AJP - Renal Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 297: F802-F808, 2009. First published June 17, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00197.2009
0363-6127/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/3/F802    most recent
00197.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nakano, D.

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade and calcium channel blockade have different renoprotective effects on glomerular and interstitial injury in rats

Jun Du,1,3 Yu-Yan Fan,2 Hirofumi Hitomi,1 Hideyasu Kiyomoto,2 Shoji Kimura,1 Chui-Ze Kong,3 Takahisa Noma,2 Masakazu Kohno,2 Akira Nishiyama,1 and Daisuke Nakano1

Departments of 1Pharmacology and 2Cardiorenal and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Kagawa University Medical School, Kagawa, Japan; and 3Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Submitted 8 April 2009 ; accepted in final form 12 June 2009

We hypothesized that combination treatment with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine elicits better renoprotective effects than monotherapy with either drug, via different mechanisms in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) hypertensive rats. DS rats were fed a high-salt diet (4% NaCl) for 10 wk and were treated with vehicle (n = 12), eplerenone (50 mg·kg–1·day–1, po, n = 12), amlodipine (3 mg·kg–1·day–1, po, n = 12), or eplerenone plus amlodipine (n = 12) after 2 wk of salt feeding. Vehicle-treated DS rats developed proteinuria, which was attenuated by eplerenone or amlodipine. Interestingly, eplerenone attenuated the glomerulosclerosis and podocyte injury, but amlodipine did not. Conversely, treatment with amlodipine markedly improved interstitial fibrosis, while the effect of eplerenone was minimal. Combination treatment markedly improved proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, podocyte injury, and interstitial fibrosis in DS rats. Renal hypoxia estimated by pimonidazole, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and density of peritubular endothelial cells was exacerbated by salt feeding. Amlodipine, either as monotherapy or in combination, ameliorated the renal hypoxia, whereas eplerenone treatment had no effect. In conclusion, both eplerenone and amlodipine attenuated renal injuries in high salt-fed DS rats, but the targets for renoprotection differed between these two drugs, with eplerenone predominantly acting on glomeruli and amlodipine acting on interstitium. The combination of eplerenone and amlodipine improved renal injury more effectively than either monotherapy in high salt-fed DS rats, presumably by achieving their own renoprotective effects.

interstitial fibrosis; hypoxia; salt-sensitive hypertension



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Nakano, Dept. of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa Univ., 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-Cho, Kita-Gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan (e-mail: dnakano{at}med.kagawa-u.ac.jp)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.