Jr and J. A. Schafer

A computer model of the proximal tubule of the rabbit is described in which the tubule is treated as a single cylindrical barrier to the flow of solute and water between lumen and bath, and volume absorption is assumed to be driven exclusively by hydrostatic and osmotic pressure differences across this barrier. The model mimics the function of the tubule in two in vitro preparations: in simulations of the isolated tubule perfused under oil, the model correctly describes the solute concentration gradients that exist between the perfusate and absorbate and predicts differences in solute concentrations among absorbate droplets on the same tubule if luminal concentration becomes limiting. This prediction was tested experimentally with glucose and found to be correct. In simulations of the tubule perfused in an aqueous bath, the role of transmural hydrostatic pressure was explored; it is predicted that, at normal rates of in vitro perfusion (approximately 10 nl/min), increases in pressure have very little effect on volume absorption but can greatly alter the osmotic differences present across the wall of the tubule, especially with high values of osmotic water permeability. At high rates of perfusion, the ability of the tubule to produce a lumen hypotonic to the bath is reduced, but the direct effects of pressure on volume absorption become more apparent, resulting in relatively little effect of perfusion rate on volume absorption if the osmotic water permeability is sufficiently high. A similar relationship was seen experimentally. In all, this simple model provides a good prediction of function in isolated perfused tubules without any assumptions of hypertonic compartments within the epithelium.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online