|
|
||||||||
Divisions of 1Nephrology and 3Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, and 2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Submitted 5 September 2003 ; accepted in final form 7 January 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) has been shown to regulate their expression in adipocytes. In our experiments, PPAR
mRNA was elevated in db/db diabetic kidneys, and PPAR
protein was upregulated in glomeruli, cortical tubules, and renal arterial vessels of db/db mice. In conclusion, these studies furnish new RNA-based data for mechanistic investigation into renal injury in the diabetic kidney and identify a switch of kidney phenotype in favor of lipid accumulation in diabetic kidney.
transcriptome; diabetes; microarray; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
To better understand the mechanisms underlying diabetic nephropathy, the tools of functional genomics have recently been applied to profile changes in renal gene expression in uninephrectomized streptozotocin-induced mice (47, 48). These studies identified 81 genes that were differentially regulated in an early phase of renal injury, including several known genes related to glucose or lipid metabolism (48). Suppression-subtractive hybridization has been used to identify 200 genes regulated by high glucose in human mesangial cells in vitro (5). These studies were not designed to profile expression of genes in progressive renal injury. Moreover, gene profiles have not been assembled in models of type 2 diabetic nephropathy, which accounts for the majority of diabetic patients with nephropathy compared with type 1 diabetes.
In this study, we used high-density oligonucleotide microarrays to profile changes in kidney gene expression in a mouse model of progressive renal injury in type 2 diabetes, db/db mice (2, 15, 24, 35). The db/db congenic strain develops type 2 diabetes due to a loss-of-function mutation in the leptin receptor gene that causes abnormal splicing (4, 23). These mice develop a progressive form of renal injury that recapitulates aspects of diabetic nephropathy in humans, including albuminuria and glomerular injury with mesangial expansion (2, 6, 18, 51). Changes in gene expression were analyzed in the incipient and overt injury phases to uncover genes potentially involved in this critical transition.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microarray measurement of transcript expression. Total RNA was extracted from db/db and db/m kidneys (n = 3 from each group), and target RNA was labeled and hybridized to high-density oligode-oxynucleotide microarrays from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA) as previously described (29) with modifications. Briefly, biotin-labeled cRNA (15 µg) was hybridized to murine genome U74v2 microarrays for16 h at 45°C, and after stringent washing in a microfluidics station, bound cRNA was stained with R-phycoerythrin streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and scanned before and after antibody amplification. Fluorescence intensities were measured with a laser confocal scanner (Hewlett Packard). Image output files were inspected for hybridization artifacts, and based on fluorescence intensity differences between perfect match and mismatch probes, a hybridization intensity was calculated for each transcript (Microarray Suite 5.0, Affymetrix). Default parameters optimized by the manufacturer for this microarray chip were used for all signal analyses. The U74v2A murine microarray represents gene sequences derived from expressed sequence tag (EST) clusters in build 74 of Unigene. Of these sequences,
6,000 are annotated genes (either GenBank or TIGR) and
6,000 are unannotated ESTs.
Analysis of RNA expression data. The transcript signal, which represents mRNA transcript abundance, was used for all subsequent analysis of expression data. Scanned images were globally scaled to a target intensity of 1,500 to facilitate comparison of transcript levels from different mice. Gene transcripts with a high probability of increasing or decreasing were identified using the permutation-based significance analysis of microarrays (SAM v1.2) algorithm on the log2 transcript signal (40, 41, 45). The q value, a P value-like measure of each of many tests performed simultaneously, was also calculated (40, 41). Transcript data were visualized and grouped by hierarchical clustering using pairwise average-linkage and the Pearson correlation coefficient as the metric of similarity in Cluster v2.2 (10). Annotations and gene ontology were from the National Cancer Institute's Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (9). The list of significantly changed genes with identifiers is available at www.cwru.edu/med/simonson/Link2MiceData.htm, as is a complete file of all transcript levels from each mouse. All microarray data in a MIAME-compliant format have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI (accession no. GSE642 [NCBI GEO] ).
RT-PCR analysis of adipose differentiation-related protein and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
mRNA. Isolation of total RNA from mouse kidney and cDNA synthesis were carried out as described above for microarray analysis. cDNA synthesized from 5 µg of RNA was used for quantification of mRNA by real-time PCR using the ABI Prism Sequence Detection System 7000 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). We designed primers for mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) and adipose differentiation-related protein (ADRP) using Primer Express (Applied Biosystems): PPAR
-upstream: GCA GTG CCC TGA ACA TCG A; downstream: TCG CCG AAA GAA GCC CTT A; ADRP-upstream: CTG GAC CGT GCC GAC TTG; downstream: GCT CTG TTG GGG ATC CAC TAC; GAPD upstream: TCA ACG ACC CCT TCA TTG AC; downstream: ATG CAG GGA TGA TGT TCT GG. PCR amplification was performed in 25 µl of reaction mixture containing 0.5 µl of cDNA, 1 µl of each up- and downstream primer, and 12.5 µl of SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) with denaturation at 94°C for 10 min, followed by 45 two-temperature cycles (15 s at 94°C and 1 min at 60°C). A melting curve was recorded at the end of PCR, and 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to ensure that the correctly sized amplicon was present. Relative quantification of the mRNA between db/db and db/m mice was computed using the comparative Ct method, and GAPD served as the reference gene (25).
Western blotting in db/db and db/m kidney. Kidney homogenates (15% wt/vol) were prepared in extraction buffer, composed of 50 mM PIPES/HCl, pH 6.5, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% 3-([3-cholamidopropyl]dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 mM DTT, 2 mM Na pyrophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1 mM NaF, and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein content in the supernatant was assayed with a DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, CA). An aliquot of the lysate (25 µg protein) was boiled with SDS sample buffer, resolved on a 412% SDS-PAGE gradient gel, and transferred to a 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking in 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T (20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h, the membrane was washed three times with TBS-T for 5 min each and incubated overnight at 4°C with guinea pig polyclonal anti-ADRP antibody (1:1,000, Research Diagnostic, Flanders, NJ) or rabbit polyclonal anti-murine PPAR
that does not recognize PPAR
or
(1:1,000, Research Diagnostic) in 3% BSA in TBS-T. After incubating with a suitable HRP-labeled secondary antibody (1:2,000) and extensive washing, the membrane was incubated with a chemiluminescence mixture and exposed to film with an average exposure duration ranging from 10 to 30 s. Statistical significance between different groups of mice was calculated by ANOVA with a Bonferroni posttest.
Localization of ADRP and PPAR
by immunohistochemistry and of lipid storage droplets by oil red-O staining. Protocols for immunohistochemistry have been previously published (37, 38). Briefly, small blocks of kidney were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h before being embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer-thick sections were deparaffinized, washed with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), and incubated with 1.5% H2O2 in methanol to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 10% normal goat serum in DPBS. Sections were incubated overnight with the anti-ADRP or anti-PPAR
antibody (1:500 in blocking solution) in a humidified chamber at 4°C. The anti-ADRP antiserum has been extensively characterized for immunohistochemistry (17). Nonimmune antibodies at the same concentration of IgG were used in negative controls. For immunohistochemical staining of PPAR
, tissue sections were exposed to antigen unmasking in 10 mM Na citrate, pH 6.0, and 0.05% Tween 20 was added to the blocking buffer. Antibodies were localized with the ABC technique (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine substrate solution with nickel chloride enhancement. Sections were then dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted in Eukitt without counterstaining. To localize lipid droplets, 5-µm-thick frozen sections were stained with oil red-O. Images were acquired with a SPOT CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) using the same exposure to facilitate semiquantitative comparisons of staining intensity.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To identify changes in gene expression that potentially contribute to early kidney injury in diabetes, three mice were chosen at random from the four groups described above (i.e, 8-wk db/db and db/m; 16-wk db/db and db/m). RNA was isolated, labeled, and hybridized to high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. Genes with a high likelihood of differential expression in the 8- and 16-wk mice were identified using SAM. Using this approach, 482 genes were identified as significantly changed in 8-wk db/db vs. 8-wk db/m mice (437 induced and 45 repressed); of these genes, the least significant (thyroid peroxidase) exhibited a 3.1-fold change and a q value of 6.20. The 16-wk db/db vs. db/m kidneys had 639 significantly changed genes (533 induced and 86 repressed) with the least significant gene (an unknown EST), demonstrating a 4.5-fold induction and a q value of 6.85. The combined list of genes (1,016 distinct transcripts) was clustered to detect patterns in the expression profile (Fig. 2A). The first cluster contained genes that were repressed in 8- and 16-wk db/db mice, whereas the second and largest cluster had genes induced at 8 and 16 wk. The third and fourth clusters contained genes induced predominately at 8 and 16 wk, respectively. The fifth cluster consisted of genes repressed in 16-wk db/m mice with variable patterns of expression in db/db. We also clustered genes by functional classification using GO gene annotations and found that the gene profile was enriched in genes that regulate cell signaling and growth, oxidative stress, and lipid homeostasis (Fig. 2, BD). Some of these genes, such as those encoding transforming growth factor (TGF)-
and IGF-1, have been previously identified in diabetic kidneys (27); most have not been previously associated with renal injury in diabetes.
|
A program of genes directing lipid homeostasis in db/db kidneys. One of the most striking changes revealed by gene expression profiling was the induction of a group of genes that control aspects of lipid homeostasis (Fig. 2D). This profile included several genes induced exclusively in 16-wk diabetic kidneys: acyl-CoA synthetase, apolipoprotein CII, PPAR
, lipin-1, C/EBP
, and ADRP. ADRP is transcriptionally upregulated in differentiating adipocytes and is a member of the perilipin family of lipid storage proteins, with the human ortholog being adipophilin (26). Because ADRP is necessary for the formation and function of lipid storage droplets, we asked whether db/db kidneys contained these cytoplasmic storage vesicles for neutral lipids. Lipid storage droplets, analyzed by oil red-O staining, were undetectable in 8-wk db/m kidneys and only rarely observed in 16-wk db/m kidneys (Fig. 3, A and bottom right). In contrast, 8-wk db/db kidneys had abundant lipid storage droplets in the cortical tubules, and the number of droplets increased 2.3-fold at 16 wk (Fig. 3, B and bottom right). The lipid droplets were diffusely associated with cortical tubules (Fig. 3C) and were less often identified in the glomeruli and medulla (data not shown). The abundance of lipid storage droplets represented a major difference in the renal phenotype of diabetic and nondiabetic kidneys.
|
Further investigation of ADRP expression in db/db kidney showed specific upregulation of ADRP protein in the diabetic kidneys. ADRP mRNA was elevated 5.4-fold in 16-wk db/db vs. db/m kidneys (Fig. 4A), and the increase in ADRP mRNA was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 4A, inset). ADRP mRNA was not elevated in 8-wk db/db kidneys compared with the db/m controls. In contrast to ADRP mRNA levels, ADRP protein detected by Western blotting was elevated in both 8- and 16-wk db/db kidneys but was undetectable in db/m controls (Fig. 4, B and C), suggesting a complex mechanism of ADRP expression in the diabetic kidney. Localization of ADRP by immunohistochemistry showed that ADRP was undetectable even in 16-wk nondiabetic kidneys (Fig. 5A). In 16-wk diabetic kidneys, ADRP immunoreactivity was localized to the cytoplasm of cortical tubules in a pattern consistent with the lipid storage vesicles (Fig. 5B). Nonspecific staining was minimal (Fig. 5C), and specific ADRP staining was occasionally observed in glomeruli (data not shown). Higher-magnification staining reveals the essentially dropletlike pattern of ADRP protein localization in db/db kidneys (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these results demonstrate that ADRP mRNA and protein are specifically upregulated in db/db diabetic kidneys in a manner consistent with the presence of lipid storage droplets.
|
|
Because PPAR
has previously been shown to be important for the gene regulatory network in response to lipid accumulation, we next sought to determine whether PPAR
expression in diabetic kidney was accurately predicted by the gene expression profile. Transcript levels for PPAR
were elevated in 16-wk db/db kidneys compared with 16-wk db/m and with 8-wk db/m and db/db kidneys (Fig. 6A). RT-PCR confirmed the induction of PPAR
mRNA in db/db kidney (Fig. 6A, inset). Western blotting of kidney extracts revealed a trend toward increased PPAR
protein in 8-wk db/db kidneys and a marked increase in 16-wk db/db kidneys (Fig. 6, B and C). By immunohistochemistry, sparse staining for PPAR
was observed in cortical tubules of 16-wk db/m kidneys (Fig. 7A). No significant staining for PPAR
was observed in the glomerulus and the renal vasculature in 16-wk db/m kidneys. In 16-wk db/db kidneys, nuclear staining for PPAR
was elevated in cortical tubules and in the vasculature (Fig. 7, B and C). Occasional sparse staining was observed in the glomerulus (not shown). Sparse cytoplasmic staining in the tubules was also observed in 16-wk db/db kidneys (Fig. 7B). Vascular staining was greatly elevated in the endothelium and less so in the medial layer (Fig. 7C). These results demonstrate that upregulation of PPAR
mRNA and protein is associated with progressive renal injury in db/db mice.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perhaps the most striking change in diabetic kidneys was the induction of genes normally expressed in adipocytes and related to lipid homeostasis. This adipose-selective group included genes that regulate lipid transport,
- or
-oxidation, and lipid accumulation in cortical tubules. Lipid storage droplets, which consist of triglycerides and esterified cholesterol, were undetectable in normal db/m kidneys at 8 wk and were only rarely detected at 16 wk. In marked contrast, small lipid storage droplets were present in cortical tubules of 8-wk db/db mice, and the droplets increased in size and number at 16 wk. Abnormal lipid deposits have been observed in tubules of human diabetic kidney (30, 32, 44) and have been proposed to participate in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and other proteinuric renal diseases (21, 33, 34). Lipid droplets were also detected in the cortical tubules of the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat (42). A direct link between lipid accumulation and kidney injury has not been established directly. However, excess intracellular lipid in other nonadipose tissues has convincingly been linked to insulin resistance and cellular damage (i.e., lipotoxicity). Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain lipotoxicity in nonrenal tissues, including increased oxygen consumption costs, elevated reactive oxygen species due to fatty acid oxidation, dysregulation of lipid signaling, and apoptosis (11, 46, 49, 50). Collectively, our results suggest that diabetes induces a fundamental change in the phenotype of db/db kidneys in favor of utilizing and storing lipids. From our experiments, we cannot determine whether hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, or both mediate the differential expression of these genes. However, we speculate that increased deposition of lipid in the kidney contributes to cellular damage and to the progression of diabetic kidney disease.
Induction of the ADRP gene is apparently an important aspect of the response to diabetes and formation of lipid storage droplets in the db/db kidney. ADRP, also called adipophillin in humans, is a
50-kDa fatty acid binding protein that is transcriptionally activated when preadipocytes differentiate into mature adipocytes (20). ADRP belongs to the perilipin family of lipid storage proteins (26), and similar to other perilipin members, localizes to the cytoplasmic surface of lipid storage droplets in distinct cell types (3, 17). We found that the ADRP gene and protein were robustly induced in db/db vs. db/m kidneys. The discordance between the kinetics of ADRP mRNA and protein induction reflects a complex mode of regulation that might involve posttranscriptional control. Indeed, posttranscriptional control has been observed for perilipin A, presumably involving protein stabilization secondary to lipid binding (26), and a similar mechanism might be operative in db/db diabetic kidney for ADRP. In db/db kidneys, ADRP protein was present in a spherical pattern in cortical tubules and corresponded with the presence of oil red-O-positive lipid droplets. Induction of kidney ADRP by diabetes might simply be a marker of diabetic injury, but recent evidence from other sources suggests that ADRP could play a regulatory role in lipid accumulation in nonadipose tissues. For example, ADRP facilitates uptake and transport of long-chain fatty acids in a dose-dependent manner (13), and fatty acids are a robust stimulus of ADRP gene transcription (14). In addition, deletion of the gene encoding perilipin in mice blocks diet-induced lipid uptake and obesity (43), which suggests that other perilipin family proteins might help regulate lipid uptake in addition to forming lipid storage droplets. Additional experiments are required to test the functional role of ADRP in the kidney's response to diabetic injury.
Our experiments with db/db kidneys demonstrated marked induction by diabetes of the gene encoding PPAR
, which we propose might help direct the transcriptional response of db/db kidneys in diabetes. PPAR
belongs to a family of nuclear hormone receptors that bind fatty acid ligands (16). In concert with specific coactivators, the liganded PPAR
binds to DNA as a heterodimer with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor and regulates transcription of genes containing a cognate PPAR response element. PPAR
is expressed in muscle, liver, heart, and kidney cortex, where it regulates fatty acid catabolism (1, 22). PPAR
activates transcription of numerous genes involved in fatty acid uptake (fatty acid binding proteins),
-oxidation (acyl-CoA oxidase),
-oxidation (cytochrome P-450 4-family), and lipoprotein assembly (apolipoprotein C-II), many examples of which reside in the list of genes differentially regulated by diabetes in our experiments with db/db kidneys. Thus we speculate that PPAR
is a diabetes-induced transcription factor that helps control the kidney's response to lipids. In the normal kidney, PPAR
expression is highest in the proximal tubule and thick limb where it contributes to lipid-induced gene expression (31). Although PPAR
induction in response to fasting and the initial response to hyperlipidemia appears beneficial, the longer-term effect of PPAR
in the kidney is difficult to predict. Indeed, cardiac-specific PPAR
overexpression increases fatty acid oxidation, elevates lipid storage droplets, and augments cardiomyopathy in diabetes compared with wild-type controls (11). PPAR
null mice do not develop this phenotype. These results suggest that by sensing fatty acids and stimulating their uptake, PPAR
can contribute to tissue damage in diabetic target organs like the heart. On the other hand, oral fibrates, PPAR
agonists that lower serum triglycerides, reduce proteinuria in a subset of diabetic patients (12, 39). Thus perhaps the net effect of PPAR
induction is beneficial because a systemic reduction in triglycerides results in less renal lipid accumulation. Therefore, additional studies in db/db mice with PPAR
activators will be needed to clarify the role of this transcription factor in diabetic renal injury.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
GRANTS
This work was supported by a grant from the Diabetes Association of Greater Cleveland, by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant DK-62331, and by support to the Division of Nephrology from the Rosenberg Foundation of the Community Dialysis Center of Cleveland. The Gene Expression Array core facility of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Case Western Reserve University and the University Hospitals of Cleveland is supported by NIH Grant P30-CA-43702.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1, its type II receptor, and activation of the Smad signaling pathway in the db/db mouse. Am J Pathol 158: 1653-1663, 2001.
CT method. Methods 25: 402-408, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-oxidation enzyme gene expression in the developing rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275: F777-F784, 1998.
as a key mediator. Diabetes 44: 1139-1146, 1995.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Ruan, F. Zheng, and Y. Guan PPARs and the kidney in metabolic syndrome Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1032 - F1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Barati, M. L. Merchant, A. B. Kain, A. W. Jevans, K. R. McLeish, and J. B. Klein Proteomic analysis defines altered cellular redox pathways and advanced glycation end-product metabolism in glomeruli of db/db diabetic mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1157 - F1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mishra, L. Zhu, R. L. Eckert, and M. S. Simonson TGF-beta-regulated collagen type I accumulation: role of Src-based signals Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): C1361 - C1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Robenek, O. Hofnagel, I. Buers, M. J. Robenek, D. Troyer, and N. J. Severs Adipophilin-enriched domains in the ER membrane are sites of lipid droplet biogenesis J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2006; 119(20): 4215 - 4224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Srivastava, S. Shenouda, R. Mishra, and E. Carrier Transplanted Embryonic Stem Cells Successfully Survive, Proliferate, and Migrate to Damaged Regions of the Mouse Brain Stem Cells, July 1, 2006; 24(7): 1689 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Dalen, S. M. Ulven, B. M. Arntsen, K. Solaas, and H. I. Nebb PPAR{alpha} activators and fasting induce the expression of adipose differentiation-related protein in liver J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 931 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. R. Tobin, N. K. Harsem, K. T. Dalen, A. C. Staff, H. I. Nebb, and A. K. Duttaroy Regulation of ADRP expression by long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in BeWo cells, a human placental choriocarcinoma cell line J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Park, H. W. Kim, S. H. Ko, H. W. Chung, S. W. Lim, C. W. Yang, Y. S. Chang, A. Sugawara, Y. Guan, and M. D. Breyer Accelerated Diabetic Nephropathy in Mice Lacking the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}. Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 885 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Susztak and E. P. Bottinger Diabetic Nephropathy: A Frontier for Personalized Medicine J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Masuda, H. Itabe, M. Odaki, K. Hama, Y. Fujimoto, M. Mori, N. Sasabe, J. Aoki, H. Arai, and T. Takano ADRP/adipophilin is degraded through the proteasome-dependent pathway during regression of lipid-storing cells J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 87 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Robenek, M. J. Robenek, and D. Troyer PAT family proteins pervade lipid droplet cores J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1331 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Robenek, S. Lorkowski, M. Schnoor, and D. Troyer Spatial Integration of TIP47 and Adipophilin in Macrophage Lipid Bodies J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5789 - 5794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Breyer, E. Bottinger, F. C. Brosius III, T. M. Coffman, R. C. Harris, C. W. Heilig, K. Sharma, and for the AMDCC Mouse Models of Diabetic Nephropathy J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 27 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guan Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Family and Its Relationship to Renal Complications of the Metabolic Syndrome J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2801 - 2815. [Abstract] [Full Text] |