Vol. 275, Issue 4, F467-F477, October 1998
INVITED REVIEW
Relevance of extracellular matrix, its receptors, and cell adhesion
molecules in mammalian nephrogenesis
Elisabeth I.
Wallner2,
Qiwei
Yang1,
Darryl R.
Peterson1,
Jun
Wada1, and
Yashpal S.
Kanwar1
Departments of 1 Pathology and
2 Medicine,
Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
60611
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mammalian nephrogenesis begins by the reciprocal
interaction of the ureteric bud with the undifferentiated mesenchyme.
The mesenchyme differentiates into an epithelial phenotype with the development of the glomerulus and proximal and distal tubules. At the
same time, the mesenchyme stimulates the branching morphogenesis of the
ureteric bud that differentiates into the collecting ducts. These
inductive interactions and differentiation events are modulated by a
number of macromolecules, including the extracellular matrix (ECM),
integrin receptors, and cell adhesion molecules. Many of these
macromolecules exhibit spatiotemporal developmental regulation in the
metanephros. Some are expressed in the mesenchyme, whereas others
appear in the ureteric bud epithelia. The molecules expressed in the
mesenchyme or at the epithelial:mesenchymal interface may serve as
ligands while those in the epithelia serve as the receptors. In such a
scenario the ligand and the receptor would be ideally suited for
epithelial:mesenchymal paracrine/juxtacrine interactions that are also
influenced by RGD sequences and
Ca2+ binding domains of the ECM
proteins and their receptors. This review addresses the role of such
interactions in metanephric development.
renal development; integrins
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DURING EMBRYONIC LIFE, organogenesis proceeds by the
differentiation and proliferation of multipotent cells leading to the formation of a defined sculpted tissue mass and is followed by a
continuum of cell replication and terminal differentiation in most
mammalian organs, with few exceptions, e.g., nervous system. These
processes involve the participation of various extracellular matrix
(ECM) glycoproteins (72), ECM receptors, i.e., integrins (84), cell
adhesion molecules (CAMs) (12), intracellular cytoskeletal proteins
(59), growth factors or hormones and their receptors (1), DNA-binding
proteins (62), protooncogenes (52), and ECM-degrading enzymes and their
inhibitors (53); as expected, the activities of this diverse group of
macromolecules in fetal development are interlinked. For
instance, ECM glycoproteins influence intracellular events via their
receptors, i.e., integrins, and thereby cell differentiation,
migration, and polarization. On the other hand, the transcription,
translation, and posttranslational modification of ECM macromolecules
have been shown to be regulated by various growth factors or hormones
and their receptors. Another set of macromolecules, i.e., CAMs, which
influence intercellular adhesion and cell:cell (homotypic or
heterotypic) interactions, are also the key participants in the
morphogenesis of various organs during cell:matrix interactions (10).
Finally, critical to cell behavior during differentiation, associated
with organogenesis, is the fundamental process of phosphorylation of
various integrins and hormone receptors or growth factor receptors that
contain tyrosine or serine/threonine kinase intracellular catalytic
domains (101, 113); the latter, as indicated above, are
known to influence the expression of ECM proteins.
The expression of various ECM proteins or their receptors varies
considerably in different developing organ systems during embryonic
life. This means that the macromolecules with restricted spatiotemporal
genotypic or phenotypic expressions are relevant only to the
morphogenesis of a particular organ system. Thus a morphogen is defined
as a molecule that expresses its concentration gradient in a given
tissue and alters the fate of target cells in a dose-dependent
manner. Conceivably, differential concentration gradients
of these macromolecules in various regions of the same developing
tissue would induce different specific cellular events, thus adding
complexity to the differentiation processes that ultimately lead to
regional specialization within a given organ system. Finally, the
magnitude of expression of various morphogenetic elements during fetal
life would suggest that their function is specific for a given stage of
a developing organ system. Although the expression of morphogens may be
stage and tissue specific, a concerted coordination among the various
macromolecules is critical for morphogenesis to proceed normally in the
formation of a particular visceral organ.
Information as to the role of various morphogenetic modulators has been
derived from in vivo knockout experiments in mice as well as in vitro
culture systems applicable to mammary (44), prostate (16), and salivary
glands (6) and lung (123) and kidney (26, 100). In the morphogenesis of
all these organ systems, the epithelial:mesenchymal or ligand:receptor
interactions seem to be a common feature. Although the development of
the mammalian metanephros represents a prototypic example of such
interactions, there are certain distinct features that are unique to
renal development and are discussed below.
 |
GENERAL FEATURES OF METANEPHRIC DEVELOPMENT |
Renal development ensues following the sequential appearance of the
pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros as a craniocaudal wave of
cellular differentiation in the nephrogenic cord lying alongside the
nephric or Wolffian duct (100). In mammals, the pronephros and
mesonephros are rudiments of the nephrogenic cord, and it is the
metanephros that matures to form a permanent kidney. In the mouse,
metanephrogenesis commences at day 11 of gestation (100) by the interaction of the dorsally migrating
ureteric bud, an epithelial-lined tubular structure arising from the
Wolffian duct, with the blastema, a loosely organized mesenchymal mass on the lateral aspect of the aorta in the most caudal segment of the
nephrogenic cord. The migratory intercalation of the ureteric bud into
the blastema is followed by differentiation of the mesenchyme into an
epithelial phenotype and reciprocal inductive arborization of the
ureteric bud and formation of the nascent nephrons. The nascent nephrons are formed by undergoing the following developmental stages: condensate/vesicle, comma-shaped bodies, and S-shaped bodies
(Fig. 1) (26, 100). The distal portion of
the S-shaped body differentiates into various tubular segments, and it
fuses with the ureteric bud branches, which form the collecting ducts of the kidney. The proximal portion of the S-shaped body develops into
precapillary bodies, which upon vascularization by the processes of
vasculogenesis (in situ blood vessel formation) and angiogenesis (sprouting of preexisting capillaries) form functioning mature glomeruli of the mammalian kidney. All these stages of renal glomerular and tubular development can be visualized in a histological section of
the newborn murine kidney, where the immature nephrons are situated
underneath the renal capsule, whereas the most mature nephrons appear
in the deeper cortex. Here, it needs to be mentioned that the processes
of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis of the mammalian embryonic kidney
are rather complex and are beyond the scope of this review, and the
reader is referred to an excellent recent article by Hyink
and Abrahamson (45).

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic drawing depicting various stages of differentiation of the
nephron. Formation of the nephron commences by interaction of the
ureteric bud with loose metanephric mesenchyme. As a result, a
condensate is formed, which goes through the comma-shape- and
S-shape-body stages. This is followed by tubule elongation to form the
precapillary stage nephric unit. The precapillary unit is vascularized
by an ingrowth of extrarenal blood vessels leading to the formation of
a mature glomerulus with an intricate capillary network (modified from
Ref. 49).
|
|
To gain insights into the developmental dynamics of the mammalian
metanephros with respect to epithelial:mesenchymal or
paracrine:juxtacrine interactions, investigators have resorted to in
vitro techniques, including organ or cell culture systems. The cell
culture system, e.g., MDCK cell lines, has been useful in studying the
branching morphogenesis of tubules and the development of their
epithelial junctions and polarity characteristics (76). Recently, a
simple three-dimensional cell culture system using a cell line derived from the embryonic mouse ureteric bud has been described
to study the morphogenesis of kidney tubules (95). Utilizing this
system, Sakurai et al. (95) successfully studied the influence of a large number of growth factors on the branching morphogenesis of the
tubules. Similarly, the influence of various growth factors on
tubulogenesis has been studied in another three-dimensional Matrigel
culture system in which baby mouse kidney cells were used (109). To
study the morphogenesis of the whole kidney and of the glomerulus and
tubules, Grobstein (37, 38) established an in vitro metanephric organ
culture transfilter technique, which has been used widely with certain
modifications (3, 8) for four decades by many investigators. In this
culture system, various developmental stages, with the exception of
vascularization of the metanephros, can be studied. The technique
employs harvesting of either uninduced (day
10.5) or induced (day
11.5) metanephric mesenchyme, placing it on a
microporous (~0.8 µm) filter, and maintaining it in culture for
7-10 days. In this system, the uninduced mesenchyme can be induced
by placing ureteric bud or a heterologous inducer, e.g., embryonic
neural tissue, on the bottom of the filter. The mesenchyme receives the
inductive signals through the pores of the filter, perhaps by
establishing pseudopodal cell-cell contacts (100). Once
the mesenchyme is induced, morphogenesis of the nephrons proceeds
normally even if the inducer is removed after only a brief exposure
(100). The induced mesenchyme goes through a series of differentiation
events leading to glomerulogenesis and tubulogenesis. Finally,
fundamental to the inductive neotransformation of the mesenchyme are
the macromolecules expressed at the epithelial:mesenchymal interface or
ligands expressed in the mesenchyme and receptors in the ureteric bud
epithelium that would be ideally suited for juxtacrine/paracrine
interactions (Fig. 2). The concept of such juxtracrine/paracrine interactions is discussed in this review with
respect to cell:matrix interactions; also, an attempt is made to
establish the relevance of other molecules that influence the
expression of various ECM proteins and their receptors, i.e., growth
factors, and consequently the development of the mammalian metanephros.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Schematic drawing depicting the reciprocal induction of mesenchymal
cells and ureteric bud epithelia in embryonic kidney. The receptors of
growth factors (GFs) and of extracellular matrix (ECM), i.e.,
integrins, are localized in the epithelial cells of the ureteric bud.
The protooncogenes, such as c-ret and
c-ros, which function as tyrosine
kinase receptors, are localized in the ureteric bud epithelium.
Although the ligands of many protooncogenes are unknown, the ligand of
c-ret is a glial-derived neurotrophic
factor (GDNF) and has been shown to be expressed in the metanephric
mesenchyme (96, 111). Among the ECM proteins, some are expressed in the
mesenchyme, while others are expressed at the epithelial:mesenchymal
interface (modified from Ref. 69).
|
|
 |
ECM, ECM-DEGRADING ENZYMES, INTEGRINS, AND CAMS |
Grobstein (37, 38) and Saxen (100) were the pioneers who laid down the
foundation for the work to be pursued by numerous investigators on
metanephric development. They postulated that the basement membrane
(BM) of the ECM, sandwiched between the leading edge of the ureteric
bud and the blastema, could exert a "paracrine" effect, which
would facilitate the interactions between the two cell types and lead
to an epithelial conversion of the mesenchyme and ultimately to the
formation of the metanephros. Since the BM glycoproteins that induce
branching morphogenesis are cytosecretory products of the native or
neotransformed epithelium, the current belief is that the basal lamina
also has a self-stimulatory or "autocrine" effect on the
embryonic tissues during development. Although the impetus for these
studies evolved from the initial detection of constitutively expressed
BM glycoproteins in the metanephric tissues, their simple presence and
expression may not have a specific role at a given stage of embryonic
development. Nevertheless, many functional studies, carried out by
Ekblom (24, 26), Sariola et al. (99), Saxen (100), and others, have
conclusively elucidated the morphogenetic role of certain ECM and
ECM-related macromolecules in renal development.
 |
ECM PROTEINS |
Various ECM molecules expressed during metanephric development are
mesenchymal proteins, i.e., interstitial collagens, tenascin, nidogen
(entactin), and fibronectin; and integral BM glycoproteins, i.e., type
IV collagen, laminin, proteoglycans (PG), and tubulointerstitial antigen (TIN-Ag) (49). Some of the mesenchymal proteins, e.g., interstitial collagens, disappear at day
11 after induction, whereas the mRNA expression of
others, e.g., the splice variants of fibronectin EIIIA, EIIIB, and V,
decreases rapidly after day 15/16 of
murine gestation (81). Although mesenchymal proteins are expressed in
the metanephros, the role of the majority of them, with a few exceptions, remains elusive. For instance, anti-fibronectin antibodies are incapable of perturbing the conversion of mesenchyme to polarized epithelium. Although RGDS peptides that bind to the fibronectin receptor do reduce lobulations of embryonic lungs (24), they are
ineffective in inhibiting metanephrogenesis (99). Also, no nephric
defects in mice lacking fibronectin have been described (34). Tenascin
is another mesenchymal protein that interacts with fibronectin and PGs,
and it appears transiently around the condensates, S-shaped bodies, and
tubules. Although its expression decreases if tubulogenesis is
inhibited (2), no renal defects have been described in
tenascin-deficient knockout mice (92). Nidogen is a
long-sought mesenchymal factor that seems to have a pivotal role in
nephrogenesis. Nidogen is produced by mesenchymal cells, and it
interacts with the
1-chain of
laminin-1 (Fig. 3). This interaction,
apparently, is crucial for the assemblage of the BM (27).
Interestingly, disruption of the binding of the laminin-1
1-chain to nidogen by a
blocking antibody leads to inhibition of nephrogenesis in embryonic
renal explants in culture (23). In contrast to the limited functional
data on the mesenchymal proteins, the role of integral BM
glycoproteins, e.g., laminin and PGs, and their receptors is more well
defined in embryonic development. Type IV collagen and TIN-Ag exhibit a
restricted spatiotemporal distribution in the developing metanephros;
however, the functional data is not yet available (60). Last, although the integral BM proteins seem to appear simultaneously around the
condensate, S-shaped bodies, glomerular capillaries, and tubules (25),
the expression of their individual peptide chains is asynchronous.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Schematic drawing of the model depicting interactions between the
various chains of laminin-1,
6 1,
-dystroglycan, and mesenchymal cell-derived nidogen (entactin)
during epithelial morphogenesis. Conceivably, integrin
6 1
and -dystroglycan are involved in various transductional events,
which may be relevant in cell:matrix interactions influencing the
organogenesis of the mammalian kidney. Arrowhead (with "N")
represents the N-linked oligosaccharide chains attached to the various
components of the dystroglycan complex (modified from Ref.
22).
|
|
Laminin-1 is a high-molecular weight protein with
1-,
1-, and
1-chains organized into a
cross-shaped structure. Its role in metanephric development has been
well documented (11, 27). The expression of laminin chains during early
development is asynchronous and is also species specific and stage
specific (24). The mRNA expression of
1- and
1-laminin chains is detectable
in vitro 24 h after the induction of nephrogenesis in mice. In
contrast, the expression of the
1-chain appears only after 2 days, coinciding with the appearance of polarized epithelia in the
comma- and S-shaped bodies, and is gradually lost from the ureter,
distal tubules, and glomerular BM (GBM). Evidence for a direct role of
laminin in in vitro nephrogenesis was elucidated by using
elastase-generated peptides and chain-specific antibodies, i.e.,
against the carboxy ends of
1-chains (E3) and
1-
1-
1-chains
(E8), the amino terminus of
1-chains (E4), and the central
region of the whole laminin molecule containing the YIGSR-dependent
laminin receptor binding sites (Fig. 3) (24). The antibodies against
E3, the heparin binding domain more recently found to bind to the
dystroglycan complex (see INTEGRINS AND OTHER ECM
RECEPTORS), and E8, the
6
1-integrin receptor binding site (105), inhibited the morphogenesis and formation
of polarized epithelium, whereas antibodies against the central region
of the laminin molecule did not perturb renal development (24).
Interestingly, antibodies directed against the central regions of
laminin do perturb morphogenesis of the lungs (24). During development,
other roles of laminin include angiogenesis and
integrin-receptor-mediated attachment, with the activities confined to
YIGSR sequences of laminin
1-chain and RGD sequences of
the
1-chain,
respectively (27). The expression of
1-chain is confined to larger
blood vessels (24), whereas that of the
2-chain is confined
to capillaries of the mature renal glomeruli. Such
stage-specific isoforms or switches in their expressions are also seen
in other proteins that regulate development, e.g., PGs.
PGs play a significant role in the morphogenesis of several tissues
(126). The PGs are made up of glycosaminoglycan (GAGs) chains that are
bound by O-glycosidic linkage to the
core peptide. A number of different types of PGs are expressed in the
kidney, including heparan sulfate-proteoglycan (HSPG) (63), chondroitin sulfate-proteoglycan (CSPG) (50), and decorin and biglycan (9). The
basal lamina-specific HSPG is known as perlecan (78), whereas those
that are cell membrane bound belong to the family of syndecans (7). The
latter are present in the mesenchyme and early differentiating epithelium, and they gradually disappear with the maturation of the
nephron (7). Initially, at the time of induction, the sulfated PGs are
highly concentrated at the "tips" of the ureteric bud branches,
i.e., the epithelial:mesenchymal interface and the site where nascent
nephrons are formed. Later on, they are seen around the
condensate and persist in the BMs throughout the fetal and neonatal
periods (63). Inhibition of synthesis of sulfated PGs by puromycin or
addition of GAG chains onto the core peptide is associated with
blunting of the tips of ureteric bud branches and dysmorphogenesis of
the kidney (63, 65). Incidentally, addition of heparin sulfate, and not
heparan sulfate, to culture medium also inhibits nephrogenesis (85).
Thus it appears that the biological actions of PGs are mediated via
their GAG chains. This notion has been supported by the experiments
with salivary glands, where enzymatic deletion of GAGs was shown to
inhibit lobulogenesis (4). The GAG chains can interact with other
matrix molecules, such as the E8 fragment of laminin (105), and they also act as reservoirs for various growth factors, e.g., basic fibroblast growth factor (90), and thus can influence morphogenesis by
more than one mechanism.
Some of the growth factors or their receptors which have been shown to
modulate the expression of PGs and are linked to the morphogensis of
the kidney include insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and
transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) and -
(TGF-
) (56,
66-68, 87-89, 121). Conceivably, the epithelial:mesenchymal interactions also take place among these molecules, since the ligands,
like insulin or IGF-I, are expressed in the mesenchyme while their
receptors are in the ureteric bud epithelia, and both of these display
a restricted spatiotemporal distribution during metanephric development
(66, 68, 121). The addition of IGF-I or insulin into the organ culture
medium leads to hypertrophy/hyperplasia of the metanephric explants,
concomitant with an increase in mRNA and protein expression of the PGs
(66, 67). On the other hand, gene disruption of the IGF-I or insulin
receptors by addition of antisense oligonucleotides in organ culture
leads to atrophy of the explants with markedly decreased expression of
the PGs, especially at the tips of the ureteric bud branches, the site where epithelial:mesenchymal interactions take place (66, 121). Similarly, gene disruption of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) receptor, i.e., c-ret
protooncogene with a phosphotyrosine kinase catalytic
domain (111), leads to a remarkable dysmorphogenesis of the kidney
concomitant with a dramatic decrease in the expression of ECM proteins,
in particular, that of the PGs (69). Conceivably, GDNF, a molecule
related to the TGF-
superfamily, is expressed in the mesenchyme,
whereas c-ret is in the ureteric bud
epithelia, and in vivo gene disruption of either of these also leads to
the agenesis or hypogenesis of the kidney (96, 103). This
scenario again reemphasizes the importance of epithelial:mesenchymal
interactions in renal development. Here it is relevant to mention the
role of another matrix protein, i.e., bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7), in renal development. BMP-7 belongs to the TGF-
superfamily and is involved in the mineralization of cartilage (42). Its spatiotemporal mRNA expression in the metanephros is somewhat controversial. Dudley et al. (19) reported that at day
14.5 of gestation, BMP-7 mRNA transcripts are expressed
in the mesenchyme of the nephrogenic zone, the condensing aggregates,
and the epithelia of comma- and S-shaped bodies, with a weaker
expression in the ureteric buds. However, Luo et al. (71)
and Vukicevic et al. (117) reported that at day
12.5, BMP-7 mRNA is expressed in both the ureteric bud
and condensed mesenchymal cells around these and at
day 14.5 in the condensing aggregate,
comma- and S-shaped bodies, and vascularized glomeruli. These
differences appear to be related to the time of gestation at which the
tissues were examined and how rigorously the tissues were processed for
in situ hybridization. Nevertheless, these studies do not in any way
undermine the role of BMP-7 in metanephric development, since two
independent studies indicate that BMP-7-deficient mice exhibit hypogenesis/agenesis of the kidney, in addition to
anomalies of the eye and skeletal systems (19, 71). Here,
it is worth mentioning that since BMP-7, a member of TGF-
superfamily, modulates the synthesis of PGs (31), it is
conceivable that the effects of BMP-7 on the metanephric development
are mediated via the PGs. Further evidence that TGF-
, a modulator of
the expression of PGs, plays a role in nephrogenesis is
derived from cell culture studies, where TGF-
was found
to perturb tubulogenesis of MDCK cells grown in collagen
gels (97). The mechanism by which TGF-
modulates the expression of
PGs is rather complex. TGF-
seems to exert its
influence via about nine binding proteins or receptors, and among them
the first three are well characterized. Type I and II receptors contain
serine/threonine kinase domains. Upon their heterodimerization, there
is an activation of the Mad
("mothers against dpp") signaling pathway leading to target gene
expression. The type III receptors are made up of endoglin and
betaglycan, and both are transmembrane PGs with serine and threonine
residues, which are likely to be phosphorylated by protein kinase C and would be expected to influence the expression of the target genes. For a detailed discussion of TGF-
signaling pathways,
there is a recent excellent review by Derynack and Feng
(18).
 |
ECM-DEGRADING ENZYMES |
From the above discussion, it seems that a concentration gradient of
PGs, with the highest content being at the tips of the ureteric bud
branches or epithelial:mesenchymal interface, is necessary to maintain
nephrogenesis. A similar concentration gradient of PGs in salivary
glands, i.e., cleft vs. the advancing tips, is thought to be
responsible for their lobulogenesis (4). Such concentration gradients
also are observed for other ECM glycoproteins, e.g., type III collagen,
whose expression is highest in the cleft (75). These gradients may be
due to their constitutive expression or to a relative local deficiency
of degrading enzymes like collagenases or gelatinases. The latter are
collectively known as matrix metalloproteinases, and they are zinc
metal-dependent proteolytic enzymes (107, 124). Their role in
organotypic epithelial:mesenchymal interaction was originally proposed
three decades ago by Grobstein and Cohen (36) and Wessells and Cohen
(125). Direct evidence implicating a differential gradient of collagen
fragments initiating cleft formation and lobulogenesis was provided by
studies in which treatment with bacterial collagenase perturbed the
branching morphogenesis of salivary glands (32, 40). In contrast,
collagenase inhibitors stimulated branching morphogenesis of the
salivary glands (74). In lungs, an enhanced gelatinase-A (matrix
metalloproteinase-2, MMP-2) activity, in response to TGF-
and
epidermal growth factor (EGF), has been reported to inhibit
arborization of the pulmonary alveoli (33). Conversely, increased
expression of stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) in transgenic mice correlates with
the accentuated lobulation of the mammary gland (108, 127). Along these
lines, the increasing mRNA expression of MMP-2 in stromal cells and of
membrane type-1 MMP (MT-1-MMP) in ureteric bud epithelia during
embryonic life, and decreasing levels during the postnatal period may
suggest their role in the organogenesis of the kidney (79). Such a
distribution of MMP-2 and MT-1-MMP would be conducive for the
epithelial:mesenchymal interactions to take place. Moreover, it is
conceivable that it is the trimacromolecular complex of
MT-1-MMP:MMP-2:TIMP-2 (TIMP-2 is the tissue inhibitor of MMPs) that may
influence the morphogenesis of the embryonic kidney (79). However, it
should be noted that the anti-MMP-2 antibodies fail to inhibit the
organogenesis of the kidney (64). The failure to perturb renal
morphogenesis by the latter may be due to the fact that anti-MMP-2
antibodies may not be of the blocking type. Nevertheless, MMP-9,
expressed in the metanephros, has been shown to play a role in the
organogenesis of the kidney (64). The role of MMPs in organogenesis can
be also extrapolated from studies on MDCK cell culture systems. In these cell culture systems, Nigam and colleagues (93, 94) have been
able to demonstrate a parallel rise or fall in the mRNA expression of
MMP-1 with stimulation or inhibition of branching morphogenesis under
the influence of TGF-
or ligands of the EGF receptor, e.g., TGF-
.
Other matrix-degrading enzymes, which conceivably may play a role in
nephrogenesis, include various serine proteases. Among these,
tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) has been localized to S-shaped
bodies and glomeruli, whereas the urokinase-type (uPA) has maximal gene
expression in renal tubular epithelia (98). Both tPA and uPA can
degrade ECM either on their own or by activating latent MMPs. Although
these matrix-degrading proteases are expressed in the embryonic
kidneys, mice lacking tPA and uPA do not reveal any embryological
abnormalities (14). However, in vitro, the tubulogenesis of MDCK cells
is inhibited by inhibitors of serine proteases, whose enzymatic
activities and expression are modulated by a known morphogen, i.e.,
hepatocyte growth factor (82).
 |
INTEGRINS AND OTHER ECM RECEPTORS |
Integrins are transmembrane, heterodimeric, noncovalently bound
glycoprotein complexes consisting of
- and
-chains, are widely
distributed in various tissues, and mediate diverse biological functions including cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, cell polarity, cell migration, and angiogenesis (84). More than 20 integrins
have been discovered in various tissues, and these serve as receptors
for various morphogenetic ECM proteins, e.g., laminin-1. Although both
chains participate in divalent cation-dependent and
peptide-sequence-specific ligand binding, the
-subunit largely determines the substrate specificity with ECM proteins. The
intracytoplasmic tail of the
-chain is responsible for its
interactions with the cell cytoskeleton via binding to talin, vinculin,
and
-actinin and may be also involved in transductional events,
since certain
-subunits contain tyrosine phosphorylation sites (84).
In the metanephros, integrin exhibits spatiotemporal expression. Among the
1-integrins,
1
1
and
4
1
are expressed in the uninduced mesenchyme, whereas
3
1,
2
1,
and
6
1
are distributed at the interface between the basal lamina and the
plasmalemma of the foot processes of developing podocytes, endothelia,
and tubular epithelium, respectively (54, 55). The
6-subunit, expressed in the
cells of the condensing mesenchyme and polarized tubular epithelium,
codistributes with the laminin
1-chain. The
6
1-integrin serves as a receptor for the E8 fragment of
1-
1-
1-chains
of laminin (Fig. 3), and, like the E8 laminin-1 fragment,
anti-
6 antibodies also perturb
the formation of polarized nephric epithelium and branching
morphogenesis of salivary glands and tubulogenesis of the metanephros
in vitro (24, 29). In addition to
6
1,
2
1
and
3
1
also bind to laminins, and
2-integrin is expressed in the
distal tubules, with
3 in the
maturing glomerular podocytes (22). Although
2
1
binds to laminin, its binding affinity to type IV collagen is much
higher (83, 114). Since type IV collagen is present during early stages
of tubule formation and maturation of nephrons, it is likely that its
interaction with
2
1
is physiologically relevant in renal tubulogenesis.
The notion that integrins play a role in metanephric development is
also supported by in vivo knockout experiments. The most interesting
results have been obtained with the gene disruption of the
8-subunit of
8
1-integrin,
as a consequence of which an almost complete arrest of nephrogenesis
was observed (73). Although a target mutation in the integrin
3 gene does not lead to
agenesis/hypogenesis of the embryonic kidney, some degree of growth
retardation of the metanephros is observed (57). Along these lines, in
vitro gene disruption of
2
1-integrin
leads to a failure in the branching morphogenesis of tubules in the
MDCK cell collagen gel culture system (91). Since the E8 fragment of
laminin-1 also interacts with
3
1-
and
7
1-integrins,
it would suggest that their common
-subunit may also have a
functional role in morphogenesis (55). In this regard,
anti-
1 antibodies have been
shown to cause functional impairment in mammary epithelia and block the
differentiation of colon carcinoma cells and the formation of glandular
structures in three-dimensional collagen gels (24). The role of
1 in nephrogenesis has received
limited attention (29), but its in vivo gene disruption is associated with peri-implantation lethality (106). Among the
v-related integrins,
v
3
has been reported to be present on the endothelial cells of glomerular
and extraglomerular capillaries (55). The
v
3
binds to a number of ligands including vitronectin, fibrinogen, von
Willebrand factor, thrombospondin, fibronectin, osteopontin, bone
sialoprotein, thrombin, laminin, and collagens type I and IV (35). With
such a broad range of interactions, one would expect
v
3
to participate in diverse biological functions, particularly in
angiogenesis. Its relevance to renal angiogenesis, however, remains to
be investigated. Certainly,
v-related integrins do play a
role in metanephric development, as assessed by gene disruption with
the inclusion of
v-specific
antisense deoxyoligonucleotides in the metanephric culture system
(119).
Dystroglycan complex is another recently discovered ECM receptor
molecule that seems to be relevant to the morphogenesis of the
mammalian kidney (Fig. 3). The dystroglycan complex is made up of
several proteins forming a transmembrane linkage between muscle laminin
and the cytoskeleton (13, 28). The complex includes six proteins, i.e.,
- and
-dystroglycans,
-,
-, and
-sarcoglycans, and a
25-kDa protein. The
-dystroglycan is extracellular, and it binds to
E3-like G domains of laminin-2 in muscle and possibly interacts with
laminin-1 as well. The
-dystroglycan, which is transmembrane, binds
to the COOH terminus of intracellular dystrophin, and the
NH2 terminus of the latter has
binding affinities with F-actin. By in situ hybridization, it has been
shown that dystroglycan and laminin
1-chains are coexpressed in
epithelial components of the developing metanephros, and both exhibit a
restricted spatiotemporal distribution (21). Since extracellular
-dystroglycan interacts with the E3 domain of laminin
1-chain that regulates
morphogenesis of the kidney, it is conceivable that the dystroglycan
complex plays some role in renal development. Indeed, inclusion of
monoclonal antibodies, which are known to block the binding of
-dystroglycan to laminin-1, in culture perturb the morphogenesis of
the developing metanephros, in particular, that of the differentiating
epithelium (21). The relevance of this newly discovered ligand:receptor interaction reinforces the original contention of Grobstein (37) as to
the significance of epithelial:mesenchymal interactions in
metanephrogenesis.
 |
CAMS AND SIALOGLYCOCONJUGATES |
CAMs are integral plasma membrane glycoproteins like integrin receptors
or the dystroglycan complex and may play a role in metanephric
development. They may be involved in the increased adhesiveness of
cells to form condensates around the ureteric bud branches during
development. Two types of CAMs, i.e., neural (N-CAM) and liver (L-CAM),
are expressed in the kidney (51, 116). The N-CAM, a heavily sialyated
glycoprotein, is distributed in the uninduced mesenchyme. L-CAM
(E-cadherin or uvomorulin), a prototype of class I cadherin and a
glycosylated protein with adhesive properties confined to its 26-kDa
fragment, appears subsequent to induction in the condensates and at
lateral surfaces of the differentiated polarized tubular epithelium,
coinciding with the expression of laminin
1-chain, thus suggesting its
potential role in tubulogenesis. However, antibodies to both L-CAM and
N-CAM do not inhibit the conversion of mesenchyme to an epithelial
phenotype of the metanephros (51, 116) or affect the morphogenesis of MDCK cells (39). Also, N-CAM-deficient mice do not exhibit any renal
abnormalities (15). Incidentally, anti-uvomorulin antibodies perturb
compaction at the 8- to 16-cell stage of the primitive embryonic tissues, which may be due to interference with protein kinase
C-dependent phosphorylation (104) and disruption of uvomorulin:actin interactions mediated via
- and
-catenins, which associate with the intracytoplasmic domain of uvomorulin (80). Another CAM, a
prototype of class II cadherin is K-cadherin. K-cadherin is specifically expressed in the kidney, and it mediates
Ca2+-dependent homophilic cell
aggregation (128); its role in nephrogenesis remains to be
investigated. Tensin is another newly discovered F-actin binding
protein and is expressed in the kidney; however, it regulates postnatal
renal development only (70). Thus it is not clear whether the actin
binding proteins are essential to the organogenesis of the embryonic
kidney. It would be interesting to investigate whether the proteins
that do not bind to actin, e.g., Dp140
(a product of Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus), and are expressed in
the embryonic metanephros (20) have any role in renal organogenesis.
Sialoconjugates (43, 61), including podocalyxin (102), and sialylated
glycosphingolipids (gangliosides) (99), as well as many other N-linked
oligosaccharides (30) are expressed in the kidney.
Podocalyxin may be the major sialoglycoprotein in the developing
glomerular epithelium involved in podocyte-GBM interactions (102). The
gangliosides are ubiquitously distributed in various tissues and
display cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesive properties by modulating
protein kinase C and tyrosine kinase activities (115). Two gangliosides
of interest are GD2 and
GD3. GD3 is expressed on
well-differentiated podocytes, metanephric mesenchyme, and interstitial
cells near the stalk of the ureter. Since
GD3 is expressed at the cell
surfaces and its antibodies markedly inhibit tubulogenesis, this
suggests that cell:cell contact in epithelial:mesenchymal interactions
is crucial for metanephric development (99).
 |
CONCLUDING REMARKS |
Renal morphogenesis constitutes a defined period of intense cellular
activity, inductive transformation of undifferentiated cells to
polarized epithelia, ingrowth of capillaries into an intricate
parenchymal epithelial-mesenchymal mass, and finally the maturation
into an organ with diverse structural and biological functions. A large
number of factors are operative, in a defined sequence during
nephrogenesis, which are tightly regulated to attain a successful
outcome, that is, the genesis of functioning nephrons. During the last
2-3 decades, a wealth of information has been generated that allows us
to have a greatly expanded insight into the overall cellular events
relevant to renal organogenesis. It should be emphasized that
modulation of the interactions between various ECM glycoproteins,
ECM-degrading enzymes and their inhibitors, CAMs, integrins, and growth
factors and their receptors are required for proper
epithelial:mesenchymal interactions essential to the normal processes
of nephrogenesis. Considerable progress has been made, and the roles of
such macromolecules have been elucidated in renal development over the
last few years. The list is rapidly growing, and the roles
of other matrix or plasmalemmal proteins, which are
expressed in the kidney, require delineation, e.g., crystallins
(neuro-ectodermal lens proteins) (48), osteopontin (2ar) (77), SPARC (secreted protein,
acidic and rich in cysteine), also known as osteonectin and BMP-40
(47), epimorphins (mesenchymal cell-surface proteins) (41), polycystin
(46a), the hedgehog family of proteins (46), and yet-to-be-described
other mesenchymal or epithelial-derived molecules. Similarly
understudied and requiring attention, the molecules that may regulate
matrix protein expression and consequently the renal
vasculogenesis/angiogenesis include tyrosine kinase receptors,
flk-1 and ELK, and their putative
ligands, VEGF and LERK-2 (17, 86, 112). Also, there are several other novel genes encoding mesenchymal or plasmalemmal proteins that have
been discovered in the embryonic kidney by differential-display and
-representation techniques (58, 120), and their role in metanephric
development remains to be investigated. Finally, another area of
considerable interest is that which includes the molecules that are
developmentally regulated in several organ systems and interact with
matrix proteins, e.g., galectins (5, 118, 122).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK-28492.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests: Y. S. Kanwar, Dept. of Pathology,
Northwestern Univ. Medical School, 303 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL
60611.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Adamson, E. D.
Growth factors and their receptors in development.
Dev. Genet.
14:
159-164,
1993[Medline].
2.
Aufderheide, E.,
R. Chiquet-Ehrismann,
and
P. Ekblom.
Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the developing kidney lead to expression of tenascin in the mesenchyme.
J. Cell Biol.
105:
599-608,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Avner, E. D.,
D. Ellis,
T. Temple,
and
R. Jaffe.
Metanephric development in serum-free organ culture.
In Vitro (Rockville)
18:
675-682,
1982[Medline].
4.
Banerjee, S. D.,
R. H. Cohn,
and
M. R. Bernfield.
Basal lamina of embryonic salivary epithelia. Production by the epithelium and role in maintaining lobular morphology.
J. Cell Biol.
73:
445-463,
1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Barondes, S. H.,
D. N. W. Cooper,
M. A. Gitt,
and
H. Leffler.
Galectins: structure and function of a large family of animal lectins.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
20807-20810,
1994[Free Full Text].
6.
Bernfield, M.,
S. Banerjee,
J. E. Koda,
and
A. C. Rapraeger.
Remodeling of the basement membrane: morphogenesis and maturation.
Ciba Found. Symp.
108:
179-196,
1984[Medline].
7.
Bernfield, M., M. T. Hinkes, and R. L. Gallo.
Developmental expression of the syndecans: possible function and
regulation. Development Suppl.: 205-212,
1993.
8.
Bernstein, J.,
F. Chen,
and
J. Roszka.
Glomerular differentiation in metanephric culture.
Lab. Invest.
45:
183-190,
1981[Medline].
9.
Bianco, P.,
L. W. Fisher,
M. F. Young,
J. D. Termine,
and
P. G. Robey.
Expression and localization of the two small proteoglycans biglycan and decorin in developing human skeletal and non-skeletal tissues.
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
38:
1549-1563,
1990[Abstract].
10.
Birchmeier, C.,
and
W. Birchmeier.
Molecular aspects of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
9:
511-540,
1993.
11.
Burgeson, R. E.,
M. Chiquet,
R. Deutzmann,
P. Ekblom,
J. Engel,
H. Kleinman,
G. R. Martin,
G. Meneguzzi,
M. Paulsson,
J. Sanes,
R. Timpl,
K. Tryggvason,
Y. Yamada,
and
P. D. Yurchenco.
A new nomenclature for the laminins.
Matrix Biol.
14:
209-211,
1994[Medline].
12.
Buxton, R. S.,
and
A. I. Magee.
Structure and interactions of desmosomal and other cadherins.
Semin. Cell Biol.
3:
157-167,
1992[Medline].
13.
Campbell, K. P.
Three muscular dystrophies: loss of cytoskeleton-extracellular matrix linkage.
Cell
80:
675-679,
1995[Medline].
14.
Carmeliet, P.,
L. Schoonjans,
L. Kieckens,
B. Ream,
J. Degen,
R. Bronson,
R. De Vos,
J. J. van den Oord,
D. Collen,
and
R. C. Mulligan.
Physiological consequences of loss of plasminogen activator gene function in mice.
Nature
368:
419-424,
1994[Medline].
15.
Cremer, H.,
R. Lange,
A. Christoph,
M. Plomann,
G. Vopper,
J. Roes,
R. Brown,
S. Baldwin,
P. Kraemer,
S. Scheff,
D. Barthels,
K. Rajewsky,
and
W. Wille.
Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning.
Nature
367:
455-459,
1994[Medline].
16.
Cunha, G. R.
Role of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in normal and abnormal development of mammary gland and prostate.
Cancer Suppl.
74:
1030-1044,
1994.
17.
Daniel, T. O.,
E. Stein,
D. P. Cerretti,
P. L. St.-John,
B. Robert,
and
D. R. Abrahamson.
ELK and LERK-2 in developing kidney and microvascular endothelial assembly.
Kidney Int.
50:
73-81,
1996.
18.
Derynack, R.,
and
X. H. Feng.
TGF-
receptor signalling.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1333:
105-150,
1997.
19.
Dudley, A. T.,
K. M. Lyons,
and
E. J. Robertson.
A requirement for bone morphogenetic protein-7 during development of the mammalian kidney and eye.
Genes Dev.
9:
2795-2807,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Durbeej, M.,
D. Jung,
T. Hjalt,
K. P. Campbell,
and
P. Ekblom.
Transient expression of Dp 140, a product of Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus, during kidney tubulogenesis.
Dev. Biol.
181:
156-167,
1997[Medline].
21.
Durbeej, M.,
E. Larsson,
O. Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya,
S. L. Roberds,
K. P. Campbell,
and
P. Ekblom.
Non-muscle a-dystroglycan is involved in epithelial development.
J. Cell Biol.
130:
79-91,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Ekblom, P.
Extracellular matrix and cell adhesion molecules in nephrogenesis.
Exp. Nephrol.
4:
92-96,
1996[Medline].
23.
Ekblom, P.,
M. Ekblom,
L. Fecker,
G. Klein,
H. Zhang,
Y. Kadoya,
M.-L. Chu,
U. Mayer,
and
R. Timpl.
Role of mesenchymal nidogen for epithelial morphogenesis in vitro.
Development
120:
2003-2014,
1994[Abstract].
24.
Ekblom, P.
Basement membranes in development.
In: Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Basement Membranes, edited by D. H. Rohrbach,
and R. Timpl. New York: Academic, 1993, p. 359-383.
25.
Ekblom, P.
Formation of basement membranes in embryonic kidney: an immunohistochemical study.
J. Cell Biol.
91:
1-10,
1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Ekblom, P.
Renal development.
In: The Kidney, edited by D. W. Seldin,
and G. Giebisch. New York: Raven, 1992, p. 475-501.
27.
Engel, J.
Structure and function of laminin.
In: Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Basement Membranes, edited by D. H. Rohrbach,
and R. Timpl. New York: Academic, 1993, p. 147-171.
28.
Ervasti, J. M.,
and
K. P. Campbell.
A role for the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex as a transmembrane linker between laminin and actin.
J. Cell Biol.
122:
809-823,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Falk, M.,
K. Salmivirta,
M. Durbeej,
E. Larsson,
M. Ekblom,
D. Vestweber,
and
P. Ekblom.
Integrin
6
1 is involved in kidney tubulogenesis in vitro.
J. Cell Sci.
109:
2801-2810,
1996[Abstract].
30.
Fleming, S.
N-linked oligosaccharides during human renal organogenesis.
J. Anat.
170:
151-160,
1990[Medline].
31.
Flechtenmacher, J.,
K. Huch,
E. J. Thonar,
J. A. Mollenhauer,
S. R. Davies,
T. M. Schmid,
W. Puhl,
and
T. K. Sampath.
Recombinant human osteogenic protein 1 is a potent stimulator of the synthesis of cartilage proteoglycans and collagens by human articular chondrocytes.
Arthritis Rheum.
39:
1896-1904,
1996[Medline].
32.
Fukuda, Y.,
Y. Masuda,
J.-I. Kishi,
Y. Hashimoto,
T. Hayakawa,
H. Nogawa,
and
Y. Nakanishi.
The role of collagens in cleft formation of mouse embryonic submandibular gland during initial branching.
Development
103:
259-267,
1988[Abstract].
33.
Ganser, G. L.,
G. P. Stricklin,
and
L. M. Martisian.
EGF and TGF-
influence in vitro lung development by induction of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases.
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
35:
453-461,
1991[Medline].
34.
George, E. L.,
E. N. Georges-Labouesse,
R. S. Patel-King,
H. Rayburn,
and
R. O. Hynes.
Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin.
Development
119:
1079-1091,
1993[Abstract].
35.
Gladson, C. L.,
and
D. A. Cheresh.
The
v integrins.
In: Integrins: The Biological Problems, edited by Y. Takada. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994, p. 83-89.
36.
Grobstein, C.,
and
J. Cohen.
Collagenase: effect on the morphogenesis of embryonic salivary epithelium in vitro.
Science
150:
626-628,
1965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37.
Grobstein, C.
Mechanism of organogenetic tissue interaction.
Natl. Cancer Inst Monogr.
26:
279-299,
1967.
38.
Grobstein, C.
Trans-filter induction of tubules in mouse metanephric mesenchyme.
Exp. Cell Res.
10:
424-440,
1956[Medline].
39.
Gumbiner, B.,
B. Stevenson,
and
A. Grimaldi.
The role of cell-adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex.
J. Cell Biol.
107:
1575-1587,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40.
Hayakawa, T., J.-I. Kishi, and Y. Nakanishi. Salivary gland
morphogenesis: possible involvement of collagenase.
Matrix 1, Suppl.: 344-351, 1992.
41.
Hirai, Y.,
K. Takebe,
M. Takashina,
S. Kobayashi,
and
M. Takeichi.
Epimorphin: A mesenchymal protein essential for epithelial morphogenesis.
Cell
49:
471-481,
1992.
42.
Hogan, B. L. M.
Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development.
Genes Dev.
10:
1580-1594,
1996[Free Full Text].
43.
Holthofer, H.,
R. A. Henningar,
and
B. A. Schulte.
Glomerular sialoconjugates of developing and mature rat kidneys.
Cell Differ.
24:
215-222,
1988[Medline].
44.
Howlett, A. R.,
and
M. J. Bissell.
The influence of tissue micro-environment (stroma and extracellular matrix) on the development and function of mammary epithelium.
Epithelial Cell Biol.
2:
79-89,
1993[Medline].
45.
Hyink, D. P.,
and
D. R. Abrahamson.
Origin of the glomerular vasculature in the developing kidney.
Semin. Nephrol.
15:
300-314,
1995[Medline].
46.
Ingham, P. W.
Signalling by hedgehog family proteins in Drosophila and vertebrate development.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:
492-498,
1995[Medline].
46a.
International Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium.
Polycystic kidney disease: the complete structure of PKD1 gene and its protein.
Cell
81:
289-298,
1995[Medline].
47.
Iruela-Arispe, M. L.,
T. F. Lane,
D. Redmond,
M. Reilly,
R. P. Bolender,
T. J. Kavanagh,
and
E. H. Sage.
Expression of SPARC during development of chicken chorioallantoic membrane: evidence for regulated proteolysis in vivo.
Mol. Biol. Cell
6:
327-343,
1995[Abstract].
48.
Iwaki, T.,
A. Iwaki,
R. K. H. Liem,
and
J. E. Goldman.
Expression of
B-crystallin in the developing rat kidney.
Kidney Int.
40:
52-56,
1991[Medline].
49.
Kanwar, Y. S.,
F. A. Carone,
A. Kumar,
J. Wada,
K. Ota,
and
E. I. Wallner.
Role of extracellular matrix, growth factors and proto-oncogenes in metanephric development.
Kidney Int.
52:
589-606,
1997[Medline].
50.
Klein, D. J.,
D. M. Brown,
A. Moran,
T. R. Oegema,
and
J. L. Platt.
Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan synthesis and reutilization of
-D-xyloside-initiated chondroitin/dermatan sulfate glycosaminoglycans in fetal kidney branching morphogenesis.
Dev. Biol.
133:
515-528,
1989[Medline].
51.
Klein, G.,
M. Langegger,
C. Goridis,
and
P. Ekblom.
Neural cell adhesion molecules during embryonic induction and development of the kidney.
Development
102:
749-761,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
52.
Klein, G.
Oncogenes in Cancer Medicine (3rd ed.), edited by J. F. Holland. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1993, p. 65-77.
53.
Kleiner, D. E.,
and
W. G. Stetler-Stevenson.
Structural biochemistry and activation of matrix metalloproteinases.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5:
891-897,
1993[Medline].
54.
Korhonen, M.,
J. Ylänne,
L. Laitinen,
and
I. Viratanen.
The
1-
6 subunits of integrins are characteristically expressed in distinct segments of developing and adult human nephron.
J. Cell Biol.
111:
1245-1254,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
55.
Korhonen, M.,
J. Ylänne,
L. Laitinen,
and
I. Viratanen.
Distribution of
1 and
3 integrins in human fetal and adult kidney.
Lab. Invest.
62:
616-625,
1990[Medline].
56.
Kovacs, J.,
F. A. Carone,
Z. Z. Liu,
S. Nakumara,
A. Kumar,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Differential growth factor-induced modulation of proteoglycans synthesized by normal human renal versus cyst-derived cells.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
5:
47-54,
1994[Abstract].
57.
Kreidberg, J. A.,
M. J. Donovan,
S. L. Goldstein,
H. Rennke,
K. Shepherd,
R. Jones,
and
R. Jaenisch.
3
1 integrin has a crucial role in kidney and lung organogenesis.
Development
122:
3537-3547,
1996[Abstract].
58.
Kretzler, M.,
G. Fan,
D. Rose,
L. J. Arend,
J. P. Briggs,
and
L. B. Holzman.
Novel mouse embryonic renal marker gene products differentially expressed during kidney development.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 40):
F770-F777,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
59.
Kries, T. E.,
and
R. D. Vale.
Guidebook to Cytoskeletal and Motor Proteins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
60.
Kumar, A.,
K. Ota,
J. Wada,
E. I. Wallner,
A. S. Charonis,
F. A. Carone,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Developmental regulation and partial-length cloning of tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen of murine metanephros.
Kidney Int.
52:
620-627,
1997[Medline].
61.
Laitinen, L.,
I. Viratanen,
and
L. Saxen.
Changes in the glycosylation pattern during embryonic development of mouse kidney as revealed with lectin conjugates.
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
35:
55-65,
1987[Abstract].
62.
Latchman, D. S.
Transcription Factors. New York: IRL, 1993.
63.
Lelongt, B.,
H. Makino,
T. M. Dalecki,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Role of proteoglycan in metanephric development.
Dev. Biol.
128:
256-276,
1988[Medline].
64.
Lelongt, B.,
G. Trugnan,
G. Murphy,
and
P. M. Ronco.
Matrix metalloproteinases MMP2 and MMP9 are produced in early stages of kidney morphogenesis but only MMP9 is required for renal organogenesis in vitro.
J. Cell Biol.
136:
1363-1373,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
65.
Liu, Z. Z.,
T. M. Dalecki,
N. Kashihara,
E. I. Wallner,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Effect of puromycin on metanephric differentiation. Morphological, autoradiographic and biochemical studies.
Kidney Int.
39:
1140-1155,
1991[Medline].
66.
Liu, Z. Z.,
A. Kumar,
K. Ota,
E. I. Wallner,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Developmental regulation and the role of insulin and insulin receptor in metanephrogenesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:
6758-6763,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
67.
Liu, Z. Z.,
A. Kumar,
E. I. Wallner,
J. Wada,
F. A. Carone,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Trophic effect of insulin-like growth factor-I on metanephric development: relationship to proteoglycans.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
65:
378-391,
1994[Medline].
68.
Liu, Z. Z.,
J. Wada,
K. Alvares,
A. Kumar,
E. I. Wallner,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Distribution and relevance of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor in metanephric development.
Kidney Int.
44:
1242-1250,
1993[Medline].
69.
Liu, Z. Z.,
J. Wada,
A. Kumar,
F. A. Carone,
M. Takahashi,
and
Y. S. Kanwar.
Comparative role of phosphotyrosine kinase domains of c-ros and c-ret proto-oncogenes in metanephric development with respect to growth factors and matrix morphogens.
Dev. Biol.
178:
133-148,
1996[Medline].
70.
Lo, S. H.,
Q.-C. Yu,
L. Degenstein,
L. B. Chen,
and
E. Fuchs.
Progressive kidney degeneration in mice lacking tensin.
J. Cell Biol.
136:
1349-1361,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
71.
Luo, G.,
C. Hofmann,
A. L. J. J. Bronckers,
M. Sohocki,
A. Bradley,
and
G. Karsenty.
BMP-7 is an inducer of nephrogenesis and is also required for eye development and skeletal patterning.
Genes Dev.
9:
2808-2820,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
72.
Matrisian, L. M.,
and
B. L. M. Hogan.
Growth factor regulated proteases and extracellular matrix remodeling during mammalian development.
Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.
24:
219-259,
1990[Medline].
73.
Muller, U.,
D. Wang,
S. Denda,
J. J. Meneses,
R. A. Pedersen,
and
L. F. Reichardt.
Integrin
8
1 is critically important for epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during kidney morphogenesis.
Cell
88:
603-613,
1997[Medline].
74.
Nakanishi, Y.,
F. Sugiura,
J. Kishi,
and
T. Hayakawa.
Collagenase inhibitor stimulates cleft formation during early morphogenesis of mice salivary gland.
Dev. Biol.
113:
201-206,
1986[Medline].
75.
Nakanishi, Y.,
H. Nogawa,
Y. Hashimoto,
J.-I. Kishi,
and
T. Hayakawa.
Accumulation of collagen III at cleft points of developing mouse submandibular epithelium.
Development
104:
51-59,
1988[Abstract].
76.
Nathke, I. S., L. E. Hinck, and J. W. Nelson. Epithelial cell adhesion and development of cell
surface polarity: possible mechanisms for modulation of cadherin
function, organization and distribution. J. Cell
Sci. 17, Suppl.:
139-145, 1993.
77.
Nomura, S.,
A. J. Wills,
D. R. Edwards,
J. K. Heath,
and
B. L. M. Hogan.
Developmental expression of 2ar (Osteopontin) and SPARC (Osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization.
J. Cell Biol.
106:
441-450,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
78.
Noonan, D. M.,
and
J. R. Hassell.
Proteoglycans of basement membrane.
In: Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Basement Membranes, edited by D. H. Rohrbach,
and R. Timpl. New York: Academic, 1993, p. 189-210.
79.
Ota, K., W. G. Stetler-Stevenson, Q. Yang, A. Kumar, J. Wada, N. Kashihara, E. I. Wallner, and Y. S. Kanwar. Cloning of murine membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase
(MT-1-MMP) and its metanephric developmental regulation with respect to
MMP-2 and its inhibitor. Kidney Int.
In press.
80.
Ozawa, M.,
M. Ringwald,
and
R. Kemler.
Uvomorulin-catenin complex formation is regulated by a specific domain in the cytoplasmic region of the cell adhesion molecule.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:
4246-4250,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
81.
Pagani, F.,
L. Zagato,
C. Vergani,
G. Casari,
A. Sidoli,
and
E. Baralle.
Tissue-specific splicing pattern of fibronectin messenger RNA precursor during development and aging in rat.
J. Cell Biol.
113:
1223-1229,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
82.
Pepper, M. S.,
K. Matsumoto,
T. Nakamura,
L. Orci,
and
R. Montesano.
Hepatocyte growth factor increases urokinase type plasminogen activator (u-Pa) and u-PA receptor expression in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:
20493-20496,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
83.
Pfaff, M.,
W. Gohring,
J. Brown,
and
R. Timpl.
Binding of purified collagen receptors (
2
1,
1
1) and RGD-dependent integrins to laminin and laminin fragments.
Eur. J. Biochem.
235:
975-984,
1994.
84.
Pigot, R.,
and
C. Power.
The Adhesion Molecule Facts Book. New York: Academic, 1993.
85.
Platt, J. L.,
P. Trescony,
B. Lindman,
and
T. R. Oegema.
Heparin and heparan sulfate delimit nephron formation in fetal metanephric kidneys.
Dev. Biol.
139:
338-348,
1990[Medline].
86.
Robert, B.,
P. L. St. John,
D. P. Hyink,
and
D. R. Abrahamson.
Evidence that embryonic kidney cells expressing flk-1 are intrinsic, vasculogenic angioblasts.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 40):
F744-F753,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
87.
Rogers, S. A.,
G. Ryan,
and
M. R. Hammerman.
Metanephric TGF-
is required for renal organogenesis in vitro.
Am. J. Physiol.
262 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 31):
F533-F539,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
88.
Rogers, S. A.,
G. Ryan,
and
M. R. Hammerman.
Insulin-like growth factors I and II are produced in the metanephros and are required for growth and development in vitro.
J. Cell Biol.
113:
1447-1453,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
89.
Rogers, S. A.,
G. Ryan,
A. F. Purchio,
and
M. R. Hammerman.
Metanephric transforming growth factor-
1 regulates nephrogenesis in vitro.
Am. J. Physiol.
264 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 33):
F996-F1002,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
90.
Ruoslahti, E.,
and
Y. Yamaguchi.
Proteoglycans as modulators of growth factor activities.
Cell
64:
867-869,
1991[Medline].
91.
Saelman, E. U.,
P. J. Keely,
and
S. A. Santoro.
Loss of MDCK cell
2
1 integrin expression results in reduced cyst formation, failure of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-induced branching morphogenesis, and increased apoptosis.
J. Cell Sci.
108:
3531-3540,
1995[Abstract].
92.
Saga, Y.,
T. Yagi,
Y. Ikawa,
T. Sakakura,
and
S. Aizawa.
Mice develop normally without tenascin.
Genes Dev.
6:
1821-1831,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
93.
Sakurai, H.,
and
S. K. Nigam.
Transforming growth factor-
selectively inhibits branching morphogenesis but not tubulogenesis.
Am. J. Physiol.
272 (Renal Physiol. 41):
F139-F146,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
94.
Sakurai, H.,
T. Tsukamoto,
C. A. Kjelsberg,
L. G. Cantley,
and
S. K. Nigam.
EGF receptor ligands are a large fraction of in vitro branching morphogens secreted by embryonic kidney.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Renal Physiol. 42):
F463-F472,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
95.
Sakurai, H.,
E. J. Barros,
T. Tsukamoto,
J. Barasch,
and
S. K. Nigam.
An in vitro tubulogenesis system using cell lines derived from the embryonic kidney shows dependence on multiple soluble growth factors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:
6279-6284,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
96.
Sanchez, M. P.,
I. Silos-Santiago,
J. Frisen,
B. He,
S. A. Lira,
and
M. Barbacid.
Renal agenesis and absence of enteric neurons in mice lacking GDNF.
Nature
382:
70-75,
1996[Medline].
97.
Santos, O. F. P.,
and
S. K. Nigam.
HGF-induced tubulogenesis and branching of epithelial cells is modulated by extracellular matrix and TGF-
.
Dev. Biol.
160:
293-302,
1993[Medline].
98.
Sappino, A. P.,
J. Hurate,
J. Vassalli,
and
D. Belin.
Sites of synthesis of urokinase and tissue-type plasminogen activators in murine kidney.
J. Clin. Invest.
87:
962-970,
1991.
99.
Sariola, H.,
E. Aufderheide,
H. Bernhard,
S. Henke-Fahle,
W. Dippold,
and
P. Ekblom.
Antibodies against cell surface ganglioside GD3 perturb inductive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.
Cell
54:
235-245,
1988[Medline].
100.
Saxen, L.
Organogenesis of the Kidney. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
101.
Schlessinger, J.,
and
A. Ulrich.
Growth factor signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.
Neuron
9:
383-391,
1992[Medline].
102.
S