|
|
||||||||
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136
Submitted 17 January 2003 ; accepted in final form 17 April 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ischemic acute renal failure; apical polarity; intermediate filaments
Our laboratory and others have reported that microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) are apical in simple epithelia (3, 4, 10, 25, 34, 37), thus organizing the MTs in a polarized fashion with the minus ends toward the apical membrane (5). Although this apicobasal polarization of MTs is not absolutely essential for polarization (19, 38), it is thought to participate in the vesicular traffic bound to the apical membrane (24), especially for vesicles involved in transcytosis from basolateral to apical membrane (8). In this regard, the nucleating activity of MTOCs must be necessary to repolymerize MTs after I/R. Because MTOCs cap the minus ends of MTs (45), it is expected that MTOCs positioned in their normal (apical) localization will reorganize MTs with the correct orientation (minus end apical). Conversely, if MTOCs become delocalized during ischemia, the MTs formed during the recovery period will have abnormal orientations. In that scenario, aberrant MTs may transport the carrier vesicles that originate in the trans-Golgi network and contain apical cargo (28) to incorrect regions of the cytoplasm. Therefore, newly formed MTs with an incorrect orientation may contribute to the mispolarization of the plasma membrane more seriously than a simple depolymerization of MT.
Because our previous work suggests that the apical localization of MTOCs in simple epithelia depends on binding to apical intermediate filament (IF) (37), we decided to analyze whether the IFs are also disrupted by anoxia and whether the MTOCs are still bound to IF and apically localized in proximal tubule kidney cells after ischemia. We performed the analysis in two epithelial cell lines, and in vivo, using a mild I/R protocol of unilateral clamp of the renal vessels, which is known to disrupt the MTs (1) but causes little or no necrosis and only modest amounts of apoptosis only within the first 24 h after ischemia (31). The results indicate that MTOCs become delocalized after chemical anoxia in tissue culture or as a result of I/R in vivo. Furthermore, the anomalous localization of MTOCs results in a disorganized array of MTs and correlates with poor membrane polarization of proximal tubule cells, delayed by days respect to the formation of the F-actin brush border.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kidney ischemia in vivo. Animal handling was in compliance with Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 300450 g were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane and kept on a warm plate to maintain temperature. The peritoneal cavity was opened, and the left renal vessels were clamped for 30 min with two microvascular (no. 1) clamps. The success of the clamp, and, later, the reperfusion, was visualized by rapid changes in the color of the kidney. The animals were sutured and kept under an infrared lamp until fully awake. After various periods of time, the animals were killed by an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (1 mg/10 g body wt) and intracardiac perfusion of formaldehyde fixative (in the case of immunofluorescence experiments). The success of the perfusion was assessed by the rigid posture of muscles and tail.
Antibodies and fluorescent reagents. The antibodies used in this
study were as follows: polyclonal antibody (Ab) anti-
-tubulin
NH2-terminal synthetic peptide (EEFATEGTDRKDVFFY, Sigma);
monoclonal antibody against
-tubulin (DM 1A; Sigma); monoclonal
antibody against keratin (K) 19 (in CACO-2 cells; RCK-108; Accurate Chemical);
monoclonal antibody against K19 (in LLC-PK1 cells; A53/BA2; Sigma);
monoclonal antibody against K18, B23.1 (Biomeda); polyclonal antibody
anti-intestinal alkaline phosphatase (iAP; DAKO); polyclonal antibody
anti-carbonic anhydrase IV (CAIV), a generous gift from Dr. A. Waheed (St.
Louis University School of Medicine); and polyclonal antibody
anti-Na+-K+-ATPase, a generous gift from Dr. W. J.
Nelson (Stanford Univ.). Secondary fluorescent antibodies were affinity
purified (Jackson Laboratories). FITC-phalloidin was purchased from Molecular
Probes.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of tissue culture cells were performed as described before (37). Rat kidneys were fixed by intracardiac perfusion of the whole animal with warm 3% formaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde. The kidneys were rapidly extracted from the animal, sectioned with a razor blade into 1-mm-thick sections, and further fixed in the same fixative for 2 h. Then, the sections were infused overnight in PBS supplemented with 27% (wt/vol) sucrose, 0.3% formaldehyde, and 0.01% glutaraldehyde. The kidneys were frozen in the same solution in isopentane at melting point and stored at 70°C. Sectioning was performed in a cryostat at 25°C. The sections, attached to a glass slide, were thawed by immersion in the same fixative described above and processed for immunofluorescence following the standard protocol (37). For quantification of signal in confocal sections, highly confocal images, collected at 0.7 Airy units, were acquired, with care taken that no pixels in the positive signal were saturated. Then, the images were analyzed by selecting separately in each cell section the basolateral domain and the corresponding apical domain. In each selected area, we calculated the product of number of pixels times average pixel values (luminosity channel) and the basolateral-to-apical ratio for each cell. The data are presented as means ± SD of those ratios. Apoptosis in kidney sections was evaluated using a DNA fragmentation detection kit (Oncogene Research Products), based on the end labeling of fragmented DNA, with biotin-labeled deoxynucleotides by Klenow DNA polymerase I.
Cell extraction, fractionation, and immunoprecipitation of sonication fragments. Cell extraction, fractionation, and immunoprecipitation of sonication fragments were done as previously described (34, 37). Briefly, confluent monolayers of LLC-PK1 cells were grown in one roller bottle. The cells were extracted in 1% Triton X-100, in PBS supplemented with 2 mM EDTA, and a complete cocktail of antiproteases (Sigma), and the pellet was extensively sonicated (3 min total, with 10-s periods of sonication and 15-s lapses to dissipate heat). The sonication fragments of the Triton-insoluble cytoskeleton were separated in 10-ml 2060% sucrose continuous gradients in a SW41 swinging bucket rotor at 15,000 rpm for 50 min at 4°C. Usually, the top five 1-ml fractions of the gradient were used. Immunoprecipitation was done following standard procedures. The protein A-agarose beads were centrifuged through a 0.5-ml 30% sucrose cushion. All these centrifugations were done at 14,000 rpm for 2 s to minimize nonspecific copelleting of unbound cytoskeletal fragments. Immunoblotting was performed as described before (37).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To analyze the localization of centrosomes and to extend the observations
to a different cell line, LLC-PK1 and CACO-2 monolayers were
subjected to ATP depletion for 1 h and 1-h recovery. Double-immunofluorescence
experiments were performed colocalizing the
-tubulin signal
(Fig. 2, green) with the
cortical IF cytoskeleton (Fig.
2, red). To show the apical domain alone, K19 was used as a marker
of IF in the CACO-2 cells. As in CACO-2 cells
(37), K18, the other type I
keratin, distributed under the apical and lateral domains in
LLC-PK1 cells, but the IF cortical signal was thicker in the kidney
cells than in the intestinal cells (Fig. 2,
a, c, e, g, and i). More importantly, ATP
depletion did not affect the IF cytoskeleton in either LLC-PK1 or
CACO-2 cells (Fig. 2). A
similar result was observed, reciprocally, using anti-K18 or anti-K19
antibodies in CACO-2 or LLC-PK1 cells, respectively (not
shown).
|
In Fig. 2, examples of
fields with centrosomes within the same confocal optical section in nearby
cells are shown for control monolayers (ad) and
ATP-depleted cells (ej). As expected from previous
publications, the centrosomes in control cells were observed always embedded
in the apical IF submembrane cytoskeleton
(Fig. 2,
ad). In ATP-depleted cells, a proportion
of the centrosomes was found separated from the apical IF cytoskeleton
(Fig. 2, arrows). The
proportion was smaller in LLC-PK1 cells (
28%) than in CACO-2
cells (
49%) but in both cases significantly larger than the proportion of
centrosomes normally found separated from the IF in control interphasic cells
(0% in all our samples). In control cells, a modest proportion of centrosomes
(usually <10%) does appear attached to the lateral domain IF
(37), which was not the case
in the ATP-depleted cells either. In some cases, the
-tubulin signal
usually interpreted as centrosomes (
0.4-µm spheres, often observed in
pairs) appeared fragmented in ATP-depleted cells
(Fig. 2, h and
i). The noncentrosomal
-tubulin signal (smaller
dots or diffuse signal), normally at or within 1 µm of the terminal web
(25,
37), also appeared separated
from the apical submembrane cytoskeleton, especially in LLC-PK1
cells (Fig. 2e).
Because colocalization does not necessarily imply attachment, the physical
connection of insoluble
-tubulin-containing structures and IF was
analyzed as before (37) by
fragmenting the Triton-insoluble cytoskeleton of LLC-PK1 cells with
extensive sonication and separating the smallest fragments by size in sucrose
gradients by rate centrifugation. This procedure was originally devised to
perform immunoprecipitation in highly insoluble multiprotein complexes
(34). We collected the top
five fractions of the gradient that contain fragments small enough to be
immunoprecipitated (larger fragments tend to nonspecifically copellet with
agarose beads). Each aliquot was divided into two equal parts, one of them
immunoprecipitated with an irrelevant rabbit IgG as a negative control
(Fig. 3, lanes), and
the other with anti-
-tubulin Ab
(Fig. 3, + lanes). The
immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblot using anti-K18 or anti-K19
monoclonal antibody. In general, the previous findings in CACO-2
(37) were extended to
LLC-PK1 cells. In control cells, there was coimmunoprecipitation of
K18 and
-tubulin in fractions 1, 3, and 4 and of K19
and
-tubulin in fractions 15
(Fig. 3). This
coimmunoprecipitation was mostly abolished in LLC-PK1 cells
subjected to 1-h ATP depletion. K18 blots showed only background levels, and
K19 showed only some ATP depletion-insensitive coimmunoprecipitation with
-tubulin in fraction 4
(Fig. 3). Controls showing that
this coimmunoprecipitation cannot be explained by simple physical trapping or
artifactual protein binding as a result of detergent extraction have been
performed elsewhere (37, see
Fig. 8). These results indicate
that the attachment between MTOC and IFs is largely broken after 1-h ATP
depletion in LLC-PK1 and CACO-2 cells in tissue culture.
|
|
Ischemic injury in vivo causes detachment of MTOCs in proximal tubules. To test whether MTOCs also detach from the apical domain in vivo after ischemia, rat kidneys were subjected to a 30-min clamp of the renal vessels. The contralateral kidneys were used as a sham operation control. We analyzed the kidneys at 24 h after I/R, a time that has been widely studied but that yields results difficult to analyze because of the complexity of the effects. We also analyzed the kidneys at 3, 5, 7, and at 8 days after I/R. The latter was chosen because our preliminary experiments showed that the changes described in this section last up to 7 days after I/R, and kidney functional parameters with a 30-min bilateral clamp protocol have been reported to be nearly normal as early as 5 days after I/R (23). In addition, Hropot and co-workers (21) found plasma creatinine and sodium still abnormal after 7 days for a 40-min bilateral clamp model. Even in a different system, the human renal allograft, patients recovering well achieve acceptable glomerular filtration rates on day 7 (14).
Frozen sections from reperfused or sham-operated kidneys were analyzed by
immunofluorescence with anti-
-tubulin antibody and FITC-phalloidin to
stain F-actin. In the control proximal tubules, very few 0.3- to 0.4-µm
spots of
-tubulin signal (centrosomes) were easily recognizable and
were mostly localized in the apical pole of the cells. However, a continuous
subapical layer of
-tubulin signal was observed in most tubules both in
kidneys subjected to a sham operation (Fig.
4a) and in kidneys from animals not subjected to surgery
(not shown). When analyzed in sections perfectly perpendicular to the axis of
the tubule, the
-tubulin signal
(Fig. 4a,
inset, green) could be localized immediately below the F-actin signal
in the brush border (Fig.
4a, inset, red; arrows point at basal actin
signal). This image is consistent with findings in our laboratory and by
others as well that a layer of noncentrosomal MTOCs lies under the apical
domain (3,
25). During the first 24 h
after I/R, the apical
-tubulin layer became very discontinuous or
disappeared altogether (not shown). However, because the entire apical domain
is degraded (44), it is
difficult to draw any conclusions about the fate of MTOCs at that time. More
interesting were the results from kidneys at 3 days following I/R. At this
stage, the F-actin component of the brush border was mostly repaired in many
(but not all) cells, as judged by a phalloidin label
(Fig. 4d, arrows).
However, no subapical layer of
-tubulin was observed, even in tubules
(or cells) with a complete brush border
(Fig. 4, c vs.
d, arrows). Instead,
-tubulin signal was either
diffuse in the cytoplasm or concentrated under the lateral domain in some
cells (Fig. 4c,
arrows). At 8 days after I/R, tubules subjected to a 30-min ischemic injury
had recovered the normal distribution of
-tubulin and the images became
indistinguishable from controls in all cells (like in
Fig. 4a). This result
suggests that the repolarization of MTOCs is delayed with respect to the
reassembly of the F-actin brush border.
|
The same experiment was repeated in several animals, i.e., the harvesting
of kidneys at 1, 3, and 8 days after I/R. To assess the attachment of MTOCs to
the cytoskeleton, pieces of the cortex, freshly obtained from the animal, were
homogenized and centrifuged at low speed, so that the soluble 27S
-tubulin complexes (
-TurC; 42) remain in the supernatant and
-tubulin attached to the cytoskeleton in the pellet. In previous
studies, roughly 50% of the
-tubulin was found soluble
(37,
42), and that was the case for
kidney cortexes subjected to a sham operation (S in
Fig. 5, pellets vs. soluble).
Despite the disruption in the architecture of the tissue, and with some
variability, 37% of the
-tubulin (with respect to control) was still
associated with the cytoskeletal pellet after 1 day of recovery (I in
Fig. 5 and
Table 1). This result can be
due to minimal amounts of MTOCs still attached to the apical cytoskeleton,
which may go undetected by regular morphology. Interestingly, however, no
-tubulin was found associated with the pellet fraction at 3 days after
I/R (Fig. 5,
Table 1). At 8 days after I/R,
the fraction of
-tubulin in the pellet resembled again that of the
sham-operated kidneys (Fig. 5,
Table 1). Together with the
data in Fig. 4, this result
suggests that the bonding of MTOCs to the cytoskeleton breaks down after I/R
and that it takes days to be reestablished. This is a much longer time period
than it takes to reassemble apical F-actin at the brush border.
|
|
Disorganization of MTs at 3 days after I/R in proximal tubules. It
is known that MTs disassemble within the first 24 h after I/R
(1). We confirmed that
observation in kidney sections stained with an anti-
-tubulin antibody.
The few MTs remaining at 1 day after I/R, however, were still oriented in the
apicobasal axis (not shown), a result consistent with the persistence of 37%
of the MTOCs still attached to the cytoskeleton
(Fig. 5, Table 1). However, because of
the delocalization of MTOCs described above at 3 days after I/R, we were
prompted to analyze their organization at that particular time. Observation of
the sections with regular epifluorescence microscopy revealed that the density
of MTs per cell was similar to that in sham-operated kidneys (shown only in
confocal microscopy, Fig. 6, a vs.
b), suggesting that an active process of repolymerization
of tubulin occurs between 1 and 3 days after I/R. The thickness of the
sections (
5 µm), compared with the diameter of single MTs (
20
nm), however, made it necessary to visualize MT bundles under confocal
microscopy using a high degree of confocality (0.7 Airy units), which gives
high resolution in the z-axis. Proximal tubules from kidneys
subjected to a sham operation observed under those conditions showed MT
bundles mostly oriented in the apicobasal axis
(Fig. 6a), as
described extensively before
(3,
5,
37). In the proximal tubules
at 3 days after I/R, on the other hand, different arrangements were observed.
In some cases, MTs were visualized as a disorganized network
(Fig. 6b, red channel,
arrows), mostly separated from the apical F-actin layer (green channel). In
other sections, MTs adopted a basolateral distribution, and many bundles were
roughly perpendicular to the apicobasal axis
(Fig. 6c, arrows), an
orientation seldom seen in control cells.
|
Lack of polarity of apical plasma membrane markers at 3 days after I/R in proximal tubules showing an apparently normal F-actin brush border. Because MTOCs cap the minus end of MTs (45) and because MTOCs seem to be scattered in the cytoplasm at 3 days after I/R (Fig. 4) free from their normal cytoskeletal attachment (Fig. 5), we reasoned that the disorganized MTs at 3 days after I/R (Fig. 6) must have their minus ends randomly distributed in the cells. Therefore, MTs would not only not contribute to the normal polarization of the plasma membrane but would actually tend to randomize apical membrane proteins. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the polarization of two apical membrane markers normally expressed in S2 and S3 segments of the proximal tubule, CAIV (S2 and S3 marker) (40) and iAP (S3 marker) (30). At 3 days after I/R, F-actin in the brush borders was similar to control tubules, as judged by phalloidin distribution (Fig. 7, d vs. b). CAIV and iAP were observed only in the brush border in all tubules where they are expressed in sham-operated kidneys (Fig. 7a, Table 2). At 1 day after I/R, the iAP signal could not be observed and the CAIV signal was weak and depolarized in at least one cell in 72% of the S23 sections (Table 2). This result is consistent with previous publications describing the loss of apical membrane and depolarization of the cells immediately after ischemia (2, 44). Strikingly, however, on day 3 significant levels of basolateral CAIV (Fig. 7c, arrows) were observed in one or more cells in 55% of the S3 sections (Table 2). Similarly, 64% of the sections positive for iAP showed at least one cell depolarized (Table 2). The number of depolarized cells decreased significantly on day 5, although isolated depolarized cells were observed up to 7 days after I/R for CAIV (Table 2).
|
|
To obtain a more precise assessment of the magnitude of the depolarization of CAIV and iAP, we measured the total signal in the apical and basolateral domain in high z-axis resolution confocal optical sections (Fig. 7, e and g). For each cell, the signal was weighed as total pixels x average pixel intensity in each area. With care taken to avoid images in which high-intensity pixels are saturated, this method can provide a fair estimation of the relative distribution of a membrane marker in a way that accounts for the differences in membrane folding (36). In proximal tubules subjected to sham surgery, only 3.6 ± 4.2% of total CAIV signal was localized to the basolateral domain (Fig. 7, a and e; only detectable with digital microscopy). In kidneys at 3 days after I/R, on the other hand, proximal tubule cells showed 48.2 ± 13.3% of total cellular CAIV signal localized to the basolateral domain (Fig. 7, c, arrows, and g). In other words, these cells "look" partially polarized because the apical signal is localized in a smaller area of the section with a high level of membrane folding (brush-border microvilli), whereas the basolateral signal is in a much more stretched membrane array. However, nearly equal amounts of the apical membrane marker are localized in each domain, and, thus these cells are almost totally depolarized.
Intracellular localization of Na+-K+-ATPase after I/R. To analyze the polarity of basolateral membrane proteins during the same period after I/R, we conducted experiments similar to those depicted in Fig. 7 but using an anti-Na+-K+-ATPase antibody instead. The antibody showed a basolateral image in sham kidneys. In 3-day I/R kidneys, a large proportion (72% of the proximal tubules, an average of 8 cells/section, Table 2) of the proximal tubule cells showed intracellular images, even in cells with an already fully reassembled actin brush border (Fig. 8, arrows). At this stage, however, little or no apical distribution of Na+-K+-ATPase was observed. At 5 days after I/R, only scattered cells (21% of the sections, an average of 1.2 cells/section) were still showing the intracellular distribution of Na+-K+-ATPase, and with few exceptions (one shown in Fig. 8C), no Na+-K+-ATPase signal was found in the apical domain either (Fig. 8). These results suggest that Na+-K+-ATPase also redistributes at the 3-day stage after I/R but not in the apicobasal axis but rather into an intracellular compartment and fully confirm the observations of Alejandro and co-workers (2) in human allografts. In addition, the results also indicate that different mechanisms govern the polarization of apical and basolateral markers, as described before in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (43) and that reassembly of the brush-border actin is not an indicator of full polarization.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The initial experiments in this work were performed in two epithelial cell lines in tissue culture: LLC-PK1, derived from the proximal tubule, and CACO-2, derived from the intestine. The results from both cell lines indicate that ATP depletion has a significant impact on the apical localization of MTOCs. In proximal tubules, centrosomes were difficult to identify, and perhaps they are absent altogether in most cells. Therefore, we rather focused on the layer of noncentrosomal MTOCs that has been visualized in vivo in other epithelia as well (3). The dramatic fate of the apical pole in vivo as a result of the I/R injury, extensively described by Molitoris and co-workers (11), made any comparison of the redistribution of MTOCs in culture vs. in vivo nearly impossible. In addition, the analysis of the initial 24 h after I/R is complicated by the presence of apoptotic cells (31). Biochemical and morphological data in this work (Figs. 4 and 5) indicate that between 24 and 72 h after I/R, nearly all MTOCs become detached from the cytoskeleton and are scattered throughout the cytoplasm. Importantly, the data in tissue culture cells (Fig. 2) and in vivo (Fig. 5) consistently indicate that the detachment of MTOCs is not a consequence of depolymerization of IFs, the normal anchor of MTOCs (18, 37), that in all cases remained unaffected by ATP depletion or I/R (Figs. 2 and 5, respectively). The immediate consequence of the detachment of MTOCs was that MTs, although fully repolymerized during the same period of time (13 days after I/R), became a disorganized network, instead of the normal array of bundles highly oriented in the apicobasal axis (Fig. 6). Although we cannot assert a cause-and-effect relationship, it is safe to conclude that the disorganization of MTs correlates with poor levels of plasma membrane polarity, which only revert over a period of days to nearly normal at 5 days after I/R and, in some isolated depolarized cells, up to 7 days after I/R (Fig. 7, Table 2).
There are a number of possible explanations for the delayed recovery of
distribution of MTOCs at 3 days after I/R. The first is that apoptosis, could,
in principle, account for the separation of MTOCs from the cytoskeleton by a
simple action of caspases. However, proximal tubule cells at 3 days after I/R
displayed a nearly normal F-actin cytoskeleton and full-length MTs (although
in abnormal orientations) (Figs.
6b and
7d). Furthermore, and
in agreement with previous publications using the same I/R protocol
(31), we found only modest
proportions of apoptotic cells (58%) during the first 24 h after I/R,
and none at 3 days (not shown). This was the reason the protocol was chosen in
the first place, as opposed to more drastic ischemic injuries (e.g., 1 h) that
result in higher percentages of apoptotic cells, and, eventually, a late
secondary peak of apoptosis
(41). In addition, we have
demonstrated that, at least in intestinal epithelia, apoptosis does not
disrupt epithelial polarity as long as the cell maintains the integrity of its
plasma membrane (3). On the
other hand, we cannot rule out that the early detachment of MTOCs from IF
found in tissue culture cells may be due to caspase activation. Second,
dedifferentiation, in a general sense, may occur because tens of genes are
either upregulated or downregulated using the same I/R protocol at 1 or 3 days
after I/R (48). More
specifically, the expression of vimentin has been implicated as a reporter of
dedifferentiation in proximal tubule cells after ischemia, and, along with the
expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), it was found in a
substantial number of S3 cells at 25 days postischemia using a harsher
ischemic injury (46). In our
system, vimentin was expressed in <2% of the cells at 3 days after I/R.
Interestingly, some of the vimentin-expressing cells actually had a polarized
distribution of CAIV (not shown). Therefore, while it is quite likely that
changes in the pattern of gene expression may be responsible for the
detachment of MTOCs from the cytoskeleton, the phenomenon cannot be assigned
to a simple epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Third, changes in the
intracellular signaling/regulatory pathways, on the other hand, are more
likely to be responsible for a phenomenon that occurs >24 h after I/R.
Although the molecular identity of the "glue" attaching MTOCs to
IFs has not yet been established, we have recently identified an
190-kDa
protein that, on phosphorylation with p34cdc2, seems to
mediate the detachment of MTOCs from IF
(18). Although we have no
evidence that the same protein is responsible for the detachment of MTOCs from
IF at day 3 after I/R, our working hypothesis is that a
posttranslational modification of one of the components of the glue may be
implicated in this phenomenon. For this reason, our laboratory is presently
engaged in an attempt to identify the molecular components that mediate the
binding of MTOCs to IFs. After I/R, specific signaling pathways become
activated (39). The activation
of "stress" kinases (p39 MAP, c-Jun, and ATF3), however, seems to
be an early event after I/R (3 h)
(47), and the exact nature of
all the signaling/regulatory pathways active at 3 days after I/R is still
unknown. Fourth, mitotic responses have been observed in S3 with harsher
ischemic injuries, i.e., 40-
(46) and 50-min ischemia
(29). PDGF receptors have been
implicated in this response
(29) as well as stress kinases
(39). In mitotically active
tissue culture cells, MTOCs cycle from an IF-attached state in interphase to a
free and mobile state during mitosis
(18,
33). While there is no doubt
that MTOCs are apical in quiescent cells, it is still conceivable that they
may not reattach to the apical cytoskeleton in mitotically active S3 cells. We
cannot rule out this scenario, either.
One lesson that we can draw from various studies of the acquisition of
membrane polarity in tissue culture cells is that the time course of
polarization of various components may be different and sometimes
counter-intuitive. For example, we have demonstrated that apical polarity can
be established before basolateral polarity and in the absence of
tight-junctions (43).
Grinsdstaff et al. (19)
demonstrated that membrane polarity can precede the polarization of MTs. The
hierarchy of events during the establishment of polarity is, therefore, still
poorly understood. Our data here suggest a sequence of two groups of events:
1) an early reestablishment of the F-actin-based brush border, along
with an incipient, partial, establishment of membrane polarity completed at 3
days after I/R, entirely consistent with the findings of Brown and co-workers
(1); and 2) despite
the repolymerization of MTs completed at the same time as the apical F-actin
reorganization, a much delayed reestablishment of the polarized arrangement of
MTs, along with the full polarization of the plasma membrane, both
accomplished
1 wk after I/R. In other words, the reestablishment of the
submembrane F-actin does not seem to be sufficient for a full polarization of
the cells.
An obvious possibility is that depolarization of apical membrane proteins may be the consequence of open tight junctions and be unrelated to the disorganization of MTs. In this regard, Kwon and co-workers (22) have reported up to 57% backleak of the glomerular filtrate in transplanted patients with sustained ARF, as demonstrated by fractional clearance of dextrans. However, it is of note that the same group in the above-mentioned and previous publications (2) found redistribution of Na+-K+-ATPase to a cytoplasmic pool but not to the apical membrane. The same result was confirmed here for the 30-min unilateral ischemia paradigm in the rat (Fig. 8). Those results would suggest a dissociation between the "fence" role of tight junctions, apparently conserved, and the "gate" role, clearly disrupted. In fact, in tissue culture cells, the gate function, measured by transepithelial resistance, can be disrupted with much shorter times of ATP depletion than the fence function (6).
Although we have not analyzed the polarity of apical ion transporters, the basolateral mislocalization of such will only potentiate the effects of mislocalized Na+-K+-ATPase by shortcircuiting the remaining pumps at the basolateral membrane and contributing to the failure in proximal sodium reabsorption. Recently, it has been speculated that it may even contribute to elevated tubule pressure (32), the predominant cause of hypofiltration in ARF. While it is clear that the modest proportion of depolarized cells in the 5- to 7-day period after I/R may not be significant for overall kidney function in the 30-min clamp paradigm, they highlight the possibility that slow apical polarization may play a role in delaying recovery after ARF under other ischemic conditions, such as allografts, as well. Other consequences of a sustained depolarization of apical proteins may go beyond ionic transport. Meprin, a brush-border protease, for example, has been found relocalized to the basolateral domain, where it caused fragmentation of the extracellular matrix after I/R in rats (12). These potential connections with the pathogenesis of ARF warrant the need for future investigations into the molecular mechanisms involved in the attachment-detachment of MTOCs in response to I/R injury in kidney.
| DISCLOSURES |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulin containing structures are anchored to the apical
network of intermediate filaments in polarized CACO-2 epithelial cells.
J Cell Biol 146:
645658, 1999.
-tubulin. Cell
76: 623637,
1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
-tubulin ring complex as a
microtubule minus-end cap. Nat Cell Biol
2: 358364,
2000.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. B. N. Lee, E. Huang, and H. J. Ward Tight junction biology and kidney dysfunction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F20 - F34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zahedi, Z. Wang, S. Barone, K. Tehrani, N. Yokota, S. Petrovic, H. Rabb, and M. Soleimani Identification of stathmin as a novel marker of cell proliferation in the recovery phase of acute ischemic renal failure Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): C1203 - C1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |