AJP - Renal Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 260: F69-F74, 1991;
0363-6127/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cochineas, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cochineas, C.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 1 69-F74, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Transfer of Na transport inhibition in proximal tubules from saline volume-expanded to nonexpanded rats

S. Reddy, A. Z. Gyory, T. Bostrom and C. Cochineas
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

In dual micropuncture experiments the shrinking drop technique was used to measure volume flux with artificial tubular fluid (AF) alternating with harvested tubular fluid (HTF) during saline volume-expanded (VE) and nonexpanded (NE) periods. In VE rats, volume flux (Jv) (nl.mm-1.min-1) with AF was 1.78 +/- 0.08 (means +/- SE) during NE and was reduced to 1.39 +/- 0.09 (P = 0.01) during subsequent VE, whereas with randomly alternating HTF during VE it was 1.07 +/- 0.08 (P less than 0.0001 and less than 0.03, respectively). Jv with HTF from NE rats tested in the VE rats was 1.20 +/- 0.06, which is significantly higher than that measured with their own HTF (Wilcoxon rank, P = 0.05). In NE rats Jv was 1.65 +/- 0.10 and 1.69 +/- 0.10 with AF and HTF and was 1.28 +/- 0.07 (P less than 0.001 from both) with HTF obtained from VE rats. Elemental analysis of reaspirated tubular fluids showed no significant differences in Na or Cl concentrations among any of the fluids. It is concluded that during VE, a transferable Na transport inhibitor appears in proximal tubular fluid, which, together with a changed proximal tubular epithelium, possibly due to physical forces, accounts for proximal tubular Na transport inhibition during VE.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online