AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 253: F880-F883, 1987;
0363-6127/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salazar, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salazar, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. C.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 5 880-F883, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Possible modulatory role of angiotensin II on atrial peptide-induced natriuresis

F. J. Salazar, J. P. Granger, M. J. Fiksen-Olsen, M. D. Bentley and J. C. Romero
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine of Murcia, Spain.

Studies showing that atrial natriuretic peptides (ANP) induce a suppression of the renin-angiotensin system suggest that there might be a modulatory influence of angiotensin II (ANG II) on the natriuretic effect of the ANP system. To evaluate this possibility we assessed, in anesthetized dogs, the net increments in fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) and lithium (FELi) produced by ANP and by the inhibition of ANG II formation with captopril. These agents were infused at separate time periods into the renal artery at a maximal level that has been shown not to alter glomerular filtration rate (GFR). ANP caused an increment in FENa of 4.0 +/- 0.2, whereas captopril caused a much smaller increase of 0.2 +/- 0.04, indicating that most of the natriuretic effect of ANP is unlikely to be solely accounted for by inhibition of ANG II. The administration of both ANP and captopril produced increases in the FELi used as a marker for proximal tubular reabsorption. An infusion of ANG II superimposed on the infusion of captopril reduced the FENa from 1.5 +/- 0.3 to 0.8 +/- 0.1. Under these conditions the administration of ANP produced an increment of 2.7 +/- 0.4 in the FENa. This increase in FENa is 32.5% less than the net increase obtained when ANP was given in the absence of ANG II, whereas under these conditions FELi remained statistically unchanged. These results suggest that the modulatory activity of ANG II on the natriuretic affect of ANP could be negligible under normal conditions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online