|
|
||||||||
B
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1074
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present studies
were conducted to determine the pharmacological nature of a
cytoprotective 11-deoxy-16,16-dimethyl-PGE2 (DDM-PGE2) receptor in LLC-PK1 cells.
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection against
2,3,5-(trisglutathion-S-yl)hydroquinone (TGHQ)-mediated cytotoxicity can be reproduced using thromboxane A2
(TXA2) receptor (TP) agonists (U46619 and
IBOP), and the cytoprotective response to
DDM-PGE2 and TP agonists is inhibited by TP antagonists
(SQ-29,548 and ISAP). Western blot analysis using an
antipeptide antibody against the human platelet TP receptor (55 kDa)
identified a particulate associated 54-kDa protein.
DDM-PGE2-mediated 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) responsive element (TRE) binding activity is
not inhibited by cyclooxygenase inhibitors (aspirin and
indomethacin) or a TXA2 synthase inhibitor
(sulfasalazine), suggesting that the biological response to
DDM-PGE2 is not dependent on de novo TXA2
biosynthesis. Peak DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated TRE
binding activity and nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) binding activity are
inhibited by SQ-29,548. The full cytoprotective response to
DDM-PGE2 requires an 8-h pulse with agonist.
DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE and NF-
B binding activity remain
elevated in the presence of agonist and rapidly decay following agonist
washout, suggesting a direct correlation between
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection and persistent DNA binding activities. TPA, a protein kinase C activator, induces cytoprotection and a persistent increase of NF-
B binding activity.
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection and NF-
B binding
activity but not TRE binding activity are inhibited by sulfasalazine.
We conclude that the DDM-PGE2 receptor is a TP receptor and
that the cytoprotective response may be mediated in part by NF-
B.
quinone-thioether; TP receptor; protein kinase C; kidney
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A SINGLE GENE ENCODES the thromboxane A2
(TXA2) receptor (TP), and two alternative splice variants,
termed TP
and TP
, have been identified (23). Alternative splicing
occurs selectively in the carboxy terminus and confers association with
different G proteins, supporting the idea that these receptors couple
to different signal transduction pathways (13, 14). The tissue distribution of TP subtypes has been investigated using a variety of
techniques.
{1S-[1a,2b(5Z),3a(1E,3S)4a}-7- {3-[3-hydroxy-4(p-iodophenoxy)-1-butenyl]-7-oxabi-cyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl}-5-heptanoic acid ([125I]BOP; IBOP) is a widely used
TP agonist that detects a single high-affinity site on cultured
human vascular smooth muscle cells, a high-affinity and a low-affinity
site on human platelets, and a low-affinity site on K562 chronic
myelogenous leukemia cells (7). IBOP is also a
high-affinity agonist for a renal TP subtype (7). Consistent with
agonist binding studies, two platelet binding sites have been
identified using the TP antagonist GR-32191 (36). GR-32191 dissociates
rapidly from one site (GRr) and appears to bind
irreversibly to the other (GRirr). GRirr sites
are associated with inositol phospholipid (IP) turnover, increased
intracellular calcium, and activation of protein kinase C (PKC),
whereas GRr sites are associated with platelet shape change
and increased intracellular calcium levels, presumably from an
IP3-insensitive source (36). Platelet activating factor
heterologously downregulates GRirr but not GRr
sites on human platelets (24). TP subtypes are differentially
desensitized by phorbol ester, a potent activator of PKC, further
supporting the dissociation of these receptors (39).
In platelets and smooth muscle cells, TP-related signal transduction is
associated with increased intracellular calcium levels, IP turnover,
activation of PKC, and increased mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK)-related activity (2, 15, 25, 30). In addition, TP-related signal
transduction is associated with activation of Ras in platelets (31) but
not in smooth muscle cells (17). PKC represents a family of at least 11 different isoforms that regulate diverse cellular functions from the
cell membrane to the nucleus. Of importance to the present work, PKC isoforms are known to regulate the activity of a number of
transcription factors, including activator protein-1 (AP-1) and nuclear
factor-
B (NF-
B; 16, 19, 21). AP-1 is a heterodimeric complex of
c-jun (c-Jun, JunB, JunD) and c-fos (c-Fos, Fos B,
Fra-1) protooncogene family members, as either a Jun:Jun
homodimer or Jun:Fos heterodimer (16, 26). NF-
B DNA binding activity
is associated with at least five different NF-
B family members:
NF-
B1 (p105/p50), NF-
B2 (p100/p52), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel
(37). The most common NF-
B dimers consist of RelA (p65) and NF-
B1
(p50) or NF-
B2 (p52) subunits (32).
We have recently reported that PGE2 and
11-deoxy-16,16-dimethyl PGE2 (DDM-PGE2) induce
protection against
2,3,5-(trisglutathion-S-yl)hydroquinone (TGHQ)- mediated cytotoxicity in renal proximal tubule
epithelial cells (LLC-PK1; see Ref. 38). The
DDM-PGE2 receptor is coupled to PKC, as evidenced by the
induction of 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA)
responsive element (TRE) binding activity, inhibition of DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity by a PKC inhibitor,
and induction of cytoprotection by a PKC activator (TPA). Although DDM-PGE2 is a stable PGE2 analog, established
agonists for the known PGE2 receptor subtypes
(EP1, EP2, EP3, EP4)
failed to induce cytoprotection or TRE binding activity, suggesting
that the DDM-PGE2 receptor was unrelated to the presently
known EP subtypes. The present studies were conducted to determine the
pharmacological nature of the DDM-PGE2 receptor, and to
investigate a putative transcriptional requirement for the
cytoprotective response to DDM-PGE2. Our data suggest that
the cytoprotective response of renal epithelial cells to
DDM-PGE2 is mediated by a TP receptor coupled to NF-
B.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals. TGHQ was synthesized as previously described (20)
and was greater than 98% pure as determined by HPLC.
DDM-PGE2, 17-phenyltrinor-PGE2, sulprostone,
PGE1, U46619, and SQ-29,548 were obtained from Cayman
Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). Formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, glycerol,
and ethanol were from Fisher Scientific (Houston, TX). TRE, NF-
B,
and AP-2 consensus sequences were purchased from Promega
(Madison, WI). [
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) was
obtained from New England Nuclear (Beverly, MA). Poly D(I-C) was from
Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). All other chemicals were from
Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
Cell culture. LLC-PK1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (CL101) at passage 181. Cells were maintained in DMEM (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS) supplemented with 4 g/l D-glucose (Sigma) and 10% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA) in 5% CO2-95% air at 37°C. Cells were subcultured by trypsinization, and all experiments were conducted with 5 day postconfluent cultures at passage levels 187-200.
Pretreatment of LLC-PK1 cells with prostanoids. The protocol for PG-mediated cytoprotection has previously been described (38). Briefly, LLC-PK1 cells are seeded in 24-well plates and maintained in 10% FBS-DMEM until 5 days postconfluent, with media replacement every 2 days. Cultures are then rinsed three times with PBS and exposed to prostanoids in 10% FBS-DMEM for 1-24 h. Prior to TGHQ challenge, media is aspirated, and cell monolayers were rinsed three times with PBS to remove residual prostaglandin.
Cell viability. Measurements of cell viability were determined by a neutral red assay as described (38). Briefly, vehicle or prostaglandin-pretreated cells are rinsed three times with PBS and exposed to 300 µM TGHQ in 0.1% FBS-DMEM and 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) for 2 h in a final volume of 0.5 ml. Following chemical challenge, cells are washed three times with PBS and exposed to 50 µg/ml neutral red in 0.1% FBS-DMEM and 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) for 1 h. Monolayers are washed once with 1 ml of a 1% formaldehyde/1% calcium chloride solution, and neutral red was extracted from the cells with 1 ml of a 1% glacial acetic acid/50% ethanol solution for 15 min at room temperature while protected from light. The extracted dye is quantified spectrophotometrically at 540 nm, and results were expressed as percent of control.
Aspirin, indomethacin, and sulfasalazine treatment. Aspirin (1 mM), indomethacin (10 µM), or sulfasalazine (2 mM) was solubilized in 10% FBS-DMEM with gentle sonication, and the media were then sterile filtered (0.2 µm). LLC-PK1 cells were pretreated with aspirin, indomethacin, or sulfasalazine for 30 min prior to addition of DDM-PGE2 (1 µM, 24 h). Following DDM-PGE2 treatment, cells were exposed to TGHQ (300 µM, 2 h), and cell viability was determined as described above.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays (EMSAs) were carried out as described previously (38).
LLC-PK1 cells are collected and lysed in a HEGD buffer [25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 1.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 0.1 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)] using 20 strokes with a Dounce homogenizer. Homogenates are centrifuged at 12,000 g in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge at 4°C for 5 min, and the
supernatant was discarded. The remaining pellet is centrifuged for 10 s, and the residual supernatant was aspirated. The pellet is extracted with 40 µl HEGDK buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 1.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml PMSF, and 0.5 M KCl) for 1 h on ice.
Extracted pellets are centrifuged at 16,000 g for 20 min at
4°C, and the supernatant was designated as the nuclear
extract. Protein concentrations are determined by the
method of Bradford (5) with BSA as standard. For mobility shift assays,
10 µg of nuclear extract were incubated in a reaction mixture
consisting of 18.8 mM HEPES, 40 mM KCl, 1.1 mM EDTA, 7.5% glycerol,
0.75 mM DTT, and 62.5 ng/µl poly D(I-C) for 15 min at 25°C to
reduce interference by nonspecific DNA binding proteins.
[
-32P]ATP-labeled TRE or NF-
B (3.5 nM)
probe is added for 15 min to determine DNA binding activity. Bound DNA
is separated on a 5% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel for 2 h at 120 V. Specificity for the binding reaction is confirmed by addition of
excess target or nontarget DNA, which competitively eliminates the
inducible band or is without effect, respectively. Gels are dried and
exposed to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham) for autoradiography or quantified by electronic autoradiography using a Packard Instant Imager.
Statistics. Individual comparisons were made using the
Student's t-test or ANOVA with a post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls
test, as appropriate. P
0.05 was accepted as significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DDM-PGE2 receptor is pharmacologically distinct from
the currently known EP subtypes (38). Studies were conducted to investigate a role for the TP receptor in the cytoprotective response to DDM-PGE2. LLC-PK1 cells were cotreated with
1 µM DDM-PGE2 and 0.01-1.0 µM SQ-29,548 (TP
antagonist) for 24 h, then subsequently treated with a moderately toxic
concentration of TGHQ (300 µM) for 2 h, and cell viability was
determined. Pretreatment of cells with DDM-PGE2 protected
against TGHQ-mediated cytotoxicity, and SQ-29,548 fully inhibited
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1).
|
To further investigate the specificity of this response, the
cytoprotective property of structurally distinct TP
pharmacons were evaluated. Treatment of
LLC-PK1 cells with 0.05-10 µM U46619 (TP agonist)
for 24 h induced cytoprotection against TGHQ-mediated (300 µM, 2 h)
cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig.
2). The TP antagonist
[1S-[1a,2b(Z),3a,5a]]-7-[3-[[(4-iodophenyl)sulfonyl]amino]-6,6-dimethylbi-cyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-yl]-5-heptenoic acid (ISAP; 1 µM) inhibited the cytoprotective response
of LLC-PK1 cells to DDM-PGE2 and U46619 (Fig.
3). Pretreatment of LLC-PK1 cells with the TP agonist IBOP for 24 h afforded protection against TGHQ-mediated (300 µM, 2 h) cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent fashion, and this response was inhibited by cotreatment with ISAP and
SQ-29,548 (1 µM, Fig. 4). Collectively,
these data indicated a role for thromboxane pharmacology in the
cytoprotective response to DDM-PGE2. However, it is
possible that DDM-PGE2 induces the cyclooxygenase-dependent
biosynthesis of TXA2 and is not a direct ligand for the
putative TP receptor. To test this hypothesis, we examined the
induction of DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity, a
marker of receptor activation (38), in the presence and absence of
cyclooxygenase inhibitors. LLC-PK1 cells were pretreated
for 30 min with 10 µM indomethacin and 1 mM aspirin, then
subsequently treated with DDM-PGE2 for 2 h, and nuclear
extracts were prepared as described in MATERIALS AND
METHODS. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity by aspirin and
indomethacin was verified using a PGE2 radioimmunoassay
(RIA) (NEN DuPont, Boston, MA; data not shown). Pretreatment with
aspirin and indomethacin did not modulate peak DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity (Fig.
5), suggesting this response is not
dependent on cyclooxygenase activity. Of interest, our results contrast
historical reports indicating that LLC-PK1 cells have low
cyclooxygenase activity. Although the specific reason for this
discrepancy cannot be determined, there are several plausible
explanations. The PGE2 RIAs used over 20 years ago
demonstrate PGE2 detection in the nanogram-per-milliliter
range, whereas the PGE2 RIAs used in the present studies
can detect PGE2 in the picogram-per-milliliter range. Thus
the detection of PGE2 synthesis in our studies may be
related to state-of-the-art for prostaglandin
measurements. Alternatively, the LLC-PK1 cell line used in
earlier studies was at low passage (passage 5-30), whereas the
LLC-PK1 cells used in this present study are high passage
(passage 187-200). Therefore, it is also feasible that in vitro
selection has resulted in a LLC-PK1 phenotype with enhanced
prostanoid biosynthetic capabilities.
|
|
|
|
Studies were conducted to determine the presence of a
particulate-associated TP receptor by Western blot using
an antipeptide antibody (P2) against the human platelet TP
receptor (kind gift of Dr. Guy Le Breton, University of Illinois at
Chicago; Ref. 3). Western blot analysis demonstrated the presence of a
particulate-associated 54-kDa protein that immunoreacts with the TP
antibody (Fig. 6A). Control
reactions with secondary antibody alone were included to determine
nonspecific binding and clearly demonstrated that detection of the
54-kDa protein was dependent on the anti-TP antibody (Fig. 6B).
|
We have previously demonstrated that the cytoprotective properties of
DDM-PGE2 and PGE2, but not
17-phenyltrinor-PGE2, sulprostone, or
PGE1, correlate with increased TRE binding activity in
LLC-PK1 cells (38). A standard EMSA was conducted to
determine whether these agonists also modulate NF-
B binding
activity. NF-
B binding activity was increased in LLC-PK1
cells treated for 2 h with 20 µM DDM-PGE2 and
PGE2, but not 17-phenyltrinor-PGE2,
sulprostone, PGE1, or vehicle (Fig.
7). The high dose (20 µM) used was to
ensure agonist concentration was not limiting. The NF-
B binding
response consists of two inducible complexes, the major binding
activity is termed "complex 1" and a minor binding activity
termed "complex 2." It is not known whether these complexes
represent the DNA binding activities associated with different NF-
B
subunits or with degradation products. Consistent with a
role for thromboxane pharmacology in the cytoprotective response, peak
DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated (1 µM) TRE binding and
NF-
B binding activity was inhibited by cotreatment of cells with 1 µM SQ-29,548 (Fig. 8).
|
|
Inducible TRE binding activity was examined in LLC-PK1
cells treated with DDM-PGE2 and U46619 as either a
continuous exposure for up to 6 h, or as a 1-h pulse, followed by
washing to remove the prostanoid analog and incubation in
prostanoid-free medium for the remainder of the experiment. Treatment
of cells with 1 µM DDM-PGE2 and U46619 as a continuous
exposure resulted in the induction of peak TRE binding activity at ~2
h (Fig. 9: DDM-PGE2, solid circles; U46619, solid
squares), and TRE binding activity remained elevated in
the presence of these agonists for the time points examined (Fig.
9A). In contrast,
DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated TRE binding activities
rapidly decayed following agonist washout (Fig. 9:
DDM-PGE2, open circles; U46619, open
squares). An identical response is observed for
DDM-PGE2-mediated NF-
B binding activity (Fig.
9B). The NF-
B binding response was maintained in the
presence of DDM-PGE2 (1 µM) and rapidly decayed following
agonist washout (1-h pulse).
|
There was a clear association between the presence of agonist and
persistent DNA binding activities (Fig. 9). To determine the
significance of this association, we examined the relationship between
DDM-PGE2 exposure time and cytoprotection.
LLC-PK1 cells were exposed to 1 µM DDM-PGE2
at time 0. The media containing DDM-PGE2 was
removed at various times (0.5-8 h) thereafter, the cells were
washed with PBS, and control media (10% FBS-DMEM) was added for the
remainder of the 24-h pretreatment period. Following this treatment
regimen, cells were exposed to 300 µM TGHQ for 2 h, and cell
viability was determined. A 0.5-h pulse with DDM-PGE2 induced a marginal, but significant cytoprotection against
TGHQ-mediated cytotoxicity, whereas an 8-h pulse was required for
induction of maximal cytoprotective activity (Fig.
10). Collectively, these observations
demonstrated a direct correlation between the presence of agonist,
persistent DNA binding activities, and cytoprotection.
|
We have provided evidence that the cytoprotective response is
associated with PKC-related signal transduction, and can be induced by
a PKC activator (TPA; 38). TPA-mediated cytoprotection is associated
with a persistent induction of TRE binding activity, but we have not
examined whether TPA modulates NF-
B. LLC-PK1 cells were
treated with 10 ng/ml TPA or DMSO for up to 5 h, and NF-
B binding
activity was determined by EMSA. TPA increased NF-
B binding
activity, and this response was sustained at all times examined (Fig.
11).
|
Sulfasalazine inhibits NF-
B binding activity, but not TRE binding
activity, and the dose-response relationship for this effect is steep
(0.2-2 mM; 37). In addition, sulfasalazine is also a TXA2 synthase inhibitor (IC50 of 0.9 mM; 34).
Therefore, sulfasalazine was used to investigate a differential
requirement for TRE or NF-
B binding activity, as well as
TXA2 synthase activity in the cytoprotective response to
DDM-PGE2. To verify the differential inhibitory effect of
sulfasalazine on TRE and NF-
B binding activity, LLC-PK1
cells were pretreated for 30 min with 2 mM sulfasalazine, then
subsequently treated with 1 µM DDM-PGE2 for 2 h, and
nuclear extracts were prepared as described in MATERIALS AND
METHODS. Sulfasalazine pretreatment inhibited
DDM-PGE2-mediated NF-
B but not TRE binding activity
(Fig. 12). The effect of sulfasalazine on
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection was then examined.
LLC-PK1 cells were pretreated with 2 mM sulfasalazine for
30 min followed by 1 µM DDM-PGE2 for 24 h. Cells were
then exposed to 300 µM TGHQ for 2 h and cell viability determined as
described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sulfasalazine
pretreatment fully inhibited the cytoprotective response to
DDM-PGE2 (Fig. 13).
Sulfasalazine alone did not modulate cell viability relative to
control, suggesting this response is not secondary to a cytotoxic
response to sulfasalazine. Collectively, these observations
specifically implicate NF-
B binding activity in the cytoprotective
response.
|
|
Recently, evidence has been presented for the existence of a novel
isoprostane receptor and a number of laboratories are currently attempting to dissociate the isoprostane response from the TP receptor
(8, 9, 22). Two ligands have generally been used to investigate
isoprostane function, namely 8-iso-PGF2
and 8-iso-PGE2, and the biological response to these agents is
cell-type specific. Treatment of LLC-PK1 cells with
8-iso-PGF2
and 8-iso-PGE2 (1 µM, 2 h) did
not modulate TRE- or NF-
B binding activity or induce cytoprotection
in LLC-PK1 cells (data not shown), suggesting that the
DDM-PGE2 receptor is unrelated to the putative isoprostane receptor.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism of prostaglandin-mediated cytoprotection is not known,
but cellular and systemic components have been reported (10, 11, 28,
29). We have previously demonstrated that DDM-PGE2 induces
cytoprotection against quinone-thioether-mediated cytotoxicity in
LLC-PK1 cells via a receptor that is pharmacologically distinct from the known EP subtypes (38). The present work extends our
original observations and suggests that the DDM-PGE2
receptor is a TP receptor coupled to TRE and NF-
B binding activity.
A number of observations suggest that DDM-PGE2 elicits its cytoprotective effect through a TP receptor, including 1) DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection is inhibited by the TP antagonists SQ-29,548 and ISAP (Figs. 1 and 3), 2) TP agonists (U46619 and IBOP) induce cytoprotection (Figs. 2 and 4), and 3) TP agonist-mediated cytoprotection is inhibited by TP antagonists (Fig. 3 and 4). SQ-29,548 inhibits DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated TRE binding activity (Fig. 8), suggesting these pharmacons interact with a common receptor. DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity is not sensitive to cyclooxygenase or TXA2 synthase inhibitors, indicating this response is not dependent on de novo TXA2 synthesis. Collectively, these observations suggest that DDM-PGE2 is a ligand for the LLC-PK1 TP receptor. Western blot analysis indicates the presence of a particulate-associated 54-kDa protein in LLC-PK1 cells that immunoreacts with an antipeptide antibody against the human platelet TP receptor (55 kDa; Fig. 6), and the TP receptor has been detected in this cell type in vivo (35).
Although DDM-PGE2 is a stable PGE2 analog, we
have previously shown that EP receptor agonists do not induce TRE
binding activity, suggesting the DDM-PGE2 receptor is
unrelated to the presently known EP subtypes (38). Consistent with this
observation, EP agonists (17-phenyltrinor-PGE2,
sulprostone, and PGE1) do not modulate NF-
B binding
activity (Fig. 6). In addition, a unique class of arachidonic acid
metabolites termed the isoprostanes have been associated with
thromboxane pharmacology, although there is evidence suggesting the
existence of a unique isoprostane receptor (8, 9, 22). However,
8-iso-PGE2 and 8-iso-PGF2
did not modulate
TRE- or NF-
B binding activity in LLC-PK1 cells (data not
shown), suggesting that the DDM-PGE2 receptor is unrelated to the putative isoprostane receptor. We have evidence that the isoprostanes modulate target biological responses in other cell types,
suggesting the lack of response to isoprostanes is not related to
chemical stability or handling issues (unpublished observations).
The TP receptor is known to couple to the PKC and/or MAPK pathways (2,
15, 25, 30). Inducible TRE binding activity is a marker of AP-1
activation, which is considered a nuclear third messenger in the PKC
cascade. We have previously demonstrated that
DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity and cytoprotection are inhibited by a PKC inhibitor (38). In the present study, we extend
these observations and show that DDM-PGE2 and TP agonists increase TRE- and NF-
B binding activity in LLC-PK1
cells, and this response is inhibited by TP antagonists (Fig. 8). Thus
the molecular response of LLC-PK1 cells to
DDM-PGE2 is consistent with TP-related signal transduction.
Interestingly, DDM-PGE2-mediated DNA binding activities
remain elevated in the presence of agonist but rapidly decay following
agonist washout (Fig. 9). This observation suggests that
LLC-PK1 cells lack a negative feedback leading to receptor
desensitization, and differential desensitization of TP subtypes has
been reported (39). Additional studies are warranted to define the
regulation of DNA binding activities by the DDM-PGE2 receptor.
Western blot analysis using a TP antibody (kind gift of Dr. Guy Le Breton) detected a discrete 54-kDa band in the particulate fraction of LLC-PK1 cells. A number of plausible interpretations for the lower mobility and discrete nature of this band have been identified. Differences in the molecular mass of the TP receptor from different species and tissues (ranging from 52-58 kDa) have been reported (4, 14) and may account for the slight difference in molecular mass for the human platelet and porcine renal epithelial TP receptor. Alternative splicing also produces TP receptors with different apparent molecular masses (14). The platelet preparation is used as a positive control, and meaningful comparisons cannot be made for relative signal intensities. Alternatively, we have provided evidence that the LLC-PK1 TP receptor is not desensitized following agonist challenge, an event associated with posttranslational modification of the target TP receptor subtype (12, 33). Lack of posttranslational modification could account for the discrete nature of the band observed by Western blot, however, additional studies are required to validate this hypothesis. Importantly, the presence of a particulate-associated protein that immunoreacts with an anti-TP antibody in the predicted molecular mass range supports the existence of a TP receptor in LLC-PK1 cells and is consistent with the observed pharmacology.
At the molecular level, DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated TRE
and NF-
B binding activities are inhibited by a TP antagonist (Fig. 8), consistent with the suggestion that these agonists interact with a
common receptor and implicating transcriptional activities in the
cytoprotective response. DDM-PGE2 is a stable prostanoid analog, and exposure of LLC-PK1 cells to this agonist
results in a persistent increase of DNA binding activities (Fig. 9). In fact, a continuous exposure (8-h pulse) to DDM-PGE2 is
required for the induction of maximal cytoprotection (Fig. 10). In
experiments where agonist is washed out after a short-term pulse (1 h),
the DNA binding response rapidly decays to control values (Fig. 9) and
the cytoprotective response is dramatically reduced (Fig. 10).
Consistent with a requirement for persistent DNA binding activity in
the cytoprotective response, TPA-mediated cytoprotection is associated
with a persistent increase of TRE binding (38) and NF-
B binding
(Fig. 11) activities. To directly test a requirement for NF-
B
binding activity in the cytoprotective response, we pretreated
LLC-PK1 cells with sulfasalazine, an NF-
B but not TRE
binding activity inhibitor (37). Sulfasalazine inhibits NF-
B but not
TRE binding activity in LLC-PK1 cells (Fig. 12) and fully
inhibits DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection (Fig. 13). These data suggest an important role for NF-
B binding activity in the cytoprotective response to DDM-PGE2. Although sulfasalazine
did not inhibit TRE binding activity, the role of TRE binding activity cannot be determined from these studies. For example, if the
cytoprotective response is dependent on a gene regulated by both
NF-
B and TRE binding activity, then loss of either would result in
loss of target gene expression and cytoprotection. Thus additional
studies are required to determine the role of TRE binding activity in the cytoprotective response.
It is important to recognize that TXA2 biosynthesis is largely implicated in renal pathophysiology (1). Increases in TXA2 biosynthesis contribute to renal pathologies characterized clinically by progression to end-stage failure, including diabetic nephropathy or loss of renal parenchymal mass (6). TXA2 is also implicated in the pathophysiology of nephritis, allograft transplantation rejection, and urinary tract obstruction. The adverse effects of TXA2 in the kidney are largely attributed to dietary constituents and/or hemodynamic alterations within the glomerulus (6). Inhibition of thromboxane synthase activity or antagonism of TP receptors prevents the exacerbation of renal injury caused by these diseases (for a review see Ref. 27). These observations have provided a rationale for pursuing TXA2-blocking strategies through drug development or dietary intervention.
Few investigators have considered a beneficial role for TP agonists against chemical-induced injury. With the emergence of TP subtypes and putative novel TXA2 binding receptors such as the isoprostane receptor, it remains to be determined whether the adverse effects of TXA2 will be associated with a specific receptor subtype or localized to a target cell type. Although preventing TXA2 function may be beneficial to pathologies involving the deregulation of renal hemodynamics or in the progression of glomerular nephropathies, there may be adverse side effects to these strategies. Our data raise the possibility that renal proximal tubule epithelial cells express a TP receptor that induces protection against chemical-induced injury, an observation that is inconsistent with the association of TXA2-related signaling with renal pathology. Although additional studies are required to determine the regulation of this pathway in vivo, inhibition of TXA2-related pharmacology could interfere with the cellular defense/repair mechanisms of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells acting through the DDM-PGE2 receptor. Alternatively, the DDM-PGE2 receptor could be exploited for its protective properties through the development of a selective agonist. This proposal is consistent with a recent report describing TP subtype selective agonists (AGN-191976, AGN-192093) with differential activity on TP receptor-mediated events in platelets and smooth muscle preparations (18).
In summary, studies were conducted to determine the pharmacological
nature of the DDM-PGE2 receptor in LLC-PK1
cells. Our data suggest that the cytoprotective response to
DDM-PGE2 is mediated by a TP receptor. Inhibition of
DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE- and NF-
B binding activity by TP
antagonists, coupled with the insensitivity of
DDM-PGE2-mediated TRE binding activity to cyclooxygenase
and thromboxane synthase inhibitors, suggests DDM-PGE2 is a
direct ligand for the putative TP receptor. In addition,
DDM-PGE2- and U46619-mediated cytoprotection
is associated with the induction of multiple DNA binding activities,
raising the possibility that transcriptional activity is required for
the cytoprotective response. Sulfasalazine fully inhibits
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection and NF-
B binding
activity supporting a transcriptional component in
DDM-PGE2-mediated cytoprotection.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by National Institute of General Medical Sciences Award GM-56321 (to S. S. Lau) and by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Awards P30-ES07784 (Center Grant) and T32-ES-07247 (to T. J. Weber).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address of T. J. Weber: Molecular Biosciences Department, 902 Battelle Blvd, P7-56, Richland, WA 99352.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. S. Lau, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1074 (E-mail: slau{at}mail.utexas.edu).
Received 20 May 1999; accepted in final form 19 August 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Abe, T.,
K. Takeuchi,
N. Takahashi,
E. Tsutsumi,
Y. Taniyama,
and
K. Abe.
Rat kidney thromboxane receptor: molecular cloning, signal transduction, and intrarenal expression localization.
Cancer Res.
96:
657-664,
1995.
2.
Armstrong, R. A.,
and
N. H. Wilson.
Aspects of the thromboxane receptor system.
Gen. Pharmacol.
26:
463-472,
1995[ISI][Medline].
3.
Borg, C.,
S. C. Lam,
J. P. Dieter,
C. T. Lim,
D. Komiotis,
D. L. Venton,
and
G. C. Le Breton.
Anti-peptide antibodies against the human blood platelet thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor. Production, purification and characterization.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
45:
2071-2078,
1993[ISI][Medline].
4.
Borg, C.,
C. T. Lim,
D. C. Yeomans,
J. P. Dieter,
D. Komiotis,
E. G. Anderson,
and
G. C. Le Breton.
Purification of rat brain, rabbit aorta, and human platelet thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptors by immunoaffinity chromatography employing anti-peptide and anti-receptor antibodies.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
6109-6116,
1994
5.
Bradford, M. M.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:
248-254,
1976[ISI][Medline].
6.
Bruggeman, L. A.,
E. A. Horigan,
S. Horikoshi,
P. E. Ray,
and
P. E. Klotman.
Thromboxane stimulates synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins in vitro.
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol.
261:
F488-F494,
1991
7.
D'Angelo, D. D.,
T. Terasawa,
S. J. Carlisle,
G. W. Dorn,
and
K. R. Lynch.
Characterization of a rat kidney thromboxane A2 receptor: high affinity for the agonist ligand I-BOP.
Prostaglandins
52:
303-316,
1996[Medline].
8.
Fukunaga, M.,
K. Takahashi,
and
K. F. Badr.
Vascular smooth muscle actions and receptor interactions of 8-iso-prostaglandin E2, an E2-isoprostane.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195:
507-515,
1993[ISI][Medline].
9.
Fukunaga, M.,
T. Yura,
R. Grygorczyk,
and
K. F. Badr.
Evidence for the distinct nature of F2-isoprostane receptors from those of thromboxane A2.
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
272:
F477-F483,
1997
10.
Guth, P. H.,
G. Paulsen,
and
K. Hirabayashi.
Prostaglandin cytoprotection. Prostaglandin does not protect against aspirin- or alcohol-induced red blood cell hemolysis.
Dig. Dis. Sci.
28:
903-907,
1983[ISI][Medline].
11.
Guth, P. H.,
G. Paulsen,
H. Nagata,
F. Leung,
A. Robert,
and
Y. Ohya.
Prostaglandin cytoprotection: role of microcirculatory changes.
Adv. Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot. Res.
15:
637-639,
1985[Medline].
12.
Habib, A.,
G. A. Fitzgerald,
and
J. MacLouf.
Phosphorylation of the thromboxane receptor alpha, the predominant isoform expressed in human platelets.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:
2645-2651,
1999
13.
Hirata, T.,
F. Ushikubi,
A. Kakizuka,
M. Okuma,
and
S. Narumiya.
Two thromboxane A2 receptor isoforms in human platelets. Opposite coupling to adenylyl cyclase with different sensitivity to Arg60 to Leu mutation.
J. Clin. Invest.
97:
949-956,
1996[ISI][Medline].
14.
Honma, S.,
N. Nakahata,
and
Y. Ohizumi.
Human astrocytoma cells express two thromboxane A2 receptor subtypes that communicate with Gq and G12.
Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediators
55:
159-168,
1998.
15.
Karim, S.,
E. Berrou,
S. Levy-Toledano,
M. Bryckaert,
and
J. MacLouf.
Regulatory role of prostaglandin E2 in induction of cyclooxygenase-2 by a thromboxane A2 analog (U46619) and basic fibroblast growth factor in porcine aortic smooth-muscle cells.
Biochem. J.
326:
593-599,
1997.
16.
Karin, M.,
and
T. Smeal.
Control of transcription factors by signal transduction pathways: the beginning of the end.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17:
418-422,
1992[ISI][Medline].
17.
Ko, F. N.,
S. M. Yu,
Y. F. Kang,
and
C. M. Teng.
Characterization of the thromboxane (TP) receptor subtype involved in proliferation in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells of rat.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
116:
1801-1808,
1995[ISI][Medline].
18.
Krauss, A. H.,
D. F. Woodward,
L. L. Gibson,
C. E. Protzman,
L. S. Williams,
R. M. Burk,
T. S. Gac,
M. B. Roof,
F. Abbas,
K. Marshall,
and
J. Senior.
Evidence for human thromboxane receptor heterogeneity using a novel series of 9,11-cyclic carbonate derivatives of prostaglandin F2 alpha.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
117:
1171-1180,
1996[ISI][Medline].
19.
La Porta, C. A.,
and
R. Comolli.
PKC-dependent modulation of IkB alpha-NF
B pathway in low metastatic B16F1 murine melanoma cells and in highly metastatic BL6 cells.
Anticancer Res.
18:
2591-2597,
1998[ISI][Medline].
20.
Lau, S. S.,
B. A. Hill,
R. J. Highet,
and
T. J. Monks.
Sequential oxidation and glutathione addition to 1,4-benzoquinone: correlation of toxicity with increased glutathione substitution.
Mol. Pharmacol.
34:
829-836,
1988[Abstract].
21.
Li, J. J.,
C. Westergaard,
P. Ghosh,
and
N. H. Colburn.
Inhibitors of both nuclear factor-
B and activator protein-1 activation block the neoplastic transformation response.
Cancer Res.
57:
3569-3576,
1997
22.
Longmire, A. W.,
L. J. Roberts,
and
J. D. Morrow.
Actions of the E2-isoprostane, 8-iso-PGE2, on the platelet thromboxane/endoperoxide receptor in humans and rats: additional evidence for the existence of a unique isoprostane receptor.
Prostaglandins
48:
247-256,
1994[ISI][Medline].
23.
Miggin, S. M.,
and
B. T. Kinsella.
Expression and tissue distribution of the mRNAs encoding the human thromboxane A2 receptor (TP) alpha and beta isoforms.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1425:
543-559,
1998[Medline].
24.
Murray, R.,
E. Shipp,
and
G. A. Fitzgerald.
Prostaglandin endoperoxide/thromboxane A2 receptor desensitization. Cross-talk with adenylate cyclase in human platelets.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
21670-21675,
1990
25.
Ohkubo, S.,
N. Nakahata,
and
Y. Ohizumi.
Thromboxane A2 stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase and arachidonic acid liberation in rabbit platelets.
Prostaglandins
52:
403-413,
1996[ISI][Medline].
26.
Olson, E. N.,
R. Burgess,
and
J. Staudinger.
Protein kinase C as a transducer of nuclear signals.
Cell Growth Differ.
4:
699-705,
1993[ISI][Medline].
27.
Remuzzi, G.,
G. A. Fitzgerald,
and
C. Patrono.
Thromboxane synthesis and action within the kidney.
Kidney Int.
41:
1483-1493,
1992[ISI][Medline].
28.
Robert, A.
Cytoprotection by prostaglandins.
Gastroenterology
77:
761-767,
1979[ISI][Medline].
29.
Ruwart, M. J.
Protection of the liver against various damaging agents.
In: Biological Protection With Prostaglandins, edited by M. M. Cohen. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1986, p. 229-243.
30.
Sachinidis, A.,
M. Flesch,
Y. Ko,
K. Schror,
M. Bohm,
R. Dusing,
and
H. Vetter.
Thromboxane A2 and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation.
Hypertension
26:
771-780,
1995
31.
Shock, D. D.,
K. He,
J. D. Wencel-Drake,
and
L. V. Parise.
Ras activation in platelets after stimulation of the thrombin receptor, thromboxane A2 receptor or protein kinase C.
Biochem. J.
321:
525-530,
1997.
32.
Siebenlist, U.,
G. Franzoso,
and
K. Brown.
Structure, regulation and function of NF-
B.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10:
405-455,
1994[ISI].
33.
Spurney, R. F.
Role of C-terminal serines in desensitization and phosphorylation of the mouse thromboxane receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:
28496-28503,
1998
34.
Stenson, W. F.,
and
E. Lobos.
Inhibition of platelet thromboxane synthetase by sulfasalazine.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
32:
2205-2209,
1983[ISI][Medline].
35.
Takabashi, K.,
T. M. Nammour,
M. Fukunaga,
J. Ebert,
J. D. Morrow,
L. J. Roberts,
R. L. Hoover,
and
K. F. Badr.
Glomerular actions of a free radical-generated novel prostaglandin, 8-epi-prostaglandin F2 alpha, in the rat. Evidence for interaction with thromboxane A2 receptors.
J. Clin. Invest.
90:
136-141,
1992.
36.
Takahara, K.,
R. Murray,
G. A. Fitzgerald,
and
D. J. Fitzgerald.
The response to thromboxane A2 analogues in human platelets. Discrimination of two binding sites linked to distinct effector systems.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
6836-6844,
1990
37.
Wahl, C.,
S. Liptay,
G. Adler,
and
R. M. Schmid.
Sulfasalazine: a potent and specific inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B.
J. Clin. Invest.
101:
1163-1174,
1998[ISI][Medline].
38.
Weber, T. J.,
T. J. Monks,
and
S. S. Lau.
PGE2-mediated cytoprotection in renal epithelial cells: evidence for a pharmacologically distinct receptor.
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
273:
F507-F515,
1997
39.
Yukawa, M.,
R. Yokota,
R. T. Eberhardt,
L. von Andrian,
and
J. A. Ware.
Differential desensitization of thromboxane A2 receptor subtypes.
Circ. Res.
80:
551-556,
1997
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Weber, H. S. Smallwood, L. E. Kathmann, L. M. Markillie, T. C. Squier, and B. D. Thrall Functional link between TNF biosynthesis and CaM-dependent activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in RAW 264.7 macrophages Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): C1512 - C1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jia, M. D. Person, J. Dong, J. Shen, S. C. Hensley, J. L. Stevens, T. J. Monks, and S. S. Lau Grp78 is essential for 11-deoxy-16,16-dimethyl PGE2-mediated cytoprotection in renal epithelial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1113 - F1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. V. Gopee, V. J. Johnson, and R. P. Sharma Sodium Selenite-Induced Apoptosis in Murine B-Lymphoma Cells Is Associated with Inhibition of Protein Kinase C-{delta}, Nuclear Factor {kappa}B, and Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2004; 78(2): 204 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||