AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 270: F377-F390, 1996;
0363-6127/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, A.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 270, Issue 2 377-F390, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Pressure threshold for fluid loss from the peritoneal cavity

M. F. Flessner and A. Schwab
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, New York 14620, USA.

Ascites or dialysis fluid in the peritoneal cavity causes fluid loss from the cavity to the body. Experiments in animals and in humans have shown that the fluid loss rate increases with large increments in the intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (Pip). We hypothesized that there is a low-threshold Pip above which this fluid loss occurs. Because the full Pip force is exerted across the abdominal wall (AW), we further hypothesized that fluid movement into the abdominal wall would vary directly with the Pip. To address these questions, we dialyzed rats for 3 h in the supine position at constant levels of Pip with isotonic and hypertonic dialysis solutions containing a protein marker of fluid movement. We measured total fluid loss, AW fluid-marker concentration, and lymph flow. With variation of Pip from 0 to 8 cmH2O, we found that 1) lymph flows (0.61 +/- 0.03 ml/h) were not dependent on Pip, 2) measured isotonic fluid loss rate varied from 0.29 +/- 0.06 ml/h at 0 cmH2O to 0.62 +/- 0.02 at 2 cmH2O and then rose in a linear fashion to 5.06 +/- 0.10 ml/h at 8 cmH2O, 3) fluid movement into the AW paralleled the measured fluid loss rate, and 4) protein clearance from the cavity overestimated the true fluid loss because of adsorption of the marker to the peritoneal surface. We conclude that, although peritoneal lymph flow is not dependent on intraperitoneal hydrostatic or osmotic pressure, fluid loss from the cavity and fluid loss to the abdominal wall are directly proportional to Pip > 2 cmH2O. We also note that protein markers of fluid movement require correction for tissue surface adsorption for accurate results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, K. Credit, X. Li, and J. Tanksley
Similitude of transperitoneal permeability in different rodent species
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): F495 - F499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, R. Deverkadra, J. Smitherman, X. Li, and K. Credit
In vivo determination of diffusive transport parameters in a superfused tissue
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): F1096 - F1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Stachowska-Pietka, J. Waniewski, M. F. Flessner, and B. Lindholm
Distributed model of peritoneal fluid absorption
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1862 - H1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, J. Choi, H. Vanpelt, Z. He, K. Credit, J. Henegar, and M. Hughson
Correlating structure with solute and water transport in a chronic model of peritoneal inflammation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F232 - F240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner
The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): F433 - F442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, J. Choi, Z. He, and K. Credit
Physiological characterization of human ovarian cancer cells in a rat model of intraperitoneal antineoplastic therapy
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1518 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. F. FLESSNER, J. LOFTHOUSE, and A. WILLIAMS
Increasing Peritoneal Contact Area During Dialysis Improves Mass Transfer
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2001; 12(10): 2139 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner
Transport of protein in the abdominal wall during intraperitoneal therapy. I. Theoretical approach
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): G424 - G437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. F. FLESSNER, J. LOFTHOUSE, and E. R. ZAKARIA
Improving Contact Area between the Peritoneum and Intraperitoneal Therapeutic Solutions
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2001; 12(4): 807 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Wiig and O. Tenstad
Interstitial exclusion of positively and negatively charged IgG in rat skin and muscle
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1505 - H1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. R. Zakaria, J. Lofthouse, and M. F. Flessner
Effect of intraperitoneal pressures on tissue water of the abdominal muscle
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): F875 - F885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
H. DEMISSACHEW, J. LOFTHOUSE, and M. F. FLESSNER
Tissue Sources and Blood Flow Limitations of Osmotic Water Transport Across the Peritoneum
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 1999; 10(2): 347 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. R. Zakaria, J. Lofthouse, and M. F. Flessner
In vivo effects of hydrostatic pressure on interstitium of abdominal wall muscle
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H517 - H529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. R. Zakaria, J. Lofthouse, and M. F. Flessner
In vivo hydraulic conductivity of muscle: effects of hydrostatic pressure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2774 - H2782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. F. Flessner, J. Lofthouse, and E. R. Zakaria
In vivo diffusion of immunoglobulin G in muscle: effects of binding, solute exclusion, and lymphatic removal
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2783 - H2793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online