Vol. 283, Issue 4, F765-F770, October 2002
On the natriuretic effect of verapamil: inhibition of ENaC
and transepithelial sodium transport
Alan S.
Segal,
John P.
Hayslett, and
Gary V.
Desir
University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405; and Yale
University School of Medicine and West Haven Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
 |
ABSTRACT |
The natriuretic effect of
Ca2+ channel blockers has been attributed to hemodynamic
changes and to poorly defined direct tubular effects. To test the
possibility that verapamil may inhibit Na+ reabsorption at
the distal tubule, its effect on transepithelial Na+
transport in aldosterone-stimulated A6 cells was determined. Cells were
grown on permeable supports, and short-circuit current (Isc) measured in an Ussing chamber was used as
a surrogate marker for transepithelial Na+ transport.
Application of 300 µM verapamil to the apical side inhibited
Isc by 77% and was nearly as potent as 100 µM
amiloride, which inhibited Isc by 87%.
Verapamil-induced inhibition of Isc was
accompanied by a significant increase in transepithelial resistance, suggesting blockade of an apical conductance. Its action on
transepithelial Na+ transport does not appear to occur
through inhibition of L-type Ca2+ channels, since
Isc was unaffected by removal of extracellular Ca2+. Verapamil also does not appear to inhibit
Isc by modulating intracellular Ca2+
stores, since it fails to inhibit transepithelial Na+
transport when added to the basolateral side. The effect on
Na+ transport is specific for verapamil, since nifedipine,
Ba2+, 4-aminopyridine, and charybdotoxin do not
significantly affect Isc. A direct effect of
verapamil on the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) was tested
using oocytes injected with the
-,
-, and
-subunits. We
conclude that verapamil inhibits transepithelial Na+
transport in A6 cells by blocking ENaC and that the natriuresis observed with administration of verapamil may be due in part to its
action on ENaC.
verapamil; epithelial sodium channel; Xenopus laevis
oocyte; sodium excretion and regulation; diuretic; natriuresis; A6
cells
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CALCIUM CHANNEL
BLOCKERS are used extensively in the treatment of hypertension.
They lower blood pressure by relaxing vascular smooth muscle and
decreasing peripheral vascular resistance. Vasorelaxation is a result
of blocking Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated
Ca2+ channels. Ca2+ channel blockers also have
significant effects on heart rate and renal function. They increase
renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate and decrease the
activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the
reabsorption of salt and water (4, 6, 10).
Although the natriuretic and diuretic effect of Ca2+
channel blockers is in part due to changes in renal hemodynamics,
direct tubular actions have also been well documented. The
dihydropyridine class of Ca2+ channel blockers has been
studied most extensively. Intrarenal infusion of nifedipine
significantly increased Na+ excretion without any
detectable change in renal blood flow, creatinine clearance, and
glomerular filtration rate (7). These effects are thought
to result from a decrease in Na+ reabsorption in the
proximal tubule. On the other hand, felodipine, another
dihydropyridine, appears to increase Na+ excretion by
blocking reabsorption at a distal tubular site (6). Verapamil, a phenylalkylamine, causes natriuresis when injected into
the renal artery of the dog (1). Renal Na+
excretion is also significantly enhanced in hypertensive patients treated with verapamil (5, 10).
The molecular mechanisms underlying the tubular effects of
Ca2+ channel blockers are unclear. Na+
reabsorption occurs all along the nephron, and inhibition at any site
could account for the modest degree of natriuresis observed with these
agents. The collecting duct is an important site for Na+
homeostasis. In this nephron segment, principal cells are responsible for Na+ reabsorption. The rate-limiting step is the apical
entry of Na+ through the epithelial Na+ channel
(ENaC) (2). This process is regulated by
mineralocorticoids and plays a critical role in overall Na+
balance. The A6 cell line, derived from the Xenopus laevis
kidney, possesses many of the properties of principal cells and has
been used extensively as a model for the study of electrogenic
transepithelial Na+ transport. When grown on
permeable supports, these cells develop a high transepithelial
resistance (TER), express the ENaC, and engage in transepithelial
electrogenic Na+ transport that is regulated by insulin,
aldosterone, and antidiuretic hormone. A6 cells and X. laevis oocytes expressing ENaC were used in the present study to
examine the possibility that Ca2+ channel blockers exert
their natriuretic effect by inhibiting Na+ transport in the
cortical collecting duct (CCD).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
A6 cells were plated and maintained in culture as previously described
(9). Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/cm2 on permeable supports in DMEM
modified for amphibian culture and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum. They were grown in a humidified atmosphere of 2%
CO2 at 28°C. Aldosterone (1.5 µM) was added for 2 days
after the initial seeding and then for 18 h before measurements.
Solution and drugs.
Unless stated otherwise, the apical and basolateral solutions were
identical and consisted of 97 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.2). For
Ca2+-free solutions, CaCl2 was omitted and 1 mM
EGTA was added. Where indicated, Ba2+ was added as
BaCl2. Verapamil and nifedipine were dissolved in 100%
DMSO and added from 100 mM stock. The final DMSO concentration was
<0.1%. In control studies, we ascertained that 0.1% DMSO added for
up to 1 h to the apical membrane of A6 cells had no effect on
short-circuit current (Isc = 15.7 ± 1.3 µA, n = 4). Similarly, 0.1% DMSO did not affect
ENaC current measured in oocytes at
80 mV (current =
2.1 ± 0.2 µA, n = 4). For dose-response experiments, drugs were added to the apical or basolateral compartment in increasing concentrations. The inhibition constant (Ki) for
verapamil was calculated from the best logistic fit of the dose
response. Values are means ± SE.
Electrical measurements in A6 cells.
Falcon inserts were mounted on plastic rings (effective surface
area = 0.64 cm2) and placed in an Ussing chamber
modified to allow continuous independent perfusion of apical and
basolateral compartments. The compartments were connected by 1 M
KCl-2% agar bridges. Current and transepithelial potential were
measured using Ag-AgCl half-cells and a current-voltage clamp (model
DVC-1000, WPI). Current flowing from the apical to the basolateral side
was measured as positive by convention. The solution resistance was
measured and compensated for before recordings began.
Isc was measured by clamping the transepithelial
voltage to 0 mV for 5 s. TER was calculated from the difference in
current measured when the cells were voltage clamped to 0 or 60 mV, as
follows: TER (
· cm2) = 60 mV/[Isc(60 mV)
Isc(0 mV)] µA/cm2.
Expression and measurement of ENaC current in X. laevis oocytes.
Stage V-VI X. laevis oocytes were dissected from ovarian
lobes and stored in modified Barth's solution, as previously
described. Oocytes were injected with 50 nl of solution containing
either a mixture of in vitro-transcribed, 5'-capped
-,
-,
and
-ENaC RNA or water as a negative control.
Whole cell currents were recorded using a standard two-microelectrode
voltage clamp (model OC-725, Warner Instruments) 1-8 days after
injection. Oocytes were impaled with microelectrodes filled with 1 M
KCl (resistance = 1-4 M
). The bath contained Na+ (or Li+)-ND-96: 96 mM NaCl (or LiCl), 2 mM
KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES
(pH 7.4). Voltage-clamp protocols were controlled by PULSE (HEKA
Lambretch), and amplified currents were filtered at 1-2 kHz and
then recorded and analyzed using PULSE-FIT (HEKA Lambretch) and
Igor-Pro (Wavemetrics).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Effect of verapamil on transepithelial
Na+ transport (Isc).
Isc is used as a surrogate marker for
transepithelial Na+ transport in A6 cells, because ~90%
of the current is amiloride sensitive. We confirmed this for A6 cells
grown on permeable supports and treated with aldosterone for 18 h
before measurements. Under these conditions, 100 µM amiloride
inhibited Isc by 87.3 ± 2%
(n = 4). Therefore, the amiloride-sensitive
Isc correlates well with Na+
transport from the apical to the basolateral side through the ENaC.
The effect of verapamil on Isc (and, therefore,
on Na+ transport) was tested on A6 cells mounted in an
Ussing chamber. As shown in Fig. 1, 0.2 mM verapamil added to the apical side significantly inhibited
Isc compared with control conditions (16.0 ± 2.6 to 5.3 ± 1.1 µA/cm2, n = 8, P < 0.05). Because verapamil is a known inhibitor of L-type Ca2+ channels, it might exert its effect on
Isc by decreasing apical Ca2+ entry.
To test the dependence of Isc on extracellular
Ca2+, the effect of Ca2+ removal on
Isc was measured. Figure 1 shows that removal of
apical Ca2+ had no effect on Isc
under control conditions and TER was unaffected. Furthermore, verapamil
inhibited Isc to a similar degree in the absence
and presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 1). Verapamil is lipophilic, so
it penetrates the cell membrane and accumulates inside the cell.
Therefore, it could inhibit Ca2+ release from intracellular
stores, which could in turn modulate Isc. To
further rule out the possibility that verapamil's action on
Isc might be Ca2+ dependent, its
inhibitory effect on Isc was compared with that of nifiedipine, a structurally unrelated, potent L-type
Ca2+ channel blocker. Although nifedipine is a
significantly more potent blocker of L-type Ca2+ channels
than verapamil, it decreased Isc by only
7.3 ± 0.3% when applied to the apical side at the highest
concentration (200 µM) achievable in aqueous media. Because, as shown
in Fig. 1, 0.2 mM verapamil added to the basolateral side has no
significant effect on Isc, we conclude that the
drug inhibits Isc and Na+ transport
only when applied to the apical side and through a mechanism unrelated
to its action on plasma membrane L-type Ca2+ channels and
intracellular Ca2+ stores.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Verapamil inhibits transepithelial Na+
transport in A6 cells grown on permeable supports and treated with 1 µM aldosterone 18 h before study. Monolayers were mounted in
Ussing chambers, and short-circuit current (Isc)
was measured by clamping to 0 mV for 5 s. Apical Ca2+
concentration was 0 or 1 mM. Verapamil (Vera) was added to apical or
basolateral perfusate.
|
|
Effect of verapamil on TER.
It is possible that verapamil could inhibit Isc
and yet cause no change in net Na+ transport. Indeed, if
addition of the drug leads to a nonspecific decrease in TER, through
interaction with the paracellular junction or by damaging the plasma
membrane, transepithelial voltage and Isc would
be expected to decrease independently of a net decrease in
Na+ transport. If that were the case, the inhibition of
Isc would be accompanied by a fall in membrane
resistance. For instance, diltiazem is known to increase the
permeabilities of anions and cations in photoreceptor rod outer
segments and in intact red blood cells (3). To exclude
this possibility, the effect of verapamil on membrane resistance was
determined from the change in monolayer current resulting from a 60-mV
voltage step. As shown in Fig. 2, control
cells had a TER of 2,575 ± 350
· cm2
(n = 11). Increasing concentrations of verapamil from
100 to 400 µM led to progressive increases in TER (5,002 ± 406
· cm2, n = 5). These results
indicate that the fall in Isc observed with the
addition of verapamil does not occur because of nonspecific changes in
the paracellular junction or damage to the cell membranes. Instead,
verapamil appears to have a direct inhibitory effect on
transepithelial Na+ transport.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Verapamil increases transepithelial resistance.
Transepithelial resistance of A6 cells was obtained by measuring change
in current when voltage was stepped from 0 to 60 mV. Increasing
concentrations of verapamil were added to apical perfusate. Inhibition
of Isc is accompanied by an increase in
transepithelial resistance.
|
|
Dose-dependent inhibition of Na+
transport by verapamil.
The dose-response curve for verapamil with respect to inhibition of
Isc in A6 cells was determined by adding
increasing concentrations of the drug to the apical side. The
amiloride-sensitive component of Isc was
determined after each experiment by the addition of 100 µM amiloride.
As shown in Fig. 3, the
Ki of Isc for verapamil is 104.5 µM.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dose-response curve for inhibition of
Isc by apical verapamil. Amiloride-sensitive
component was determined by addition of 100 µM amiloride at the end
of each experiment. Percent inhibition of amiloride-sensitive current
was determined at each concentration (n = 4 for each
data point). Data were fitted using Origin 6.0. Ki, concentration for 50% inhibition.
|
|
Verapamil contains a nitrogen at position 9 that undergoes pH-dependent
protonation (pKa = 8.5). The nonprotonated
form of verapamil is lipophilic and readily penetrates biological
membranes. Figure 4 shows that the effect
of verapamil is strongly influenced by the pH of the apical perfusate.
As pH increases from 5 to 8, verapamil becomes deprotonated and its
potency to block Isc increases. Indeed,
verapamil predominantly blocks L-type Ca2+ and
K+ channels from the cytoplasmic side (13). It
is likely that verapamil also inhibits Isc from
the cytoplasmic side, since, as observed for inhibition of
Ca2+ and K+ channels, its onset of action on
Isc is delayed (3-4 min) and slowly reaches
a plateau within 10-15 min. Therefore, the true Ki for verapamil-induced inhibition of
Isc cannot be determined without measuring the
intracellular concentration of the drug.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Alkaline pH potentiates inhibitory action of verapamil.
Apical pH was varied from 5 to 8, and inhibition of
Isc by 100 µM verapamil was determined.
Verapamil was 4.5 times more potent at pH 8 than at pH 5.
|
|
Effect of nifedipine and K+ channel
blockers on Na+ transport.
Verapamil is also known to inhibit voltage-gated K+
channels, such as Kv1.3 and KCNA10 (Ki = 50 µM). Therefore, it is possible that it could mediate its effect on
transepithelial Na+ transport by blocking K+
channels. This possibility was tested by examining the effect of
K+ channel blockers applied to the apical side of A6 cells.
Ba2+ (10 mM), which inhibits a variety of K+
channels, caused only a small decrease in Isc
(Fig. 5) and TER (from 2,520 ± 223 to 2,001 ± 216
· cm2, n = 4). This confirms the results of Thomas and Mintz (11), who showed that Ba2+ depolarizes the apical membrane of A6
cells in culture and also reduces TER, probably by opening a
paracellular conductive pathway. Inhibitors of voltage-gated and
Ca2+-activated K+ channels (charybdotoxin and
4-aminopyridine, respectively) had no detectable effect on
Isc and Na+ transport. Nifedipine, a
dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel blocker chemically unrelated
to verapamil, blocks Na+ channels in rat cardiac myocytes
with a Ki of 3.0 µM (12). Its
effect on Isc in A6 cells was tested, and, as
shown in Fig. 5, it was ineffective at blocking
Isc at the highest concentration achievable in
aqueous media (0.2 mM). The inability of nifedipine to block
Isc supports the conclusion that the effect of
verapamil on Isc is independent of its action on
L-type Ca2+ channels. These data also indicate that
verapamil is a specific inhibitor of transepithelial Na+
transport in A6 cells and that its mechanism of action does not depend
on the inhibition of K+ channels.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Verapamil is a specific inhibitor of Na+
transport in A6 cells. Drugs were added to apical perfusate. Amiloride
and verapamil specifically block Isc, while
nifedipine (a dihydropyridine) was ineffective. Classic K+
channel blockers such as Ba2+, 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), and
charybdotoxin (CTX) were also without significant effect.
|
|
Effect of verapamil on ENaC in X. laevis oocytes.
We considered the possibility that verapamil directly blocks ENaC.
Indeed, its chemical structure resembles that of two inhibitors of
ENaC, namely, trimethoprim and benzamil. To test that hypothesis, cRNA
for
-,
-, and
-ENaC were coinjected into X. laevis
oocytes, and the effect of verapamil on amiloride-sensitive inward
current was examined using the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp method. Figure 6 depicts a representative
experiment in which membrane voltage is clamped from
80 to +40 mV in
10-mV increments and the resulting current is measured. In oocytes
expressing ENaC, 85.1 ± 3% (n = 4) of the
current measured at
80 mV was amiloride sensitive and mediated by
ENaC. Verapamil inhibited amiloride-sensitive current with a
Ki of 34 ± 5.2 µM (n = 4). The Ki observed in oocytes is similar to
that measured in A6 cells, supporting the notion that ENaC inhibition
underlies the effect of verapamil on Isc.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Verapamil inhibits epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC)
currents expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. A:
2-microelectrode voltage clamp. Whole cell currents were recorded from
oocytes in ND-96 injected with -, -, and -ENaC with no drug
(left) or in the presence of 100 µM verapamil
(middle) or amiloride (right). B:
current-voltage relation. Verapamil blocks 93 ± 3%
(n = 6) of amiloride-sensitive current detected in
oocytes expressing -, -, and -ENaC.
|
|
The data presented above confirm the hypothesis that verapamil inhibits
ENaC. It is not clear whether the drug inhibits from the cytoplasmic
side, since, although the slow time course of inhibition and its
dependence on external pH suggest that it does, its inability to block
when added to the basal side argues otherwise. The latter observation
does not completely rule out the possibility of blocks from the inside,
since it is not known whether verapamil that enters from the
basolateral side freely diffuses to the apical side.
Physiological relevance.
On the basis of studies examining the urinary concentration of
verapamil and its metabolites, ~5% of the dose of verapamil administered is excreted unchanged in the urine over 24 h
(8). With a maximum daily dose of 500 mg, distal tubular
fluid may contain 25 mg/l verapamil or ~50 µM. The data in the
present study suggest that this concentration would be sufficient to
exert a significant effect on Na+ transport through
inhibition of ENaC. It should be noted, however, that inhibition of
Isc by verapamil was greater at alkaline than acidic pH. The pH at the distal tubule can be as low as 5.5 and would
predict a significant decrease in the inhibitory potency of
verapamil. On the other hand, verapamil tends to accumulate in
cells, and the steady-state intracellular concentration at distal
tubular cells might be even higher than expected from a luminal
concentration of 50 µM.
Conclusion.
The present study shows that verapamil, unlike nifedipine, inhibits
Na+ reabsorption in A6 cells, a cell model for the
principal cells of the CCD. The concentration of verapamil thought to
be present in distal tubular fluid is more than sufficient to cause
significant inhibition of Na+ reabsorption through ENaC.
Therefore, the natriuresis observed with the administration of
verapamil is likely mediated by a combination of hemodynamic factors
and the direct tubular effect demonstrated in this study. The present
study documents a previously unrecognized amiloride-like effect of
verapamil on Na+ transport in A6 cells and a direct
inhibitory effect of the drug on ENaC. We speculate that the
antihypertensive action of verapamil results from a combination of a
direct effect on vascular smooth muscle and a small but significant
decrease in total body Na+ stores through its action on
Na+ reabsorption in the CCD. It may be possible to improve
the efficacy and safety profile of verapamil and develop analogs with
enhanced natriuretic properties.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Cecilia Canessa for providing the ENaC subunit clones and
Larry J. Macala for technical expertise.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
G. V. Desir and J. P. Hayslett are supported by a Merit
Review Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs. G. V. Desir was also supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases Grant DK-48105B and is an Established Investigator of
the American Heart Association.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. V. Desir, Dept. of Medicine, Sect. of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, 2073 LMP, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510 (E-mail: gary.desir{at}yale.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
May 22, 2002;10.1152/ajprenal.00253.2001
Received 15 August 2001; accepted in final form 22 April 2002.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Bell, AJ,
and
Lindner A.
Effects of verapamil and nifedipine on renal function and hemodynamics in the dog.
Renal Physiol
7:
329-343,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Canessa, CM,
Schild L,
Buell G,
Thorens G,
Gautschi I,
Horisberger JD,
and
Rossier BC.
Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits.
Nature
367:
463-467,
1994[Medline].
3.
Caretta, A,
Sorbi RT,
Stein PJ,
and
Tirindelli R.
Diltiazem at high concentration increases the ionic permeability of biological membranes.
J Membr Biol
122:
203-213,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Chellingsworth, MC,
and
Kendall MJ.
Effects of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem on renal function.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
25:
599-602,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
De Leeuw, PW,
and
Birkenhager WH.
Effects of verapamil in hypertensive patients.
Acta Med Scand Suppl
681:
125-128,
1984[Medline].
6.
Dibona, GF,
and
Sawin LL.
Renal tubular site of action of felodipine.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
228:
420-424,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Dietz, JR,
Davis JO,
Freeman RH,
Villarreal D,
and
Echtenkamp SF.
Effects of intrarenal infusion of calcium entry blockers in anesthetized dogs.
Hypertension
5:
482-488,
1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Hamann, SR,
Blouin RA,
and
McAllister RG, Jr.
Clinical pharmacokinetics of verapamil.
Clin Pharmacokinet
9:
26-41,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Hayslett, JP,
Macala LJ,
Smallwood JI,
Kalghatgi L,
Gassala-Herraiz J,
and
Isales C.
Adenosine stimulation of Na+ transport is mediated by an A1 receptor and a [Ca2+]i-dependent mechanism.
Kidney Int
47:
1576-1584,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Leonetti, G,
and
Zanchetti A.
Renal effects of calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients.
J Hypertens Suppl
3:
S535-S539,
1985[Medline].
11.
Thomas, SR,
and
Mintz E.
Time-dependent apical membrane K+ and Na+ selectivity in cultured kidney cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
253:
C1-C6,
1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.
Yatani, A,
and
Brown AM.
The calcium channel blocker nitrendipine blocks sodium channels in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes.
Circ Res
56:
868-875,
1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Zhang, S,
Zhou Z,
Gong Q,
Makielski JC,
and
January CT.
Mechanism of block and identification of the verapamil binding domain to HERG potassium channels.
Circ Res
84:
989-998,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 283(4):F765-F770