AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 260: F395-F401, 1991;
0363-6127/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salmond, R.
Right arrow Articles by Seney, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salmond, R.
Right arrow Articles by Seney, F. D., Jr

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 3 395-F401, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Reset tubuloglomerular feedback permits and sustains glomerular hyperfunction after extensive renal ablation

R. Salmond and F. D. Seney Jr
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-8856.

To determine the contribution of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system to glomerular hyperfunction after extensive loss of renal mass, TGF was assessed in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats 7 days after 5/6 reduction of renal mass (2/3 infarction of 1 kidney plus contralateral nephrectomy) or sham surgery. Five-sixths renal ablation significantly increased single-nephron (SN) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 57%, late proximal tubule fluid flow 58-63%, and maximal proximal tubule stop-flow pressure (PSF) 24%. Despite these increments, 5/6 ablation did not increase TGF activation, as judged by the difference between proximally and distally measured SNGFR values, nor did it affect maximal TGF responses, measured as change in PSF during forward microperfusion of the loop of Henle. However, 5/6 ablation increased the late proximal perfusion rate eliciting half-maximal PSF suppression (V1/2) from 27.3 +/- 1.6 to 45.7 +/- 2.4 nl/min (P less than 0.001), a change closely matching the increment in native late proximal tubule fluid flow from 26.6 +/- 2.2 to 43.8 +/- 2.1 nl/min (P less than 0.001). Unilateral nephrectomy increased V1/2 less dramatically than did 5/6 ablation, thus showing that the effects of renal ablation on TGF are proportional to the degree of ablation. We conclude that extensive renal ablation resets TGF operation in a way that permits and helps sustain glomerular hyperfunction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
K. A. Griffin, H. Kramer, and A. K. Bidani
Adverse renal consequences of obesity
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F685 - F696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. Loutzenhiser, K. Griffin, G. Williamson, and A. Bidani
Renal autoregulation: new perspectives regarding the protective and regulatory roles of the underlying mechanisms
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): R1153 - R1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online