AJP - Renal Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F200-F205, 1997;
0363-6127/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nafz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nafz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.

AJP - Renal Physiology, Vol 273, Issue 2 200-F205, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Flow versus pressure in the control of renin release in conscious dogs

B. Nafz, H. Berthold, H. Ehmke, E. Hackenthal, H. R. Kirchheim and P. B. Persson
Institut fur Physiologie der Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin (Charite), Germany.

In Goldblatt hypertension, renal artery stenosis reduces renal arterial pressure (RAP) and renal blood flow (RBF) and thereby increases plasma renin activity (PRA) levels. Although it is clear that reduction in RAP stimulates renin, the decrease in RBF may contribute to higher PRA as well. However, it has hitherto never been possible to dissociate a decrease in RBF from a concomitant decrease in RAP. To overcome this restriction, we used two protocols. 1) RAP was reduced in a single step to 70 +/- 0.2 mmHg (N = 8). RBF followed the sudden fall in RAP within 15 s but subsequently took on initial levels. In contrast, renal venous PRA increased from 0.95 +/- 0.22 to 5.6 +/- 1.4 ng angiotensin I.ml-1.h-1 (P < 0.05) and remained at higher values even after RBF had regained control conditions. 2) Resonance between RAP and RBF was induced by superimposing slow sinusoidal RAP waves with a period length of 450 s (N = 9), leading to a phase shift of roughly 180 degrees (time delay, 241 +/- 12 s), i.e., RBF was maximal at minimal RAP. Under these conditions, renin release was only dependent on decrements in RAP (delay of only 27 +/- 8 s). In conclusion, RBF played no major role in renin release.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. M. Sorensen, P. P. Leyssac, M. Salomonsson, O. Skott, and N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou
ANG II-induced downregulation of RBF after a prolonged reduction of renal perfusion pressure is due to pre- and postglomerular constriction
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): R865 - R873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Wagner, M. Hinder, B. K. Kramer, and A. Kurtz
Role of Renal Nerves in the Stimulation of the Renin System by Reduced Renal Arterial Pressure
Hypertension, November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1101 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online