AJP - Renal AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F445-F452, 1998;
0363-6127/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shalmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shalmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Vol. 274, Issue 3, F445-F452, March 1998

Model explaining the relation between distal nephron Li+ reabsorption and urinary Na+ excretion in rats

Michael Shalmi1, Thomas Jonassen1, Klaus Thomsen2, Jonathan D. Kibble3, Peter Bie4, and Sten Christensen1

Departments of 1 Pharmacology and of 4 Medical Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen; 2 Institute for Basic Psychiatric Research, Department of Biological Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; and 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Li+ may be reabsorbed via an amiloride-sensitive mechanism in the collecting ducts of rats administered a low-Na+ diet. This was investigated by measuring the increase in fractional urinary excretion of Li+ (FELi) in response to amiloride in conscious rats at two different levels of plasma Li+ concentration and after administration of bendroflumethiazide (BFTZ), angiotensin III (ANG III), and aldosterone (Aldo). The results confirmed that amiloride increased (FELi) in rats on a low-Na+ diet (20 ± 1 to 35 ± 1%, means ± SE), whereas no increase was observed in rats on a normal Na+ diet (37 ± 1 to 38 ± 1%). The lithiuretic effect of amiloride was 1) abolished by preadministration of BFTZ (32 ± 1 to 33 ± 2%) to Na+-deprived rats and 2) increased by ANG III (27 ± 3 to 33 ± 2%) and Aldo (25 ± 2 to 37 ± 2%) in Na+-replete rats. Amiloride-induced changes in FELi were independent of plasma Li+ concentration but inversely related to the fractional excretion of Na+ and the amiloride-sensitive excretion of K+. These results are compatible with the hypothesis that a low tubular Na+ concentration reduces end-tubular Na+ reabsorption and results in hyperpolarization of the apical membrane, thus favoring Li+ uptake into the cells.

tubular reabsorption; bendroflumethiazide; amiloride; aldosterone; angiotensin III; lithium clearance; lithium ion; sodium ion

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

RENAL LITHIUM ION CLEARANCE is used as an index of the delivery of tubular fluid from the proximal tubules to the loop of Henle in humans and Na+-replete rats (15). The technique is based on the assumptions 1) that Li+ in the proximal tubule is reabsorbed to the same extent as Na+ and water so that the concentration of Li+ in the proximal tubular fluid remains constant and 2) that transtubular transport of Li+ is negligible in the postproximal segments of the tubule, i.e., the loop of Henle, the distal convoluted tubules, and the collecting ducts (4, 28). Consistent with these assumptions, it has been found repeatedly that the renal clearance of Li+ in Na+-replete rats is unaffected by administration of amiloride, which inhibits apical membrane Na+ entry into the cells of the collecting duct (2). However, during Na+ depletion, the clearance of Li+ is markedly decreased but can be normalized by amiloride, indicating that, in this situation, a significant proportion of the distal tubular load of Li+ may be reabsorbed in the distal nephron (31).

The reason why amiloride-sensitive transport of Li+ is quantitatively significant in Na+-depleted but not in Na+-replete rats is unknown. The limitation in reabsorption of Li+ during Na+-replete conditions may be either the cellular influx across the apical membrane or extrusion through the basolateral membrane, and, in both cases, the distal tubular load of Na+ may be crucial for the reabsorption of Li+. If Na+ and Li+ compete for the same apical transporter, an increased tubular load of Na+ would be expected to result in a parallel reduction in Li+ transport. Furthermore, Li+ extrusion across the basolateral membrane may require a large concentration gradient between the intracellular fluid and the plasma, as the extrusion does not undergo active transport (9). In this situation, hyperpolarization of the apical membrane, which increases apical inward cation transport, may be crucial for elevating the intracellular Li+ concentration to levels necessary for substantial transepithelial Li+ transport.

In the present study, we have examined, by use of a conscious rat model, the mechanism(s) underlying distal tubular Li+ reabsorption by modulation of the Na+ reabsorption. The influence of amiloride on the fractional extraction of Li+ (FELi), an index of distal tubular Li+ reabsorption, was investigated in rats on normal and low-Na+ intakes, in which distal tubular transport rates of Na+ were manipulated by administration of bendroflumethiazide (BFTZ), angiotensin III (ANG III), and aldosterone (Aldo). The effect of an 80-90% reduction in plasma Li+ concentration was also investigated. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that, during Na+-depleted conditions, the apical membrane in the more distal parts of the amiloride-sensitive region of the collecting ducts becomes hyperpolarized due to a low-Na+ influx, and distal Li+ reabsorption can occur.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Animals. Specific pathogen-free female Wistar rats (200-250 g) were obtained from the Department of Experimental Medicine, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen (Copenhagen, Denmark). They were housed in a temperature (22-24°C)- and humidity (40-70%)-controlled room with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (light on from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM). The rats were given free access to tap water and pelleted rat diet with a K+ content of 220 mmol/kg and Na+ contents of either 5 mmol/kg (Na5 diet) or 200 mmol/kg (Na200 diet) for at least 8 days before experimentation. Three days before the clearance study, lithium citrate was added to the food (12 and 7 mmol/kg for Na200 and Na5, respectively) to obtain measurable plasma Li+ concentration ([Li+]) without influencing renal function (26). In one group of rats, Li+ was withdrawn 1 day before the experiment to reduce the plasma [Li+] in this group (Na5-low Li).

Animal preparation. Animals were surgically prepared for clearance studies 2 wk before experimentation as described previously (21). In summary, animals were anesthetized with halothane-N2O, and Tygon catheters were inserted into the abdominal aorta and the inferior caval vein via femoral vessels. A suprapubic bladder catheter was also implanted. After instrumentation, animals were housed individually. During the last week before clearance studies, rats were adapted to the restraining cage used for these experiments by training them for two periods of ~90 min each.

Clearance technique. On the day of the experiment, the rats were transferred to restraining cages, and the catheters were opened and flushed with 150 mM glucose containing 20 U/ml of heparin. Throughout the experiments, the animals received an infusion of this solution at a rate of 0.25 ml/h to keep the arterial catheter open. In addition, each animal received throughout the experiment an infusion of 150 mmol/l glucose (bolus 0.5 ml, sustained 0.5 ml/h) containing [3H]inulin (batch no. 119-121; bolus 5 µCi, sustained 5 µCi/h; Amersham), LiCl (bolus 3.3 µmol, sustained 3.3 µmol/h), and 1.0 ml/h of 150 mM glucose as vehicle for drugs. Each experiment comprised a 15-min inulin-Li+ bolus period, a 105-min equilibration period, three 30-min preamiloride periods, and three 30-min periods during which amiloride was added to the ongoing intravenous infusion.

The total rate of infusion of 150 mM glucose was kept constant at 1.75 ml/h in all experiments. In addition, during administration of BFTZ or amiloride, urinary fluid losses exceeding 1.75 ml/h were replaced by infusion of a 150 mmol/l NaCl solution by a computer-driven servo-controlled system. This system, which includes a personal computer, an electronic balance (type MC 1; Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany), and an infusion pump (Perfusor Secura; Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany), monitored urine flow rate gravimetrically at 5-min intervals and adjusted the rate of the pump accordingly (5).

Blood samples of 250 µl were collected from the arterial catheter at the end of the equilibration period, after the preamiloride periods, and at the end of the experiment. All blood samples were replaced immediately with heparinized donor blood. At the end of the experiment, all catheters were sealed with 50% glucose, 500 units of heparin, and 10,000 units of streptokinase per milliliter, and the rats were returned to the animal unit. When different experiments were performed on the same animal, they were separated by at least 1 wk, allowing full recovery between experiments.

Drugs were dissolved in 150 mM glucose and were given as an intravenous priming dose followed by a maintenance infusion at a rate of 0.5 ml/h. The priming doses of BFTZ (83 µg), ANG III (1.5 µg), and amiloride (0.17 mg) were given over a period of 5 min, whereas Aldo (600 pmol) was given over a period of 15 min together with the inulin bolus. The corresponding maintenance infusions provided 250 µg/h, 1.5 µg/h, 0.5 mg/h, and 600 pmol/h, respectively.

Analyses. Urine volume was determined gravimetrically. Na+ concentration ([Na+]), K+ concentration ([K+]), and [Li+] in plasma and urine were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, using a Perkin-Elmer model 2380 atomic absorption spectrophotometer. In the Na5-low Li group, plasma and urine [Li+] were determined by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry, using a Perkin-Elmer electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometer (16, 24). [3H]inulin in plasma and urine was determined by liquid scintillation counting using a Packard Tri-Carb liquid scintillation analyzer (model 2250CA). The urinary excretion rate of amiloride was determined in eight of the Na5 and eight of the Na200 rats given vehicle infusion. Urinary amiloride concentrations were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography system with fluorescent analysis. Blood pressure and heart rate were determined continuously using Baxter Uniflow pressure transducers (Bentley Laboratories) connected to Hugo Sachs pressure and heart couplers. Signals were displayed on a Watanabe Instruments WR 3101 Line recorder Mark VII (Watanabe Instruments).

Calculations. Values for renal clearance (C) and fractional excretion (FE) were calculated using standard formulas
C = U × V/P
FE = 100 × C/GFR
where U is the concentration in the urine, V is the urine flow rate, and P is the concentration in plasma. [3H]inulin clearance (Cin) was used as a marker for the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

The urinary amiloride concentrations were 346 ± 95 (means ± SE) and 170 ± 18 (means ± SE) µmol/l, and the excretion rates were 7.3 ± 0.8 and 6.5 ± 0.8 nmol · min-1 · 100 g body wt-1 in the Na5-vehicle and the Na200-vehicle groups, respectively. From these values, intratubular amiloride concentrations were estimated to range from 5 to 10 µmol/l in the proximal tubules and higher in the cortical collecting ducts. These concentrations are well below those reported to block the Na+-H+ exchange mechanism in the proximal tubules [inhibitory constant (Ki) >50-100 µmol/l] but above the concentrations required to block movement of Na+ through the conductive Na+ channel (Ki <1 µmol/l; see Refs. 2 and 11).

Assuming that amiloride completely blocked the conductive Na+ channels in the collecting ducts and that Na+ is not reabsorbed by other mechanisms in this segment or further downstream (22), the reabsorption (R) of Na+ expressed as a fraction (f) of the load delivered to the reabsorptive site can be calculated as
fR<SUB>Na-Amil</SUB> = (V<SUB>2</SUB> × U<SUB>Na2</SUB> − V<SUB>1</SUB> × U<SUB>Na1</SUB>)/V<SUB>2</SUB> × U<SUB>Na2</SUB>
where V1×UNa1 and V2×UNa2 represent the absolute excretion of Na+ before and after administration of amiloride, respectively. To account for changes in GFR and plasma [Na+] between the two observation periods, these variables should be factored, resulting in the following equation expressing the relative (r) amiloride-sensitive Na+ reabsorption
rR<SUB>Na-Amil</SUB> = [(V<SUB>2</SUB> × U<SUB>Na2</SUB>/P<SUB>Na2</SUB>)/GFR<SUB>2</SUB>
 − (V<SUB>1</SUB> × U<SUB>Na1</SUB>/P<SUB>Na1</SUB>)/GFR<SUB>1</SUB>]/[(V<SUB>2</SUB> × U<SUB>Na2</SUB>/P<SUB>Na2</SUB>)/GFR<SUB>2</SUB>]
which is equal to the equation
rR<SUB>Na-Amil</SUB> = (FE<SUB>Na2</SUB> − FE<SUB>Na1</SUB>)/FE<SUB>Na2</SUB>
Similarly, the relative amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption can be expressed as
rR<SUB>Li-Amil</SUB> = (FE<SUB>Li2</SUB> − FE<SUB>Li1</SUB>)/FE<SUB>Li2</SUB>
The expressions fRNa-Amil and rRNa-Amil are similar, as no differences between GFR and PNa are seen before or after administration of amiloride. In contrast, as PLi showed time-dependent changes in some series, a meaningful estimate of the relative reabsorption of Li+ in the amiloride-sensitive segment can only be accomplished through determination of rRLi-Amil. Furthermore, Li+ and Na+ transport in the amiloride-sensitive segment can be directly compared using the expressions rRLi-Amil and rRNa-Amil. Because the Na+ load on which rRNa-Amil is based (FENa2) may be underestimated because of Na+ reabsorption in the distal nephron by mechanisms not being amiloride sensitive, the true rRNa-Amil may be less than the calculated value. However, this inaccuracy is not important for the data presentation and interpretation performed.

Data presentation and statistics. Renal clearance variables are presented as mean values of the last two preamiloride periods and the last two periods during amiloride infusion. Effects of amiloride were evaluated statistically by comparing the two average values using Student's paired t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Values presented are means ± SE.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, GFR, and plasma electrolytes before and during amiloride are given in Table 1. Between series, the blood pressure values were similar except for the series given ANG III. Administration of ANG III increased blood pressure by ~15%. In most experiments, GFR was not influenced by the dietary Na+ intake and the various pharmacological treatments, but, in the ANG III series, it was reduced by ~20% compared with the other appropriate control series. Plasma [Li+] averaged 125-170 µmol/l, except in the Na5-low Li group in which plasma [Li+] was 10-20% of this level. There were no significant differences in plasma [Na+] or [K+] among the groups.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, GFR, and blood parameters

The renal handling of Na+ and Li+ is reported in terms of fractional excretion before and during amiloride administration (Table 2). The difference between the FELi before and during amiloride administration (delta FELi) may be taken as an index of the Li+ reabsorption in the distal tubular segments, predominantly in the collecting ducts (Table 3). With regard to the general pattern of changes in FELi, it is noticeable that 1) conditions during which distal tubular reabsorption of Na+ is intensified, resulting in low fractional excretion rates of Na+, were associated with amiloride-reversible reductions in the FELi; and 2) FELi after amiloride always was close to 35% irrespective of large changes in Na+ intake or plasma [Li+] or of administration of Aldo, ANG III, or thiazide.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Renal parameters before and during blockade of distal tubular reabsorption of Li+ with amiloride

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Renal responses to administration of amiloride

FELi was markedly reduced by a low-Na+ diet (Na5-vehicle group), and this reduction was completely reversed by amiloride. The difference amounted to 16% of the filtered load equal to ~40% of the estimated distal delivery of Li+ (Table 3). A practically identical reversal of FELi was observed after amiloride in the Na5-low Li group in which plasma [Li+] was reduced by 80-90%. Here, amiloride increased FELi with 14% of the filtered load, indicating that the amiloride-reversible reduction in FELi induced by the low-Na+ diet was independent of [Li+] in plasma. Administration of BFTZ completely reversed the decrease of FELi otherwise observed in rats on a low-Na+ diet (Na5-BFTZ group vs. the Na5-vehicle and Na200-vehicle groups), and subsequent administration of amiloride did not affect FELi of the Na5-BFTZ group at all. Similar to the effects of dietary Na+ restriction, pretreatment with Aldo led to a reduction of FELi, which also was fully reversed by subsequent administration of amiloride. A less pronounced effect was seen after the administration of ANG III. All conditions during which fractional Na+ excretion was reduced (low-Na+ intake, Aldo or ANG III pretreatment) were associated with a decrease in FELi, which was reversible by amiloride, whereas conditions during which fractional excretion of Na+ was normal or high (normal Na+ diet, thiazide + normal Na+ diet or thiazide + low-Na+ diet) revealed FELi values close to 35% and completely amiloride insensitive.

The amiloride-sensitive reabsorption of Na+ and Li+ expressed as a fraction of the distal tubular load (rRNa-Amil and rRLi-Amil, respectively) showed almost the same pattern as delta FENa and delta FELi (Table 3). In general, rRNa-Amil was ~95% in the groups with low-Na+ excretion (Na5-vehicle, Na5-low Li, and Na200-Aldo), suggesting an almost complete distal tubular Na+ reabsorption. In the groups with a high Na+ excretion (Na200-vehicle, Na200-BFTZ, and Na5-BFTZ), rRNa-Amil ranged from 35 to 80% and was thereby somewhat lower compared with rats exhibiting Na+ retention. rRLi-Amil was ~35% in groups with a low-Na+ excretion, but, in contrast to rRNa-Amil, it completely vanished in groups with a high Na+ excretion. These data emphasize that rRNa-Amil and rRLi-Amil did not change proportionally between conditions with a high and a low urinary Na+ excretion.

To gain further insight into the mechanism of Li+ transport in the distal nephron, the relationships between Li+ and Na+ handling were investigated in more detail, and K+ was included in the analysis. Because the amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel is probably the only quantitatively important mechanism for Na+ reabsorption in the cortical collecting ducts and further downstream (22), the fractional excretion of Na+ after amiloride administration can be used as an estimate of the fractional delivery of Na+ to the amiloride-sensitive nephron site. It is evident that BFTZ administration was associated with an increase in the fractional distal tubular Na+ delivery (Table 2). This increase in Na+ delivery led to a decrease of the amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption, and, overall, there was an inverse relationship between delta FELi and the fractional distal delivery of Na+ (Fig. 1A). Similarly, there was an inverse correlation between delta FELi and the fractional excretion of Na+ in the urine before amiloride (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A: relationship between amiloride-sensitive reabsorption of Li+ (Delta FELi) and the fractional delivery of Na+ to the site of reabsorption [(FENa)Amiloride]. B: relationship between Delta FELi and the fractional excretion of Na+ [(FENa)Control]. Data are expressed as means ± SE. open circle , 5 mmol/kg Na+ (Na5-Vehicle); triangle , Na5-bendroflumethiazide (BFTZ); square , Na5-low Li; bullet , 200 mmol/kg Na+ (Na200-Vehicle); black-triangle, Na200-BFTZ; black-square, Na200-ANG III; black-lozenge , Na200-aldosterone.

The increased distal tubular delivery of Na+ during BFTZ was associated with increased Na+ reabsorption in the distal tubular segments, particularly in the Na5 group, as evidenced by the higher delta FENa during amiloride infusion in animals treated with BFTZ compared with vehicle infusion (Table 3). In addition, BFTZ administration increased amiloride-sensitive K+ secretion from 16 to 24% and from 10 to 38% in the Na200 and Na5 groups, respectively (Table 3). When evaluating all groups, a strong inverse correlation was observed between amiloride-sensitive Li+ and K+ transport (Fig. 2). Thus changes in the potential difference across the apical membrane, as reflected in the driving force for K+ efflux and K+ excretion, seemed related to changes in amiloride-reversible distal tubular Li+ reabsorption.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Relationship between Delta FELi and the amiloride-sensitive secretion of K+ (Delta FEK). Symbols are as in Fig. 1.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Effect of amiloride on Li+ reabsorption in the distal nephron. Amiloride blocks conductive Na+ channels in the collecting duct and has often been used as a tool to recognize distal nephron Li+ reabsorption (13, 27, 31). Micropuncture studies have shown that, in the doses employed in these studies, as well as in the present study, absolute and fractional proximal reabsorption of Li+, Na+, and water is not influenced, nor is the reabsorption of Li+ and Na+ in the loop of Henle. The increase of fractional urinary Li+ excretion observed in Na+-depleted rats is due to inhibition of Li+ reabsorption in the collecting ducts (7, 29, 32). An increased urine flow rate during amiloride administration, as observed in the present study, has consistently been found and is due to decreased water reabsorption in the collecting ducts (7, 29).

Effect of BFTZ on Li+ reabsorption in distal nephron. The results of the present study confirm previous observations that dietary Na+ depletion in rats leads to reabsorption of Li+ via an amiloride-sensitive transport mechanism (27, 31). This amiloride-sensitive reabsorption of Li+ is located between the last accessible part of the distal nephron and the end of the collecting ducts (32). In the present study, we show, for the first time, that Li+ transport at these distal nephron sites is abolished by administration of the thiazide diuretic BFTZ. Thiazide diuretics inhibit Na+-Cl- cotransport in the distal convoluted tubules, just proximal to the amiloride-sensitive region (1, 6). BFTZ does not interfere with the tubuloglomerular feedback because of its lacking inhibition of the carbonic anhydrase in the proximal tubules (3) and does not inhibit Li+ reabsorption in Na+-repleted rats (12). Furthermore, BFTZ does not impair the amiloride-sensitive Na+ transport as seen from the similar natriuretic responses to amiloride in the Na200-vehicle and the Na200-BFTZ series (Table 2).

The ability of BFTZ to abolish amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption suggests that Li+ transport at distal nephron sites is inhibited by increased Na+ delivery to the amiloride-sensitive mechanism. Indeed, this would also account for previous findings that the diuretics acetazolamide and furosemide, which act in the proximal tubule and in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop, respectively, also suppress amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption (13, 30, 32). The alternative explanation that Li+ reabsorption in the distal nephron could be mediated by a thiazide-sensitive mechanism seems unlikely, since BFTZ and amiloride did not display an additive lithiuretic effect, in contrast to what was observed for Na+.

Mechanism of Li+ transport in distal nephron. The mechanism of Li+ reabsorption in distal nephron segments is not yet known with certainty, but, since it is blocked by amiloride, Li+ movement via the amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel is presumably involved (2). This channel is located in the apical cell membrane of collecting duct principal cells, and it displays a slightly higher permeability for Li+ than for Na+ (20). The number of open Na+ channels is increased by Na+ depletion (18) or chronic Aldo administration (19), but, even in Na+-replete animals, a significant number of channels are active, as also suggested by the increase of FENa in response to amiloride observed in previous studies and in the present study. It is therefore surprising that Li+ is only reabsorbed in the distal nephron in Na+-depleted rats and not in Na+-replete rats.

Because the number of apical Na+ channels is limited and determines the amiloride-sensitive Na+ reabsorption, it is obvious that Na+ and Li+ compete for cellular influx across the apical membrane. This has led to speculations of the importance of the [Na+]-to-[Li+] ratio for the distal tubular Li+ reabsorption (25, 30, 32). Thus it has been hypothesized that an increase in the [Na+]/[Li+] ratio in distal tubular fluid arriving to the amiloride-sensitive channels may account for suppression of Li+ ions transport. However, whereas the distal tubular [Na+]/[Li+] ratio undoubtedly influences the number of Li+ being transported by the channels, this does not necessarily imply that the amiloride-induced increase of FELi is influenced. Thus a decrease of plasma [Li+] leads to a proportional decrease of tubular fluid [Li+] and a proportional decrease of the number of Li+ being reabsorbed, but the fraction of Li+ being reabsorbed is supposedly not dependent on the plasma [Li+]. The reduction of FELi in response to dietary Na+ restriction is accordingly not changed when plasma Li+ is lowered, despite the fact that the tubular [Na+]/[Li+] ratio is increased. In agreement with this, it was found that, although the urinary [Na+]/[Li+] ratio in the Na5-low Li series was less favorable for distal tubular Li+ transport than in the Na5-vehicle series (13 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 1, respectively), the increase in FELi during amiloride infusion (delta FELi) was similar in the two series (14 vs. 15%, respectively). Furthermore, the urinary [Na+]/[Li+] ratio in the Na5-low Li series was similar to that of the Na200-vehicle series (13 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 3, respectively) in which delta FELi was zero. The data thus show that differences in the distal tubular [Na+]/[Li+] ratio cannot explain the increase in amiloride-inhibitable Li+ reabsorption observed in rats transferred from a high to a low dietary Na+ intake.

These results do, however, not answer the question whether the lack of distal tubular Li+ reabsorption seen in rats on a normal Na+ diet can be explained by competition alone or if a difference in basolateral membrane transport between Na+ and Li+ contributes as well. The affinity and maximal rate of Li+ transport via the apical membrane is slightly higher than that of Na+ (20). In consequence, if competition was the only reason for the lack of Li+ reabsorption, rRLi-Amil would be expected to be similar to rRNa-Amil in Na+-replete rats and vary proportionally. Nevertheless, it was found that the rRLi-Amil was less than rRNa-Amil in Na+-replete rats (0 ± 3 vs. 80 ± 3, respectively), and overall rRNa-Amil and rRLi-Amil did not vary proportionally. Although the true rRNa-Amil may be slightly smaller than indicated above, because of a non-amiloride-sensitive Na+ transport, an rRLi-Amil of around zero is in any case markedly lower than the rRNa-Amil values reported. This suggests that the lack of distal tubular Li+ reabsorption during Na+-replete conditions cannot be explained by simple competition of transport across the apical membrane between Na+ and Li+ alone.

An alternative model. Because modulation of Li+ transport across the distal tubule via the amiloride-sensitive mechanism cannot be explained by changes in the relative concentration of Na+ and Li+ in distal tubular fluid or by competition alone between Na+ and Li+ for entrance through the channels of the apical membrane, an alternative model is warranted. Of importance for the transcellular transport of Li+ across the distal tubular epithelium is the Li+ pathway across the basolateral membrane. The efflux of Li+ at the antiluminal side of the cell does not occur via the Na+-K+-ATPase (9) and may rely on either the Na+-Li+ antiporter previously described in other "tight" epithelia (14) or even simple diffusion, through as yet undefined channels driven by the prevailing electrochemical gradient. This difference in basolateral transport capacity for Na+ over Li+ may explain why the amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption is quantitatively insignificant during Na+-replete conditions. Considering that Li+ may rely on passive extrusion mechanisms at the basolateral membrane, accumulation inside the cell will occur and thereby diminish the driving force for influx via the luminal membrane Na+ channels. If the extrusion is entirely passive without being coupled to inward transport of Na+, the intracellular [Li+] ([Li+]i) above which basolateral Li+ transport occurs can be estimated. Given a potential difference across the basolateral membrane of 83 mV (23) and a plasma [Li+] of ~0.15 mM, the Nernst equation indicates that [Li+]i must exceed 3.3 mM before efflux across the basolateral membrane is initiated. The [Li+] in late distal tubular fluid is about two times that of plasma (4), i.e., 0.30 mM. Thus, using 3.3 mM as an estimate of [Li+]i, it follows that the potential difference across the apical membrane (PDa) must be higher than 64 mV (lumen positive) before Li+ influx across the apical membrane occurs. However, this equilibrium potential for Li+ may not be strictly correct, since basolateral Li+ extrusion is presumably coupled to Na+ influx (14), resulting in a lower intracellular-to-plasma Li+ concentration ratio than that obtained by passive distribution. Ratios between one and four have been reported in the literature from nonepithelial tissues (9), but, as the transport of Li+ into the distal tubulus cell is facilitated by the presence of a conductive Na+ channel, a higher [Li+]i in tubular cells must be expected compared with the nonepithelial tissues. Based on an intracellular/plasma [Li+] ratio of ~10, the Nernst equation dictates, with the same set of assumptions as above, that the PDa in distal tubule cells must exceed 43 mV (lumen positive) before Li+ influx across the apical membrane occurs.

These reasonable estimates may explain why amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption is insignificant in Na+-replete rats (4). PDa in Na+-replete rats is ~50 mV (lumen positive; see Ref. 23) and therefore close to the equilibrium potential for Li+. This PDa may therefore not be sufficient to drive a quantitatively significant Li+ uptake. In addition, this model may explain why Li+ is reabsorbed in this segment during Na+ restriction. In this condition, not only is the number of active Na+ channels increased, but also the Na+ delivery to the later part of the amiloride-sensitive region is markedly decreased, as indicated by the low urinary Na+ excretion. This reduces the competition from Na+, and, furthermore, due to a decrease in Na+ influx through the apical ion channels, the apical membrane potential becomes relatively hyperpolarized, favoring intracellular uptake of Li+.

In line with this, Aldo treatment led in the current study to a reduction of Na+ delivery to the later part of the amiloride-sensitive region, as indicated by a lowering of FENa, and induced a quantitatively significant amiloride-sensitive Li+ reabsorption (Table 3). In contrast, Horisberger and Diezi (10) failed to see any reduction in FELi in their study on the effect of Aldo in adrenalectomized rats, but this was presumably because FENa was not reduced sufficiently. In that study, FENa during Aldo administration was 0.5%, which is similar to what was observed in our Na200 control group, in which no distal nephron reabsorption of Li+ was detectable either.

ANG III was administered as another means of increasing distal tubular Na+ reabsorption (8) and was chosen in favor of ANG II because its effect on mean arterial pressure is significantly less pronounced (8). A modest increase in mean arterial pressure and a 20% reduction in GFR during ANG III infusion documented its expected pharmacological actions. Surprisingly, ANG III did not increase rRNa-Amil in the present study; however, it did reduce FENa below control levels and thereby contributed with a further data point in the relationship between delta FENa control and delta FELi. The Na+-retaining effect elicited by ANG III was not as marked as for Aldo and, in line with this, the influence on distal tubular Li+ reabsorption was also weaker (Table 3). However, when evaluating the ANG III results in conjunction with the other data obtained, these results complement the continuity in the relation between FENa control and delta FELi (Fig. 1B) from a Na+-retaining state to Na+-replete conditions.

Further support for the hypothesis that PDa influences the amiloride-sensitive distal tubular Li+ reabsorption is derived from the results obtained with BFTZ. It has been established that, as Na+ delivery to the distal nephron rises, the Na+ influx via Na+ channels increases, and the luminal membrane depolarizes (17). Therefore, as Na+ delivery increases, Li+ influx via Na+ channels should fall, which is consistent with the effect of BFTZ observed in the present study. The depolarizing effect of increased Na+ delivery and reabsorption is also reflected by an increase in K+ secretion, since a decrease of PDa increases the driving force for K+ efflux. Thus, if changes in PDa are important, amiloride-sensitive Li+ and K+ transport should change in opposite directions as well. Figure 2 shows that this was indeed the case, since a close inverse relationship between amiloride-sensitive Li+ and K+ transport pertains.

In conclusion, Na+ is reabsorbed more readily than Li+ at all levels of urinary Na+ excretion. Measurable distal tubular Li+ reabsorption occurs only when the urinary Na+ excretion and hence the [Na+] in the distal tubular fluid are low. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that, because Li+ is not extruded from the cell with the Na+-K+-ATPase, it is accumulated intracellularly, and its influx through the apical membrane is dependent of the prevailing PDa. Under Na+-replete conditions, Na+ is reabsorbed in advance of Li+ because it is actively extruded across the basolateral membrane, and the reabsorption of Na+ depolarizes the apical membrane, thereby preventing Li+ from being reabsorbed. Under Na+-depleted conditions, the apical membrane becomes hyperpolarized due to a low-Na+ influx, and distal Li+ reabsorption can occur.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. P. Christensen for performing some of the Li+ analysis by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry and Ellen Philipson and Lene Gertman for excellent technical assistance. Bendroflumethiazide was donated by Leo Pharmaceuticals (Ballerup, Denmark), and amiloride hydrochloride was donated by GEA A/S. Urinary amiloride concentrations were generously analyzed by GEA A/S.

    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported by the Danish Research Council for Health Sciences, The Novo Nordisk Foundation, The Direktør Ib Henriksens Fond, and The United Kingdom National Kidney Research Fund.

Address for reprint requests: M. Shalmi, Clinical Development WHC/CNS, Novo Nordisk, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark.

Received 20 December 1996; accepted in final form 15 October 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Beaumont, K., D. A. Vaughn, and D. P. Healy. Thiazide diuretic receptors: Autoradiographic localization in rat kidney with [3H]metolazone. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 250: 414-419, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Benos, D. J. Amiloride: a molecular probe of sodium transport in tissues and cells. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Cell Physiol. 11): C131-C45, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Beyer, K. H., and J. E. Baer. Physiological basis for the action of newer diuretic agents. Pharmacol. Rev. 13: 517-562, 1961[Free Full Text].

4.   Boer, W. H., R. Fransen, D. G. Shirley, S. J. Walter, P. Boer, and H. A. Koomans. Evaluation of the lithium clearance method: Direct analysis of tubular lithium handling by micropuncture. Kidney Int. 47: 1023-1030, 1995[Medline].

5.   Burgess, W. J., M. Shalmi, J. S. Petersen, J. Plange-Rhule, R. J. Balment, and J. C. Atherton. A novel computer-driven, servo-controlled fluid replacement technique and its application to renal function studies in conscious rats. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 85: 129-137, 1993[Medline].

6.   Ellison, D. H., H. Velazques, and F. S. Wright. Thiazide-sensitive sodium chloride cotransport in early distal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 22): F546-F554, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Fransen, R., W. H. Boer, P. Boer, and H. A. Koomans. Amiloride-sensitive lithium reabsorption in rats: a micropuncture study. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 263: 646-650, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Harris, P. J., J. Zhuo, and S. L. Skinner. Effects of angiotensins II and III on glomerulotubular balance in rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 14: 489-502, 1987[Medline].

9.   Holstein-Rathlou, N.-H. Lithium transport across biological membranes. Kidney Int. Suppl. 28: S4-S9, 1990[Medline].

10.   Horisberger, J.-D., and J. Diezi. Effect of aldosterone on the excretion of lithium in the adrenalectomized rat. Pflügers Arch. 399: 213-215, 1983[Medline].

11.   Horisberger, J.-D., and G. Giebisch. Potassium-sparing diuretics. Renal Physiol. 10: 198-220, 1987[Medline].

12.   Jonassen, T. E. N., L. Grønbeck, M. Shalmi, J. S. Petersen, F. Andreasen, and S. Christensen. Supra-additive natriuretic synergism between bendroflumethiazide and furosemide in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 275: 558-565, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Kirchner, K. A. Lithium as a marker for proximal tubular delivery during low salt intake and diuretic infusion. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 22): F188-F196, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Kirk, K. L., and D. C. Dawson. Mechanism of epithelial lithium transport. Evidence for basolateral Na: Na and Na: Li exchange. J. Gen. Physiol. 82: 497-510, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Koomans, H. A., and E. J. Dorhout Mees. Lithium in renal physiology: Post-conference discussion and consensus. Kidney Int. Suppl. 28: S78-S79, 1990[Medline].

16.   Leyssac, P. P., and P. Christensen. A comparison between endogenous and exogenous lithium clearance in anaesthetized rat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 151: 173-179, 1994[Medline].

17.   Malnic, G., R. W. Berliner, and G. Giebisch. Flow dependence of K+ secretion in cortical distal tubules of the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 256 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 25): F932-F941, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Pácha, J., G. Frindt, L. Antonian, R. B. Silver, and L. G. Palmer. Regulation of Na channels of the rat cortical collecting tubule by aldosterone. J. Gen. Physiol. 102: 25-42, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Palmer, L. G., L. Antonian, and G. Frindt. Regulation of the Na-K pump of the rat cortical collecting tubule by aldosterone. J. Gen. Physiol. 102: 43-57, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Palmer, L. G., and G. Frindt. Conductance and gating of epithelial Na channels from rat cortical collecting tubule. Effects of luminal Na and Li. J. Gen. Physiol. 92: 121-138, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Petersen, J. S., M. Shalmi, H. R. Lam, and S. Christensen. Renal response to furosemide in conscious rats: Effects of acute instrumentation and peripheral sympathectomy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 258: 1-7, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Schafer, J. A., and C. T. Hawk. Regulation of Na+ channels in the cortical collecting duct by AVP and mineralocorticoids. Kidney Int. 41: 255-268, 1992[Medline].

23.   Schafer, J. A., S. L. Troutman, and E. Schlatter. Vasopressin and mineralocorticoid increase apical membrane driving force for K+ secretion in rat CCD. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 27): F199-F210, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Shalmi, M., J. D. Kibble, J. P. Day, P. Christensen, and J. C. Atherton. Improved analysis of picomole quantities of lithium, sodium, and potassium in biological fluids. Am. J. Physiol. 267 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 36): F695-F701, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Shalmi, M., J. S. Petersen, K. Thomsen, and S. Christensen. Distal lithium reabsorption in the sodium-restricted rat is not dependent on the urinary sodium to lithium concentration ratio. Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 79: 109-112, 1990[Medline].

26.   Shalmi, M., and K. Thomsen. Alterations of lithium clearance in rats by different modes of lithium administration. Renal Physiol. Biochem. 12: 273-280, 1989.[Medline]

27.   Shalmi, M., and K. Thomsen. Inhibition of tubular lithium reabsorption by amiloride in the conscious sodium-restricted rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 230: 33-39, 1993[Medline].

28.   Shirley, D. G., and S. J. Walter. Is lithium a useful tool in studies on renal sodium handling? J. Nephrol. 9: 126-132, 1996.

29.   Shirley, D. G., S. J. Walter, and B. Sampson. A micropuncture study of renal lithium reabsorption: effects of amiloride and furosemide. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32): F1128-F1133, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Thomsen, K., and P. P. Leyssac. Acute effects of various diuretics on lithium clearance. Studies in rats on medium and low sodium diet. Renal Physiol. 9: 1-8, 1986[Medline].

31.   Thomsen, K., M. Shalmi, and O. V. Olesen. Effect of low dietary sodium and potassium on lithium clearance in rats. Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 19: 91-98, 1993[Medline].

32.   Walter, S. J., B. Sampson, and D. G. Shirley. A micropuncture study of renal tubular lithium reabsorption in sodium-depleted rats. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 483: 473-479, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].


AJP Renal Physiol 274(3):F445-F452
0363-6127/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. J. Bedford, J. P. Leader, R. Jing, L. J. Walker, J. D. Klein, J. M. Sands, and R. J. Walker
Amiloride restores renal medullary osmolytes in lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F812 - F820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Kjolby and P. Bie
Chronic activation of plasma renin is log-linearly related to dietary sodium and eliminates natriuresis in response to a pulse change in total body sodium
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R17 - R25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. Nielsen, T.-H. Kwon, J. Frokiaer, M. A. Knepper, and S. Nielsen
Lithium-induced NDI in rats is associated with loss of {alpha}-ENaC regulation by aldosterone in CCD
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1222 - F1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Thomsen and D. G. Shirley
A hypothesis linking sodium and lithium reabsorption in the distal nephron
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 869 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T.-H. Kwon, U. H. Laursen, D. Marples, A. B. Maunsbach, M. A. Knepper, J. Frokiar, and S. Nielsen
Altered expression of renal AQPs and Na+ transporters in rats with Lithium-induced NDI
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): F552 - F564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Thomsen, M. Bak, and D. G. Shirley
Chronic Lithium Treatment Inhibits Amiloride-Sensitive Sodium Transport in the Rat Distal Nephron
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 1999; 289(1): 443 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shalmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shalmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online