Vol. 275, Issue 1, F119-F125, July 1998
Ligand-dependent regulation of NPR-A gene expression in inner
medullary collecting duct cells
Li
Cao,
Song Cang
Chen,
Tong
Cheng,
Michael H.
Humphreys, and
David G.
Gardner
Metabolic Research Unit and Department of Medicine, University
of California at San Francisco, California 94143
 |
ABSTRACT |
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) interacts with high-affinity,
guanylyl cyclase-linked receptors in the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD), where it exerts important regulatory control over sodium
handling. We sought to determine whether receptor activity in these
cells would be modulated (downregulated) by prolonged exposure to
ligand. A number of natriuretic peptides (ANP, brain natriuretic
peptide, and urodilatin) were found to decrease ligand-dependent natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A) activity in IMCD cells. This
inhibition was in direct proportion to their capacity to increase basal
cGMP levels in this cell population. The reduction in receptor activity
was accompanied by a dose- and time-dependent reduction in NPR-A mRNA
levels in these cells. The decrease in transcript levels arose, in
part, from a reduction in NPR-A gene transcription. ANP reduced NPR-A
gene promoter activity in a transiently transfected IMCD cell
population. 8-Bromo-cGMP was also effective in inhibiting NPR-A mRNA
levels and NPR-A promoter activity, suggesting that the second
messenger (i.e., cGMP) rather than ANP, itself, is responsible for
downregulation of NPR-A gene expression.
receptors; natriuretic peptide; renal epithelial cells
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE ATRIAL NATRIURETIC peptide (ANP) is a cardiac
hormone that displays potent vasorelaxant and natriuretic activity in a variety of species. Its natriuretic action has been attributed to a
number of hemodynamic and direct tubular effects in the kidney (2, 3).
These include alterations in intraglomerular pressure, changes in
glomerular permeability, shifts in inner medullary blood flow, and
inhibition of sodium transport in both proximal and distal nephron
segments. In the latter instance, it has been shown to inhibit sodium
reabsorption in the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD), a nephron
segment that handles less than 5% of the filtered sodium load, yet
plays a pivotal role in establishing the final sodium concentration of
the urine (30).
The natriuretic peptides have been shown to exert their biological
effects through binding to one or more of a small group of natriuretic
peptide receptors (NPR). NPR-A and NPR-B are single transmembrane
domain receptors that link an extracellular peptide binding domain to a
carboxy terminal guanylyl cyclase catalytic domain located inside the
cell (17). The latter represents the effector arm of the liganded
receptor. NPR-A binds predominantly to ANP and brain natriuretic
peptide (BNP), whereas NPR-B recognizes C-type natriuretic peptide
(CNP) as its cognate ligand (18). A third receptor, NPR-C, is truncated
just distal to its single transmembrane-spanning domain and lacks the
guanylyl cyclase activity of the other receptors. It binds to all three
natriuretic peptides and functions in a clearance mode, taking up and
internalizing peptide from the extracellular space (12, 20). It may
also possess signaling activity that is independent of the cGMP
generation intrinsic to the other receptors (1, 16).
The guanylyl cyclase receptors are the predominant receptor subtypes
found in the IMCD (15), and very little NPR-C is thought to be present
in this segment. It is assumed that ANP, present in circulating plasma
or in the tubular fluid itself, binds to these receptors and increases
cellular cGMP levels. cGMP, either directly or through activation of
the cGMP-dependent protein kinase (19), suppresses sodium transport
through the amiloride-sensitive sodium channel on the luminal surface
of the IMCD cell and, thereby, increases urinary excretion of sodium.
We have shown previously that NPR-A expression and activity in rat
aortic smooth muscle cells (RASM) are suppressed by prior exposure to
the natriuretic peptides (i.e., ANP, BNP, or CNP) (5). RASM cells are
known to express all three NPRs (27). We sought to determine whether a
similar downregulation of NPR-A activity would be conserved in IMCD
cells, which display a more limited receptor repertoire and, if so,
whether this downregulation is accompanied by a decrease in NPR gene
expression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials. ANP [rat
ANF-(1
28)], brain natriuretic peptide [BNP-(1
32),
porcine], C-type natriuretic peptide [CNP-(1
22), porcine], cANF
{des-[Gln18,Ser19,Gly20,Leu21, Gly22]ANP-(4
23)-NH2,
rat}, and urodilatin [cardiodilatin/ANP-(95
126)] were purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA). IBMX, reagents for cGMP radioimmunoassay (cGMP standard and antibody), and
actinomycin D were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
125I-cGMP and
[
-32P]dCTP were
purchased from New England Nuclear (Wilmington, DE). Lipofectamine
(GIBCO) was obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). The luciferase assay kit was purchased from Promega
(Madison, WI). Collagenase was purchased from Worthington Biochemical
(Freehold, NJ). The rat NPR-A and NPR-B cDNAs were generously provided
by David Garbers. The bovine NPR-C cDNA was a gift from Gordon Porter, and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA was from
Seigo Izumo. All other chemicals and cell culture reagents were
purchased from standard commercial suppliers.
Isolation and culture of cells. IMCD
cells were isolated from freshly excised kidneys of adult
Sprague-Dawley rats using the hypotonic lysis technique of Grenier et
al. (14) with some modifications. The inner medullary tissue was
dissected away from the outer medulla and minced into fine pieces with
a scalpel blade. The minced tissue from six rats was incubated in 4 ml
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mg/ml collagenase, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C for 30 min
with gentle agitation. The cell suspension was collected, and 1 ml FBS
was added to each 4 ml suspension. Harvested cells were kept at
4°C. The process was repeated until the tissue was completely
digested. A quantity of 7.5 ml of distilled water was then added to
every 4 ml of cell suspension to give a final osmolality of 120 mosmol/kg, and the mixture was centrifuged immediately at 500 g for 4 min. This hypotonic shock
lyses all but the medullary collecting duct cells in the preparation
(14). The cell pellet was resuspended in PBS containing 10% BSA and
centrifuged again at 500 g for 4 min.
Cells were resuspended in medium-1 (1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham's F-12
medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 42 mM sodium bicarbonate, 100 IU/ml
penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin). Cells were seeded into
either 24-well (16-mm well diameter), 6-well (35-mm diameter), or 10-cm
(diameter) Falcon culture plates. On the second day, the cells were
transferred to K-1 medium [1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham's F-12
medium supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 42 mM sodium
bicarbonate, 5 µg/ml insulin, 50 nM hydrocortisone, 5 µg/ml
transferrin, 5 pM triiodothyronine, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin] and cultured for 3-4 days until the
cells attained confluence.
cGMP measurement. Confluent IMCD
cells, cultured in 24-well plates, were pretreated with the agents
described in the legends to Figs. 1-7. For measurement of
ANP-stimulated cGMP accumulation, the cells were washed (3 times) with
prewarmed PBS or acidic medium (pH of the medium was reduced to 5.0 by
the addition of 4% acetic acid) (21), as indicated, and incubated with
0.5 ml of DMEM containing 0.5 mM IBMX and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, for 10 min at 37°C. ANP (100 nM except where indicated) was added to the
medium, and the incubation continued for another 10 min. The reaction was terminated by aspiration of media and addition of 0.3 ml of 12%
trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The extraction was continued for 30 min at
4°C. The precipitated proteins were removed by
centrifugation, and the supernatant was extracted four times with 0.5 ml of water-saturated ether. Aliquots were lyophilized and resuspended
in 0.1 ml of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer. Soluble protein was measured
using the Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce Chemical). cGMP
levels were determined by radioimmunoassay after acetylation of the
samples and standards, using a commercially available antibody and
125I-labeled cGMP. For
measurements of basal cGMP levels, the pretreatment was terminated by
aspiration of culture media and the addition of 0.3 ml of 12% TCA.
Subsequent steps were identical to those described above.
RNA isolation and Northern
hybridization. Confluent IMCD cells (10-cm dishes) were
washed with cold PBS, and total cellular RNA was extracted using the
guanidinium thiocyanate-CsCl technique (8). A quantity of 30 µg RNA
was electrophoresed through a 1% agarose/2.2 M formaldehyde gel,
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GeneScreen Plus, New England
Nuclear) and fixed to the membrane by ultraviolet irradiation (DNA
transfer lamp, Fotodyne). A 1.2-kb
EcoR I fragment from the 5' end
of the rat NPR-A cDNA (7), 1.3-kb EcoR
I-BamH I fragment from the rat NPR-B
cDNA (25), or a full-length bovine NPR-C cDNA (2.1-kb
Hind
III-EcoR I fragment) (12) was labeled
with [
-32P]dCTP
using the random primer technique. Hybridizations were performed
overnight at 42°C using conventional techniques. To standardize for
variations in RNA loading and transfer, the filters were stripped of
label with 2× SSC (0.3 M sodium chloride and 0.03 M sodium
citrate)/0.5% SDS followed by 0.1× SSC (0.015 M sodium chloride
and 0.0015 M sodium citrate)/0.5% SDS at 100°C. They were then
reprobed with a 1.3-kb Pst I fragment
from the human GAPDH cDNA. Hybridization signal was detected by
autoradiography and quantified by densitometry.
Transfection of IMCD cells. Cells were
plated in 6-well plates and grown to 60-80% confluence over
2-3 days. For each individual transfection, the following
solutions were prepared: solution A
contained 2 µg plasmid DNA diluted in 0.1 ml OPTI-MEM I reduced serum
medium (GIBCO-BRL); solution B
contained 0.01 ml of Lipofectamine reagent diluted in 0.1 ml of
OPTI-MEM I reduced serum medium. Solutions
A and B were combined,
mixed gently, and incubated at room temperature for 30 min to allow
DNA-liposome complexes to form. Cells were washed once with 2 ml of
OPTI-MEM I medium. A quantity of 0.8 ml of the same medium was added to
0.2 ml of DNA-liposome complex. After gentle agitation, the mixture was
overlaid onto the washed cells. Cultures were incubated at 37°C in
5% CO2 for 5 h, at which point 1 ml of K-1 medium was added. The incubations were continued for another
20 h. The medium was then replaced with complete K-1 culture medium
supplemented with the additives indicated. Seventy-two hours after the
start of transfection, cells were harvested and luciferase activity was
measured using a commercial kit (Promega).
Statistics. Data were analyzed by
one-way analysis of variance with the Newman-Keuls test for
significance. Pooled data were drawn from 2-5 experiments with
three independent samplings per experiment.
 |
RESULTS |
Previous studies have shown that IMCD cells harbor almost exclusively
the biologically active (i.e., particulate guanylyl cyclase-associated)
NPRs with little or no clearance receptor activity (15). Identification
of the precise NPR subtypes present in the IMCD has been controversial,
with some investigations supporting the presence of both NPR-A and
NPR-B in this segment (9, 28) and others demonstrating only NPR-A (10).
To determine which of the biologically active receptors (NPR-A vs.
NPR-B) predominate in our in vitro preparations of IMCD cells, we
challenged them with either ANP or CNP (selective ligands for the A and
B receptor, respectively) and measured cellular cGMP levels. As shown
in Fig. 1A,
these cells displayed a robust response to ANP but not to CNP, implying
a predominance of NPR-A in the cultures. This was confirmed by Northern
analysis of RNA isolated from these cells. When total RNA was
blot-hybridized with cDNAs for the different NPRs, only that probed for
NPR-A displayed a detectable signal (Fig.
1B) under conditions which have
readily detected NPR transcripts in RNA prepared from other cell types
(4, 6).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Natriuretic peptide receptor (NPR) subtypes in primary cultures of
inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells.
A: confluent cells were washed and
preincubated in medium containing 0.5 mM IBMX and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, for 10 min, then challenged with 100 nM atrial natriuretic peptide
(ANP) ( ) or C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP; ) for an additional
10 min. Reactions were terminated with 12% TCA, and cGMP levels were
measured by radioimmunoassay. Data are means ± SD
(n = 3).
B: total RNA was collected from
confluent cells as described in MATERIALS AND
METHODS. RNA, 30 µg, was size-fractionated,
transferred to a nitrocellulose filter by capillary action, hybridized
with
[ -32P]dCTP-labeled
NPR-A (lane 1), NPR-B
(lane 2), or NPR-C
(lane 3) cDNA, and autoradiographed
at 70°C for 5 days. Results in each panel are representative
of 2 independent experiments.
|
|
Next, we asked whether pretreatment of IMCD cells for varying periods
of time with the receptor's cognate ligand (i.e., ANP) would alter the
subsequent response to ligand. As shown in Fig 2A, there was a rapid
reduction in ANP-stimulated cGMP levels in these cultures after as
little as 2-h exposure to the ligand. NPR-A activity remained
suppressed throughout the remainder of the experiment (48 h). This
desensitization did not result from continued occupancy of the receptor
by ligand. If ligand was removed from the cells with a mild acid wash
(21) prior to challenge with ANP, then the response to the latter was
still suppressed (Fig. 2B) to a
level equivalent to or less than that seen in the conventional
cultures.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ANP inhibits NPR-A activity in IMCD cells.
A: IMCD cells were pretreated with 100 nM ANP for varying periods of time, washed with PBS (3 times), and
ANP-stimulated cGMP (ANP-s-cGMP) was measured as described in
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Pooled data
represent means ± SD (n = 6). Zero
time point represents 263 ± 34 pmol cGMP/mg soluble protein.
B: confluent cultures were pretreated
with varying concentrations of ANP for 48 h. Cells were then washed 3 times with either acidic DMEM-Ham's F-12 (pH 5.0) ( ) or PBS ( )
and incubated in fresh medium containing 0.5 mM IBMX and 10 mM HEPES
(pH 7.4) for 10 min. ANP-stimulated cGMP levels were determined as
described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
Pooled data are presented as means ± SD
(n = 6).
* P < 0.05 and
** P < 0.01 vs. untreated
group. Control cGMP levels in absence of ANP were 147 ± 45 pmol/mg
soluble protein in the PBS-washed cultures and 213 ± 17 pmol/mg
soluble protein in the acid-washed cultures.
|
|
The suppression of NPR-A activity was shared solely by those
natriuretic peptides capable of interacting with these receptors in
IMCD cells. As shown in Fig.
3A, ANP, BNP, and
urodilatin, all ligands with high affinity for NPR-A, promoted a
dose-dependent reduction in the NPR-A response to a subsequent
challenge with ANP. CNP and cANF, ligands which selectively bind to
NPR-B and NPR-C, respectively, were ineffective. The activities of the
individual ligands were related to their ability to activate cGMP
production in these cells, presumably through occupancy of the NPR-A
receptor. As shown in Fig. 3B, ANP and
BNP pretreatment was accompanied by a significant elevation in basal
cGMP levels. This was not seen with CNP nor with the clearance receptor
ligand.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of individual natriuretic peptides on NPR-A activity. Confluent
IMCD cells were treated with varying concentrations of the natriuretic
peptide indicated for 48 h. A: cells
were washed, and ANP-stimulated cGMP (ANP-s-cGMP) was measured as
described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
Control cGMP levels in absence of natriuretic peptide were 162 ± 25 pmol/mg soluble protein. B: in
parallel cultures, steady-state cGMP levels were measured immediately
following the 48-h incubation. Control cGMP levels in absence of
natriuretic peptide were 3.5 ± 0.6 pmol/mg soluble protein. Pooled
data are presented as means ± SD.
* P < 0.05 and
** P < 0.01 vs. untreated
group (n = 6).
|
|
The rapid kinetics of ANP-dependent desensitization implied that at
least the early reduction of NPR-A activity was independent of changes
in NPR-A gene expression. This is supported by the fact that
pretreatment of the cultures with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D for 1 h, a
condition which reduced
[3H]uridine
incorporation in these cells to very low levels (data not shown),
failed to block the response to ANP (Fig. 4). Thus suppression of NPR-A gene transcription did not prevent the
ligand-dependent reduction of NPR-A activity. This implies that the
ligand acts, at least early on, through a posttranscriptional mechanism
in reducing NPR-A activity.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Actinomycin D (Act D) fails to prevent early ligand-dependent
downregulation of NPR-A activity. IMCD cells were preincubated in
presence or absence of 5 µg/ml actinomycin D for 1 h. ANP (100 nM)
was then added, and incubation was continued for another 2 h.
ANP-stimulated cGMP production was measured as described in
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Pooled data are
presented as the means ± SD (n = 14). Experimental data have been normalized to that obtained in
untreated control cells. Control cGMP levels in absence of natriuretic
peptide were 121 ± 16 pmol/mg soluble protein.
* P < 0.05 and
** P < 0.01 vs. untreated
control (Ctrl) cultures.
|
|
At later time points, however, definite effects on NPR-A gene
expression were observed. An ANP-dependent reduction in NPR-A mRNA
levels was seen after 48 h, but not after 2 h of treatment with the
ligand (Fig. 5, A and
B). Of interest, this reduction could also be effected by treatment of the cultures with 8-bromo-cGMP with similar kinetics of response, suggesting that the second messenger
rather than ANP itself provides the ultimate signal for decreased NPR-A
gene expression. The reduction in NPR-A mRNA levels was dose-dependent
with maximal inhibition (~50%) seen at 100 nM ANP (Fig.
6, A and
B).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time course of ANP-dependent reduction of NPR-A mRNA levels.
A: IMCD cells were pretreated with 100 nM ANP or 100 µM 8-bromo-cGMP (8-br-cGMP) for 2 or 48 h, and total
cellular RNA was collected. RNA, 30 µg, from each group was analyzed
for NPR-A transcripts by Northern blot hybridization followed by
autoradiography. B: NPR-A transcript
levels were quantitated by densitometric scanning, and normalized
values are plotted as a bar graph. Data are pooled from 3 independent
experiments. * P < 0.01 vs. untreated control
group.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Dose-dependent suppression of NPR-A gene expression by ANP.
A: cells were treated with increasing
concentrations of ANP for 48 h, and total cellular RNA was collected.
RNA, 30 µg, from each group was analyzed for NPR-A and GAPDH
transcript levels by Northern blot hybridization followed by
autoradiography. B: NPR-A transcript
levels were quantitated by densitometric scanning, and normalized
values were plotted as a bar graph. Data are pooled from 3 independent
experiments. ** P < 0.01 vs.
control.
|
|
To explore the locus of this reduction in steady-state NPR-A mRNA
levels, we transfected the IMCD cells with a reporter construct linking
1,575 bp of 5'-flanking sequence from the rat NPR-A gene to
bacterial luciferase (5), treated the cells with the agents indicated,
and assayed reporter activity 72 h later. As shown in Fig.
7, pretreatment with either ANP or 8-bromo-cGMP resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in NPR-A promoter activity. This suggests
that the reduction in NPR-A mRNA levels results, at least in part, from
a decrease in NPR-A gene promoter activity and that the
cis-acting element(s) which sense the
ANP-dependent signal are contained within the 1,575 bp of
5'-flanking sequence present in this construct.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
ANP and 8-bromo-cGMP suppress the activity of the NPR-A gene promoter.
Cells were transfected with 2 µg 1575 NPR-A LUC as described
in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cells were
then exposed to different concentrations of ANP or 8-bromo-cGMP for 48 h. Cellular extracts were prepared and assayed for luciferase activity
using a commercial kit. Pooled data from 3 independent experiments are
presented as the means ± SD.
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 vs. untreated
group.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have shown previously that ligand-dependent downregulation of NPR-A
is accompanied by a reduction in steady-state NPR-A mRNA levels and
NPR-A gene promoter activity in cultured RASM cells (5). The findings
presented above indicate that similar regulatory mechanisms are
operative in IMCD cells of the rat kidney. Although RASM cells harbor
all three NPR subtypes (i.e., NPR-A, -B, and -C), cultured IMCD cells
appear to contain almost exclusively NPR-A (Fig. 1). As a result,
treatment of RASM cells with either ANP or CNP, either of which is
capable of increasing cGMP levels in these cells, results in a
reduction of NPR-A activity, whereas only ANP is effective in IMCD
cells. By inference, the cellular controls governing ligand-dependent
downregulation of NPR-A activity in IMCD cells are more selective than
those in RASM. This could have important physiological implications in
that NPR-A activity in IMCD cells would be predicted to be largely
independent of locally produced CNP from renal parenchyma (28) or
vascular endothelial cells (26). Several recent reports have documented low level expression of the ANP gene in the distal convoluted tubule of
the kidney (24). Local production of ANP, or its
amino-terminal-extended homolog urodilatin (13, 29), would have the
capacity not only to activate NPR-A but to control its expression as
well. This would, in effect, create a local system for governing sodium
excretion in distal tubular segments, operating in parallel with, but
separate from, the systemic regulatory mechanisms that control sodium
homeostasis.
A number of studies have shown that ANP regulates NPR-A activity at a
posttranscriptional level (22, 23). Desensitization of NPR-A in a
stably transfected COS cell system appears to result from selective
dephosphorylation of the receptor protein. Other studies, however, have
suggested that desensitization of the endogenous NPR-A is accompanied
by an increase in receptor phosphorylation (11), so the precise
mechanism underlying this reduction in receptor activity remains
controversial. Based on the rapid kinetics of the ANP response and the
failure of actinomycin D to eliminate the difference in NPR-A activity
in control vs. ANP-treated cells, it is likely that a similar
nontranscriptional desensitization of receptor activity is operative in
the IMCD cell, at least early following administration of ligand. In
addition, there appears to be a late downregulation of receptor
activity that relies on a reduction in NPR-A mRNA levels and, hence,
decreased template for de novo receptor synthesis. As in RASM cells,
this latter effect is directly tied to a reduction in NPR-A promoter
activity, implying a transcriptional locus for the inhibitory effect.
This combination of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory loci provides the IMCD cell with greater flexibility in both initiating and maintaining the suppression of NPR-A activity.
Collectively, these data imply that ANP and/or urodilatin
control their own biological activity in the distal nephron.
Experimental dissection of this system should provide us with a better
understanding of the regulatory controls governing sodium handling in
this nephron segment and, perhaps, provide clues to the underlying
pathogenesis of disorders where regulation of sodium handling in this
segment is altered.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests: D. G. Gardner, Box 0540, Metabolic
Research Unit, Univ. of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Received 15 December 1997; accepted in final form 26 March 1998.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Anand-Srivastava, M. B.,
M. R. Sairam,
and
M. Cantin.
Ring-deleted analogs of atrial natriuretic factor inhibit adenylate cyclase/cAMP system.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
8566-8572,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Baxter, J. D.,
J. A. Lewicki,
and
D. G. Gardner.
Atrial natriuretic peptide.
Biotechnology
6:
529-546,
1988.
3.
Brenner, B. M.,
B. J. Ballermann,
M. E. Gunning,
and
M. L. Zeidel.
Diverse biological actions of atrial natriuretic peptide.
Physiol. Rev.
70:
665-699,
1990[Free Full Text].
4.
Cao, L.,
and
D. G. Gardner.
Natriuretic peptides inhibit DNA synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts.
Hypertension
25:
227-234,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Cao, L.,
J. M. Wu,
and
D. G. Gardner.
Atrial natriuretic peptide suppresses the transcription of its guanylyl cyclase-linked receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:
24891-24897,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.
Cao, L.,
D. W. Zlock,
and
D. G. Gardner.
Differential regulation of natriuretic peptide receptor activity in vascular cells.
Hypertension
24:
329-338,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Chinkers, M.,
D. L. Garbers,
M. S. Chang,
D. G. Lowe,
H. Chin,
D. V. Goeddel,
and
S. Schulz.
A membrane form of guanylate cyclase is an atrial natriuretic peptide receptor.
Nature
338:
78-83,
1989[Medline].
8.
Chirgwin, J. M.,
A. E. Przybyla,
R. J. MacDonald,
and
W. J. Rutter.
Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease.
Biochemistry
18:
5294-5299,
1979[Medline].
9.
Dean, A. D.,
V. M. Vehaskari,
D. Ritter,
and
J. E. Greenwald.
Distribution and regulation of guanylyl cyclase type B in the rat nephron.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 39):
F311-F318,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
De Leon, H.,
M. C. Bonhomme,
and
R. Garcia.
Rat renal preglomerular vessels, glomeruli and papillae do not express detectable quantities of B-type natriuretic peptide receptor.
J. Hypertens.
12:
539-548,
1994[Medline].
11.
Duda, T.,
and
R. K. Sharma.
Regulation of guanylate cyclase activity by atrial natriuretic factor and protein kinase C.
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
93:
179-184,
1990[Medline].
12.
Fuller, F.,
J. G. Porter,
A. E. Arfsten,
J. Miller,
J. W. Schilling,
R. M. Scarborough,
J. A. Lewicki,
and
D. B. Schenk.
Atrial natriuretic peptide clearance receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:
9395-9401,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Goetz, K. L.
Renal natriuretic peptide (urodilatin?) and atriopeptin: evolving concepts.
Am. J. Physiol.
261 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 30):
F921-F932,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Grenier, F. C.,
T. E. Rollins,
and
W. L. Smith.
Kinin-induced prostaglandin synthesis by renal papillary collecting tubule cells in culture.
Am. J. Physiol.
241 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 10):
F94-F104,
1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Gunning, M. E.,
B. J. Ballermann,
P. Silva,
B. M. Brenner,
and
M. L. Zeidel.
Characterization of ANP receptors in rabbit inner medullary collecting duct cells.
Am. J. Physiol.
255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24):
F324-F330,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.
Hu, R. M.,
E. R. Levin,
A. Pedram,
and
H. J. L. Frank.
Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits the production and secretion of endothelin from cultured endothelial cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
17384-17389,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Koller, K. J.,
and
D. V. Goeddel.
Molecular biology of the natriuretic peptides and their receptors.
Circ. Res.
86:
1081-1088,
1992.
18.
Koller, K. J.,
D. G. Lowe,
G. L. Bennett,
N. Minamino,
K. Kangawa,
H. Matsuo,
and
D. V. Goeddel.
Selective activation of the B natriuretic peptide receptor by C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP).
Science
252:
120-123,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Light, D. B.,
J. Corbin,
and
B. A. Stanton.
Dual ion-channel regulation by cyclic GMP and cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase.
Nature
344:
336-339,
1990[Medline].
20.
Maack, T.,
M. Suzuki,
F. A. Almeida,
D. Nussenzveig,
R. M. Scarborough,
G. A. McEnroe,
and
J. A. Lewicki.
Physiological role of silent receptors of atrial natriuretic factor.
Science
238:
675-678,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21.
Martin, E. R.,
J. A. Lewicki,
R. M. Scarborough,
and
B. J. Ballermann.
Expression and regulation of ANP receptor subtypes in rat renal glomeruli and papillae.
Am. J. Physiol.
257 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 26):
F649-F657,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Potter, L. R.,
and
D. L. Garbers.
Dephosphorylation of the guanylyl cyclase-A receptor causes desensitization.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
14531-14534,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23.
Potter, L. R.,
and
D. L. Garbers.
Protein kinase C-dependent desensitization of the atrial natriuretic peptide receptor is mediated by dephosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
14636-14642,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24.
Ritter, D.,
J. Chao,
P. Needleman,
E. Tetens,
and
J. Greenwald.
Localization, synthetic regulation and biology of renal atriopeptin-like hormone.
Am. J. Physiol.
263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32):
F503-F509,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25.
Schulz, S.,
S. Singh,
R. A. Bellet,
G. Singh,
D. J. Tubb,
H. Chin,
and
D. L. Garbers.
The primary structure of a plasma membrane guanylate cyclase demonstrates diversity within this new receptor family.
Cell
58:
1155-1162,
1989[Medline].
26.
Suga, S.,
K. Nakao,
H. Itoh,
Y. Komatsu,
Y. Ogawa,
N. Hama,
and
H. Imura.
Endothelial production of C-type natriuretic peptide and its marked augmentation by transforming growth factor-
.
J. Clin. Invest.
90:
1145-1149,
1992.
27.
Suga, S.,
K. Nakao,
M. Mukoyama,
H. Arai,
K. Hosoda,
Y. Ogawa,
and
H. Imura.
Characterization of natriuretic peptide receptors in cultured cells.
Hypertension
19:
762-765,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Terada, Y.,
K. Tomita,
H. Nonoguchi,
T. Yang,
and
F. Marumo.
PCR localization of C-type natriuretic peptide and B-type receptor mRNAs in rat nephron segments.
Am. J. Physiol.
267 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 36):
F215-F222,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Valentin, J. P.,
and
M. H. Humphreys.
Urodilatin: a paracrine renal natriuretic peptide.
Semin. Nephrol.
13:
61-70,
1993[Medline].
30.
Zeidel, M. L.
Hormonal regulation of inner medullary collecting duct sodium transport.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 34):
F159-F173,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275(1):F119-F125
0002-9513/98 $5.00
Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society