|
|
||||||||
Laboratory of Kidney and Electrolyte Metabolism, National Heart, Lung,and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1603
Submitted 28 January 2003 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2003
In tests of osmotic tolerance of renal inner medullary cells in tissue culture, osmolality has usually been increased in a single step, whereas in vivo the increase occurs gradually over several hours. We previously found that more passage 2 mouse inner medullary epithelial (p2mIME) cells survive a linear increase in NaCl and urea from 640 to 1,640 mosmol/kgH2O over 20 h (which is similar to the change that may occur in vivo) than they do a step increase. The present studies examine accompanying differences in gene expression. Among mRNAs of genes known to be protective, tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein and aldose reductase increase with a linear but decrease with a step increase; betaine transporter BGT1 decreases with a step but not a linear increase; heat shock protein 70.1 (HSP70.1) and HSP70.3 increase more with a linear than a step increase; and osmotic stress protein 94 and heme oxygenase-1 increase with a linear but decrease with a step increase. mRNAs for known urea-responsive proteins, GADD153 and Egr-1, increase with both a step and linear increase. A step increase in urea alone reduces mRNAs, similar to the combination of NaCl and urea, but a step increase in NaCl alone does not. HSP70 protein increases substantially with a linear rise in osmolality but does not change significantly with a step rise. We speculate that poorer survival of p2mIME cells with a step than with linear increase in NaCl and urea is accounted for, at least in part, by urea-induced suppression of protective genes, particularly HSP70.
osmotic stress; organic osmolyte; heat shock protein; mRNA abundance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Irarrazabal, C. K. Williams, M. A. Ely, M. J. Birrer, A. Garcia-Perez, M. B. Burg, and J. D. Ferraris Activator Protein-1 Contributes to High NaCl-induced Increase in Tonicity-responsive Enhancer/Osmotic Response Element-binding Protein Transactivating Activity J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2554 - 2563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Burg, J. D. Ferraris, and N. I. Dmitrieva Cellular Response to Hyperosmotic Stresses Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1441 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. I. Dmitrieva, M. B. Burg, and J. D. Ferraris DNA damage and osmotic regulation in the kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): F2 - F7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Lamitina and K. Strange Transcriptional targets of DAF-16 insulin signaling pathway protect C. elegans from extreme hypertonic stress Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): C467 - C474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. McReynolds, K. M. Taylor-Garcia, K. A. Greer, J. B. Hoying, and H. L. Brooks Renal medullary gene expression in aquaporin-1 null mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): F315 - F321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ferraris and M. B. Burg Drying and salting send different messages J. Physiol., July 1, 2004; 558(1): 3 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Huang and A. Tunnacliffe Response of human cells to desiccation: comparison with hyperosmotic stress response J. Physiol., July 1, 2004; 558(1): 181 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |