|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Renal Division, Department of Medicine, and 2Department of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Submitted 21 October 2003 ; accepted in final form 20 November 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
urea transporter; aquaporin; urinary concentrating ability; sodium/potassium/chloride cotransport
One candidate mediator is vasopressin. Diabetic rats have elevated plasma vasopressin levels in some studies (4, 29) but not in another (10). However, measuring vasopressin levels in rats can be difficult because any factor that causes the rat to become anxious can result in a large and rapid release of vasopressin from the pituitary gland. The Brattleboro rat has central diabetes insipidus due to a congenital lack of vasopressin and is an excellent animal model for studying the effects of vasopressin (8). Previous studies of medullary transport proteins have generally administered vasopressin (or dDAVP, a V2-selective agonist) to Brattleboro rats for 57 days (5, 6, 11, 12, 27). Vasopressin increases AQP2 protein abundance in the inner medulla (5, 6, 12, 27). dDAVP increases NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundance in the outer medulla (11), although vasopressin does not (6). In contrast, vasopressin decreases UT-A1 protein abundance in the inner medulla (28). The goal of this study was to determine the effect of diabetes mellitus on UT-A1, AQP2, and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances in Brattleboro rats so that we could study the effect of diabetes in the absence of vasopressin.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To induce diabetes mellitus, Brattleboro rats were injected with STZ (40 mg/kg body wt prepared fresh in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 4.0; Sigma) into a tail vein at 7 AM (10, 13, 21). Vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats received STZ 2 days after the vasopressin-containing minipumps were placed. Diabetes mellitus was confirmed by measuring spot urine glucose at 24 and 48 h after STZ injection (Ames N-Multistix SG, Miles, Elkhart, IN).
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) weighing 125200 g received free access to 23% protein rat chow and water for at least 3 days after delivery. To induce water diuresis, rats were given sugar water containing 10% glucose to drink for 14 days (24). The sugar water-fed rats do not develop glucosuria (24).
All rats were fed 23% protein chow and water (or sugar water) ad libitum throughout the study. Two days before death, rats were put into metabolic cages and 24-h urine was collected to measure urine volume, osmolality, and glucose and urea concentrations. Rats were killed by decapitation, and trunk blood was collected to measure glucose (One Touch Profile Diabetes Tracking Kit, Lifescan, Milpitas, CA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN; Infinity BUN reagent, Sigma), and osmolality.
Western blot analysis. Kidneys were removed and the medulla was dissected into outer medulla, inner medullary base, and inner medullary tip as previously described (10, 13). In some studies, one inner medulla was not subdivided, whereas the other kidney from the same rat was dissected into base and tip. Kidney tissue from a single rat was placed into ice-cold isolation buffer (10 mM triethanolamine, 250 mM sucrose, pH 7.6, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 mg/ml PMSF), homogenized, and SDS was added to a final concentration of 1% SDS for Western blot analysis of total cell lysate (10, 13). Total protein in each sample was measured by a modified Lowry method (Bio-Rad DC protein assay reagent, Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Proteins (10 µg/lane) were size separated by SDS-PAGE using 7.5, 10, or 15% polyacrylamide gels, blotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF; Gelman Scientific, Ann Arbor, MI), and Western blotting was performed as described previously (10, 13). Western blots were probed with antibodies (diluted in TBS/Tween) to the following proteins: 1) UT-A1 (17), 2) AQP2 (10, 19), and 3) NKCC2/BSC1 (10, 11). Blots were quantified using an Imaging Densitometer GS670 and Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad). When reporting on total UT-A1 protein abundance differences, we make the assumption that the antibody recognizes both glycoproteins equally. The functional difference between these two glycoproteins, if any, is not known. In all cases, parallel gels were stained with Coomassie blue to confirm uniformity of loading (data not shown). Results are expressed as arbitrary units per microgram of protein.
Phosphorylation of UT-A1. Inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) suspensions were incubated with 32P, and then UT-A1 protein was immunoprecipitated from equal amounts of the whole cell lysates as previously described (31). Proteins were size separated on two identical SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing an equal portion of the total immunoprecipitated protein per lane. The proteins on one gel were transferred to a PVDF membrane and the amount of immunoprecipitated UT-A1 was assayed by Western blotting. The other gel was dried, and 32P incorporation into UT-A1 was analyzed by autoradiography.
Statistics. Data are presented as means ± SE (n), where n indicates the number of rats studied. To test for statistically significant differences between two groups, a paired Student's t-test was used. To test for statistically significant differences between three or more groups, an ANOVA was used followed by a multiple comparison, protected t-test (25).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Because the increase in UT-A1 at 12 days is opposite to previous results following 5 days of vasopressin (28), we performed two additional experiments. First, we measured UT-A1 abundance in the inner medullary tip and base from Brattleboro rats that received vasopressin for 5 days. We also measured it in whole inner medulla to provide a direct comparison to the previous study (28). UT-A1 protein abundance was decreased in the inner medullary tip and in whole inner medulla of 5-day vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats, compared with untreated Brattleboro rats, consistent with the previous study (28), but did not change in the inner medullary base (Fig. 4). AQP2 protein abundance was increased in the inner medullary tip of the 5-day Brattleboro rats (Fig. 4), consistent with previous studies (5, 6, 12, 27). The Brattleboro rats treated with vasopressin for 5 days had comparable increases in urine osmolality and reductions in urine volume to rats treated for 12 days (data not shown).
|
Second, we measured UT-A1, AQP2, and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances in Sprague-Dawley rats undergoing water diuresis for 14 days to reduce endogenous vasopressin levels. The water diuretic rats had significantly reduced urine osmolality and increased urine volume compared with control rats (Table 2). All three protein abundances were significantly decreased in the inner medullary tip (UT-A1, AQP2) or outer medulla (NKCC2/BSC1) of water diuretic rats compared with untreated Sprague-Dawley rats (Fig. 5).
|
|
Effect of diabetes mellitus on UT-A1, AQP2, and NKCC2/BSC1 in Brattleboro rats. Blood glucose was markedly increased in diabetic Brattleboro rats, both with and without vasopressin (Table 1). Neither vasopressin nor STZ changed BUN. Diabetic Brattleboro rats had significantly higher urine volume, urea excretion, and glucose excretion than control Brattleboro rats. Diabetes mellitus did not increase UT-A1 protein abundance in the inner medullary tip of Brattleboro rats (Fig. 6) but did increase AQP2 to 170% over control (Fig. 7). Diabetes mellitus also increased NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundance to 280% over control in the outer medulla (Fig. 8).
|
|
|
In Brattleboro rats that received vasopressin, diabetes mellitus again increased urine volume, urea excretion, and glucose excretion. In addition, diabetes mellitus decreased urine osmolality in vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats compared with nondiabetic vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats. In vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats, diabetes mellitus increased the protein abundance of the 117-kDa UT-A1 glycoprotein to 69% over vasopressin alone but did not change the abundance of the 97-kDa UT-A1 glycoprotein (Fig. 9). UT-A1 typically runs as two glycoprotein bands (97 and 117 kDa) on Western blot (3). However, in Fig. 9, the 117-kDa band appears to have expanded to include some less glycosylated species between the 97- and 117-kDa bands. The Western blot was scanned as the discreet 97-kDa UT-A1 isoform, which did not change with diabetes (10), and the larger bands centering
117 kDa were grouped for densitometic analysis. In Sprague-Dawley rats, it is the upper glycosylated species that are changed with diabetes (10). Diabetes mellitus also increased the protein abundances of AQP2 to 71% over vasopressin alone (Fig. 10) in the inner medullary tip and NKCC2/BSC1 to 37% over vasopressin alone in the outer medulla of vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats (Fig. 11).
|
|
|
Phosphorylation of UT-A1 protein. The relative abundance of immunoprecipitated UT-A1 protein from IMCD suspensions was not different from the relative abundance of UT-A1 protein in whole cell lysate by Western blot analysis, i.e., control
diabetes mellitus alone < vasopressin (12 days) alone < vasopressin and diabetes mellitus (Fig. 12). Only IMCD suspensions from the vasopressin-treated diabetic Brattleboro rats had a significant increase in UT-A1 phosphorylation to 190% over control Brattleboro rats. IMCD suspensions from the vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats did not show any increase in UT-A1 phosphorylation despite a significant increase in UT-A1 protein abundance.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of vasopressin in Brattleboro rats. Vasopressin gradually restores urinary concentrating ability in Brattleboro rats (8, 12). Correction of the urinary concentrating defect is associated with a progressive increase in inner medullary osmolality, primarily due to an increase in inner medullary urea content (8). After 3 days of vasopressin, inner medullary osmolality is only 5075% of normal, but there is osmotic equilibration between urine and the inner medullary interstitium (8, 12). This finding suggests that the collecting duct is able to osmotically reabsorb water after 3 days of vasopressin, even though AQP2 protein abundance is subnormal (12). After 5 days of vasopressin, AQP2 protein abundance returns to normal levels (5, 6, 12, 27, and present study). After 1428 days of vasopressin, urine and inner medullary osmolality are normal (8, 12), suggesting that urea content does not become normal until sometime between 3 and 1428 days. After 5 days of vasopressin, UT-A1 protein abundance is decreased (28, present study) but is increased after 12 days (present study). This time course is consistent with Harrington and Valtin's and Kishore and colleagues' time courses (8, 12) and may help to explain the gradual correction of concentrating ability in Brattleboro rats.
Why the delayed increase in UT-A1 protein? The promoter for rat UT-A1 does not contain a consensus cAMP-response element (CRE) but does contain a tonicity enhancer element (15, 16). Thus it is possible that vasopressin may not directly increase UT-A1 transcription but may do so indirectly by increasing the transcription of other genes, such as AQP2, NKCC2/BSC1, that begin to increase inner medullary osmolality (9, 30). Consistent with this hypothesis is that UT-A1 protein abundance increases following 2 days of water diuresis (28) but decreases following 14 days of water diuresis (present study). Vasopressin does increase AQP2 transcription (30), which could account for the more rapid increase in AQP2 protein following vasopressin administration to Brattleboro rats.
The effect of vasopressin on NKCC2/BSC1 abundance has differed in different studies (2, 6, 11). Water restriction (which raises endogenous vasopressin levels) increases NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundance and a selective V2-receptor antagonist decreases it (2, 11), consistent with the presence of a CRE in the NKCC2/BSC1 promoter (9). In Brattleboro rats, dDAVP increases NKCC2/BSC1 abundance (11) but vasopressin does not (6). Knepper and colleagues (6) proposed that this difference may result from higher vasopressin levels following exogenous vasopressin administration resulting in V1a-receptor effects on the thick ascending limb that counteracts its V2-receptor effect to increase NKCC2/BSC1. The present study is consistent with this hypothesis, because exogenous vasopressin did not increase NKCC2/BSC1, but water diuresis (which reduces endogenous vasopressin levels) did decrease it. Other potential explanations for the difference between exogenous and endogenous vasopressin include a difference in sensitivity of the thick ascending limb vs. collecting duct to vasopressin (7) or the difference in half-life and duration of action of dDAVP vs. vasopressin (23).
Effect of diabetes mellitus in Brattleboro rats. Previous studies show that UT-A1, AQP2, and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances increase after 10 days of diabetes mellitus in Sprague-Dawley rats (1, 10, 18). In the present study, AQP2 and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances increased in diabetic Brattleboro rats, indicating that vasopressin is not required for the increase in these proteins in diabetes mellitus. AQP2 is known to be regulated by both vasopressin-dependent and -independent pathways (reviewed in Ref. 20). Promeneur and colleagues (22) showed that dehydration increases AQP2 protein in Brattleboro rats, even in the absence of vasopressin, and suggested that oxytocin is acting as an antidiuretic hormone through the V2 receptor. Thus it is possible that oxytocin is responsible for the increase in AQP2 protein in diabetic Brattleboro rats in the present study.
In contrast, UT-A1 protein abundance did not increase in diabetic Brattleboro rats but did increase in vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats. This finding suggests that vasopressin is necessary for the increase in UT-A1 protein abundance during diabetes. It also suggests that a factor other than vasopressin is responsible for the increase in UT-A1 protein because vasopressin levels were not different between the two vasopressin-treated groups of Brattleboro rats. One potential mechanism for the upregulation of UT-A1 in the vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats is an increase in luminal and/or interstitial osmolality or urea concentration, because diabetes does not change urine osmolality or urea concentration in untreated Brattleboro rats but does in the vasopressin-treated Brattleboro rats (Table 1).
Vasopressin also increased UT-A1 phosphorylation, but only in vasopressin-treated diabetic Brattleboro rats. We previously showed that an increase in UT-A1 phosphorylation by vasopressin correlates with an increase in vasopressin-stimulated urea transport in the rat IMCD (31). Thus, in the absence of vasopressin, diabetes mellitus does not increase UT-A1 protein abundance or its phosphorylation by vasopressin.
Summary. The abundances of the major medullary transport proteins involved in the urinary concentrating mechanism vary with time after the onset of diabetes mellitus in rats. At 35 days of diabetes mellitus, UT-A1 protein abundance is decreased in the inner medullary tip and AQP2 protein abundance is unchanged, compared with control rats, and this effect is mediated by glucocorticoids (10, 13). At 1020 days of diabetes mellitus, UT-A1, AQP2, and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances are increased despite the ongoing osmotic diuresis (1, 10, 18, 26). The increases in AQP2 and NKCC2/BSC1 protein abundances are not mediated by vasopressin because these proteins increase in diabetic Brattleboro rats, but vasopressin is necessary for the increase in UT-A1 protein abundance.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-DK-41707 and R01-DK-63657.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Kwon, S. W. Lim, and H. M. Kwon Hypertonic Stress in the Kidney: A Necessary Evil Physiology, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Kim, W.-Y. Kim, H.-W. Lee, J. Kim, H. M. Kwon, J. D. Klein, J. M. Sands, and D. Kim Urea and NaCl regulate UT-A1 urea transporter in opposing directions via TonEBP pathway during osmotic diuresis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): F67 - F77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Blount, J. M. Sands, K. J. Kent, T. D. Smith, S. R. Price, and J. D. Klein Candesartan augments compensatory changes in medullary transport proteins in the diabetic rat kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): F1448 - F1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tiwari, S. Riazi, and C. A. Ecelbarger Insulin's impact on renal sodium transport and blood pressure in health, obesity, and diabetes Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F974 - F984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Klein, B. P. Murrell, S. Tucker, Y.-H. Kim, and J. M. Sands Urea transporter UT-A1 and aquaporin-2 proteins decrease in response to angiotensin II or norepinephrine-induced acute hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): F952 - F959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Klein, O. Frohlich, M. A. Blount, C. F. Martin, T. D. Smith, and J. M. Sands Vasopressin Increases Plasma Membrane Accumulation of Urea Transporter UT-A1 in Rat Inner Medullary Collecting Ducts J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 2680 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Cai, M. Keck, M. R. McReynolds, J. D. Klein, K. Greer, K. Sharma, J. B. Hoying, J. M. Sands, and H. L. Brooks Effects of water restriction on gene expression in mouse renal medulla: identification of 3betaHSD4 as a collecting duct protein Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): F218 - F224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, W. Wang, S. N. Summer, M. A. Cadnapaphornchai, S. Falk, F. Umenishi, and R. W. Schrier Hyperosmolality In Vivo Upregulates Aquaporin 2 Water Channel and Na-K-2Cl Co-Transporter in Brattleboro Rats J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1657 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-W. Lim, K.-H. Han, J.-Y. Jung, W.-Y. Kim, C.-W. Yang, J. M. Sands, M. A. Knepper, K. M. Madsen, and J. Kim Ultrastructural localization of UT-A and UT-B in rat kidneys with different hydration status Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): R479 - R492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kim, J. D. Klein, S. Racine, B. P. Murrell, and J. M. Sands Urea may regulate urea transporter protein abundance during osmotic diuresis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): F188 - F197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, J. D. Klein, W. Wang, M. A. Knepper, S. Nielsen, J. M. Sands, and J. Frokiaer Altered expression of urea transporters in response to ureteral obstruction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1154 - F1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |