AJP - Renal Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F222-F243, 2001;
0363-6127/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, T.
Vol. 281, Issue 2, F222-F243, August 2001

A numerical model of acid-base transport in rat distal tubule

Hangil Chang1 and Toshiro Fujita2

1 Health Service Center and 2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of this study is to develop a numerical model that simulates acid-base transport in rat distal tubule. We have previously reported a model that deals with transport of Na+, K+, Cl-, and water in this nephron segment (Chang H and Fujita T. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F931-F951, 1999). In this study, we extend our previous model by incorporating buffer systems, new cell types, and new transport mechanisms. Specifically, the model incorporates bicarbonate, ammonium, and phosphate buffer systems; has cell types corresponding to intercalated cells; and includes the Na/H exchanger, H-ATPase, and anion exchanger. Incorporation of buffer systems has required the following modifications of model equations: new model equations are introduced to represent chemical equilibria of buffer partners [e.g., pH = pKa + log10 (NH3/NH4)], and the formulation of mass conservation is extended to take into account interconversion of buffer partners. Furthermore, finite rates of H2CO3-CO2 interconversion (i.e., H2CO3 right-left-harpoons  CO2 + H2O) are taken into account in modeling the bicarbonate buffer system. Owing to this treatment, the model can simulate the development of disequilibrium pH in the distal tubular fluid. For each new transporter, a state diagram has been constructed to simulate its transport kinetics. With appropriate assignment of maximal transport rates for individual transporters, the model predictions are in agreement with free-flow micropuncture experiments in terms of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption rate in the normal state as well as under the high bicarbonate load. Although the model cannot simulate all of the microperfusion experiments, especially those that showed a flow-dependent increase in HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption, the model is consistent with those microperfusion experiments that showed HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption rates similar to those in the free-flow micropuncture experiments. We conclude that it is possible to develop a numerical model of the rat distal tubule that simulates acid-base transport, as well as basic solute and water transport, on the basis of tubular geometry, physical principles, and transporter kinetics. Such a model would provide a useful means of integrating detailed kinetic properties of transporters and predicting macroscopic transport characteristics of this nephron segment under physiological and pathophysiological settings.

bicarbonate transport; hydrogen ion transport; anion exchanger; hydrogen adenosinetriphosphatase; sodium-hydrogen exchanger


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IN OUR PREVIOUS PAPER (22), we developed a numerical model of the rat distal tubule to help understand the complex transport phenomena that had been observed in this nephron segment. In that study, we concentrated on transport of Na+, K+, Cl-, and water, because the magnitude of transport flux ascribable to these molecules overwhelms that of other molecules (such as H+, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, Ca2+, Mg2+, ammonium, and phosphate). The distal tubule, however, actively participates in acidification of the tubular fluid, and normally it reabsorbs 5-10% of filtered HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, an amount equal to or greater than that assigned to the cortical and medullary collecting duct (16). In this paper, we extend our previous model to deal with acid-base transport in the rat distal tubule.

Acid-base transport in the rat distal tubule has been extensively studied by free-flow micropuncture and in vivo microperfusion experiments. These experiments have shown that there is an axial heterogeneity in the mechanism underlying transepithelial HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transport. In the early part of the distal tubule (that is, the distal convoluted tubule), H+ is secreted into the tubular fluid via an Na/H exchanger located in the luminal membrane. Closely linked with this process, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> is transported out of the cytosolic space to the basolateral space, probably via an anion exchanger. In the late part, which is composed of the connecting tubule and the initial collecting tubule, there are distinct types of tubular cells (called intercalated cells) that are specifically involved in acid-base transport. One type of cell (type A intercalated cell) is involved in transepithelial HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption by secreting H+ via luminal H-ATPase and extruding intracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> via the basolateral anion exchanger. Another type of cell (type B intercalated cell) has these transporters on the opposite side and secretes HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> into the tubular fluid. These features of acid-base transport in the distal tubule are represented in the present model by introduction of new cell types that correspond to intercalated cells and new models of transporters that simulate transport kinetics of the Na/H exchanger, H-ATPase, and the anion exchanger. With the aid of a computer program (21) that solves steady-state equations of transitional state diagrams, we have been able to simulate transport kinetics of these transporters in a consistent manner.

As we did in the previous model, we adjust model parameters so that model predictions simulate the results of micropuncture experiments, because these experiments are the least invasive and yield mutually consistent results. Specifically, we try to fit the model to the results by Capasso et al. (16, 17): an HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption rate of ~50 pmol/min in normal rats and ~180 pmol/min in acutely HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-loaded rats. Additionally, we compare the model with in vivo microperfusion experiments. These experiments yield widely varied and mutually inconsistent results. For example, the HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption rate in normal rats was essentially equal to zero in several reports (46, 56, 57), whereas it was comparable to micropuncture experiments in other reports (20, 54). The mechanism underlying the inconsistency has not been resolved and is possibly multifactorial, and we will make only a limited attempt to fit the model to microperfusion experiments.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Model geometry and variables. The model tubule has the same diameters (inner, 24 µm; outer, 37 µm) and length (0.23 cm) as in the previous model (22). Reflecting the axial heterogeneity of the actual tubule, the model is divided into two parts. The early (or upstream) part is 0.10 cm long and corresponds to the distal convoluted tubule (53). This portion is composed of a single type of cell (distal convoluted tubule cell). Accordingly, the model has only one cell type. The late part is 0.13 cm long and corresponds to the connecting tubule and the initial collecting tubule (53). This portion is composed of heterogeneous cell types. The predominant number of cells1 is involved in Na+ and K+ transport and had been the only cell type incorporated in the previous model. Other cell types are type A intercalated cells and type B intercalated cells, which are involved in H+ secretion and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> secretion, respectively. The present model incorporates both intercalated cell types. To derive the discretized form of the system of model equations that is suitable for numerical solution, the model tubule has been conceptually divided into 23 sections with equal widths (0.01 cm).

Model variables are composed of electrical potential, flow rate, and concentrations of Na+, K+, Cl-, H+, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, H2CO3, NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, NH3, H2PO<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, HPO<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>2−</SUP></UP>, and urea in the luminal space; electrical potential and concentrations of Na+, K+, Cl-, H+, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, NH3, and impermeant solute in distal convoluted tubule cells and principal cells; and electrical potential and concentrations of Cl-, H+, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, and impermeant solute in intercalated cells. The total number of model variables (in the discretized form) has increased from 270 in the previous model to 611 in the present model.

Model equations. In the cellular compartments, mass conservation of water or solute is specified as
J<SUP>mc</SUP><SUB>v</SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUP>sc</SUP><SUB>v</SUB><IT>=</IT>0

J<SUP>mc</SUP><SUB>x</SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUP>sc</SUP><SUB><IT>x</IT></SUB><IT>=</IT>0
where J<UP><SUB>v</SUB><SUP>mc</SUP></UP> is the volume flux from the luminal space into the cell, J<UP><SUB>v</SUB><SUP>sc</SUP></UP> is the volume flux from the serosal space into the cell, J<UP><SUB>x</SUB><SUP>mc</SUP></UP> is the flux of solute x from the luminal space into the cell, and J<UP><SUB>x</SUB><SUP>sc</SUP></UP> is the flux of solute x from serosal space into the cell. The iteration procedure of the Newton method (22), which has been used to solve the system of model equations, is continued until the absolute magnitude of the difference between the left-hand side and the right-hand side of each model equation becomes smaller than the tolerance value that is predetermined for each equation. The tolerance values for the above equations have been 1.42 × 10-7 ml · s-1 · cm-2 and 1.42 × 10-10 mmol · s-1 · cm-2. These values have been selected to ensure that the sum of errors of all sections is, at most, 0.023 nl/min and 0.023 pmol/min. Conservation of solutes that constitute buffer systems is handled differently, as described later.

In the luminal compartment, mass conservation includes a convective term
<FR><NU>dF<SUB>v</SUB></NU><DE>d<IT>x</IT></DE></FR><IT>+</IT>2<IT>&pgr;R</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>J</IT><SUB>v</SUB><IT>=</IT>0

<FR><NU>dF<SUB><IT>x</IT></SUB></NU><DE>d<IT>x</IT></DE></FR><IT>+</IT>2<IT>&pgr;R</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>J<SUB>x</SUB>=</IT>0
where Fv is the tubular flow rate, Ri is the inner radius of the luminal compartment, Jv is the rate of transepithelial volume reabsorption, Fx is the flux of solute x along the tubular axis, and Jx is the rate of transepithelial reabsorption of solute x. If we neglect the electrodiffusive movement of solutes along the tubular axis, Fx is simply FvC<UP><SUB>x</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>, where C<UP><SUB>x</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> is the concentration of solute x in the luminal compartment. The tolerance values have been 1.7 × 10-11 ml/s (0.001 nl/min) and 1.7 × 10-14 mmol/s (0.001 pmol/min). Conservation of solutes that constitute buffer systems are handled differently, as described later.

Electroneutrality within each compartment requires
<LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL>x</LL></LIM> z<SUB>x</SUB>C<SUB><IT>x</IT></SUB><IT>=</IT>0
where zx is the valence of solute x, Cx is the concentration of solute x within the compartment, and the sum is of all the solutes within the compartment. The tolerance value has been 0.01 mM.

In the present model, introduction of buffer systems has required the following modifications of model equations. First, concentrations of the acid form ([Acid]) and the base form ([Base]) of a buffer system should fulfill the following condition
pH<IT>=</IT>p<IT>K</IT><SUB>a</SUB><IT>+</IT>log<SUB>10</SUB> ([Base]/[Acid])
where pKa = 10-Ka (Ka: dissociation constant of the buffer system). The tolerance value has been 0.0001 pH unit.

Second, conservation of the total number of molecules that constitute a buffer system is considered, instead of individual molecular species. For example, in the case of the ammonium buffer system in the cytosolic space, the following equation has been postulated
J<SUP>mc</SUP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUP>mc</SUP><SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUP>sc</SUP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUP>sc</SUP><SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0
where J<UP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB><SUP>mc</SUP></UP> and J<UP><SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><SUP>mc</SUP></UP> are fluxes of NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> and NH3 from the luminal space into the cell, and J<UP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB><SUP>sc</SUP></UP> and J<UP><SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><SUP>sc</SUP></UP> are fluxes from the serosal space, respectively. The above equation is derived from the fact that the amount of NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> generated by the chemical reaction (NH3 + H+ right-left-harpoons  NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>) is exactly the same as the amount of NH3 consumed in the reaction.

Third, the model equation that represents mass conservation of H+ includes the term of the rate of H+ generation via interconversion of buffer partners (Base + H+ right-left-harpoons  Acid). For example, the equation of mass conservation of H+ in the luminal space becomes
<FR><NU>dF<SUB>H</SUB></NU><DE>d<IT>x</IT></DE></FR><IT>+</IT>2<IT>&pgr;R</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>J</IT><SUB>H</SUB><IT>−&pgr;R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>i</SUB><IT>G</IT><SUB>H</SUB><IT>=</IT>0 (1)
where FH is the flux of H+ along the tubular axis, JH is the rate of transepithelial efflux of H+, and GH is the rate of H+ generation via interconversion of buffer partners. This equation can be used as a model equation without the introduction of a new model variable (GH), because GH can be expressed by model variables as follows.2 When there is only one buffer system, it can be easily deduced that GBase = GH = -GAcid. When there are more than one buffer system, the relationship becomes
G<SUB>H</SUB><IT>=</IT><LIM><OP>∑</OP></LIM><IT> G</IT><SUB>Base</SUB>
where the sum on the right-hand side encompasses all the bases (that is, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, NH3, and HPO<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>2−</SUP></UP> in this model). GBase can be expressed in terms of model variables using the equation similar to Eq. 1. Consequently, GH can be expressed in terms of model variables.

Last, finite rates of H2CO3 dehydration and CO2 hydration are taken into account in modeling the bicarbonate buffer system. The bicarbonate buffer system is composed of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, H2CO3, and CO2, which are interconverted according to the following reaction3
HCO<SUP><IT>−</IT></SUP><SUB>3</SUB>+H<SUP>+</SUP> ⇌ H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL><IT>k</IT><SUB>h</SUB></LL><UL><IT>k</IT><SUB>d</SUB></UL></LIM> CO<SUB>2</SUB><IT>+</IT>H<SUB>2</SUB>O
The left part of the reaction is a rapid process and is essentially at equilibrium. Therefore, given the pKa of 3.57 for carbonic acid, the following relationship can be assumed
pH<IT>=</IT>3.57<IT>+</IT>log<SUB>10</SUB> <FR><NU>[HCO<SUP>−</SUP><SUB>3</SUB>]</NU><DE>[H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB>]</DE></FR> (2)
In contrast, the right part of the reaction is a slower process,4 and H2CO3 concentration can deviate significantly from its equilibrium value when there is an H+ load. For example, when there is an H+ load of 0.8 × 10-3 mmol · s-1 · cm-3 (which is equivalent to 50 pmol · min-1 · distal tubule-1) in the absence of carbonic anhydrase activity, luminal H2CO3 concentration should increase5 by 16 µM from its equilibrium value (kh/kd[CO2] = 3.6 µM). Owing to this increase in H2CO3 concentration, the pH value becomes lower (Eq. 2) than the value observed when there is no H+ load. The difference is called "disequilibrium pH" and is demonstrated experimentally in the distal tubule (62). Disequilibrium pH is simulated in the present model by formulating the following model equation that relates the rate of H2CO3 generation and the rate of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> generation, which is equivalent to Eq. 7 in Ref. 78
G<SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>−G<SUB>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>−k</IT><SUB>d</SUB><IT>·</IT>[H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB>]<IT>+k</IT><SUB>h</SUB><IT>·</IT>[CO<SUB>2</SUB>] (3)
The tolerance value has been 3.7 mmol · s-1 · cm-3 (equivalent to 0.0001 pmol · min-1 · section-1). In the present model, disequilibrium pH exists only in the luminal space. In the cytosolic space, we have assumed that H2CO3 concentration is essentially equal to the equilibrium value (3.6 µM) due to the carbonic anhydrase in the distal tubular cells (27). Consequently, cytosolic H2CO3 concentration is equal to the serosal H2CO3 concentration (which is also equal to the equilibrium value), and there would be no H2CO3 transport across basolateral cell membranes even if there is H2CO3 permeability. Therefore, basolateral H2CO3 permeability is not incorporated in the present model.

The model equations have been transformed to a system of difference equations and solved numerically. The derivation of difference equations has been conducted as in the previous study (22). Briefly, the model tubule has been divided into 23 sections, and the continuous model variables have been replaced by discrete ones that represent the values at the center of each section. Previously, we had compared two separate derivations of difference equations: one taking into account the axial electrodiffusive movement of molecules and another neglecting it. The derivation with electrodiffusive terms had the advantage of being a more realistic prediction of luminal electrical potential profile at the junction of the early and late distal tubules but had the disadvantage of demanding an ~35 times longer computational time. In the present study, we have employed only the derivation without electrodiffusive terms, because solution of the equations with electrodiffusive terms has become prohibitively time-consuming due to the increased number of model variables and more involved calculations of transport velocities through transporters (as described below). Fortunately, model predictions relevant to the present study (that is, reabsorption rates of solute and water) had been essentially unaffected by the choice of the discretization schemes (22). The present program solves the model equation in ~910 ms when run on a machine with PowerPC 604e (180-MHz clock cycle).

Transporters

Transporters that have been incorporated into the present model are illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2. In the early distal tubule (Fig. 1), distal convoluted tubule cells have a Na-Cl cotransporter, Na/H exchanger, K-Cl cotransporter, Na+ channel, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, NH3 permeability, H2CO3 permeability (not listed in Fig. 1), and H-ATPase in the luminal membrane; and Na-K-ATPase, an anion exchanger, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, and NH3 permeability in the basolateral membrane. The paracellular pathway has conductances for Na+, K+, NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, Cl-, and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> ions. In the late distal tubule (Fig. 2), principal cells have the Na-Cl cotransporter, K-Cl cotransporter, Na+ channel, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, NH3 permeability, and H2CO3 permeability (not listed in Fig. 2) in the luminal membrane; and Na-K-ATPase, an Na/H exchanger, anion exchanger, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, and NH3 permeability in the basolateral membrane. Type A intercalated cells have H-ATPase in the luminal membrane and an anion exchanger and Cl- channel in the basolateral membrane. Type B intercalated cells have an anion exchanger in the luminal membrane and H-ATPase and Cl- channel in the basolateral membrane. The paracellular pathway has the same conductances as in the early distal tubule.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Transport mechanisms of the early distal tubule. Distal convoluted tubule cell is represented as a large rectangle. In the luminal cell membrane, there are (from top to bottom) thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter, Na/H exchanger, K-Cl cotransporter, Na+ channel, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl-channel, permeability for H2CO3 (not listed), permeability for NH3, and H-ATPase. In the basolateral cell membrane, there are Na-K-ATPase, anion exchanger, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, and permeability for NH3. In the tight junction (paracellular pathway), there are conductances for Na+, K+, NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, Cl-, and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. Alongside of circles indicating individual transport mechanisms, transport velocities in the basic state are expressed as pmol/min. phi , Electrical potential.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Transport mechanisms of the late distal tubule. From the top of the figure, principal cell, type A intercalated cell, and type B intercalated cell are represented by rectangles. In the luminal cell membrane of principal cells, there are (from top to bottom) thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter, K-Cl cotransporter, Na+ channel, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, permeability for H2CO3 (not listed), and permeability for NH3. In the basolateral side of principal cells, there are Na-K-ATPase, Na/H exchanger, anion exchanger, K+ channel (also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>), Cl- channel, and permeability for NH3. In the tight junction, there are conductances for Na+, K+, NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, Cl-, and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. In type A intercalated cells, there is H-ATPase on the luminal side; and there are anion exchanger and Cl- channel on the basolateral side. In type B intercalated cells, there is anion exchanger on the luminal side; and there are H-ATPase and Cl- channel on the basolateral side. Alongside of circles indicating individual transport mechanisms, transport velocities in the basic state are expressed as pmol/min.

Transport velocities via the K-Cl cotransporter, ion channels, and paracellular conductances have been calculated as in the previous model (22). Briefly, transport velocity via the K-Cl cotransporter has been calculated by an equation derived from a kinetic diagram that accounts for apparent dissociation constants for K+ and Cl- (38); and transport velocities via ion channels and paracellular conductances have been calculated by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz current equation (41). In the present model, we have assumed that the K+ channel is also permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, because the ROMK channel, which is the native K+ channel in principal cells of the cortical collecting duct, has been demonstrated to be permeable for NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> (66). On the basis of the single-channel conductances and channel open probabilities for K+ and NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP>, we have assumed that the magnitude of NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> permeability, PNH4, is 20% of K+ permeability, PK (66, 78). We have also assumed that NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> is permeable through the tight junction with permeability similar to that for other cations. Transport rates of water across cell membranes have been assumed to be proportional to the difference in osmolality across the membrane.

Calculation of transport velocity via the Na-Cl cotransporter [thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter (TSC)] has been extended from the previous model to simulate a wider range of experimental observations as described in Chang and Fujita (21). The extended model simulates those experimental data of TSC, such as binding of thiazide in the absence of substrates, inhibitory effect of Cl- on thiazide binding, stimulatory effect of Na+ on thiazide binding, combined effects of Na+ and Cl- on thiazide binding, dependence of Na+ influx on extracellular Na+ and Cl-, and inhibition of Na+ influx by extracellular thiazide (21). To be consistent with the previous model parameters, transport velocity via TSC (JTSC) has been represented in the following form
J<SUB>TSC</SUB><IT>=J</IT><SUB>TSC, max</SUB> <FR><NU><IT>j</IT><SUB>TSC</SUB></NU><DE><IT>j</IT><SUB>TSC, max</SUB></DE></FR>
where JTSC, max (mmol · s-1 · cm-2) is a model parameter, jTSC is the transport velocity via a single TSC molecule, and jTSC, max is the maximal transport velocity via a single TSC molecule. In this way, model parameter JTSC, max represents the maximal transport rate that is achievable via the TSC transport mechanism as in the previous presentation. This convention has also been followed by other transporters that have been newly introduced.

Calculation of transport velocities via Na-K-ATPase has been extended to include NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> transport (75). Specifically, transport velocities of NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> (JNH4-ATPase) and K+ (JK-ATPase) have been calculated from the following equations (78)
J<SUB>K-ATPase</SUB><IT>+J</IT><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB>-ATPase</SUB><IT>=</IT>2<IT>·J</IT><SUB>a</SUB>

J<SUB>K-ATPase</SUB><IT> : J</IT><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB>-ATPase</SUB><IT>=</IT><FR><NU>C<SUP>s</SUP><SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR><IT> : </IT><FR><NU>C<SUP>s</SUP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB></NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB></DE></FR>
where Ja is the rate of ATP hydrolysis, C<UP><SUB>K</SUB><SUP>s</SUP></UP> and C<UP><SUB>NH<SUB>4</SUB></SUB><SUP>s</SUP></UP> are basolateral K+ and NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> concentrations, and KK and KNH4 are kinetic constants with the ratio (KNH4/KK) of 5.8 (75). With typical values of basolateral K+ concentration (4.25 mM) and NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> concentration (0.068 mM; Ref. 44), JNH4-ATPase/ JK, ATPase becomes 0.0028. The rate of ATP hydrolysis (Ja) and transport velocity of Na+ (JNa-ATPase) have been calculated as before (22, 83)
J<SUB>a</SUB><IT>=J</IT><SUB>a, max</SUB><IT>·</IT><FR><NU>1</NU><DE>1<IT>+</IT><FENCE><FR><NU><IT>K</IT><SUB>Na, ATPase</SUB></NU><DE>C<SUP>c</SUP><SUB>Na</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE><SUP>3</SUP></DE></FR>

J<SUB>Na-ATPase</SUB><IT>=</IT>−3<IT>·J</IT><SUB>a</SUB>
where Ja, max is a model parameter, C<UP><SUB>Na</SUB><SUP>c</SUP></UP> is cytosolic Na+ concentration, and KNa-ATPase is a kinetic constant with a value of 12 mM.

Transport velocities via NH3 permeability and H2CO3 permeability have been assumed to be proportional to concentration differences
J<SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>=P</IT><SUB>NH<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>·</IT>([NH<SUB>3</SUB>]<SUB>from</SUB><IT>−</IT>[NH<SUB>3</SUB>]<SUB>to</SUB>)

J<SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>=P</IT><SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><IT>·</IT>([H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB>]<SUB>from</SUB><IT>−</IT>[H<SUB>2</SUB>CO<SUB>3</SUB>]<SUB>to</SUB>)
Transport via the Na/H exchanger has been assumed to obey a kinetic diagram (Fig. 3 and Table 1) that is based on the one elaborated by Weinstein (77). In this diagram, the Na/H exchanger has a single binding site to which Na+, H+, and NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> competitively bind, and only the bound forms of the transporter are able to cross the membrane. One noticeable feature of this model is that transitional rate constants are symmetrical with respect to the membrane (for example, k1 = k7, k2 = k8, and k13 = k14; Fig. 3 and Table 1). Besides the benefit of decreasing the number of independent parameters, this feature ensures that thermodynamic requirements (55) such as k1k4k8k9k13k16 = k2k3k7k10k14k15 are automatically fulfilled. Another feature (described in Table 1) is that rates of translocation (from k13 through k18) are affected by cytosolic H+ concentration (for quantitative description, see the legend for Table 1). This aspect of the model (internal modifier site) was necessary (77) to account for the observed complex effect of internal H+ on net transport, with intracellular alkalosis shutting off Na/H exchange more sharply than a simple substrate depletion effect (4).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   State diagram of Na-H exchanger. The model Na-H exchanger (E) has a single binding site to which Na+, H+, and NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> bind competitively. Only loaded transporters (ENa, EH and ENH4 in the extracellular side; and ENa*, EH*, and ENH4* in the intracellular side) can cross the membrane. Bracketed symbols (such as [H] and [Na*]) indicate substrate concentrations.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Rate constants of Na/H exchanger

Transport velocity via the Na/H exchanger can be calculated by numerically solving the steady-state equations of this diagram by using the program that we had developed (21). With an internal pH of 6.0 (and no internal Na+), Na+ influx of the model Na/H exchanger has an apparent KNa of 58.8 mM when external pH is 6.6 and 11.9 mM when external pH is 7.5, whereas the corresponding experimental values are 54 and 13 mM (5), respectively. The inhibition constant (Ki) for inhibition of Na+ influx by external H+ (external Na+ 0.1 mM; internal Na+ 0 mM; and internal pH 6.0) is 38 nM, and the corresponding experimental value is 35 nM (5). Ki for inhibition of Na+ influx by external NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> (external Na+ 0.1 mM; internal Na+ 0 mM; and internal pH 6.0) is 50 mM when external pH is 6.6 and 11 mM when external pH is 7.5, both of which are identical to experimental values (5).

The kinetic model of H-ATPase is from Andersen et al. (3). This model had been developed to explain the relationship between transport velocity via H-ATPase and luminal pH in the turtle bladder (see Fig. 5 in Ref. 3). According to this model, H-ATPase consists of two components (Fig. 4): a catalytic unit at the cytoplasmic side that mediates the ATP-driven H+ translocation, and a transmembrane channel that mediates the transfer of H+ from the catalytic unit to the extracellular solution. Between these two compartments there exists a buffer compartment (antechamber; Fig. 4), in which H+ is nearly in equilibrium with extracellular H+. The catalytic unit has two binding sites for H+, and only the fully loaded form can translocate H+ from the cytosolic space to the antechamber (Fig. 5). Therefore, stoichiometry is strictly 2H+:1ATP.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Conceptual diagram of H-ATPase. The transporter consists of 2 components: a membrane channel and a catalytic unit. Between these components, there is a buffer space (antechamber), in which hydrogen ion (Ha) is essentially in equilibrium with extracellular hydrogen ion (H) owing to a large conductance of the membrane channel. Hydrogen ion in the antechamber is also interchangeable with cytosolic hydrogen ion (H*) through the catalytic unit. This process is coupled with ATP hydrolysis/synthesis with a stoichiometry of 2H+:1ATP.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   State diagram of the catalytic unit of H-ATPase. The catalytic unit (E) has 2 binding sites for H. Symbols with asterisk (*), such as EH*, indicate conformations of the catalytic unit in which binding sites face the cytosolic space, and symbols without asterisk (e.g., EH) indicate conformations in which binding sites face the antechamber. Transition between the unloaded conformations (Eright-arrowE*) is coupled with ATP hydrolysis/synthesis. The label [Ha] indicates H+ concentration in the antechamber, and other bracketed labels, such as [ATP*] and [H*], indicate substrate concentrations in the cytosolic space. H+ in the antechamber is assumed to be in equilibrium with extracellular H+, and electrical potential of the antechamber is assumed to be equal to that of cytosolic space. Therefore
[H<SUB>a</SUB>]<IT>=</IT>[H]<SUB>o</SUB> exp {<IT>F</IT>(<IT>&psgr;</IT><SUB>o</SUB><IT>−&psgr;<SUB>i</SUB></IT>)<IT>/RT</IT>}
where [H]o is extracellular H+ concentration, and psi o and psi i are electrical potentials of the extracellular space and the intracellular space, respectively.

Values of rate constants for the kinetic model of H-ATPase are listed in Table 2, which are essentially identical to the ones reported by Andersen et al. (3). These values fulfill the thermodynamic requirement
k<SUB>1</SUB>k<SUB>3</SUB>k<SUB>6</SUB>k<SUB>8</SUB>k<SUB>10</SUB>k<SUB>11</SUB>/k<SUB>2</SUB>k<SUB>4</SUB>k<SUB>5</SUB>k<SUB>7</SUB>k<SUB>9</SUB>k<SUB>12</SUB>=exp (<IT>&Dgr;G</IT><SUP>0</SUP><SUB>ATP</SUB><IT>/RT</IT>)
where Delta G<UP><SUB>ATP</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> is the standard free energy change of ATP hydrolysis (-33 kJ/mol). We have assumed that cytosolic ATP concentration ([ATP]c) = 2.5 × 10-3 M, and [ADP]c · [Pi]c = 10-7 M2 (3). Transport velocity through H-ATPase has been calculated by solving the steady-state equations of the kinetic diagram. Transport velocity of the model H-ATPase is plotted in Fig. 6 as a function of luminal pH. The continuous line represents the calculation that simulates the experiments by Andersen et al. (3). The model prediction fits well with the experimental data ( in Fig. 6). Transport velocity becomes half-maximal near the luminal pH of 6.0, and it becomes essentially undetectable at a luminal pH of 4 (0.5% of the maximal rate). At a luminal pH of 3.2, H+ transport reverses its direction.6 In Fig. 6, transport velocities under the conditions simulating distal convoluted tubule cells and type A intercalated cells are also shown (dashed lines).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Rate constants of H+-ATPase



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Transport velocity of the model H-ATPase. Transport velocity of the model H-ATPase is plotted as a function of luminal pH. The solid continuous line is calculated with the conditions (cytosolic pH 7.5; luminal potential 0 mV; and cytosolic potential -30 mV) that simulate experiments by Andersen et al. (3). Solid circles represent corresponding experimental values (3). Transport velocity is normalized by the transport velocity with luminal pH of 9.0 (J<UP><SUB>H</SUB><SUP>max</SUP></UP>). The dashed line represents a calculation with the conditions simulating distal convoluted tubule cells (cytosolic pH 7.0; luminal potential 0 mV; and cytosolic potential -90 mV). The dashed-dotted line represents a calculation with the conditions simulating type A intercalated cells (cytosolic pH 7.4; luminal potential -17 mV; and cytosolic potential -26 mV). JH, rate of H+ transport via H-ATPase.

A state diagram for the anion exchanger, which catalyzes one-for-one exchange of anions such as Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, is illustrated in Fig. 7. In this diagram, termed the "ping-pong" mechanism by Gunn and Frölich (43), the anion exchanger has a single binding site (transport site) to which substrates (Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>) competitively bind, and only loaded transporters can cross the membrane. Additionally, there is an internal modifier site to which cytosolic Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> competitively bind. Binding to this modifier site is independent of the state of the transport site, and the anion exchanger with the modifier site occupied cannot participate in ion transport. Therefore, the transport rate is decreased by a factor of (1+[Cl*]/K<UP><SUB>i</SUB><SUP>Cl</SUP></UP> + [HCO*3]/K<UP><SUB>i</SUB><SUP>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUP></UP>)-1, where [Cl*] is the cytosolic Cl- concentration, [HCO*3] is the cytosolic HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration, K<UP><SUB>i</SUB><SUP>Cl</SUP></UP> is the dissociation constant of the modifier site for Cl-, and K<UP><SUB>i</SUB><SUP>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUP></UP> is the dissociation constant for HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   State diagram of anion exchanger. The model transporter (E) has a single binding site to which Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> competitively bind. Only loaded transporters (ECl and EHCO3 in the extracellular side; and ECl* and EHCO3* in the intracellular side) can cross the membrane. Brackets indicate substrate concentrations.

Values of rate constants for anion exchanger are listed in Table 3. We have assumed that rate constants involved in substrate binding (k1, k3, k5, and k7) are diffusion limited (45). We have also assumed that affinities of the transport site for Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> are symmetrical with respect to the cell membrane, according to the report by Liu et al. (59). Other rate constants have been optimized by Powell's method (69) to fit the experimental results of Gasbjerg et al. (36) and Knauf et al. (49), who investigated the kinetics of the anion exchanger in human red blood cells at body temperature (38°C). We note that rate constants for Cl- dissociation (k2 and k6) are consistent with the lower limits of these values determined by 35Cl NMR (4.5 × 105 s-1 for k2 and 1.3 × 105 s-1 for k6; Ref. 31 ). Model predictions with these rate constants, together with experimental data, are plotted in Figs. 8 and 9. The model anion exchanger simulates dependency of transport velocity on extracellular and intracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentrations (Fig. 8) and dependency of transport velocity on extracellular and intracellular Cl- concentrations (Fig. 9). A similar kinetic model of the anion exchanger that also fits well to these experimental results has been recently reported by Weinstein (79).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Rate constants of anion exchanger



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Transport velocity of the model anion exchanger: HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> dependency. Transport velocity of the model anion exchanger is calculated as a function of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration and is plotted as a solid line. Experimental data (36) are plotted together as solid circles. A: unidirectional HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> efflux (Jeff) as extracellular (o) HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration is varied from 0 to 54 mM. Internal (i) HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration is 50 mM. There are no Cl- ions. B: unidirectional HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> efflux as extracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> is varied from 0 to 250 mM. Internal HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration is 165 mM. There are no Cl- ions. C: unidirectional HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> efflux as internal HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration is varied from 0 to 640 mM. External HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration is 50 mM. There are no Cl- ions. D: HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> exchange flux (Jeff) as extracellular and intracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentrations are varied simultaneously (no HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> gradient) from 0 to 640 mM. There are no Cl- ions. Experimental data are from Fig. 5 in Ref. 36.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Transport velocity of the model anion exchanger: Cl- dependency. Transport velocity of the model anion exchanger is calculated as a function of Cl- concentration and is plotted as a solid line. Experimental data (49) are plotted together as solid circles. A: unidirectional Cl- efflux as extracellular Cl- concentration is varied from 0 to 160 mM. Internal Cl- concentration is 105.4 mM. There are no HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> ions. B: Cl- exchange flux as extracellular and intracellular Cl- concentrations are varied simultaneously (no Cl- gradient) from 0 to 650 mM. There are no HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> ions. Experimental data are representative points of Figs. 1 and 4 in Ref. 49.

From Table 3, we can see that loaded transporters translocate faster to the intracellular side than to the extracellular side (that is, k9 > k10 and k11 > k12). This indicates that the anion exchanger is more stable in the intracellular side than in the extracellular side when substrate concentrations are equal on both sides of the membrane. Quantitatively, this is represented by the asymmetry factor (A) that is defined as the ratio of unloaded outward-facing sites to unloaded inward-facing sites, [E]/[E*], with equal concentrations of substrates. According to the ping-pong model (as is the present model), A should be the same regardless of concentrations and species of the substrate that are used to measure it, because A reflects the free energy difference (Delta G) between the unloaded inward- and outward-facing forms (E and E*). A of the model exchanger is 0.18, which is within the range of experimental estimations (0.03-0.37; Refs. 36 and 49). Molar Gibbs free energy change (Delta G<UP><SUB>m</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP>) of the transition between the two unloaded forms is estimated from A (Delta G<UP><SUB>m</SUB><SUP>0</SUP></UP> -RT log A) to be 4.4 kJ/mol.

Parameter assignment. Values of model parameters are listed in Table 4. Values directly related to acid-base transport are as follows. Permeabilities of NH3 are 0.0113 cm/s and 0.0036 cm/s in the luminal and the basolateral membrane, respectively. These values are from the measurement in the rabbit cortical collecting duct (82). Permeability of H2CO3 through luminal membranes is 1.28 × 10-3 cm/s, which is estimated from the apical membrane formic acid permeability (4.6 × 10-2 cm/s; Ref. 68) in the rat proximal tubule and its 36-fold amplification of the luminal surface area by microvilli (52). Permeabilities of Cl- via basolateral conductances in type A and type B intercalated cells are 7.40 × 10-6 and 1.80 × 10-5 cm/s, respectively. These values are from the basolateral conductances of the intercalated cells in the model of cortical collecting duct by Strieter et al. (73).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Model parameters

We have assumed that NH<UP><SUB>4</SUB><SUP>+</SUP></UP> permeability through the paracellular pathway is the same as those of other cations, because no experimental information is available about its value. Similarly, permeability of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> through the paracellular pathway (P<UP><SUB>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><SUP>ms</SUP></UP>) has been assumed to be equal to that of Cl-. This value (2.40 × 10-6 cm/s), however, is significantly smaller than the value reported by Chan et al. (20). They measured HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> backflux during the perfusion of the rat distal tubule with nominally HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-free solution and deduced a P<UP><SUB>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><SUP>ms</SUP></UP> value of 2.32 × 10-5 cm/s. However, this value is larger than the estimated paracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> permeability of the rat proximal tubule (1.77 × 10-5; Ref. 23), a "leaky" epithelium, and should be regarded, as they had pointed out (20), as the estimation of the upper limit of paracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> permeability in the distal tubule, because processes not directly related to paracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> entry, such as the diffusion of ammonia from blood into the tubule lumen, can affect the measurement of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> backflux. Consequently, instead of adopting their value, we have assumed that paracellular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> permeability is equal to that of Cl-, which had been determined from the transepithelial conductance of the distal tubule (22, 63). If we recalculate the model predictions with a P<UP><SUB>HCO<SUB>3</SUB></SUB><SUP>ms</SUP></UP> value of 2.32× 10-5 cm/s, HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption in the distal tubule decreases by 9.2 pmol/min in the basic state due to an increased backflux of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> through the paracellular pathway.

The value of the rate constant of H2CO3 hydrolysis in the luminal space (k<UP><SUB>d</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>) has been chosen to be considerably larger than the value reported for carbonic anhydrase-free solution (35). This is based on the experiments by Malnic et al. (62), who showed that to explain the relationship among measurements of luminal pH, luminal HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> concentration, and magnitude of H+ secretion in the distal tubule, k<UP><SUB>d</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> should be from 2.4- to 64.1-fold higher than the value in the carbonic anhydrase-free solution. In this model, we have assumed that k<UP><SUB>d</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>as well as k<UP><SUB>h</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> is 10-fold larger than the corresponding values in carbonic anhydrase-free solution (35). The origin of this higher k<UP><SUB>d</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> is not known. An authoritative immunocytochemical study (15) did not detect the membrane-bound form carbonic anhydrase in the distal tubule. However, a recent study has shown that carbonic anhydrase immunoreactivity is detected on apical membranes of type A intercalated cells in the rabbit distal tubule (72). Therefore, a modest increase in k<UP><SUB>d</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP> in the distal tubule might be due to carbonic anhydrase activity in apical membranes of a restricted group of tubular cells.

Other parameters that are related to acid-base transport have been chosen to fit free-flow micropuncture experiments by Capasso et al. (16, 17): that is, a distal tubular HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> reabsorption rate of 53.2 pmol/min in normal rats7 and 179 pmol/min in acutely bicarbonate-loaded rats. To find those values, we have employed an epithelial model, which neglects axial changes of solute concentrations and greatly simplifies model equations. After determining the parameters that are directly related to acid-base transport as above, we have redone the parameter optimization procedure that had been conducted in the previous study (22), using the Powell method, to fit the model with experimental data of Na+, K+, Cl-, and water transport in the rat distal tubule.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Comparison with free-flow micropuncture experiments. We first examine whether incorporation of the new cell types and transporters has not affected the goodness of fit of the previous model. Model predictions of transport of Na+, K+, Cl