|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 10018
Submitted 9 September 2003 ; accepted in final form 3 April 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pelvic nerve; pudendal nerve; N-methyl-D-aspartate; DL-
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-propionic acid
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors (mediated forms of LTP) have been recognized in the neocortex (21) and within the hippocampus itself (5, 19, 26, 32, 35). Another possible related phenomenon, termed "windup," is a progressive increase in the number of action potentials elicited per stimulus that occurs in dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord under low-frequency repetitive stimulation. Investigations on this phenomenon using spinal slices suggested windup, at least in part, is responsible for the hyperalgesia and allodynia following prolonged noxious stimulation (6, 25, 32, 4042. However, the limitation of the transverse slice technique, which retained only 36 mm of attached dorsal roots, did not permit reliable analysis of afferent fibers responsible for this phenomenon in each case. Furthermore, the destination and physiological relevance of impulses resulting from the potentiated response remain unclear.
Urine storage is one of the important functions of the urinary bladder. During the storage phase of micturition cycles, action potentials induced by bladder distension transmit centripetally onto dorsal horn neurons through pelvic afferent nerve fibers. After integration within the spinal cord, these impulses cause external-urethral sphincter (EUS) contraction via the pudendal efferent nerve (PEN) fiber. This pelvic-to-pudendal reflex (PPR) is essential for urine continence (10). A recent study on the windup phenomenon, using an intact spinal cord with dorsal and ventral roots attached, demonstrated that the plasticity of PPR could be modulated by repetitive peripheral inputs (23).
On the other hand, LTP of spinal neurons following a brief C fiber strength conditioning stimulation has been demonstrated in a spinal cord slice (2, 18, 31). However, to date, there is no investigation using intact spinal preparation to investigate LTP. In the present study, employing an in vivo spinal preparation with intact rootlets attached, we aimed to study whether modifications of PPR plasticity can be induced by tetanic stimulation and the possible neurotransmitters involved in this phenomenon.
| METHODS AND MATERIALS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laminectomy. Vertebraes were exposed along the thoracolumbar level, and this was followed by a 4-cm-long laminectomy. A needle (30-gauge, 1.5-cm length) was inserted into the subarachnoid space for intrathecal injection. In some animals, a spinal transection was performed at the level of T13 using a method described elsewhere (24).
Intraurethral pressure recording. The urinary bladder and the urethra were exposed through a midline incision of the abdomen. The urinary bladder was drained freely into the abdominal cavity by an incision at the bladder dome. A PE-50 catheter was inserted through the opening of the urethra and was connected to a pressure transducer (P23 ID; Gould-Statham). Two 40 nylon silk sutures were placed around the bladder trigone and ligated. Intraurethral pressure (IUP) was continuously recorded on an oscilloscope (Tectronics TDS 3014, Wilsonville, OR) through a preamplifier (Grass 7P1, Cleveland, OH).
Nerve dissection. The pelvic nerve was dissected carefully from the surrounding tissue and was then transected as distally as possible by a microscissor. A small branch of the pudendal nerve was dissected from the surface of the urethra for multiple unit recordings. The pudendal nerve was identified by 1) anatomic location, 2) tonic discharge when saline (0.050.10 ml) was infused into the urethra through the urethral catheter, and 3) electric stimulation of the pudendal nerve causing an elevation of the IUP. After identification, the pudendal nerve was crushed twice (vertical to each other) as close as possible to the urethra to eliminate afferent firing.
Recording of multiple unit nerve activity. Conventional nerve recording techniques were used for multiple unit recordings from the pudendal nerve efferent fiber as described in a previous report (37). The firing frequency of each filament was recorded by placing the nerve fiber across a pair of thin bipolar stainless steel wire electrodes. The recorded nerve and the electrodes were bathed in a pool of warm paraffin oil (37°C) to prevent drying. The nerve activity was amplified 20,000-fold and filtered (high-frequency cutoff at 3,000 Hz and low at 30 Hz, respectively) by a preamplifier (Grass P511AC), then continuously displayed on an oscilloscope (Tectronics TDS 3014) and recorded on magnetic tape (Neurocoder, DR-890; Neuro Data). Nerve activities were fed into a window discriminator (WPI, 121, Sarasota, FL) and then integrated and displayed on the recording system (MP30, Biopac, Santa Barbara, CA) (22).
Recording of electromyogram activity.
Epoxy-coated copper wire (50 µm; M.T. Giken, Tokyo, Japan) electromyogram electrodes were placed in the EUS. This was performed using a 30-gauge needle with a hooked electromyogram electrode positioned at the tip. The needle was inserted into the sphincter
12 mm lateral to the urethra and then withdrawn, leaving the electromyogram wires embedded in the muscle. EUS electromyogram (EUSE) signals were also amplified and passed through a window discriminator and then recorded on the recording system. The accumulated firing rate during each stimulation was measured (4).
Experimental arrangement. The schematic arrangement of PEN, EUSE, and IUP, as well as the contralateral pelvic nerve afferent fiber stimulation is shown in Fig. 1. The protocol for assessing the effects of tetanic stimulation of pelvic nerve afferent fiber on PPR activity was as follows. Once the electrode's position was optimized on each nerve, the recording of PEN fiber activity began (referred to as "test activity"). An electric current of square-wave pulses with a pulse duration of 0.1 ms was applied from a stimulator (Grass S88) through a stimulus isolation unit (Grass SIU5B) and a constant current unit (Grass CCU1A). Single shocks at fixed suprathreshold strengths (530 V) were repeated at 30-s or 3-min intervals and given through a pair of stimulation electrodes before tetanic stimulation. This frequency of stimulation was chosen for sampling data because it did not result in response facilitation. The intensity of stimulation was gradually increased from 0 to 30 V, and a stimulus intensity that yielded a single spike action potential in the PEN fiber was usually chosen to standardize the baseline PPR activity. After the baseline period, a high-frequency train (3 tetanic stimulations of 1-s duration, each at 100-Hz and 10-s intervals) was delivered at the identical intensity as used for the baseline response.
|
Data analysis. All the data in the text and figures are means ± SE. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by means of ANOVA. For comparisons across treatment groups, a Tukey test was used. A value of <0.05 was accepted as significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Antagonism of APV and NBQX. Figure 3B shows a potentiated PPR induced by tetanic stimulation. The intrathecal application of APV (100 µM, 25 µl bolus; C) (31), the selective NMDA-receptor antagonist (8, 38), produced a complete blockage in the potentiation in PPR. On the other hand, NBQX (20 µM, 25 µl bolus; D) (31), the novel selective non-NMDA-receptor antagonist (34), caused a partial and reversible antagonism of the potentiation in PPR. Saline (25 µl bolus) was also tested via intrathecal injection but showed no effect on the potentiation in PPR. Figure 4 shows the effect of APV and NBQX on the tetanization-induced potentiation in PPR summarized from 17 rats. Because the tendency was parallel and showed no statistical difference between the PEN fiber and EUSE activities, the data were therefore pooled together.
|
|
|
Secondary changes in response to plasticity. As shown in Fig. 7A, a PPR was induced by a "test stimulation" (0.0330.005 Hz) and a contraction wave in IUP was produced by urethral sphincter contraction. After the tetanic stimulation, as shown in Fig. 7B, firing in PEN and EUSE, evoked by each stimulation, increased. Furthermore, the duration of the contraction wave of IUP, secondary to the urethral sphincter contraction, increased in a parallel fashion, although the peak pressure remained unchanged. The time relationships among activities of PEN, EUSE, and IUP waves were further investigated using a faster time base (Fig. 7, A and B, right). After the main IUP contraction wave, potentiated PPR produced successive contractions of smaller amplitude (Fig. 7B), compared with that induced by test stimulation (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, each contraction shows a close time relationship to the firing of the pudendal nerve efferent fiber and EUSE resulting from potentiation in PPR.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physiological and pathological relevance.
PPR is physiologically important in urine continence during the storage phase of voiding cycles (10). A recent study on the windup phenomenon demonstrated that repetitive pelvic afferent stimulation resulted in a substantial increase in the strength of PPR activity and the physiological response secondary to this reflex. These results suggest that during the storage phase, repetitive discharges in pelvic afferent inputs caused by volume distension may induce prolonged urethral sphincter contraction. The resistance in the urethra, which resulted from sphincter contraction, is essential for urine continence in the physiological condition (23). On the other hand, Randi
et al. (32) suggested that tetanization-induced enhancement of excitatory postsynaptic potential may be related to the mechanism involved in the generation of postinjury pain hypersensitivity. Chemical irritation-induced hyperactivity in the urethral sphincter was also reported by investigators (3, 36). High resistance in the lower urinary tract as a result of a hyperactive sphincter is suggested to cause obstructive bladder dysfunctions.
In the present study, tetanic stimulation was used to induce potentiation in PPR. Because the entire pelvic nerve trunk was stimulated with suprathreshold intensity, i.e., C fibers were recruited, the PPR plasticity in the present study may be involved in pathological conditions, such as hyperactive bladder caused by inflammation that can sensitize C fiber afferents. Potentiated PPR elicited by such pathological conditions, in turn, may cause a high urethral resistance that induces obstructive bladder dysfunctions.
Possible neurotransmitters involved.
The induction of LTP is presently thought to require both activation of NMDA and AMPA receptors by synaptically released glutamate (5, 9) and depolarization of the postsynaptic membrane (14). Moreover, studies of LTP in the hippocampus revealed that although LTP is induced postsynaptically, the maintenance of LTP may be, at least in part, presynaptic due to long-lasting enhancement of transmitter release (9, 10, 20, 27). In the present study, intrathecal application of NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists blocked or attenuated the potentiation in PPR, suggesting a close connection to the mechanism of LTP in the lower spinal cord. This conjecture is in accordance with the report of Randi
et al. (31) that suggests LTP can be induced in spinal dorsal horn neurons. However, for the nature of multiple units recording technique is highly variable, whether NBQX attenuated PPR (as shown in Fig. 3) needs further investigations. On the other hand, in this study, the enhancement of reflex activities in PEN and EUSE was induced by tetanic stimulation. Further investigation of the synaptic efficacy on the dorsal horn, within the spinal cord, needs to be elucidated as to whether this enhancement is mediated by a "LTP-like" synaptic transmission. On the other hand, it is well known that pelvic afferent nerve stimulation or bladder distension can also elicit the pelvic-to-hypogastric nerve reflex (10), which induces contraction of the internal urethral sphincter and, in turn, increases the IUP. This possibility cannot be ruled out.
Although there is little to suggest that inhibitory mechanisms contribute to the maintenance of synaptic LTP (15), there is evidence that its induction is affected by inhibitory influences (11, 12, 39). It is known that the cell remains depolarized for a sufficient time to enable the activation of the NMDA receptor during high-frequency stimulation. This is made possible, at least in part, by the frequency-dependent depression of synaptic inhibition caused by GABAA, feeding back and depressing its own release by action on the presynaptic GABAA receptors (7). The latter finding demonstrated a role for the GABAA receptor on synaptic plasticity (5). In this study, potentiation in PPR induced by tetanic stimulation was not affected by intrathecal application of bicuculline, a GABAA-receptor antagonist, ruling out the involvement of the GABAA polysynaptic inhibitory pathway. However, the role of other inhibitory pathways, such as GABAB, serotonin, and glycine, should be investigated in further studies.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M. Long-lasting modification in synaptic efficacy at primary afferent synapses with neurons in rat superficial spinal dorsal horn. Soc Neurosci Abstr 17: 1331, 1991.
M. Long-lasting modification in synaptic efficacy at primary afferent synapses with neurons in rat superficial spinal dorsal horn. Third IBRO World Congress in Neuroscience (Abstract). IBRO, 1991, p. 307.
M, Jiang MC, and Cerne R. Long-term potentiation and long-term depression of primary afferent neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 13: 52285241, 1993.[Abstract]
M, Jiang MC, Rusin KI, Cerne R, and Kolaj M. Interactions between excitatory amino acids and tachykinins and long-term changes of synaptic responses in the rat spinal dorsal horn. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Neuropeptides, Nociception and Pain. Mainz, Germany: German Academy of Science, 1993.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-Y. Peng, H.-M. Chang, S.-D. Lee, P.-C. Huang, G.-D. Chen, C.-H. Lai, C.-Y. Lai, C.-H. Chiu, K.-C. Tung, and T.-B. Lin TRPV1 mediates the uterine capsaicin-induced NMDA NR2B-dependent cross-organ reflex sensitization in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1324 - F1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-L. Chen, Y.-H. Huang, Y.-L. Kao, G.-D. Chen, C.-L. Cheng, H.-Y. Peng, J.-M. Liao, P.-C. Huang, S.-J. Tsai, and T.-B. Lin Acute anal stretch inhibits NMDA-dependent pelvic-urethra reflex potentiation via spinal GABAergic inhibition in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F923 - F931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Peng, P.-C. Huang, J.-M. Liao, K.-C. Tung, S.-D. Lee, C.-L. Cheng, J.-C. Shyu, C.-Y. Lai, G.-D. Chen, and T.-B. Lin Estrous cycle variation of TRPV1-mediated cross-organ sensitization between uterus and NMDA-dependent pelvic-urethra reflex activity Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2008; 295(3): E559 - E568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Peng, H.-M. Chang, S. Y. Chang, K.-C. Tung, S.-D. Lee, D. Chou, C.-Y. Lai, C.-H. Chiu, G.-D. Chen, and T.-B. Lin Orexin-A modulates glutamatergic NMDA-dependent spinal reflex potentiation via inhibition of NR2B subunit Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2008; 295(1): E117 - E129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-F. Pan, H.-Y. Peng, C.-C. Chen, M.-J. Chen, S.-D. Lee, C.-L. Cheng, J.-C. Shyu, J.-M. Liao, G.-D. Chen, and T.-B. Lin Nicotine-activated descending facilitation on spinal NMDA-dependent reflex potentiation from pontine tegmentum in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1195 - F1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-D. Chen, M.-L. Peng, P.-Y. Wang, S.-D. Lee, H.-M. Chang, S.-F. Pan, M.-J. Chen, K.-C. Tung, C.-Y. Lai, and T.-B. Lin Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II mediates NO-elicited PKG activation to participate in spinal reflex potentiation in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R487 - R493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-D. Chen, H.-Y. Peng, K.-C. Tung, C.-L. Cheng, Y.-J. Chen, J.-M. Liao, Y.-C. Ho, S.-F. Pan, M.-J. Chen, and T.-B. Lin Descending facilitation of spinal NMDA-dependent reflex potentiation from pontine tegmentum in rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1115 - F1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Liao, C.-H. Yang, C.-L. Cheng, S.-F. Pan, M.-J. Chen, P.-C. Huang, G.-D. Chen, K.-C. Tung, H.-Y. Peng, and T.-B. Lin Spinal glutamatergic NMDA-dependent cyclic pelvic nerve-to-external urethra sphincter reflex potentiation in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): F790 - F800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Liao, P.-C. Huang, S.-F. Pan, M.-J. Chen, K.-C. Tung, H.-Y. Peng, J.-C. Shyu, Y.-M. Liou, G.-D. Chen, and T.-B. Lin Spinal glutamatergic NMDA-dependent pelvic nerve-to-external urethra sphincter reflex potentiation caused by a mechanical stimulation in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): F1791 - F1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Chen, H.-Y. Peng, C.-L. Cheng, C.-H. Chen, J.-M. Liao, Y.-C. Ho, J.-T. Liou, K.-C. Tung, T.-H. Hsu, and T.-B. Lin Acute unilateral ureteral distension inhibits glutamate-dependent spinal pelvic-urethra reflex potentiation via GABAergic neurotransmission in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): F1007 - F1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Chang, C.-L. Cheng, J.-J. J. Chen, and W. C. de Groat Roles of glutamatergic and serotonergic mechanisms in reflex control of the external urethral sphincter in urethane-anesthetized female rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R224 - R234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |