AJP - Renal AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275: F922-F927, 1998;
0363-6127/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schnermann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schnermann, J.
Vol. 275, Issue 6, F922-F927, December 1998

Inhibition of adenosine-1 receptor-mediated preglomerular vasoconstriction in AT1A receptor-deficient mice

Timothy Traynor1, Tianxin Yang1, Yuning G. Huang1, Lois Arend1, Michael I. Oliverio3, Thomas Coffman3, Josie P. Briggs1,2, and Jürgen Schnermann1

1 Departments of Physiology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; 2 Division of Kidney, Urological, and Hematological Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and 3 Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The effect of the adenosine type 1 receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) on glomerular vascular reactivity was studied in male angiotensin II type 1A (AT1A) receptor knockout mice (9). Vascular reactivity was assessed as the response of stop-flow pressure (PSF) to infusion of CHA into loops of Henle using micropuncture techniques. In AT1A +/+ mice at ambient arterial blood pressure (96.7 ± 2.8 mmHg), the presence of CHA (10 -5 M) in the perfusate increased PSF responses from 6.8 ± 0.6 to 14.3 ± 0.9 mmHg when the loop of Henle of the index nephron was perfused and from 0.7 ± 0.3 to 12.3 ± 1.0 mmHg when the loop of an adjacent nephron was perfused. At reduced arterial blood pressure (82.8 ± 1.3 mmHg), index nephron perfusion with CHA increased PSF responses from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 9.4 ± 0.4 mmHg. In AT1A -/- mice with a mean arterial blood pressure of 80 ± 1.9 mmHg, CHA increased PSF responses only from 0.1 ± 0.3 to 3.6 ± 0.54 mmHg during index nephron perfusion and from 0.25 ± 0.2 to 2.7 ± 0.55 mmHg during adjacent nephron perfusion, significantly less than in wild-type animals (P < 0.001). Responses to CHA were intermediate in AT1A +/- mice. Thus AT1A receptor knockout mice show a markedly reduced constrictor response to CHA both in the presence and absence of simultaneous activation of the tubuloglomerular feedback system. These data support the notion of a functional interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in the regulation of afferent arteriolar tone.

micropuncture; mouse; angiotensin II type 1A receptor; gene knockout; tubuloglomerular feedback; adenosine type 1 receptor

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIMENTAL evidence supports the existence of a specific and synergistic interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in regulating renal vascular resistance. Early studies have shown that the renal vasoconstrictor effect of bolus injections of adenosine was less pronounced or absent in NaCl-loaded animals (17, 31). Furthermore, the vasoconstrictor response to an infusion of adenosine was markedly attenuated in dogs during converting enzyme inhibition, suggesting that an intact renin-angiotensin system is necessary for the expression of the vasoconstrictor effect of adenosine (7). Evidence that the interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II occurs at the receptor level is suggested by the observations that the renal vasoconstriction caused by single injections of adenosine or of the adenosine type 1 receptor (A1R)-specific agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; Ref. 3) was attenuated by saralasin, an AT receptor antagonist (4, 29, 34). Nevertheless, the renal vasoconstriction caused by adenosine or CHA does not appear to be always modified by inhibition of AT receptors (10, 21).

The availability of mice with a targeted deletion in the angiotensin II type 1A (AT1A) receptor gene offers a new opportunity to investigate the interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in the complete absence of the AT1A receptor (9). Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that the constrictor effect of CHA at the glomerular vascular pole can be studied in vivo by measuring the response of stop-flow pressure (PSF) to an addition of CHA to the fluid perfusing the loop of Henle of the index nephron or of an adjacent nephron (28). In the current experiments we have examined the effect of local tubular CHA application on PSF in AT1A receptor-deficient mice. The results of these studies indicate that the decrease in PSF following local administration of CHA was markedly blunted in these genetically altered animals. This observation is consistent with the notion that functional AT1A receptors are required for the expression of the full constrictor potential of A1R activation.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Experiments were performed in a strain of AT1A germ line null mutant mice that has been generated as described by Ito et al. (9). All animals used in this study (wild-type AT1A +/+, heterozygous AT1A +/-, and homozygous AT1A -/-) were derived from a heterozygous breeder pair from the Duke University colony. At weaning, animals were ear-tagged, and a short piece of the tail was clipped off. Genomic DNA was extracted from the tail samples with a standard procedure involving digestion with proteinase K and purification of DNA with ethanol. The genotype of each DNA sample was determined by testing for the presence of wild-type or modified AT1A sequence using PCR. AT1A gene-specific primers were selected in the region of the first exon of the AT1A gene that is deleted in the knockout mice, resulting in a 433-bp PCR product in AT1A +/+ and AT1A +/-, but not AT1A -/-. The mutant AT1A gene was detected with Neor-specific primers amplifying a 457-bp product of the neomycin resistance gene (Neor) in AT1A +/- and AT1A -/-, but not in AT1A +/+. A third PCR for beta -globin served as control to validate similar amounts of DNA in each sample. The sequence of the oligonucleotide primers and their location in the published sequence are as follows: sense AT1A, 5'-GTCAAGTGGATTTCGAATAGTGTCTG-3' (bp 220-245); antisense AT1A, 5'-TCTCAGCATCGACCGCTAC-3' (bp 634-652) (13); sense Neor, 5'-ACAACAGACAATCGGCTGCTCTGATG-3' (bp 225-250); and antisense Neor, 5'-GTTCGCCAGGCTCAAGGCGCGCA-3' (bp 660-682) (1). Amplification was carried out for 30 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, annealing at 58°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 8 min). After genotype analysis was completed, animals were separated according to genotype and gender.

Animals were maintained on a standard rodent diet and tap water. Male mice in a weight range between 23 and 30 g were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ip Inactin and 100 mg/kg im ketamine. Body temperature was maintained at 38°C by placing the animals on an operating table with a servo-controlled heating plate. The trachea was cannulated, and a stream of 100% oxygen was blown toward the tracheal tube throughout the experiment. The femoral artery was cannulated with hand-drawn polyethylene tubing for measurement of arterial blood pressure. The femoral vein was cannulated for an intravenous maintenance infusion of 2.25 g bovine serum albumin/100 ml saline at a rate of 0.5 ml/h. In addition to the five AT1A +/+, three AT1A +/-, and five AT1A -/- mice studied at ambient blood pressures, three wild-type mice were prepared in which arterial blood pressure was lowered to the mean level observed in AT1A knockouts by injections of small amounts of Inactin.

The left kidney was approached from a flank incision, freed of adherent fat and connective tissue, and placed in a Lucite cup adapted for the size of the mouse kidney. The kidney was covered with mineral oil. Measurements of PSF during loop of Henle perfusion were done by identification of a late proximal tubule segment from the staining pattern following microperfusion of a randomly selected proximal segment with the FD&C-stained perfusate. The tubule was blocked with wax, the pump was inserted in the last superficial proximal segment, and the pressure pipette was inserted into an early proximal segment recognizable from the widening of the tubular lumen. After PSF had stabilized, loop of Henle perfusion rate was increased to 40 nl/min to assess the maximal tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) response. The perfusion pipette was then withdrawn and replaced with a pipette containing CHA, and TGF responses to an increase in flow to 40 nl/min were tested again. Subsequently, the CHA-containing pipette was inserted into a randomly chosen proximal segment adjacent, but not belonging to the index nephron. CHA solution was infused into the freely flowing tubule at a rate of 40 nl/min, and PSF in the index nephron was recorded with its loop of Henle not being perfused. Control perfusate contained (in mM/l) 136 NaCl, 4 NaHCO3, 4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 7.5 urea, 100 mg/100 ml FD&C green (Keystone), and 1 g/100 ml ethanol as a solvent control. CHA was prepared as a 10-4 M solution in artificial tubular fluid (ATF) containing 10 g/100 ml ethanol and diluted 10-fold with ATF to yield a concentration of 10-5 M. CHA-containing solutions were made fresh for each experiment. At the end of each experiment, the blood pressure response to intravenous angiotensin II (1, 5, and 10 ng in AT1A +/+ and AT1A +/-; and 10, 50, and 100 ng in AT1A -/- mice) was tested to functionally verify the animal's genotype.

Adenosine type 1 receptor mRNA. To determine whether AT1A knockout mice express A1R mRNA, we extracted total RNA from the cortex of kidneys harvested from AT1A +/+ and AT1A -/- mice. Methods for RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and RT-PCR have been described in detail in several earlier publications from this laboratory (35). The sequence of the oligonucleotide primers used for the amplification of the A1R product was as follows: sense A1R, 5'-GCA TGG AGT ACA TGG TCT AC-3' (bp 832-851), and antisense A1R, 5'-AGT CCT CAG CTT TCT CCT CT-3' (bp 1266-1285) (11). PCR products of the expected size of 453 bp have been amplified with these primers in cDNA from both rats and mice, and they have been identified as part of the A1R cDNA by restriction enzyme analysis.

Statistical comparisons were made with ANOVA in association with the Scheffé test, or the Student's t-test, using paired or unpaired comparisons, as appropriate.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mean body weights and mean kidney weights were 25.4 ± 0.6 and 0.18 ± 0.01 g in five wild-type mice, 29.0 ± 1.6 and 0.17 ± 0.02 g in four heterozygous mice, and 27.6 ± 2.06 and 0.2 ± 0.02 g in five homozygous mice of the AT1A receptor knockout strain generated by Ito et al. (9). Mean arterial blood pressure was 96.9 ± 2.8 mmHg in wild-type (range 77-108 mmHg), 97.7 ± 3.3 mmHg in heterozygous (range 77-110 mmHg), and 80 ± 1.9 mmHg in homozygous mice (range 64-97 mmHg). Similar to earlier observations in both conscious and anesthetized animals (9, 15, 28), mean arterial pressures in wild-type and heterozygote mice were significantly higher than in homozygous AT1A knockout mice (P < 0.001). Blood pressure responses to exogenous angiotensin II, assessed at the end of the micropuncture experiments, were greatly attenuated in homozygous knockout animals. Bolus injections of 1, 5, and 10 ng angiotensin II increased mean arterial blood pressure by 11.3 ± 6, 31.7 ± 6.2, and 43.2 ± 9.9 mmHg in wild-type mice and by 8 ± 1.05, 15.3 ± 4.7, and 22.5 ± 6.6 mmHg in heterozygous mice. In AT1A -/- mice, injections of 10, 50, and 100 ng angiotensin II were associated with mean pressure changes of 0.5 ± 0.6, 3.4 ± 1.4, and 0.3 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively.

Table 1 summarizes measurements of PSF during perfusion of the loops of Henle of both index and adjacent nephrons in the absence and presence of 10-5 M CHA. In previous studies in rats, this dose of CHA had been found to produce the largest reductions in PSF (22). Mean PSF fell significantly in both AT1A +/+ and AT1A +/- mice when loop perfusion of the index nephron was increased from 0 to 40 nl/min using control Ringer solution. In agreement with our earlier observations, PSF at zero loop flow was lower in AT1A -/- mice than in wild-type mice, and there was no change in PSF in response to loop perfusion at 40 nl/min (28). Perfusion of nephrons adjacent to the index nephrons with control solution did not cause significant changes in PSF in any of the mice regardless of genotype. Adding CHA to the perfusate markedly augmented the fall of PSF during perfusion of both index and adjacent nephrons in both AT1A +/+ and AT1A +/- mice. In AT1A -/- mice, a small and significant change of PSF was noted when CHA was present in the perfusate of index or adjacent nephrons, but these changes were significantly less than in AT1A +/+ mice (P < 0.0001 for index or adjacent nephron comparison). Original recordings of the PSF response to control Ringer perfusion without and with CHA in a wild-type and a homozygous knockout mouse are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 2 graphically depicts PSF changes caused by increasing loop flow from 0 to 40 nl/min. It can be seen that the effect of CHA to augment TGF responses of PSF was significantly diminished in both heterozygous and homozygous AT1A transgenic compared with wild-type mice. Attenuation of the CHA response was found both in the presence (index nephron) and absence (adjacent nephron) of a superimposed TGF response.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Mean stop-flow pressures during perfusion of loop of Henle


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Original recordings of stop-flow pressure (PSF; top tracing in each set) during changes of loop of Henle perfusion rate in an AT1A +/+ (top two tracings) and an AT1A -/- (bottom two tracings) mouse. During the time periods marked by the black bars, tubules were perfused at a rate of 40 nl/min with control Ringer solution or with control Ringer containing 10-5 M N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA). Perfusion was either into the index nephron or into a nephron adjacent to the index nephron. Bottom tracing in each pair represents arterial blood pressure (AP).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Mean changes in PSF in response to loop perfusion with control Ringer solution or with control Ringer + CHA (10-5 M) in AT1A +/+, AT1A +/-, and AT1A -/- mice. A: infusion into the loop of Henle of the index nephron. B: infusion into the loop of Henle of an adjacent nephron. Error lines indicate SE (where line is missing, SE is smaller than the line). * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 by ANOVA (comparison given is with PSF change in AT1A +/+ mice).

To examine the effect of arterial blood pressure per se on the vascular response to CHA, studies were performed in which blood pressure in three wild-type mice was reduced by supplemental doses of Inactin. Mean arterial blood pressure in these animals averaged 82.8 ± 1.3 mmHg, similar to mean blood pressures found in the AT1A knockout mice (80 ± 1.9 mmHg). When perfusion rate was increased to 40 nl/min PSF fell by 4.5 ± 0.3 mmHg, from 38.6 ± 2.5 to 34.1 ± 2.2 mmHg (n = 9; P = 0.06 compared with wild-type mice at ambient blood pressure). In the presence of CHA (10-5 M) in the perfusate of the index nephron, PSF fell by 9.4 ± 0.4 mmHg, from 35.7 ± 2 to 26.2 ± 1.8 mmHg (P = 0.0023 compared with mice at ambient blood pressures; P < 0.0001 compared with knockout mice).

Expression of A1R mRNA in renal cortical tissue as determined by RT-PCR was not found to be different between AT1A +/+ and AT1A -/- animals. An example showing PCR products amplified from four different cDNA samples from AT1A null transgenic and control mice is given in Fig. 3. Relative band intensities corrected for beta -actin were 0.98 ± 0.21 in AT1A +/+ and 1.01 ± 0.23 in AT1A -/- mice, not significantly different between the two strains of mice.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Phosphoimages of adenosine type 1 (A1) receptor and beta -actin RT-PCR products from cortical tissue of AT1A +/+ and AT1A -/- mice. Results are from 4 cDNA samples, with each sample being amplified at two cDNA dilutions (1× and 10× for A1 receptor, and 100× and 1,000× for beta -actin).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The current experiments show that the effects of CHA on PSF in wild-type mice are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those observed earlier in rats (5, 22, 27). When CHA was included in the perfusate of the index nephron, the fall in PSF in response to a saturating flow increase was significantly larger than that caused by TGF alone. Furthermore, addition of CHA to the proximal fluid of an adjacent nephron caused a marked reduction of PSF in the neighboring index nephron. Since the loop of Henle of the index nephron was not perfused at this time, the enhanced PSF response occurred in the absence of TGF activation. These results are difficult to reconcile with the assumption that the CHA effect on glomerular arterioles is mediated through luminal A1Rs, but suggests rather that CHA at least during adjacent nephron perfusion interacts with extratubular, presumably vascular receptors. A high density of A1Rs in the terminal afferent arteriole is suggested by in situ hybridization of A1R mRNA and by functional studies in isolated perfused afferent arterioles (32, 33).

The main finding in the present study is that the PSF response magnitude to local administration of the A1 agonist CHA was significantly reduced in both AT1A +/- and AT1A -/- mice compared with wild-type controls. The reason for the attenuation of A1R-mediated vasoconstriction in AT1A knockout mice is not clear, but a number of possibilities may be considered. Chronic absence of AT1A receptor activity may cause downregulation of A1R expression, but our assessment of A1R mRNA abundance does not support this assumption. Alternate splicing can lead to variant transcripts of adenosine A1R mRNA (14). However, it would seem highly speculative to assume that AT1A mutant mice express an A1R variant that is more angiotensin II dependent than that found in wild-type mice. Previous studies have shown that the renal vasoconstriction caused by adenosine was greatly attenuated in rats in which renal perfusion pressure had been reduced to 70 mmHg (6). Since AT1A receptor knockout mice had a significantly lower blood pressure than wild-type mice, we examined whether lowering of arterial pressure per se could be accountable for the reduced response of PSF to CHA in these animals. Both native TGF responses and CHA-induced constrictor responses were in fact found to be smaller in magnitude than those observed in wild-type mice at ambient blood pressures. However, CHA-induced responses were significantly larger than in knockout mice, suggesting that the diminished CHA constriction in the mutant animals for the most part was not a consequence of the lower blood pressure. Finally, in view of the abnormalities in renal vascular morphology described in angiotensin converting enzyme knockout mice it seems possible that structural alterations in the glomerular microvasculature of AT1A receptor knockout mice may prevent vasoconstrictor responses in general (8). However, such structural changes have not been described in the heterozygous mice, suggesting that the significantly reduced constrictor responses to CHA in AT1A +/- animals have some functional cause. Overall, data are compatible with the view that the blunting of constrictor responses to CHA is another expression of the specific and synergistic interaction between angiotensin II and adenosine that has been observed in earlier experiments using different approaches.

A regulatory mechanism in which adenosine and angiotensin II appear to interact to cause afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction is TGF, the response of afferent arteriolar resistance to changes in NaCl concentration at the macula densa (2). Nonspecific as well as adenosine A1R-specific inhibitors were noted to markedly blunt the efficiency of signal transmission (5, 16, 23, 27). Inhibition of TGF responses was also caused by interference with the generation or action of angiotensin II, whereas peritubular or intravenous infusion of angiotensin II caused an augmentation of TGF responses (12, 18-20, 24-26, 30). Furthermore, results in a recent report as well as our current findings show that TGF responses are essentially obliterated in AT1A receptor knockout mice (28). The coincidence of absent TGF responses and blunted responses to CHA in the AT1A receptor-deficient mice is consistent with the view that an interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II is a major cause for macula densa-controlled changes in afferent arteriolar tone.

In summary, the present experiments show a marked reduction in the response of the glomerular vasculature to the constrictor effect of the adenosine A1R agonist CHA in mice both heterozygous or homozygous for an AT1A receptor knockout mutation. These data support the notion that adenosine-induced vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles is synergistically enhanced by angiotensin II. Furthermore, the coincident absence of both TGF responses and of normal constrictor responses to adenosine A1R activation in AT1A-deficient mice is consistent with the notion that adenosine A1 and AT1A receptors interact to induce macula densa-dependent regulation of afferent arteriolar tone.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-37448, DK-39255, DK-40042, and HL-56122. Support for this work was in part from the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Michigan, funded by National Center for Research Resources Grant M01-RR-00042.

    FOOTNOTES

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests: J. Schnermann, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Building 10, Room 4D51, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1370, Bethesda, MD 20892-1370.

Received 13 April 1998; accepted in final form 27 August 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Beck, E., G. Ludwig, E. A. Auerswald, B. Reiss, and H. Schaller. Nucleotide sequence and exact localization of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene from transposon Tn5. Gene 19: 327-336, 1982[Medline].

2.   Briggs, J. P., and J. Schnermann. The tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism. In: Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management (2nd ed.), edited by J. H. Laragh, and B. M. Brenner. New York: Raven, 1995, p. 1359-1383.

3.   Bruns, R. F., J. W. Daly, and S. H. Snyder. Adenosine receptors in brain membranes: binding of N6-cyclohexyl[3H]adenosine and 1,3-diethyl-8-[3H]phenylxanthine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 5547-5551, 1980[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Dietrich, M. S., K. Endlich, N. Parekh, and M. Steinhausen. Interaction between adenosine and angiotensin II in renal microcirculation. Microvasc. Res. 41: 275-288, 1991[Medline].

5.   Franco, M., P. D. Bell, and L. G. Navar. Effect of adenosine A1 analogue on tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 26): F231-F236, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Haas, J. A., and H. Osswald. Adenosine induced fall in glomerular capillary pressure. Effect of ureteral obstruction and aortic constriction in the Munich-Wistar rat kidney. Arch. Pharmacol. 317: 86-89, 1981.

7.   Hall, J. E., and J. P. Granger. Adenosine alters glomerular filtration control by ANG II. Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 19): F917-F923, 1986.

8.   Hilgers, K. F., V. Reddi, J. H. Krege, O. Smithies, and R. A. Gomez. Aberrant renal vascular morphology and renin expression in mutant mice lacking angiotensin-converting enzyme. Hypertension 29: 216-221, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Ito, M., M. I. Oliverio, P. J. Mannon, C. F. Best, N. Maeda, O. Smithies, and T. M. Coffman. Regulation of blood pressure by the type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 3521-3525, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Joyner, W. L., R. E. Mohama, T. O. Myers, and J. P. Gilmore. The selective response to adenosine of renal microvessels from hamster explants. Microvasc. Res. 35: 122-131, 1988[Medline].

11.   Mahan, L. C., L. D. McVittie, E. M. Smyk-Randall, H. Nakata, F. J. Monsma, C. R. Gerfen, and D. R. Sibley. Cloning and expression of an A1 adenosine receptor from rat brain. Mol. Pharmacol. 40: 1-7, 1991[Abstract].

12.   Mitchell, K. D., and L. G. Navar. Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback during peritubular perfusions of angiotensins I and II. Am. J. Physiol. 255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24): F383-F390, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Murphy, T. J., R. W. Alexander, K. K. Griendling, M. S. Runge, and K. E. Bernstein. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Nature 351: 233-236, 1991[Medline].

14.   Olah, M. E., and G. L. Stiles. Adenosine receptor subtypes: characterization and therapeutic regulation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 35: 581-606, 1995[Medline].

15.   Oliverio, M. I., C. F. Best, H.-S. Kim, W. J. Arendshorst, O. Smithies, and T. M. Coffman. Angiotensin II responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice: a role for AT1B receptors in blood pressure regulation. Am. J. Physiol. 272 (Renal Physiol. 41): F515-F520, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.  Osswald, H., H. H. Hermes, and G. Nabakowski. Role of adenosine in signal transmission of tubuloglomerular feedback. Kidney Int. 22, Suppl. 12: S136-S142, 1982.

17.   Osswald, H., H. J. Schmitz, and O. Heidenreich. Adenosine response of the rat kidney after saline loading, sodium restriction and hemorrhagia. Pflügers Arch. 357: 323-333, 1975[Medline].

18.   Ploth, D. W., J. Rudulph, R. Lagrange, and L. G. Navar. Tubuloglomerular feedback and single nephron function after converting enzyme inhibition in the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 64: 1325-1335, 1979.

19.   Ploth, D. W., and R. N. Roy. Renal and tubuloglomerular feedback effects of (Sar1,Ala8) angiotensin II in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 11): F149-F157, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.  Ploth, D. W., and R. N. Roy. Renin-angiotensin influences on tubuloglomerular feedback activity in the rat. Kidney Int. 22, Suppl. 12: S114-S121, 1982.

21.   Rossi, N. F., P. C. Churchill, K. A. Jacobson, and A. E. Leahy. Further characterization of the renovascular effects of N6-cyclohexyladenosine in the isolated perfused rat kidney. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 240: 911-915, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Schnermann, J. Effect of adenosine analogues on tubuloglomerular feedback responses. Am. J. Physiol. 255 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 24): F33-F42, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Schnermann, J., H. Osswald, and M. Hermle. Inhibitory effect of methylxanthines on feedback control of glomerular filtration rate in the rat kidney. Pflügers Arch. 369: 39-48, 1977[Medline].

24.   Schnermann, J., J. P. Briggs, G. Schubert, and M. Marin-Grez. Opposing effects of captopril and aprotinin on tubuloglomerular feedback responses. Am. J. Physiol. 247 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 16): F912-F918, 1984.

25.   Schnermann, J., and J. P. Briggs. Single nephron comparison of the effect of loop of Henle flow on filtration rate and pressure in control and angiotensin II-infused rats. Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 15: 103-107, 1989[Medline].

26.   Schnermann, J., and J. P. Briggs. Restoration of tubuloglomerular feedback in volume expanded rats by angiotensin II. Am. J. Physiol. 259 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 28): F565-F572, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Schnermann, J., H. Weihprecht, and J. P. Briggs. Inhibition of tubuloglomerular feedback during adenosine1 receptor blockade. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 27): F553-F561, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Schnermann, J., T. Traynor, T. Yang, Y. G. Huang, M. I. Oliverio, T. Coffman, and J. P. Briggs. Absence of tubuloglomerular feedback responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Renal Physiol. 42): F315-F320, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Spielman, W. S., and H. Osswald. Blockade of postocclusive renal vasoconstriction by an ANG II antagonist: evidence for an angiotensin-adenosine interaction. Am. J. Physiol. 237 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 6): F463-F467, 1979.

30.   Stowe, N. T., J. Schnermann, and M. Hermle. Feedback regulation of nephron filtration rate during pharmacologic interference with the renin-angiotensin and adrenergic systems in rats. Kidney Int. 15: 473-486, 1979[Medline].

31.   Thurau, K. Renal hemodynamics. Am. J. Med. 36: 698-719, 1964[Medline].

32.   Weaver, D. R., and S. M. Reppert. Adenosine receptor gene expression in rat kidney. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32): F991-F995, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Weihprecht, H., J. N. Lorenz, J. P. Briggs, and J. Schnermann. Vasomotor effects of purinergic agonists in isolated rabbit afferent arterioles. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32): F1026-F1033, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Weihprecht, H., J. N. Lorenz, J. P. Briggs, and J. Schnermann. Synergistic effects of angiotensin and adenosine in the renal microvasculature. Am. J. Physiol. 266 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 35): F227-F239, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35.   Yang, T., I. Singh, H. Pham, D. Sun, A. Smart, J. B. Schnermann, and J. P. Briggs. Regulation of cyclooxygenase expression in the kidney by dietary salt intake. Am. J. Physiol. 274 (Renal Physiol. 43): F481-F489, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275(6):F922-F927
0002-9513/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Franco, R. Bautista, O. Perez-Mendez, L. Gonzalez, U. Pacheco, L. G. Sanchez-Lozada, J. Santamaria, E. Tapia, R. Monreal, and F. Martinez
Renal interstitial adenosine is increased in angiotensin II-induced hypertensive rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F84 - F92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald
Adenosine and kidney function.
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. W. Inscho
Modulation of renal microvascular function by adenosine
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R23 - R25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. Schnermann
The Juxtaglomerular Apparatus: From Anatomical Peculiarity to Physiological Relevance
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 1681 - 1694.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. K. Jackson, C. Zhu, and S. P. Tofovic
Expression of adenosine receptors in the preglomerular microcirculation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): F41 - F51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
E. K. Jackson and R. K. Dubey
Role of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway in renal physiology
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F597 - F612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. K. Jackson and Z. Mi
Preglomerular Microcirculation Expresses the cAMP-Adenosine Pathway
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T. Traynor, T. Yang, Y. G. Huang, J. H. Krege, J. P. Briggs, O. Smithies, and J. Schnermann
Tubuloglomerular feedback in ACE-deficient mice
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): F751 - F757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. Brown, A. Ollerstam, B. Johansson, O. Skott, S. Gebre-Medhin, B. Fredholm, and A. E. G. Persson
Abolished tubuloglomerular feedback and increased plasma renin in adenosine A1 receptor-deficient mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1362 - R1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schnermann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schnermann, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online