|
|
||||||||
1 Departments of Physiology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; 2 Division of Kidney, Urological, and Hematological Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and 3 Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of the adenosine type 1 receptor agonist
N6-cyclohexyladenosine
(CHA) on glomerular vascular reactivity was studied in male angiotensin
II type 1A (AT1A) receptor
knockout mice (9). Vascular reactivity was assessed as the
response of stop-flow pressure
(PSF) to infusion of CHA into
loops of Henle using micropuncture techniques. In
AT1A +/+ mice at ambient arterial
blood pressure (96.7 ± 2.8 mmHg), the presence of CHA (10
5 M) in the perfusate
increased PSF responses from 6.8 ± 0.6 to 14.3 ± 0.9 mmHg when the loop of Henle of the index
nephron was perfused and from 0.7 ± 0.3 to 12.3 ± 1.0 mmHg when
the loop of an adjacent nephron was perfused. At reduced arterial blood
pressure (82.8 ± 1.3 mmHg), index nephron perfusion with CHA
increased PSF responses from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 9.4 ± 0.4 mmHg. In
AT1A
/
mice with a
mean arterial blood pressure of 80 ± 1.9 mmHg, CHA increased PSF responses only from 0.1 ± 0.3 to 3.6 ± 0.54 mmHg during index nephron perfusion and
from 0.25 ± 0.2 to 2.7 ± 0.55 mmHg during adjacent nephron
perfusion, significantly less than in wild-type animals
(P < 0.001). Responses to CHA were
intermediate in AT1A +/
mice. Thus AT1A receptor knockout
mice show a markedly reduced constrictor response to CHA both in the
presence and absence of simultaneous activation of the tubuloglomerular
feedback system. These data support the notion of a functional
interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in the regulation of
afferent arteriolar tone.
micropuncture; mouse; angiotensin II type 1A receptor; gene knockout; tubuloglomerular feedback; adenosine type 1 receptor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIMENTAL evidence supports the existence of a specific and synergistic interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in regulating renal vascular resistance. Early studies have shown that the renal vasoconstrictor effect of bolus injections of adenosine was less pronounced or absent in NaCl-loaded animals (17, 31). Furthermore, the vasoconstrictor response to an infusion of adenosine was markedly attenuated in dogs during converting enzyme inhibition, suggesting that an intact renin-angiotensin system is necessary for the expression of the vasoconstrictor effect of adenosine (7). Evidence that the interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II occurs at the receptor level is suggested by the observations that the renal vasoconstriction caused by single injections of adenosine or of the adenosine type 1 receptor (A1R)-specific agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; Ref. 3) was attenuated by saralasin, an AT receptor antagonist (4, 29, 34). Nevertheless, the renal vasoconstriction caused by adenosine or CHA does not appear to be always modified by inhibition of AT receptors (10, 21).
The availability of mice with a targeted deletion in the angiotensin II type 1A (AT1A) receptor gene offers a new opportunity to investigate the interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in the complete absence of the AT1A receptor (9). Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that the constrictor effect of CHA at the glomerular vascular pole can be studied in vivo by measuring the response of stop-flow pressure (PSF) to an addition of CHA to the fluid perfusing the loop of Henle of the index nephron or of an adjacent nephron (28). In the current experiments we have examined the effect of local tubular CHA application on PSF in AT1A receptor-deficient mice. The results of these studies indicate that the decrease in PSF following local administration of CHA was markedly blunted in these genetically altered animals. This observation is consistent with the notion that functional AT1A receptors are required for the expression of the full constrictor potential of A1R activation.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments were performed in a strain of
AT1A germ line null mutant mice
that has been generated as described by Ito et al. (9). All animals
used in this study (wild-type AT1A
+/+, heterozygous AT1A +/
,
and homozygous AT1A
/
) were derived from a heterozygous breeder pair from the
Duke University colony. At weaning, animals were ear-tagged, and a
short piece of the tail was clipped off. Genomic DNA was extracted from
the tail samples with a standard procedure involving digestion with
proteinase K and purification of DNA with ethanol. The genotype of each
DNA sample was determined by testing for the presence of wild-type or
modified AT1A sequence using PCR.
AT1A gene-specific primers were
selected in the region of the first exon of the
AT1A gene that is deleted in the
knockout mice, resulting in a 433-bp PCR product in
AT1A +/+ and
AT1A +/
, but not
AT1A
/
. The mutant
AT1A gene was detected with
Neor-specific primers amplifying a
457-bp product of the neomycin resistance gene
(Neor) in
AT1A +/
and
AT1A
/
, but not in
AT1A +/+. A third PCR for
-globin served as control to validate similar amounts of DNA in each
sample. The sequence of the oligonucleotide primers and their location
in the published sequence are as follows: sense AT1A,
5'-GTCAAGTGGATTTCGAATAGTGTCTG-3' (bp 220-245);
antisense AT1A,
5'-TCTCAGCATCGACCGCTAC-3' (bp 634-652) (13); sense
Neor,
5'-ACAACAGACAATCGGCTGCTCTGATG-3' (bp 225-250); and
antisense Neor,
5'-GTTCGCCAGGCTCAAGGCGCGCA-3' (bp 660-682) (1).
Amplification was carried out for 30 cycles (denaturation at 94°C
for 40 s, annealing at 58°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for
40 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 8 min). After
genotype analysis was completed, animals were separated
according to genotype and gender.
Animals were maintained on a standard rodent diet and tap water. Male
mice in a weight range between 23 and 30 g were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ip Inactin and 100 mg/kg im ketamine. Body temperature was
maintained at 38°C by placing the animals on an operating table
with a servo-controlled heating plate. The trachea was cannulated, and
a stream of 100% oxygen was blown toward the tracheal tube throughout
the experiment. The femoral artery was cannulated with hand-drawn
polyethylene tubing for measurement of arterial blood pressure. The
femoral vein was cannulated for an intravenous maintenance infusion of
2.25 g bovine serum albumin/100 ml saline at a rate of 0.5 ml/h. In addition to the five AT1A
+/+, three AT1A +/
, and
five AT1A
/
mice
studied at ambient blood pressures, three wild-type mice were prepared
in which arterial blood pressure was lowered to the mean level observed
in AT1A knockouts by injections of
small amounts of Inactin.
The left kidney was approached from a flank incision, freed of adherent
fat and connective tissue, and placed in a Lucite cup adapted for the
size of the mouse kidney. The kidney was covered with mineral oil.
Measurements of PSF during loop of
Henle perfusion were done by identification of a late proximal tubule
segment from the staining pattern following microperfusion of a
randomly selected proximal segment with the FD&C-stained perfusate. The tubule was blocked with wax, the pump was inserted in the last superficial proximal segment, and the pressure pipette was inserted into an early proximal segment recognizable from the widening of the
tubular lumen. After PSF had
stabilized, loop of Henle perfusion rate was increased to 40 nl/min to
assess the maximal tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) response. The
perfusion pipette was then withdrawn and replaced with a pipette
containing CHA, and TGF responses to an increase in flow to 40 nl/min
were tested again. Subsequently, the CHA-containing pipette was
inserted into a randomly chosen proximal segment adjacent, but not
belonging to the index nephron. CHA solution was infused into the
freely flowing tubule at a rate of 40 nl/min, and
PSF in the index nephron was
recorded with its loop of Henle not being perfused. Control perfusate
contained (in mM/l) 136 NaCl, 4 NaHCO3, 4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 7.5 urea, 100 mg/100 ml
FD&C green (Keystone), and 1 g/100 ml ethanol as a solvent control. CHA
was prepared as a 10
4 M
solution in artificial tubular fluid (ATF) containing 10 g/100 ml
ethanol and diluted 10-fold with ATF to yield a concentration of
10
5 M. CHA-containing
solutions were made fresh for each experiment. At the end of each
experiment, the blood pressure response to intravenous angiotensin II
(1, 5, and 10 ng in AT1A +/+ and
AT1A +/
; and 10, 50, and
100 ng in AT1A
/
mice) was tested to functionally verify the animal's genotype.
Adenosine type 1 receptor mRNA. To
determine whether AT1A knockout
mice express A1R mRNA, we
extracted total RNA from the cortex of kidneys harvested from
AT1A +/+ and
AT1A
/
mice. Methods for RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and RT-PCR have been described in
detail in several earlier publications from this laboratory (35). The
sequence of the oligonucleotide primers used for the amplification of
the A1R product was as follows:
sense A1R, 5'-GCA TGG AGT
ACA TGG TCT AC-3' (bp 832-851), and antisense
A1R, 5'-AGT CCT CAG CTT TCT
CCT CT-3' (bp 1266-1285) (11). PCR products of the expected
size of 453 bp have been amplified with these primers in cDNA from both
rats and mice, and they have been identified as part of the
A1R cDNA by restriction enzyme analysis.
Statistical comparisons were made with ANOVA in association with the Scheffé test, or the Student's t-test, using paired or unpaired comparisons, as appropriate.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean body weights and mean kidney weights were 25.4 ± 0.6 and 0.18 ± 0.01 g in five wild-type mice, 29.0 ± 1.6 and 0.17 ± 0.02 g in four heterozygous mice, and 27.6 ± 2.06 and 0.2 ± 0.02 g in five homozygous mice of the
AT1A receptor knockout strain generated by Ito et al. (9). Mean arterial blood pressure was 96.9 ± 2.8 mmHg in wild-type (range 77-108 mmHg), 97.7 ± 3.3 mmHg in heterozygous (range 77-110 mmHg), and 80 ± 1.9 mmHg in homozygous mice (range 64-97 mmHg). Similar to earlier
observations in both conscious and anesthetized animals (9, 15, 28),
mean arterial pressures in wild-type and heterozygote mice were
significantly higher than in homozygous
AT1A knockout mice
(P < 0.001). Blood pressure
responses to exogenous angiotensin II, assessed at the end of the
micropuncture experiments, were greatly attenuated in homozygous
knockout animals. Bolus injections of 1, 5, and 10 ng angiotensin II
increased mean arterial blood pressure by 11.3 ± 6, 31.7 ± 6.2, and 43.2 ± 9.9 mmHg in wild-type mice and by 8 ± 1.05, 15.3 ± 4.7, and 22.5 ± 6.6 mmHg in heterozygous mice. In
AT1A
/
mice, injections of 10, 50, and 100 ng angiotensin II were associated
with mean pressure changes of 0.5 ± 0.6, 3.4 ± 1.4, and 0.3 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively.
Table 1 summarizes measurements of
PSF during perfusion of the loops
of Henle of both index and adjacent nephrons in the absence and
presence of 10
5 M CHA. In
previous studies in rats, this dose of CHA had been found to produce
the largest reductions in PSF
(22). Mean PSF fell significantly
in both AT1A +/+ and
AT1A +/
mice when loop perfusion of the index nephron was increased from 0 to 40 nl/min using
control Ringer solution. In agreement with our earlier observations, PSF at zero loop flow was lower in
AT1A
/
mice than in
wild-type mice, and there was no change in
PSF in response to loop perfusion at 40 nl/min (28). Perfusion of nephrons adjacent to the index nephrons
with control solution did not cause significant changes in
PSF in any of the mice regardless
of genotype. Adding CHA to the perfusate markedly augmented the fall of
PSF during perfusion of both index
and adjacent nephrons in both AT1A
+/+ and AT1A +/
mice. In
AT1A
/
mice, a small
and significant change of PSF was
noted when CHA was present in the perfusate of index or adjacent
nephrons, but these changes were significantly less than in
AT1A +/+ mice
(P < 0.0001 for index or adjacent
nephron comparison). Original recordings of the
PSF response to control Ringer
perfusion without and with CHA in a wild-type and a homozygous knockout mouse are shown in Fig. 1. Figure
2 graphically depicts
PSF changes caused by increasing
loop flow from 0 to 40 nl/min. It can be seen that the effect of CHA to
augment TGF responses of PSF was significantly diminished in both heterozygous and homozygous
AT1A transgenic compared with
wild-type mice. Attenuation of the CHA response was found both in the
presence (index nephron) and absence (adjacent nephron) of a
superimposed TGF response.
|
|
|
To examine the effect of arterial blood pressure per se on the vascular
response to CHA, studies were performed in which blood pressure in
three wild-type mice was reduced by supplemental doses of
Inactin. Mean arterial blood pressure in these animals averaged 82.8 ± 1.3 mmHg, similar to mean blood pressures found in
the AT1A knockout mice (80 ± 1.9 mmHg). When perfusion rate was increased to 40 nl/min
PSF fell by 4.5 ± 0.3 mmHg, from 38.6 ± 2.5 to 34.1 ± 2.2 mmHg
(n = 9;
P = 0.06 compared with wild-type mice
at ambient blood pressure). In the presence of CHA
(10
5 M) in the perfusate of
the index nephron, PSF fell by 9.4 ± 0.4 mmHg, from 35.7 ± 2 to 26.2 ± 1.8 mmHg
(P = 0.0023 compared with mice at
ambient blood pressures; P < 0.0001 compared with knockout mice).
Expression of A1R mRNA in renal
cortical tissue as determined by RT-PCR was not found to be different
between AT1A +/+ and AT1A
/
animals. An
example showing PCR products amplified from four different cDNA samples
from AT1A null transgenic and
control mice is given in Fig. 3. Relative
band intensities corrected for
-actin were 0.98 ± 0.21 in
AT1A +/+ and 1.01 ± 0.23 in
AT1A
/
mice, not
significantly different between the two strains of mice.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current experiments show that the effects of CHA on PSF in wild-type mice are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those observed earlier in rats (5, 22, 27). When CHA was included in the perfusate of the index nephron, the fall in PSF in response to a saturating flow increase was significantly larger than that caused by TGF alone. Furthermore, addition of CHA to the proximal fluid of an adjacent nephron caused a marked reduction of PSF in the neighboring index nephron. Since the loop of Henle of the index nephron was not perfused at this time, the enhanced PSF response occurred in the absence of TGF activation. These results are difficult to reconcile with the assumption that the CHA effect on glomerular arterioles is mediated through luminal A1Rs, but suggests rather that CHA at least during adjacent nephron perfusion interacts with extratubular, presumably vascular receptors. A high density of A1Rs in the terminal afferent arteriole is suggested by in situ hybridization of A1R mRNA and by functional studies in isolated perfused afferent arterioles (32, 33).
The main finding in the present study is that the
PSF response magnitude to local
administration of the A1 agonist
CHA was significantly reduced in both
AT1A +/
and
AT1A
/
mice compared with wild-type controls. The reason for the attenuation of
A1R-mediated vasoconstriction in
AT1A knockout mice is not clear,
but a number of possibilities may be considered. Chronic absence of
AT1A receptor activity may cause
downregulation of A1R expression,
but our assessment of A1R mRNA
abundance does not support this assumption. Alternate splicing can lead
to variant transcripts of adenosine
A1R mRNA (14). However, it would
seem highly speculative to assume that AT1A mutant mice express an
A1R variant that is more
angiotensin II dependent than that found in wild-type mice. Previous
studies have shown that the renal vasoconstriction caused by adenosine was greatly attenuated in rats in which renal perfusion pressure had
been reduced to 70 mmHg (6). Since
AT1A receptor knockout mice had a
significantly lower blood pressure than wild-type mice, we examined
whether lowering of arterial pressure per se could be accountable for
the reduced response of PSF to CHA
in these animals. Both native TGF responses and CHA-induced constrictor responses were in fact found to be smaller in magnitude than those observed in wild-type mice at ambient blood pressures. However, CHA-induced responses were significantly larger than in knockout mice,
suggesting that the diminished CHA constriction in the mutant animals
for the most part was not a consequence of the lower blood pressure.
Finally, in view of the abnormalities in renal vascular morphology
described in angiotensin converting enzyme knockout mice it seems
possible that structural alterations in the glomerular microvasculature
of AT1A receptor knockout mice may
prevent vasoconstrictor responses in general (8). However, such
structural changes have not been described in the heterozygous mice,
suggesting that the significantly reduced constrictor responses to CHA
in AT1A +/
animals have
some functional cause. Overall, data are compatible with the view that
the blunting of constrictor responses to CHA is another expression of
the specific and synergistic interaction between angiotensin II and
adenosine that has been observed in earlier experiments using different approaches.
A regulatory mechanism in which adenosine and angiotensin II appear to interact to cause afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction is TGF, the response of afferent arteriolar resistance to changes in NaCl concentration at the macula densa (2). Nonspecific as well as adenosine A1R-specific inhibitors were noted to markedly blunt the efficiency of signal transmission (5, 16, 23, 27). Inhibition of TGF responses was also caused by interference with the generation or action of angiotensin II, whereas peritubular or intravenous infusion of angiotensin II caused an augmentation of TGF responses (12, 18-20, 24-26, 30). Furthermore, results in a recent report as well as our current findings show that TGF responses are essentially obliterated in AT1A receptor knockout mice (28). The coincidence of absent TGF responses and blunted responses to CHA in the AT1A receptor-deficient mice is consistent with the view that an interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II is a major cause for macula densa-controlled changes in afferent arteriolar tone.
In summary, the present experiments show a marked reduction in the response of the glomerular vasculature to the constrictor effect of the adenosine A1R agonist CHA in mice both heterozygous or homozygous for an AT1A receptor knockout mutation. These data support the notion that adenosine-induced vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles is synergistically enhanced by angiotensin II. Furthermore, the coincident absence of both TGF responses and of normal constrictor responses to adenosine A1R activation in AT1A-deficient mice is consistent with the notion that adenosine A1 and AT1A receptors interact to induce macula densa-dependent regulation of afferent arteriolar tone.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-37448, DK-39255, DK-40042, and HL-56122. Support for this work was in part from the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Michigan, funded by National Center for Research Resources Grant M01-RR-00042.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests: J. Schnermann, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Building 10, Room 4D51, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1370, Bethesda, MD 20892-1370.
Received 13 April 1998; accepted in final form 27 August 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Beck, E.,
G. Ludwig,
E. A. Auerswald,
B. Reiss,
and
H. Schaller.
Nucleotide sequence and exact localization of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene from transposon Tn5.
Gene
19:
327-336,
1982[Medline].
2.
Briggs, J. P.,
and
J. Schnermann.
The tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.
In: Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management (2nd ed.), edited by J. H. Laragh,
and B. M. Brenner. New York: Raven, 1995, p. 1359-1383.
3.
Bruns, R. F.,
J. W. Daly,
and
S. H. Snyder.
Adenosine receptors in brain membranes: binding of N6-cyclohexyl[3H]adenosine and 1,3-diethyl-8-[3H]phenylxanthine.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:
5547-5551,
1980
4.
Dietrich, M. S.,
K. Endlich,
N. Parekh,
and
M. Steinhausen.
Interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in renal microcirculation.
Microvasc. Res.
41:
275-288,
1991[Medline].
5.
Franco, M.,
P. D. Bell,
and
L. G. Navar.
Effect of adenosine A1 analogue on tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.
Am. J. Physiol.
257 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 26):
F231-F236,
1989
6.
Haas, J. A.,
and
H. Osswald.
Adenosine induced fall in glomerular capillary pressure. Effect of ureteral obstruction and aortic constriction in the Munich-Wistar rat kidney.
Arch. Pharmacol.
317:
86-89,
1981.
7.
Hall, J. E.,
and
J. P. Granger.
Adenosine alters glomerular filtration control by ANG II.
Am. J. Physiol.
250 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 19):
F917-F923,
1986.
8.
Hilgers, K. F.,
V. Reddi,
J. H. Krege,
O. Smithies,
and
R. A. Gomez.
Aberrant renal vascular morphology and renin expression in mutant mice lacking angiotensin-converting enzyme.
Hypertension
29:
216-221,
1997
9.
Ito, M.,
M. I. Oliverio,
P. J. Mannon,
C. F. Best,
N. Maeda,
O. Smithies,
and
T. M. Coffman.
Regulation of blood pressure by the type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:
3521-3525,
1995
10.
Joyner, W. L.,
R. E. Mohama,
T. O. Myers,
and
J. P. Gilmore.
The selective response to adenosine of renal microvessels from hamster explants.
Microvasc. Res.
35:
122-131,
1988[Medline].
11.
Mahan, L. C.,
L. D. McVittie,
E. M. Smyk-Randall,
H. Nakata,
F. J. Monsma,
C. R. Gerfen,
and
D. R. Sibley.
Cloning and expression of an A1 adenosine receptor from rat brain.
Mol. Pharmacol.
40:
1-7,
1991[Abstract].
12.
Mitchell, K. D.,
and
L. G. Navar.
Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback during peritubular perfusions of angiotensins I and II.
Am. J. Physiol.
255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24):
F383-F390,
1988
13.
Murphy, T. J.,
R. W. Alexander,
K. K. Griendling,
M. S. Runge,
and
K. E. Bernstein.
Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor.
Nature
351:
233-236,
1991[Medline].
14.
Olah, M. E.,
and
G. L. Stiles.
Adenosine receptor subtypes: characterization and therapeutic regulation.
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
35:
581-606,
1995[Medline].
15.
Oliverio, M. I.,
C. F. Best,
H.-S. Kim,
W. J. Arendshorst,
O. Smithies,
and
T. M. Coffman.
Angiotensin II responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice: a role for AT1B receptors in blood pressure regulation.
Am. J. Physiol.
272 (Renal Physiol. 41):
F515-F520,
1997
16.
Osswald, H., H. H. Hermes, and G. Nabakowski. Role
of adenosine in signal transmission of tubuloglomerular feedback.
Kidney Int. 22, Suppl. 12: S136-S142,
1982.
17.
Osswald, H.,
H. J. Schmitz,
and
O. Heidenreich.
Adenosine response of the rat kidney after saline loading, sodium restriction and hemorrhagia.
Pflügers Arch.
357:
323-333,
1975[Medline].
18.
Ploth, D. W.,
J. Rudulph,
R. Lagrange,
and
L. G. Navar.
Tubuloglomerular feedback and single nephron function after converting enzyme inhibition in the rat.
J. Clin. Invest.
64:
1325-1335,
1979.
19.
Ploth, D. W.,
and
R. N. Roy.
Renal and tubuloglomerular feedback effects of (Sar1,Ala8) angiotensin II in the rat.
Am. J. Physiol.
242 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 11):
F149-F157,
1982
20.
Ploth, D. W., and R. N. Roy.
Renin-angiotensin influences on tubuloglomerular feedback activity
in the rat. Kidney Int. 22, Suppl. 12: S114-S121, 1982.
21.
Rossi, N. F.,
P. C. Churchill,
K. A. Jacobson,
and
A. E. Leahy.
Further characterization of the renovascular effects of N6-cyclohexyladenosine in the isolated perfused rat kidney.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
240:
911-915,
1987
22.
Schnermann, J.
Effect of adenosine analogues on tubuloglomerular feedback responses.
Am. J. Physiol.
255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24):
F33-F42,
1988
23.
Schnermann, J.,
H. Osswald,
and
M. Hermle.
Inhibitory effect of methylxanthines on feedback control of glomerular filtration rate in the rat kidney.
Pflügers Arch.
369:
39-48,
1977[Medline].
24.
Schnermann, J.,
J. P. Briggs,
G. Schubert,
and
M. Marin-Grez.
Opposing effects of captopril and aprotinin on tubuloglomerular feedback responses.
Am. J. Physiol.
247 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 16):
F912-F918,
1984.
25.
Schnermann, J.,
and
J. P. Briggs.
Single nephron comparison of the effect of loop of Henle flow on filtration rate and pressure in control and angiotensin II-infused rats.
Miner. Electrolyte Metab.
15:
103-107,
1989[Medline].
26.
Schnermann, J.,
and
J. P. Briggs.
Restoration of tubuloglomerular feedback in volume expanded rats by angiotensin II.
Am. J. Physiol.
259 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 28):
F565-F572,
1990
27.
Schnermann, J.,
H. Weihprecht,
and
J. P. Briggs.
Inhibition of tubuloglomerular feedback during adenosine1 receptor blockade.
Am. J. Physiol.
258 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 27):
F553-F561,
1990
28.
Schnermann, J.,
T. Traynor,
T. Yang,
Y. G. Huang,
M. I. Oliverio,
T. Coffman,
and
J. P. Briggs.
Absence of tubuloglomerular feedback responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Renal Physiol. 42):
F315-F320,
1997
29.
Spielman, W. S.,
and
H. Osswald.
Blockade of postocclusive renal vasoconstriction by an ANG II antagonist: evidence for an angiotensin-adenosine interaction.
Am. J. Physiol.
237 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 6):
F463-F467,
1979.
30.
Stowe, N. T.,
J. Schnermann,
and
M. Hermle.
Feedback regulation of nephron filtration rate during pharmacologic interference with the renin-angiotensin and adrenergic systems in rats.
Kidney Int.
15:
473-486,
1979[Medline].
31.
Thurau, K.
Renal hemodynamics.
Am. J. Med.
36:
698-719,
1964[Medline].
32.
Weaver, D. R.,
and
S. M. Reppert.
Adenosine receptor gene expression in rat kidney.
Am. J. Physiol.
263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32):
F991-F995,
1992
33.
Weihprecht, H.,
J. N. Lorenz,
J. P. Briggs,
and
J. Schnermann.
Vasomotor effects of purinergic agonists in isolated rabbit afferent arterioles.
Am. J. Physiol.
263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32):
F1026-F1033,
1992
34.
Weihprecht, H.,
J. N. Lorenz,
J. P. Briggs,
and
J. Schnermann.
Synergistic effects of angiotensin and adenosine in the renal microvasculature.
Am. J. Physiol.
266 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 35):
F227-F239,
1994
35.
Yang, T.,
I. Singh,
H. Pham,
D. Sun,
A. Smart,
J. B. Schnermann,
and
J. P. Briggs.
Regulation of cyclooxygenase expression in the kidney by dietary salt intake.
Am. J. Physiol.
274 (Renal Physiol. 43):
F481-F489,
1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Franco, R. Bautista, O. Perez-Mendez, L. Gonzalez, U. Pacheco, L. G. Sanchez-Lozada, J. Santamaria, E. Tapia, R. Monreal, and F. Martinez Renal interstitial adenosine is increased in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F84 - F92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald Adenosine and kidney function. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Inscho Modulation of renal microvascular function by adenosine Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R23 - R25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schnermann The Juxtaglomerular Apparatus: From Anatomical Peculiarity to Physiological Relevance J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 1681 - 1694. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, C. Zhu, and S. P. Tofovic Expression of adenosine receptors in the preglomerular microcirculation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): F41 - F51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson and R. K. Dubey Role of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway in renal physiology Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F597 - F612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson and Z. Mi Preglomerular Microcirculation Expresses the cAMP-Adenosine Pathway J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 23 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Traynor, T. Yang, Y. G. Huang, J. H. Krege, J. P. Briggs, O. Smithies, and J. Schnermann Tubuloglomerular feedback in ACE-deficient mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): F751 - F757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Brown, A. Ollerstam, B. Johansson, O. Skott, S. Gebre-Medhin, B. Fredholm, and A. E. G. Persson Abolished tubuloglomerular feedback and increased plasma renin in adenosine A1 receptor-deficient mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1362 - R1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |