|
|
||||||||
-adrenoceptor isoforms in rat CCD
Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, Nephrology Training and Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the rat cortical collecting duct (CCD), epinephrine inhibits
vasopressin (AVP)-dependent water permeability and
Na+ reabsorption. Although
inhibition is reversed by the
2-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonist
yohimbine, suggesting the epinephrine effect is primarily mediated by
an
2-AR [C. T. Hawk, L. H. Kudo, A. J. Rouch, and J. A. Schafer. Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 34): F449-F460, 1993], there are
also suggestions of an effect at an additional receptor, perhaps an
1-AR. For the present
experiments, we used RT-PCR of total RNA extracted from 1 to 5 mm of
microdissected CCDs from rat kidney to identify the
-AR isoforms
expressed. Specific primers for the
2-ARs amplifying from the 6th
transmembrane (TM) to the 3'-untranslated regions, revealed the
presence of
2A and
2B. Western blot analysis also indicated the presence of
2B-AR
at the protein level. Degenerate
1-AR primers that amplify from
conserved regions of TM-1 to TM-5, as well as specific primers that
amplify either the same region (
1B), the carboxy terminus
(
1A), or within the third
cytoplasmic loop (
1D),
indicated the presence of all three
1-ARs. Measurement of
transepithelial voltage in isolated perfused renal tubules indicated a
small inhibitory effect mediated by
1-ARs. Although the functional
effects of epinephrine on AVP-dependent transport processes appear to
be mediated predominantly by an
2-AR, a small contribution to
the overall
-AR effect may be due to simultaneous activation of an
1-AR.
cortical collecting duct; microdissection; reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; arginine vasopressin; antidiuretic hormone; sodium reabsorption; sodium transport
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RENAL ADRENERGIC NERVES and circulating catecholamines
are involved in the regulation of
Na+ and water excretion in the
kidney not only by their effects on hemodynamics but also on epithelial
transport processes along the nephron. It has long been recognized that
renal denervation and
-adrenoceptor (
-AR) blockade during dietary
Na+ restriction or volume
depletion produce natriuresis and diuresis in the absence of changes in
renal hemodynamics or glomerular filtration (e.g., 1, 18, 36).
Conversely, increased efferent renal sympathetic nerve activity (ERSNA)
and
1-AR agonists, at levels that have no effect on renal hemodynamics or glomerular filtration, reversibly decrease Na+ excretion
and produce antidiuresis (e.g., 18, 29, 35).
The anatomical basis for such effects comes from the work of Barajas
and co-workers (see Ref. 2 for additional references), who convincingly
demonstrated that, in addition to the afferent and efferent arterioles,
virtually all segments of the nephron are innervated by adrenergic
nerves. The neuroeffector junctions are generally regarded to involve
norepinephrine as the neurotransmitter and
1-postsynaptic receptors (18),
which are also the dominant type in the renal vasculature (39). Binding
studies with radiolabeled prazosin in microdissected tubule segments
have demonstrated the presence of
1-ARs along most of the
nephron, with the exception of the cortical and outer medullary
collecting ducts (7).
2-ARs are
also widely distributed. In the proximal tubule (PT), radioligand binding studies show
1- and
2-ARs predominantly on the
basolateral membrane (25, 41).
2-ARs are also found in distal
nephron segments (41).
In contrast to
1-ARs, the
2-ARs are regarded to be
primarily extrajunctional and thus responsive to circulating
catecholamines (28, 38). These receptors may be the target of
norepinephrine that is released from adrenergic nerve endings and which
spills over into the circulation. Increased ERSNA at levels that have no hemodynamic effect produces a rise in renal venous concentrations of
both norepinephrine and dopamine sufficient to activate their respective receptors, and the magnitude of this spillover is directly correlated with ERSNA (9, 18).
The consequences of renal venous catecholamine spillover and of
2-AR activation in the
regulation of Na+ and water
excretion remain unclear, but two types of observations suggest they
have an important role. First, renal venous norepinephrine spillover
increases in human subjects with hypertension, congestive heart
failure, hepatic cirrhosis, and
Na+ depletion (see Ref. 18 for
additional references). Second, renal
2-AR density is increased in
most, if not all, animal models of hypertension (18, 40), and
2-AR density is increased in normal and Dahl salt-sensitive rats when they are given a high-salt diet or when
1-ARs are blocked
by prazosin (27, 37). Because of the predominant effect of
2-ARs to inhibit adenylyl
cyclase via a Gi protein (18, 38),
it is generally believed that
2-ARs exert their predominant
influence by opposing the effects of hormones that act on renal
epithelial cells through cAMP.
We have been interested in the effects of
2-ARs on
Na+ and water transport in the
cortical collecting duct (CCD), where their activation has been shown
to inhibit cAMP production in response to arginine vasopressin (AVP)
(3, 12, 42). In the isolated perfused CCD and inner medullary
collecting duct,
2-AR agonists have been shown to inhibit the osmotic water permeability
(Pf) response
to AVP (14, 16, 19, 33). In the rat CCD, where AVP produces an increase
in Na+ reabsorption that is
synergistic with the effect of aldosterone or deoxycorticosterone (DOC)
(5, 15), we found that the lumen-to-bath Na+ flux
(JNa) was
reversibly inhibited by clonidine or epinephrine (14, 16). Epinephrine
at 100 nM in the bathing solution inhibited net
Na+ transport almost completely,
and this effect was prevented or reversed by 1 µM yohimbine, an
2-AR antagonist (14). However, three additional findings suggested that the effects of the
adrenoceptors involve mechanisms in addition to inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase via Gi coupling. First,
epinephrine inhibited not only the AVP-dependent increase in
JNa but also the
DOC-dependent JNa
(14). Second, when
Pf and
JNa were
stimulated by forskolin or 8-Br-cAMP plus IBMX, 100 nM epinephrine
still produced a 30-40% inhibition of JNa and
Pf. Third, the
effect of epinephrine in the CCD could be partially blocked by the
1-AR antagonist corynanthine
(14), although the specificity of this antagonist is now questionable (22). These observations led us to conclude that, although the primary
inhibitory effect of epinephrine on
Pf and
JNa was mediated by an
2-AR acting via a
Gi protein, there must be an
additional second messenger pathway that was either coupled to the same
2-AR, a second
2-AR, or possibly an
1-AR (14). There are now three known
2-ARs:
2A,
2B, and
2C (45). All three isoforms
have been shown to act via Gi to
inhibit cAMP production (10). It has also been shown that
2A- and
2C-AR, when expressed in CHO cells, not only inhibit adenylyl cyclase but also stimulate
phosphoinositide hydrolysis (8).
The present studies were undertaken to determine which
-ARs are
expressed in the rat CCD and thus ultimately to identify alternate
signaling pathways that may be involved in the regulation of
Na+ and water transport in this
nephron segment. We also performed experiments with isolated perfused
CCD to obtain evidence of a functional
1-adrenoceptor effect.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Harlan Sprague-Dawley, (Indianapolis, IN). The rats were maintained on a regular 16% protein rodent diet (diet 8746; Teklad, Madison, WI) containing 0.53% NaCl (measured in our laboratory) for 2-4 wk at which time their weight was from 70 to 170 g.
RT-PCR experiments were performed with total RNA from microdissected CCD and PT fragments (~20 mm total length per RT reaction) using a guanidinium/acid phenol extraction procedure (TRIzol; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). RNA was also extracted from rat brain to serve as positive controls. The RNA samples were treated with DNase I and then reverse transcribed with SuperScript II using oligo(dT)12-18 primers (Life Technologies) to form single-strand cDNA. The cDNA was initially amplified in PCR reactions with primers to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), to verify the integrity and relative quantity of cDNA. Aliquots of RNA that were not reverse transcribed were included in PCR reactions to verify the absence of genomic DNA. Each 50-µl PCR reaction used 5% of the cDNA obtained from RT reactions, representing total mRNA from 1 mm (~800 cells) of the microdissected tubules.
Specific primers were designed for each of the three rat
2-AR isoforms, (Table
1). These primers amplify from the junction of the third cytoplasmic loop and the sixth transmembrane (TM) region
(sense) to the 3'-untranslated regions (UTR) (antisense). A
second pair of primers for
2B-AR
(
) span the third cytoplasmic loop (sense)
to TM-7 (antisense). Degenerate
1-AR primers were designed to
amplify from the conserved region of TM-1 (sense) to TM-5 (antisense)
of
1A-,
1B-, and
1D-AR. The predicted products
of the degenerate primer PCR reactions could be distinguished by unique
restriction sites (Table 1).
|
Unique primers were subsequently designed to amplify the
1-AR isoforms for cloning
purposes. The
1A primers
amplify a region within the carboxy terminus, whereas the
1B primers were designed from
the same region as the degenerate
1 primers described above (Table
1).1
Two sets of primers were used to detect
1D; the first set was designed
to amplify from the carboxy terminus (sense) to the 3'-UTR (antisense), whereas the second set (
),
designed by Feng et al. (11), spanned the third intracellular loop.
PCR reactions contained 2.5 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM
Tris · HCl (pH 8.3), 1.7% BSA, 0.05 mM of each
deoxynucleoside 5'-triphosphate, 25 pmol of each oligonucleotide
primer, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) per 50 µl of total reaction volume.
Forty-eight cycles of PCR amplification followed by a final 7-min
extension at 72°C were performed in a Perkin-Elmer DNA Thermal
Cycler with the following protocol: 94°C for 1 min, 60°C
(56°C for degenerate
1-AR
primers, 58°C for
1A-,
1B-, and
-AR primers) for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. The PCR reaction products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel.
The products of PCR amplification were ethanol precipitated, then resuspended in sterile water. Aliquots of the purified products were treated with the restriction endonucleases, as described in Table 1. Digestion products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. Bands were visualized with ultraviolet transillumination, and the gel images were digitized and stored on computer disk using a Foto/Analyst Archiver (Fotodyne, Hartland, WI).
Digitized agarose gel images were examined using Collage Image Analysis Software (Fotodyne). Each agarose gel was run with sample lanes bracketed by 154 to 2,176 bp molecular weight standard ladders (MW Weight Marker VI; Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). These ladders were used to calibrate a standard curve from which the size of PCR products and restriction digests were determined using the Collage software.
When the presence of an isoform was indicated by restriction enzyme analysis, one PCR product of each isoform was subcloned into the plasmid vector pCR 2.1 using TA cloning (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Sequence analysis was performed using the T7 and/or M13 universal primers and dye-termination reactions at the Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, DNA Sequencing Core Facility (Dr. S. Hollingshead, Director). The sequences were aligned with the appropriate GenBank sequences using the GAP program of the Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package (Version 8; Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI).
Western blot analysis with an
2B-specific antibody was
performed on protein extracted from manually sorted CCDs and PTs, as
well as from whole kidney cortex. CCD and PT segments were collected to
total ~100-200 mm. They were subsequently washed twice with PBS,
pelleted, resuspended in 100 µl extraction buffer (20 mM
Tris · HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.5%
Triton X-100, and 25 µg/ml each of aprotinin and leupeptin), and
incubated on ice for 20 min. The supernatant was retained after
centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, and the protein concentration
was determined by Micro BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford,
IL). Whole kidney cortex was prepared as described by Huang et
al. (17).
Samples, 10-50 µg, of protein from CCD, PT, and whole kidney cortex were resolved by electrophoresis on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (16), transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and stained with Ponceau S for molecular weight determination. The membranes were incubated in a blocking solution of 5% nonfat powdered milk in T-TBS (Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% Tween 20) 25°C for 1 h. This was followed by a incubation with the primary antibody diluted 1:250 in blocking solution for 1 h at 25°C. After six 5-min washes with T-TBS, the membrane was incubated for 1 h at 25°C with donkey anti-rabbit IgG linked to horseradish peroxidase at a 1:3,000 dilution in blocking solution. Following six 5-min washes in T-TBS, the membrane was incubated with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (ECL, Amersham) and exposed to autoradiography on X-ray film for 3 min.
For in vitro perfusion experiments, approximately one-half of the rats were implanted with a subcutaneous pellet containing either 2.5 mg DOC or 1 mg d-aldosterone (Innovative Research of America, Toledo, OH) 48-72 h after receipt. This pharmacological dose of DOC, in the presence of AVP, leads to maximum stimulation of Na+ absorption by the CCD. The rats were anesthetized by brief exposure to CO2, and the pellets were implanted subcutaneously in the interscapular region with a 15-gauge trocar designed for this purpose. The rats were then used for experiments 3-8 days after pellet implantation. The remaining rats, which were left untreated, were used at the same time after receipt. All rats weighed 80-110 g at the time of tubule dissection. Segments of CCD were dissected from fresh kidneys and then were placed in an isotonic artificial bathing solution similar to rat serum and perfused with a hypotonic solution resembling early distal tubular fluid (5). Perfusion at 10-20 nl/min was carried out at 38°C. VT was measured between Ag/AgCl electrodes in the perfusate and bathing solution and was recorded continuously on a strip chart recorder. At least 5 min of equilibration was allowed between sequential additions of adrenergic agonists or antagonists to the bathing solution.
Sources of biochemicals. Amplification grade DNase I, and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase were from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Oligonucleotide primers were from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) and Oligos Etc. (Guilford, CT). Taq DNA polymerase (catalog no. M1861) was from Promega (Madison, WI). Restriction endonucleases BamH I, Ava II, and Kpn I were from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA); Pst I, Sac II, Ban II, and Ban I were from Promega; and Aat II and Xmn I were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Nitrocellulose membranes were from MSI (Westborough, MA), and the ECL system was from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). AVP was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Rauwolscine and phenylephrine were from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA), and propranolol was from Solo Pak Laboratories (Elk Grove Village, IL).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RT-PCR analyses were conducted for
-AR isoforms in the CCD, and, for
comparison, in PT segments. Based on previous functional results in
isolated, perfused CCD, the presence of one or more
2-ARs was expected. PCR
amplification with specific
2-AR primers followed by
restriction enzyme analysis indicated the presence of
2A and
2B in both CCDs and PTs. Figure
1A is
representative of the findings summarized in Table
2.
|
|
The 264-bp
2A-AR product
restricted as anticipated from the published sequence with
Ban I and was detected in CCD in 7 of 9 experiments, whereas
2B was
detected with both primer pairs in 10 of 10 total experiments (Table
2). The 395-bp
2B-AR product restricted with BamH I, whereas the
381-bp product of the
primers restricted
with Xmn I. Restriction analysis of
PCR products from PTs indicated the presence of the same isoforms in
this region of the nephron (Table 2).
2C-AR was never observed in CCD
or PTs, although it was readily detectable in brain (Fig.
1B). Sequence determination of both
the
2A and
2B-AR PCR products indicated nucleotide identity with published sequences from rat liver (20) and
kidney (48), respectively.
We extended our examination of adrenoceptors to include
1-AR isoforms, initially using
degenerate primers. Unexpectedly,
1A and
1B-AR were readily visualized
using our standard quantity of cDNA obtained from ~1 mm of
microdissected rat CCD (Fig. 2) and PTs
(Table 3). Using techniques newly designed
in our laboratory to microdissect larger quantities of tubules (34), we
were able to detect
1D-AR using
cDNA derived from ~5 mm of CCD in the RT-PCR reaction (Fig. 2). The
results of these experiments are summarized in Table 3.
|
|
Specific primers were designed to amplify the
1-AR isoforms (Table 1) for
cloning purposes. The
1A- and
1B-AR PCR products were
identical with the sequences isolated from rat brain (21, 43). The
first set of specific
1D
primers detected this isoform in rat brain (Fig.
3); however, we obtained no evidence of
this isoform in CCD or in PTs. With the primers used by Feng et al. (11) for the detection of
1D-AR
(
) in proximal convoluted tubules (PCT) and
medullary thick ascending limbs of the loop of Henle, we were able to
demonstrate the presence of this isoform in brain as well as in CCD
(Fig. 3), but not in PTs (data not shown). The PCR product with the
primers was identical with the
sequence originally obtained in rat brain (23).
|
The presence of
2B-AR at the
protein level was assessed by Western blot analysis. As illustrated in
Fig. 4, a labeled protein with a mobility
of 62 kDa was expressed in CCD. A protein of the same mobility was also
dominant in the PT, although minor bands of 67 and 48 kDa were also
variably detected. Whole kidney cortex displayed a dominant doublet of
62 and 65 kDa and an additional band at 48 kDa.
|
We studied the effects of an
1-agonist, phenylephrine, on
transepithelial voltage
(VT) after
treatment with AVP in isolated perfused CCD segments from both
DOC-treated and untreated rats. Rauwolscine and propranolol were used
to block, respectively,
2- and
-adrenergic effects. Phenylephrine was subsequently added as an
1-AR agonist, followed by the
antagonist phentolamine. Examination of the data by ANOVA indicated
that the only significant
1-AR
inhibitory effect on
VT
(P < 0.002) was in the
non-DOC-treated rats, and phentolamine tended to reverse this effect
(P = 0.056) (Fig.
5). Although the means reflected the same
trend in the CCD from DOC-treated rats, there were no statistically
significant differences.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of our RT-PCR studies of
2-receptor isoforms summarized
in Table 2 revealed the presence of mRNA for both
2A- and
2B-isoforms in CCD and PT, but
neither segment expressed
2C.
The PCR products were verified both by restriction and sequence analysis. Based on our previous functional studies (14, 16), we
expected to find one or more
2-AR in the CCD. We did not, however, anticipate finding the three
1-AR mRNAs. We initially used a
degenerate primer pair (Table 1) to amplify the
1-isoforms and, by restriction
enzyme analysis of the product, obtained evidence for
1A- and
1B-AR in the CCD and PT (Table
3). The presence of
1D was also
detected in two of nine CCD mRNA extractions but not in any PT samples.
Subsequently, we designed
1-AR
isoform-specific primer pairs and detected the presence of
1A,
1B, and
1D in all of the CCD samples.
The
1 PCR products from the CCD
were verified by restriction and sequence analysis.
Because of the ability to obtain larger quantities of protein from PT,
in comparison with CCD, radioligand binding studies have successfully
demonstrated
2-AR as well as
1-AR in that nephron segment
(40, 41). Neither in situ hybridization studies (26) nor binding
studies (7, 11, 13) have provided evidence for the presence of
1-AR subtype in the CCD. The
CCD presents considerable technical difficulties for such studies.
Because of the short length of the CCD and the fact that it derives
from multiple proximal nephrons, it comprises only ~1% of the mass of the renal cortex. Although Cohen et al. (7) demonstrated specific
binding of the
1 ligand
[125I]iodoprazosin in
the rat PT, thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle, and the distal
convoluted tubule, they did not find significant binding in the CCD or
outer medullary collecting duct. Clarke and Garg (6) reported specific
[3H]prazosin binding
in the inner medullary collecting duct of the rabbit but at a rather
low activity of 30 fmol/mg of protein. In comparison, the
1-receptor density in the PCT
is 140 amol/mm of tubule length or ~500 fmol/mg. It appears that the
limit of detection with
[125I]iodoprazosin of
high specific activity is ~30 amol/mm in samples of 2 mm tubule
length (7). Using CCD obtained from rat kidney by our collagenase
digestion method (34), we also conducted such binding studies with
[125I]iodoclonidine
and [3H]prazosin but
were unable to detect specific binding even with membranes isolated
from samples of 100-200 mm of CCD (data not shown). However,
because even this large sample of CCD provides only 10-20 µg of
protein, we would have been unable to detect specific binding at low
receptor density. Immunohistochemical analysis of the individual
1-ARs is further
limited by the lack of subtype-specific antibodies.
Binding studies indicating the presence of
2-receptors in individual rat
nephron segments are also limited. Compounding this lack of information
is the marginal subtype selectivity of the
2 ligands, as noted by
MacDonald et al. (24). However, several antibodies for the
2-AR subtypes have been
recently developed, and they appear to be highly selective when
examined in COS cells transfected with the
2-ARs (17, 30, 31). An antibody
developed against the third cytoplasmic loop of the
2A-AR allowed
immunohistochemical localization of this subtype in brain stem neurons
in the rat (31); however, specific immunoreactivity was not detected in kidney sections (M. D. Okusa, personal communication). The lack of
detection, in view of functional evidence of this subtype in rat
kidney, likely reflects a low density of receptors in this tissue, in
comparison with the brain, which displays high levels of expression in
discrete regions. In addition, the antibody did not appear to recognize
the denatured receptor and was thus unsuitable for Western blot
analysis (D. L. Rosin, personal communication).
We have, however, been able to obtain evidence for the presence of the
2B-receptor protein in the CCD
using an antibody developed by Okusa and his collaborators (17). This
antibody, targeted to the third cytoplasmic loop of
2B-AR, was found, on
immunohistochemical analysis, to label the basolateral membrane of the
PT but not other nephron segments. However, it was suggested that the
sensitivity of the antibody may not be sufficient to detect the
receptor if it is present at a lower density in the CCD (M. D. Okusa,
personal communication). For that reason, we tried Western blot
analysis of proteins extracted from microdissected CCD and PT and from whole kidney cortex. We found that the
2B antibody consistently labeled a band of the expected size (48 kDa) only in the whole cortex
extract and, occasionally, very faintly in the PT but not the CCD. The
antibody, however, invariably labeled a protein migrating with a
mobility of 62 kDa in all three tissues. Additional bands migrating at
65 and 67 kDa were seen in the cortex and PT samples, respectively. A
primary band of ~60 kDa would be expected for the
2A and
2C isoforms because, although
all three receptors contain a similar number of amino acids, only the
2A and
2C isoforms are glycosylated
(47). Immunohistochemical and Western blot studies in COS cells
transfected with
2A and
2C confirmed there is no
cross-reactivity of the
2B
antibody with the other isoforms (17). On Western blot analysis, a
minor band migrating at ~66 kDa was also seen by Huang et al. (see
figures 3 and 5 of Ref. 17), and preabsorption with the
glutathione S-transferase (GST)/
2B fusion
protein against which the antibody was developed, prevented labeling of
both the 66- and 45-kDa bands. We have no explanation for the larger
protein except for the possibility of alternate processing of
2B.
Although there has been little direct information from binding studies
for the presence of
2-AR in the
CCD, there is abundant functional evidence of their presence. Several
laboratories have reported that epinephrine and clonidine inhibit
AVP-dependent cAMP production in the isolated rat and rabbit CCD and
that this inhibition is reversed by phentolamine or yohimbine but not
by prazosin (3, 20, 28). We have confirmed this effect of epinephrine
on cAMP production in our laboratory (21a). In the isolated perfused
CCD, we have also shown that clonidine and epinephrine inhibit the
AVP-dependent increase in
Pf and
JNa (4, 14, 16)
and that the effect of 100 nM epinephrine could be completely reversed
by 1 µM yohimbine (14).
Despite the consistency of these findings with an
2-AR mechanism mediated through
Gi-dependent adenylyl
cyclase activation, other findings suggested there was an
additional inhibitory mechanism. We found that 1 µM corynanthine
partially reversed the inhibition of
Pf and
JNa produced by
100 nM epinephrine (14). Although corynanthine is generally considered
an
1-AR antagonist, it can also
block
2-AR at this
concentration (48). More importantly, when
Pf and
JNa were
stimulated by 50 µM forskolin or a cAMP analog in the presence of
IBMX, 100 nM epinephrine still inhibited transport, although it was
only 30-40% of the inhibition produced in the presence of AVP
(14). The smaller inhibitory effect in the presence of abundant cAMP
could be mediated by an
1-AR,
which may explain the partial reversal of inhibition by corynanthine,
or the effect could be mediated by an alternate second messenger
pathways coupled to an
2-AR.
For example,
2A and
2C-ARs have also been shown to
couple to phospholipase C (PLC) to extents which vary with the isoform
(8). Although previous experiments in this laboratory have not detected
an involvement of the PLC pathway in regulating the
-AR effect in
rat CCD (as discussed below), we do not rule out this possibility.
To determine whether there was a functional effect of the
1-ARs, we performed experiments
to measure VT in
isolated perfused rat CCD segments. In these experiments rauwolscine
and propranolol were present to block
2- and
-adrenergic
receptors, respectively. Phenylephrine was used as a general
1-agonist, followed by
phentolamine as an antagonist (Fig. 5). We observed a small
depolarization of
VT with
phenylephrine, but the effect was statistically significant only in the
case of CCD from rats that had not been treated with DOC. Although
phentolamine tended to reverse the effect, the reversal did not achieve
significance. The effect of phenylephrine was markedly less than the
yohimbine-reversible effects produced by epinephrine or clonidine. Thus
the functional effect of the
1 receptors on Na+ transport is
small in comparison with
2-AR-mediated effects.
1-ARs are primarily coupled to
PLC (8, 44) and to a lesser extent to
PLA2 (23) and PLD (43). Findings
from our laboratory have failed to demonstrate an inhibitory effect of
PGE2 on transport in the rat CCD
(4), indicating that at least this product of PLA2 activation is not involved.
We have also previously shown that activation of protein kinase C (PKC)
by phorbol myristate acetate or oleoylacetylglycerol, or elevation in
intracellular Ca2+, appear to have
no effect on AVP-dependent
Pf or
JNa in the CCD of
DOC-treated rats (32). Although these results suggested that PLC is not
involved in the inhibition of salt and water transport in this segment,
the small effect that could be attributed to
1-AR activity may not have been
detected, particularly in view of DOC pretreatment. It is also possible
that the correct PKC isoform was not activated in our previous studies.
Using RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, we have detected the presence
of five PKC isoforms in the rat CCD (46), most of which are insensitive to phorbol esters and/or
Ca2+.
We conclude that the primary adrenoceptor functionally involved in
regulating CCD Na+ and water
transport is an
2-AR, either
2A or
2B, which decreases AVP-dependent cAMP generation by coupling to a
Gi protein that inhibits adenylyl
cyclase. A small inhibitory effect is also mediated by an
1-AR activation. The multiple
roles of the
-adrenoceptors in the CCD as well as the variety of
intracellular coupling mechanisms with which they are associated remain
an important objective for future studies, especially with regard to
the possible effects of diet and salt balance on the relative
expression of these receptor isoforms and the consequences of those
receptor changes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Center for AIDS research at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (P30-AI-27767) for providing access to gene analysis programs (Wisconsin Package, Version 8, September 1994, Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Drive, Madison, WI 53711).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
We greatly appreciate the
2B-AR
antibody provided to us by Dr. Mark D. Okusa (Univ. of Virginia,
Charlottesville, VA), as well as his helpful responses to our
questions. We also gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Dr.
Diane L. Rosin (Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA), Dr. David B. Bylund (Univ. of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE), Dr. William B. Jeffries (Creighton Univ., Omaha, NE), and Drs. S. Kakar and A. Naren
in our department at Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham.
Support for this study was provided by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Research Grant 5-RO1-DK-25519 and by a Postdoctoral Fellowship (to T. W. Wilborn) from the National Kidney Foundation.
Portions of this study have been published previously in abstract form (FASEB J. 10: 404, 1996; and J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7: 2214, 1996).
1
The sequence originally called
1C-AR corresponds to the
pharmacologically defined
1A-AR, and the sequence
originally called
1A/D-AR is
currently referred to as
1D-AR
(45).
Address for reprint requests: T. W. Wilborn, Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, 958 BHS Bldg., 1918 Univ. Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294-0005.
Received 25 February 1997; accepted in final form 19 March 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Azer, M.,
R. Gannon,
and
G. J. Kaloyanides.
Effect of renal denervation of the antinatriuresis of caval constriction.
Am. J. Physiol.
222:
611-616,
1972.
2.
Barajas, L.,
and
K. Powers.
Anatomy of the renal innervation: intrarenal aspects and ganglia of origin.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
70:
735-749,
1992[Medline].
3.
Chabardès, D.,
M. Montégut,
M. Imbert-Teboul,
and
F. Morel.
Inhibition of
2-adrenergic agonists on AVP-induced cAMP accumulation in isolated collecting tubule of the rat kidney.
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
37:
263-275,
1984[Medline].
4.
Chen, L.,
M. C. Reif,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Clonidine and PGE2 have different effects on Na+ and water transport in the rat and rabbit CCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
261 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 30):
F126-F136,
1991
5.
Chen, L.,
S. K. Williams,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Differences in synergistic actions of vasopressin and deoxycorticosterone in rat and rabbit CCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
259 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 28):
F147-F156,
1990
6.
Clarke, D.,
and
L. C. Garg.
Alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in renal medullary collecting duct cells.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
259:
1081-1087,
1991
7.
Cohen, H. T.,
F. Takemoto,
T. Satoh,
and
A. I. Katz.
Renal adrenergic receptors: localization of [125I]prazosin binding sites along the microdissected rat nephron.
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
70:
1016-1020,
1992[Medline].
8.
Cotecchia, S.,
B. K. Kobilka,
K. W. Daniel,
R. D. Nolan,
E. Y. Lapetina,
M. G. Caron,
R. J. Lefkowitz,
and
J. W. Regan.
Multiple second messenger pathways of alpha-adrenergic receptor subtypes expressed in eukaryotic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
63-69,
1990
9.
Deka-Starosta, A.,
M. Garty,
Z. Zukowska-Grojec,
H. R. Keiser,
I. J. Kopin,
and
D. S. Goldstein.
Renal sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine release in rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
257 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 26):
R229-R236,
1989
10.
Eason, M. G.,
H. Kurose,
B. D. Holt,
J. R. Raymond,
and
S. B. Liggett.
Simultaneous coupling of
2-adrenergic receptors to two G-proteins with opposing effects.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
15795-15801,
1992
11.
Feng, F.,
P. W. Abel,
M. Scofield,
F. Liu,
D. W. Wolff,
and
W. B. Jeffries.
Heterogeneous expression of
1-adrenoceptor subtypes among rat nephron segments.
Mol. Pharmacol.
44:
926-933,
1993[Abstract].
12.
Gellai, M.,
and
R. M. Edwards.
Mechanism of
2-adrenoceptor agonist-induced diuresis.
Am. J. Physiol.
255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24):
F317-F323,
1988
13.
Gopalakrishnan, S. M.,
C. Chen,
and
M. F. Lokhandwala.
Identification of
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in rat renal proximal tubules.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
250:
469-472,
1993[Medline].
14.
Hawk, C. T.,
L. H. Kudo,
A. J. Rouch,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Inhibition by epinephrine of AVP- and cAMP-stimulated Na+ and water transport in Dahl rat CCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 34):
F449-F460,
1993
15.
Hawk, C. T., and J. A. Schafer. AVP and
aldosterone at physiologic concentrations have synergistic effects on
Na+ transport in rat CCD.
Kidney Int. 57, Suppl.: S35-S41, 1996.
16.
Hawk, C. T.,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Clonidine, but not bradykinin or ANP, inhibits Na+ and water transport in Dahl SS rat CCD.
Kidney Int.
40:
30-35,
1993.
17.
Huang, L.,
Y. Y. Wei,
A. Momonse-Hotokezaka,
J. Dickey,
and
M. D. Okusa.
2B-Adrenergic receptors: immunolocalization and regulation by potassium depletion in rat kidney.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 39):
F1015-F1026,
1996
18.
Kopp, U. C.,
and
G. F. DiBona.
Effects of renal nerves and neurotransmitters on renal function.
In: The Kidney (5th ed.), edited by B. M. Brenner. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996, p. 789-814.
19.
Krothapalli, R. K.,
and
W. N. Suki.
Functional characterization of the alpha adrenergic receptor modulating the hydroosmotic effect of vasopressin on the rabbit cortical collecting tubule.
J. Clin. Invest.
73:
740-749,
1984.
20.
Lanier, S. M.,
S. Downing,
E. Duzic,
and
C. J. Homcy.
Isolation of rat genomic clones encoding subtypes of the alpha-2-adrenergic receptor. Identification of a unique receptor subtype.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:
10470-10478,
1991
21.
Laz, T. M.,
C. Forray,
K. E. Smith,
J. A. Bard,
P. J. Vaysse,
T. A. Brancheck,
and
R. L. Weinshank.
The rat homologue of the bovine alpha 1c-adrenergic receptor shows the pharmacologic properties of the classical alpha 1A subtype.
Mol. Pharmacol.
46:
414-422,
1994[Abstract].
21a.
Li, L.,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Dopamine inhibits vasopressin-dependent cAMP production in the rat cortical collecting duct.
Am. J. Physiol.
275 (Renal Physiol. 44):
F62-F67,
1998
22.
Lomasney, J. W.,
S. Cotecchia,
R. J. Lefkowitz,
and
M. G. Caron.
Molecular biology of
-adrenergic receptors: implications for receptor classification and for structure-function relationships.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1095:
127-139,
1991[Medline].
23.
Lomasney, J. W.,
S. Cotecchia,
W. Lorenz,
W. Y. Leung,
D. A. Schwinn,
T. L. Yang-Feng,
M. Brownstein,
R. J. Lefkowitz,
and
M. G. Caron.
Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for the alpha 1A-adrenergic receptor. The gene for which is located on human chromosome 5.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:
6365-6369,
1991
24.
MacDonald, E.,
B. K. Kobilka,
and
M. Scheinin.
Gene targeting-homing in on
2-adrenoceptor-subtype function.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
18:
211-219,
1997[Medline].
25.
Matsushima, Y.,
S. Akabane,
and
K. Ito.
Characterization of
-1 and
-2 adrenoceptors directly associated with basolateral membranes from rat kidney proximal tubules.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
35:
2593-2600,
1986[Medline].
26.
Meister, B.,
Å. Dagerlind,
A. P. Nicholas,
and
T. Hökfelt.
Patterns of messenger RNA expression for adrenergic receptor subtypes in the rat kidney.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
268:
1605-1611,
1994
27.
Pettinger, W. A., J. Sanchez, J. Saavedra, J. R. Haywood, T. Gandler, and T. Rodes. Altered renal
2-adrenergic receptor
regulation in genetically hypertensive rats.
Hypertension 4, Suppl. II: 188-192, 1982.
28.
Pettinger, W. A.,
S. Umemura,
D. D. Smyth,
and
W. B. Jeffries.
Renal
2-adrenoceptors and the adenylate cyclase-cAMP system: biochemical and physiological interactions.
Am. J. Physiol.
252 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 21):
F199-F208,
1987
29.
Poucher, S. M.,
and
F. Karim.
The renal response to electrical stimulation of renal efferent sympathetic nerves in the anesthetized greyhound.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
434:
1-19,
1991
30.
Rosin, D. L.,
E. M. Talley,
A. Lee,
R. L. Stornetta,
B. D. Gaylinn,
P. G. Guyenet,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Distribution of alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor-like immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system.
J. Comp. Neurol.
372:
135-165,
1996[Medline].
31.
Rosin, D. L.,
D. Zeng,
R. L. Stornetta,
F. R. Norton,
T. Riley,
M. D. Okusa,
P. G. Guyenet,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Immunohistochemical localization of alpha 2A-adrenergic receptors in catecholaminergic and other brainstem neurons in the rat.
Neuroscience
56:
139-155,
1993[Medline].
32.
Rouch, A. J.,
L. Chen,
L. H. Kudo,
P. D. Bell,
B. C. Fowler,
B. D. Corbitt,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Intracellular Ca2+ and PKC activation do not inhibit Na+ and water transport in rat CCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 34):
F569-F577,
1993
33.
Rouch, R. J.,
and
L. H. Kudo.
2-Adrenergic-mediated inhibition of water and urea permeability in the rat IMCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 40):
F150-F157,
1996
34.
Schafer, J. A.,
M. L. Watkins,
L. Li,
P. Herter,
S. Haxelmans,
and
E. Schlatter.
A simplified method for isolation of large numbers of defined nephron segments.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Renal Physiol. 42):
F650-F657,
1997
35.
Slick, G. L.,
A. J. Aguilera,
E. J. Zambraski,
G. F. DiBona,
and
G. J. Kaloyanides.
Renal neuroadrenergic transmission.
Am. J. Physiol.
229:
60-65,
1975.
36.
Slick, G. L.,
G. F. DiBona,
and
G. J. Kaloyanides.
Renal sympathetic nerve activity in sodium retention of acute caval constriction.
Am. J. Physiol.
226:
925-932,
1974.
37.
Smyth, D. D.,
S. Umemura,
and
W. A. Pettinger.
Renal
2-adrenergic receptors multiply and mediate sodium retention after prazosin treatment.
Hypertension
8:
323-331,
1986
38.
Smyth, D. D.,
S. Umemura,
and
W. A. Pettinger.
Renal nerve stimulation causes
1-adrenoceptor mediated sodium retention but not
2-adrenoceptor antagonism of vasopressin.
Circ. Res.
57:
304-311,
1985
39.
Stephenson, J. A.,
and
R. J. Summers.
Autographic evidence for a heterogeneous distribution of
1-adrenoceptors labelled by [3H]prazosin in rat, dog and human kidney.
J. Auton. Pharmacol.
6:
109-116,
1986[Medline].
40.
Summers, R. J.
Renal alpha-adrenoceptors.
Federation Proc.
43:
2917-2922,
1984[Medline].
41.
Sundaresan, R. P.,
M. Barac-Nieto,
G. W. Stambo,
and
S. L. Kelvie.
Glomerular and tubular
1 and
2 adrenoceptors in the rat kidney: Distribution in basolateral and brush border membranes of tubular cells.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
13:
16-24,
1989[Medline].
42.
Umemura, S.,
D. Marver,
D. D. Smyth,
and
W. A. Pettinger.
2-adrenoceptors and cellular cAMP levels in single nephron segments from the rat.
Am. J. Physiol.
249 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 18):
F28-F33,
1985.
43.
Voigt, M. M.,
J. Kispert,
and
H. M. Chin.
Sequence of a rat brain cDNA encoding an alpha-1B adrenergic receptor.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:
1053,
1990
44.
Watson, S.,
and
S. Arkinstall.
The G-Protein Linked Receptor Facts Book. New York: Academic, 1994, p. 32-54.
45.
Watson, S.,
and
D. Girdlestone.
1996 Receptor and Ion Channel Nomenclature Supplement (7th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Elsevier Trends Journals, 1996, p. 10-11.
46.
Wilborn, T. W.,
and
J. A. Schafer.
Differential expression of PKC isoforms in fresh and cultured rabbit CCD.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 39):
F766-F775,
1996
47.
Wilson, A. L.,
K. Seibert,
S. Brandon,
J. Cragoe,
and
E. J., and L. E. Limbird.
Monovalent cation and amiloride analog modulation of adrenergic ligand binding to the unglycosylated
2A adrenergic receptor subtype.
Mol. Pharmacol.
39:
481-486,
1991[Abstract].
48.
Zeng, D.,
J. Harrison,
D. D. D'Angelo,
C. M. Barber,
A. L. Tucker,
Z. Lu,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Molecular characterization of a rat alpha-2B-adrenergic receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:
3102-3106,
1990
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. Wallace, G. Reif, A.-M. Hedge, J. B. Thrasher, and P. Pietrow Adrenergic regulation of salt and fluid secretion in human medullary collecting duct cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): F639 - F648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Schafer Abnormal regulation of ENaC: syndromes of salt retention and salt wasting by the collecting duct Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): F221 - F235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Feraille and A. Doucet Sodium-Potassium-Adenosinetriphosphatase-Dependent Sodium Transport in the Kidney: Hormonal Control Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 345 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |