AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 259: F529-F534, 1990;
0363-6127/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Arendshorst, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Arendshorst, W. J.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 259, Issue 3 529-F534, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Tubuloglomerular feedback kinetics in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats

F. H. Daniels and W. J. Arendshorst
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham 27706.

The steady-state behavior of the tubuloglomerular feedback system has been studied in detail, but little is known about its dynamics. However, kinetic data can provide insight regarding the contribution of feedback to autoregulatory responses. Accordingly, experiments were conducted in anesthetized, euvolemic, spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats to characterize the time course of changes in proximal tubular stop-flow pressure after step changes in the rate of orthograde perfusion of Henle's loop. We studied the responses both to increase in perfusion rate, which produced preglomerular vasoconstriction, and decreases in perfusion rate, which produced preglomerular vasodilation. In both strains, the pattern of induced stop-flow pressure transients consisted of a pure delay followed by a monoexponential decay to a new steady state. In SHR rats, delay times were shorter than in WKY rats, but response time constants were not significantly different in the two strains. However, response time constants for dilation were longer than for constriction in both strains. The delay times and relatively large response time constants observed indicate that tubuloglomerular feedback cannot mediate rapid autoregulatory responses to fluctuations in renal perfusion pressure. The response time of tubuloglomerular feedback is probably limited by both the time lag associated with fluid transit through the loop of Henle and a relatively slow rate-limiting step in the signal transduction process at the macula densa.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online