AJP - Renal Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F230-F241, 2009. First published October 8, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90507.2008
0363-6127/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/2/F230    most recent
90507.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skoberne, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skoberne, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffer, M.

REVIEW

Glomerular epithelial cells in the urine: what has to be done to make them worthwhile?

Andrej Skoberne,1 Andrzej Konieczny,2 and Mario Schiffer3

1Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Division of Nephrology, Voivodship Specialty Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland; and 3Division of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

ABSTRACT

The significance of the native urine sediment in the differential of glomerular diseases needs no further comment. However, the question arises whether it could be useful to develop a more specific diagnostic approach to identify the origin of renal epithelial cells that can be detected in the urine sediments as well. Especially the detection of podocytes in the urine could be a valuable noninvasive method to get information about the disease activity or disease type and could be used as a follow-up after a biopsy in an outpatient setting. So far, there are only a few studies that analyzed the clinical relevance of renal epithelial cells in the urine systematically or prospectively. The reason for this could be the nature of the material since it will remain unclear whether detachment and changes in the urine milieu have a direct effect on the expression of marker proteins on the detected cells. Dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation of cells that goes along with changed marker expression is certainly also part of the underlying disease process. This review summarizes the available information on marker proteins that have been successfully used in the diagnostic of "podocytes" in the urine. Furthermore, it gives an overview of marker expression on podocytes in situ in development and disease and examines the role of glomerular epithelial shedding in the urine at the interface of basic science and clinical medicine.

podocalyxin; membranous nephropathy; glomerulonephritis



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Schiffer, Division of Nephrology, Dept. of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany (e-mail: schiffer.mario{at}mh-hannover.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.