|
|
||||||||
1The Water and Salt Research Center, 2Institute of Anatomy and 4Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark; 3Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Taegu, Korea; and 5Laboratory of Kidney and Electrolyte Metabolism, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Submitted 15 April 2005 ; accepted in final form 31 August 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
aldosterone; connecting tubule; collecting duct; water metabolism; aquaporin 2
-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel ENaC and increased ENaC trafficking (29). There is a complex interaction between vasopressin and aldosterone, and the role of aldosterone in vasopressin-mediated water permeability has been subject to several studies in isolated perfused tubule preparations and other experimental systems. Synergistic effects of mineralocorticoids on vasopressin-induced osmotic water permeability have been shown in toad urinary bladder and isolated perfused cortical collecting duct (CCD) from rabbits (7, 16, 17). In contrast, mineralocorticoids alone have not been shown to regulate osmotic water permeability in any of the rat models (7, 16, 17, 38), and there are no changes in urine production in normal rats infused with high dose aldosterone (25). In congenitally vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro (BB) rats (37) with low AQP2 expression and polyuria (12, 36, 44), experimental mineralocorticoid deficiency (adrenalectomized BB rats substituted with glucocorticoids) was associated with decreased diluting capacity compared with BB rats with intact adrenals, whereas the urine flow was not markedly affected (15). Moreover, pharmacological interference with the renin-angiotensin system in BB rats using either captopril (an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) or spironolactone (a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker) has been shown to reduce urine production (20, 41), suggesting that aldosterone may play a role in the regulation of water excretion in vivo in the absence of vasopressin. To better understand the interaction between aldosterone and vasopressin in settings with impaired vasopressin action, we examined the effect of aldosterone or treatment with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone on the urinary water excretion and parallel changes in AQP2 trafficking and expression. Two models with impaired vasopressin signaling were applied, namely lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) and vasopressin-deficient BB rats with central diabetes insipidus (CDI).
In lithium-induced NDI, vasopressin action is interrupted, at least in part, through an inhibition of the adenylate cyclase activity in collecting duct, resulting in reduced accumulation of cAMP and decreased PKA activation (10). This reduces AQP2 protein expression and decreases apical targeting, consequently causing polyuria and a urinary concentrating defect similar to what is observed in vasopressin-deficient BB rats (23, 27, 44).
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal protocol for BB rats: Aldosterone and spironolactone treatment of BB rats with congenital CDI. Male BB (body wt 180 g; Harlan Netherlands, Horst, the Netherlands) rats were housed individually in metabolic cages and given 3 days to acclimate. The rats received 15 g rat ground chow/day (Altromin no. 1320; Chr. Petersen) and ad libitum water intake from a bottle. After acclimatization, the rats were randomly divided into the following three groups: 1) BB rats (n = 5) severed as a control group and received no additional treatment; 2) BB + Aldo rats (n = 5) had osmotic minipumps loaded with aldosterone implanted subcutaneously as described above; and 3) BB + spironolactone (n = 5) received spironolactone mixed in the food. The dose was 100 mg/kg at the 1st day and then increased to 200 mg·kg1·day1. The daily water and food intakes were monitored throughout the study. Urine for clearance studies was collected daily as 24-h collections throughout the study. After 7 days of treatment, all rats were killed as described below.
In both experiments, there was a 12-h artificial light-dark cycle, a temperature of 21 ± 2°C, and humidity of 55 ± 2%.
After 7 days of treatment, the rats were killed with halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories), and a large laparotomy was made. Blood (2 ml) was collected from the inferior vena cava and rapidly transferred to a lithium-, heparin-coated tube (Vacuette; Greiner bio-one) for Na+, K+, urea, and creatinine measurements and an EDTA-coated tube for aldosterone and lithium concentration measurements. Next, the right kidney was clamped, rapidly removed, dissected into regions [cortex, inner stripe of outer medulla, and inner medulla (IM)], and processed for immunoblotting as described below. Immediately after removal of the right kidney, the left kidney was perfusion fixed by insertion of a perfusion needle (21 gauge) in the abdominal aorta, and the inferior vena cava was cut to establish an outlet. During this procedure the rat was killed. Blood was flushed from the kidneys with cold 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) for 15 s before switching to cold 3% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 3 min. The kidney was removed, and the midregion was sectioned into 2- to 3-mm transverse sections and immersion fixed for an additional hour, followed by 3 x 10-min washes with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. The tissue was dehydrated in graded ethanol and left overnight in xylene. After tissue embedding in paraffin, 2-µm sections were cut on a rotary microtome (Leica Microsystems, Herlev, Denmark).
The animal protocols have been approved by the boards of the Institute of Anatomy and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus according to the licenses for use of experimental animals issued by the Danish Ministry of Justice.
Analysis of plasma and urine biochemistry.
The blood was centrifuged for 15 min at 4,000 g in a table-top centrifuge, and plasma was transferred to Eppendorf tubes. Measurements of plasma and urinary concentrations of Na+, K+, creatinine, and urea were determined by Vitros 950 (Johnson & Johnson). Measurement of plasma and urine osmolality was carried out by freezing-point depression (Advanced Osmometer, model 3900; Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA, and Osmomat 030-D; Gonotec, Berlin, Germany). Plasma and urine lithium concentration was determined by a Perkin-Elmer Analyst 300 atomic absorption spectrometer. Plasma aldosterone was measured using a commercially available RIA kit (Coat-A-Count; Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA) and gamma counter. Creatinine clearance was calculated as Ccr = (UCreatine conc x Uvolume/24h)/PCreatinine conc. Osmolar clearance was calculated as COsm = (UOsmolality x Uvolume/24h)/POsmolality. Free water clearance was calculated as C
= Uvolume/24h COsm.
Semiquantitative immunoblotting. The procedure was similar to what has been described in detail previously (21, 44). The dissected renal cortex, inner stripe of the outer medulla (ISOM), and IM were homogenized (Ultra-Turrax T8 homogenizer; IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) in ice-cold isolation solution containing 0.3 M sucrose, 25 mM imidazole, 1 mM EDTA, 8.5 µM leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.2. To remove large cellular debris and nuclei, the homogenates were centrifuged at 4,000 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was pipetted off and kept on ice for further processing. The total protein concentration was measured (Pierce BCA protein assay reagent kit; Pierce, Rockford, IL), and all samples were adjusted with isolation solution to reach the same final protein concentrations, solubilized with SDS at 65°C for 15 min in Laemmli sample buffer, and then stored at 20°C. To confirm equal loading of protein, an initial gel was stained with Coomassie blue dye as described previously (44). SDS-PAGE was performed on 9 or 12% polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were transferred from the gel electrophoretically (Bio-Rad Mini Protean II) to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond ECL RPN3032D; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK). After transfer, the blots were blocked with 5% milk in PBS-T (80 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM NaH2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.5) for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies directed against AQP1 and AQP2. The AQP1 antibody has been characterized previously (44). For this study, a new AQP2 antibody was prepared using the same sequences of immunizing peptide (NH2-CEVRRRQSVELHSPQSLPRGSKA-COOH) described previously (34). The specificity was evaluated by 1) detection of the immunizing peptide on immunoblot using immune-serum and as negative control preimmune serum from the same rabbit; 2) detection of AQP2 in a protein sample prepared from whole kidney homogenates using affinity-purified anti-AQP2 antibody and showing ablation of the AQP2 detection when anti-AQP2 antibody was preincubated with surplus of the immunizing peptide; 3) detection of AQP2 immunostaining of collecting duct principal cells using sections of rat kidney, and 4) ablation of the immunocytochemical labeling using anti-AQP2 antibody preincubated with immunizing peptide. The sites of antibody-antigen reaction were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (P447 or P448, diluted 1:3,000; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL or ECL+plus) system and exposure to photographic film (Hyperfilm ECL, RPN3103K; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The band densities were quantitated by scanning the films and normalizing the densitometry values to facilitate comparisons. Results are listed as the relative band densities between the groups and not absolute, hence the term semiquantitative immunoblotting.
Immunohistochemistry. For immunolabeling, the sections were dewaxed with xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanol. Sections had endogenous peroxidase activity blocked with 0.5% H2O2 in absolute methanol for 10 min. With the use of a microwave oven, the sections were boiled in a target retrieval solution (1 mmol/l Tris, pH 9.0, with 0.5 mM EGTA) for 10 min. After cooling, nonspecific binding was blocked with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS for 30 min followed by 3 x 10 min with PBS blocking buffer containing 1% BSA, 0.05% saponin, and 0.2% gelatin. The sections were incubated with primary antibody (diluted in PBS with 0.1% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100) overnight at 4°C. The sections were washed 3 x 10 min with PBS wash buffer containing 0.1% BSA, 0.05% saponin, and 0.2% gelatin and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin, DAKO P448; DAKO) for 1 h at room temperature. After 3 x 10 min rinses with PBS wash buffer, the sites of antibody-antigen reaction were visualized with a brown chromogen produced within 10 min by incubation with 0.05% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Kem-en Tek, Copenhagen, Denmark) dissolved in distilled water with 0.1% H2O2. Mayers hematoxylin was used for counterstaining, and after dehydration cover slips were mounted with hydrophobic medium (Eukitt; O. Kindler, Freiburg, Germany). For sections prepared for immunofluorescence, a secondary fluorescent antibody was used (goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 11008 and goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor, 546 11003; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). After 1 h incubation at room temperature and 3 x 10 min washes with PBS, cover slips were mounted with a hydrophilic mounting media containing antifading reagent (n-propyl-gallat, P-3101; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). Light microscopy was carried out with a Leica DMRE microscope (Leica Microsystems). Laser-scanning confocal microscopy was carried out on a Leica TCS-SP2 laser confocal microscope (Heidelberg, Germany).
Semiquantitative confocal laser scanning microscopy. For the semiquantitative analysis, microscope settings (light intensity, PMT offset and gain, sampling period, and averaging) were identical for all rats, and the observer was blinded for the treatment of the individual rats. From each rat, five to eight images of tubule segments colabeled with AQP2 and 28 kDa calbindin-D and five to eight images of tubules only positive for AQP2 were obtained. Digital images were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) to detect regions of interest and measurements of the sum of pixel intensities in the apical and basolateral cell compartments using semiautomated macros. The dynamic range was set such that the tissue with the most intense fluorescence signal only had few saturated pixels. The apical plasma membrane length of the tubules in the region of interest was measured by a calibrated manual trace of the apical plasma membrane, and the sum of pixel intensities was normalized to the length of the apical plasma membrane.
Presentation of data and statistical analyses. Quantitative data are presented as means ± SE. For blots, the results represent the mean of two blots. This was done by normalizing the absolute band densities to the mean of the controls on the same blot and then using the average normalized band density for analysis. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple-comparisons test. Multiple-comparison tests were only applied when a significant difference was determined in the ANOVA (P < 0.05). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Interestingly, the increased urine production in response to aldosterone was associated with significantly decreased plasma lithium concentration compared with rats treated with lithium alone (Table 1). In contrast, the plasma lithium concentration was unchanged in response to spironolactone treatment (Table 1). Moreover, aldosterone treatment was associated with a decreased plasma urea and potassium concentration compared with rats treated with lithium alone, although these parameters were unchanged in response to spironolactone treatment. All physiological data are summarized in Table 1.
Aldosterone treatment did not affect AQP2 protein expression in the cortex and IM. The large changes in urine production induced by aldosterone infusion to rats with lithium-induced NDI suggested possible alterations in the expression of renal AQP2 protein. We therefore carried out immunoblot analyses using an antibody specific for the vasopressin-regulated water channel AQP2. With the use of protein prepared from the cortex plus the outer stripe of the outer medulla and protein prepared from the IM, there were no major changes in AQP2 expression in response to aldosterone or spironolactone treatment when compared with rats treated with lithium alone (Fig. 2, A and C, and Table 2), although there were statistically significant differences between groups in protein prepared from the ISOM (Fig. 2B and Table 2). The expression of AQP1 in cortex was unchanged (Table 2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aldosterone decreased AQP2 labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain in the transitional zone between CNT and CCD. Similar to observations in the CNT segment, aldosterone-treated rats showed a markedly decreased AQP2 labeling in the apical cell domain in the iCCD (tubules not colabeled with calbindin-D28k in the outer cortex) compared with rats treated with lithium only (Fig. 3, F vs. E, and Fig. 4, F vs. E). Moreover, the spironolactone-treated rats showed an increased AQP2 labeling in the apical cell domain compared with rats treated with lithium only (Fig. 3, G vs. E, and Fig. 4, G vs. E). The decreased apical labeling of AQP2 in aldosterone-treated rats was associated with an increased labeling in the basolateral plasma membrane domain compared with rats treated with lithium only, whereas spironolactone did not affect the AQP2 labeling in the basolateral plasma membrane domain compared with the rats treated with lithium only (Fig. 3, EG, and Fig. 4, EG). The untreated controls showed very strong AQP2 labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain compared with the lithium-treated groups, whereas the basolateral labeling was similar (Fig. 3, H vs. E, Fig. 4, H vs. E, and Fig. 5, B and C).
In the CCDs located in the medullary rays, there was strong AQP2 labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain of the untreated control rats (Fig. 3L). In contrast, all three groups of lithium-treated rats showed much weaker apical AQP2 labeling (Fig. 3, IK).
Apical AQP2 immunofluorescence intensity correlated with daily urine production. To determine whether the semiquantitative analysis of AQP2 expression in the apical cell compartment could be related to physiological parameters, we investigated the relationship between daily urine output and AQP2 immunofluorescence labeling intensity in the apical cell compartment of CNT and iCCD, respectively. This showed an inverse relationship between urine output and AQP2 labeling in the apical cell compartment (Fig. 6). The analysis was done on the AQP2 signal in the entire apical half of the cell, as shown in Fig. 5A, and thus represented both AQP2 in the apical plasma membrane and subapical vesicles and more dispersed apical cytoplasmic labeling. To determine whether the AQP2 labeling in the apical cell compartment correlates with labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain (apical membrane and the adjacent subapical region), the images used for semiquantitative analysis were further examined and scored by three blinded observers for the degree of labeling intensity in the apical plasma membrane domain on a scale from 0 to 5. These results were similar to the results obtained from the semiquantitative analysis indicating that increased signal in the apical cell compartment (in the entire apical half of the cell) is associated with increased labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
Aldosterone-treated BB rats exhibited markedly decreased expression of AQP2 in the apical plasma membrane domain. To determine whether aldosterone induced similar changes in subcellular distribution of AQP2 as observed in rats with lithium-induced NDI, we examined immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence-labeled sections from the three different groups. The aldosterone-treated BB rats showed markedly decreased AQP2 labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain of principal cells of the CCD (Fig. 9, B and E) compared with untreated BB rats, which showed predominantly dispersed cytoplasmic AQP2 labeling (Fig. 9, A and D). Conversely, spironolactone-treated BB rats showed increased AQP2 labeling in the apical plasma membrane domain (Fig. 9, C and F) compared with untreated BB rats (Fig. 9, A and D) or BB + Aldo rats (Fig. 9, B and E). These changes were most predominant in the iCCD and CCD of the cortex. In contrast, in the CNT, aldosterone and spironolactone caused similar changes, although less prominent (data not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What is the significance of altered subcellular distribution of AQP2 in the CNT and collecting duct? The role of increased AQP2 expression in the apical plasma membrane is well documented by increased osmotic water permeability and urine concentration (35). In contrast, little is known about the role of AQP2 expression in the basolateral plasma membrane (9, 34, 35). AQP2 is regulated by intracellular trafficking for short-term regulation and by altered protein expression for long-term regulation of water balance (35). The most important mediator of both trafficking and protein expression is the peptide hormone vasopressin for regulation of renal water excretion and body water balance. Vasopressin-mediated AQP2 trafficking is mediated through the V2 receptor, resulting in Gs protein-mediated stimulation of the adenylate cyclase and resulting in increased cAMP. The increased concentration of cAMP causes activation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase PKA, which subsequently phosphorylates AQP2 and stimulates the AQP2-bearing subapical vesicles to be fused with the apical plasma membrane, increasing the water permeability (for a review see Ref. 35). In addition to the cAMP-mediated pathway, vasopressin also causes an increase in intracellular Ca2+ mobilization from ryanodine-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ stores, which is thought to play an important role in the calmodulin-mediated exocytosis process of the AQP2-transporting vesicles (8, 35).
In the present study, we observed altered AQP2 trafficking in conditions with vasopressin resistance or lacking vasopressin. Therefore, the observed changes in intracellular AQP2 trafficking are not likely mediated by the vasopressin pathway. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that several different regulatory pathways could be involved in the AQP2 regulation in addition to the vasopressin-cAMP pathways. For example, 1) A recent study demonstrated a cAMP-independent and cGMP-dependent pathway for AQP2 membrane insertion in renal epithelial cells (4). In this study, exogenous cGMP or increased endogenous cGMP level induced by sodium nitroprusside, and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) treatment stimulated relocation of AQP2 from cytoplasmic vesicles to the plasma membrane in rat kidney collecting duct principal cells and LLC-PK1 cells stably transfected with AQP2 (4). Consistent with these findings, we recently demonstrated a strong plasma membrane staining for AQP2 in both the HEK-293 cells transiently transfected with AQP2 that were exposed to ANP and the inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) principal cells of rats systemically treated with ANP (45a). In the present study, aldosterone may have caused extracellular fluid volume expansion through sodium reabsorption, and this may have increased ANP secretion, which is known to promote diuresis and natriuresis (5). However, as mentioned above, ANP induced increased plasma membrane AQP2 expression. Moreover, the time course of ANP effects on diuresis and water excretion indicate that the effect is transient (6). Thus aldosterone-induced increased ANP secretion is not likely to be involved in the decreased apical AQP2 expression observed in the present study; 2) PGE2 has been demonstrated to play an important role in antagonizing the effect of vasopressin on osmotic water permeability in the renal collecting duct. This effect has been attributed to both inhibition of cAMP synthesis and elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ in rabbit CCDs (19, 40) and rat terminal IMCD, causing decreased trafficking of AQP2 to the apical plasma membrane and/or activating AQP2 retrieval from the apical plasma membrane (30, 32, 46). In addition, it has recently been proposed that the signaling pathway underlying the diuretic effect of PGE2 includes the cAMP and Ca2+-independent activation of the Rho-kinase and formation of F-actin (42); 3) we have recently demonstrated that protein expression of medullary AQP2 and p-AQP2 (AQP2 phosphorylated in the PKA-phosphorylation consensus site Ser-256) was significantly decreased in response to dDAVP and ANG II AT1 receptor antagonist cotreatment, compared with dDAVP treatment alone (24). This may suggest that ANG II AT1 receptor activation may also play a role in regulation of AQP2 in the collecting duct (24); and 4) aldosterone has been shown to cause rapid changes in second messengers, including inositol trisphosphate (IP3), diacylglycerol, cAMP, and intracellular Ca2+ (for review see Ref. 3). Aldosterone-mediated increased cAMP or Ca2+ would be expected to promote increased trafficking of AQP2, whereas the possible activation of the phosphoinositide pathway and the effect of protein kinase C and phospholipase C may both include a pre-cAMP and post-cAMP signaling to reduce the osmotic water permeability (for review see Ref. 22) by reducing apical plasma membrane AQP2. The role of protein kinase C and phospholipase C in the trafficking of AQP2 in aldosterone- or spironolactone-treated Li rats or BB rats remains to be established.
The key finding in the present study was that aldosterone treatment caused a decreased apical AQP2 expression in the CNT and in the iCCD and an increased basolateral AQP2 expression in the iCCD in rats with diabetes insipidus. In parallel to these findings, aldosterone treatment was associated with increased urine output and free water clearance in both lithium-treated rats and BB rats. In contrast, spironolactone treatment was associated with reduced urine output and increased apical AQP2 expression. The role of basolateral AQP2 and the regulatory mechanisms involved in the targeting of AQP2 to the basolateral plasma membrane are not understood. However, it is likely that the apical and basolateral targeting processes may be independent events, possibly regulated by separate mechanisms. Initial studies investigating basolateral AQP2 expression were focused on the IMCD (34); however, basolateral AQP2 expression is also described in the cortex with considerable differences along the different tubule segments (9). It was shown that basolateral AQP2 labeling was most prominent in the CNT and IM of Sprague-Dawley rats and BB rats. In Sprague-Dawley rats, vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist treatment for 2 h was associated with markedly decreased apical AQP2 expression in the entire length of the collecting duct, whereas basolateral AQP2 was increased in the CCD but unchanged in CNT and IM. Long-term vasopressin treatment of BB rats was also associated with increased basolateral AQP2 expression in the CCD and less prominent in CNT and IMCD. Thus these data indicate that vasopressin signaling pathways are importantly involved in the changes in AQP2 redistribution to the basolateral membrane in the CCD. In the present study, we demonstrated that AQP2 is also redistributed to the basolateral plasma membrane domains in response to aldosterone in the absence of functional vasopressin signaling, e.g., in rats with lithium-induced NDI or vasopressin-deficient BB rats. This suggests that vasopressin-independent pathways are, at least in part, involved in the AQP2 targeting to the basolateral plasma membrane in conditions with no vasopressin action.
The mechanisms underlying the effect of aldosterone on altered AQP2 expression in the apical and basolateral plasma membrane are unknown. As mentioned, aldosterone has previously been shown to increase vasopressin-mediated water reabsorption whereas aldosterone alone had no intrinsic effect on water reabsorption (7, 16, 17, 38), suggesting that aldosterone only has a permissive role affecting apical AQP2. Moreover, recent studies have shown that aldosterone can increase the intracellular cAMP concentration, which may contribute to the increase in apical AQP2 trafficking (39). Similarly, aldosterone has also been shown to cause changes in intracellular Ca2+ and IP3, which could possibly be involved in increased apical expression of AQP2 (2, 18). Therefore, these results do not explain the observed paradoxical diuretic effect of aldosterone treatment with decreased apical AQP2 expression in the CNT and CCD and increased basolateral targeting in CCD occurring in the conditions exhibiting an absence of vasopressin secretion in BB rats (CDI) or a resistance of vasopressin action in lithium-induced NDI.
The mechanism for the decreased apical AQP2 expression and increased basolateral targeting in response to aldosterone treatment remains elusive. One explanation could be decreased targeting to the apical plasma membrane due to alterations in the protein-sorting process that is responsible for directing proteins to the apical plasma membrane. It has recently been shown that one form of autosomal dominant diabetes insipidus is the result of a mutation in a motif in the COOH terminus of AQP2, causing AQP2 to be targeted to the basolateral plasma membrane (1). It is therefore possible that a novel aldosterone-mediated interaction or modification of sorting motifs may prevent an apical targeting of AQP2. It could be speculated that the decreased apical expression of AQP2 in response to aldosterone treatment in conditions of diabetes insipidus could be related to the increased glomerular filtration rate and/or the increased tubular flow rate in the distal nephron and collecting duct. However, previous studies on diabetes mellitus, which is known to cause distinct glomerular hyperfiltration, osmotic diuresis, and polyuria and a significant elevation of plasma vasopressin levels, exhibited a sixfold increase of urine output and a twofold increase of inner medullary AQP2 expression, including increased apical AQP2 targeting as a compensatory process (31). Thus changes in tubular flow rate per se do not decrease the AQP2 expression. Moreover, rats treated with furosemide for 5 days showed a sevenfold increase of the urine output but no changes of the inner medullary AQP2 expression (26). This also suggests that the changes in medullary osmolality and tubular flow may be not the major factors causing changes in AQP2 expression. However, it should be noted that, in the condition of diabetes insipidus, even small changes in glomerular filtration rate can markedly affect urine production (13), although this will not explain the changes in AQP2 trafficking.
It should also be noted that aldosterone treatment in rats with lithium-induced NDI and BB rats was associated with a low plasma potassium level, consistent with the well-known aldosterone effect seen in normal physiological conditions. Previously, it has been demonstrated that rats with hypokalemia induced by feeding rats a potassium-deficient diet have polyuria and decreased AQP2 protein expression in the IM and cortex (28). Immunocytochemistry revealed decreased AQP2 labeling in principal cells of both inner medullary and CCDs (28). However, the AQP2 labeling was mainly observed in the apical plasma membrane and subapical intracellular vesicles in hypokalemic rats (28). In the present study we demonstrate decreased apical AQP2 labeling in the CNT and CCD in response to aldosterone treatment in rats with lithium-induced NDI, which also showed hypokalemia. Thus the decreased apical AQP2 labeling is not likely to be related to the hypokalemic condition.
In conclusion, we present a study that shows a novel effect of aldosterone on urine production in two different models of diabetes insipidus. The changes in urine output were associated with a decreased apical expression of AQP2 in the CNT and CCD. Aldosterone treatment aggravated polyuria in diabetes insipidus, and this was associated with a novel aldosterone-mediated AQP2 redistribution in CNT and iCCD. Conversely, spironolactone treatment caused a decrease in urine output and enhanced apical AQP2 expression. These observations further enhance the knowledge of regulation of AQP2 and may have implications with regard to optimizing the treatment of polyuric conditions, e.g., NDI and CDI.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
, and
subunit proteins in rat kidney. J Clin Invest 104: R19R23, 1999.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. T. Skowronski, A. Leska, A. Robak, and S. Nielsen Immunolocalization of Aquaporin-1, -5, and -7 in the Avian Testis and Vas Deferens J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2009; 57(10): 915 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Jensen, R. Norregaard, S. O. Topcu, J. Frokiaer, and M. Pedersen Oxygen tension correlates with regional blood flow in obstructed rat kidney J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2009; 212(19): 3156 - 3163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. B. Olesen, S. de Seigneux, G. Wang, S. C. Lutken, J. Frokiaer, T.-H. Kwon, and S. Nielsen Rapid and segmental specific dysregulation of AQP2, S256-pAQP2 and renal sodium transporters in rats with LPS-induced endotoxaemia Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2338 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Skowronski, T.-H. Kwon, and S. Nielsen Immunolocalization of Aquaporin 1, 5, and 9 in the Female Pig Reproductive System J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 2009; 57(1): 61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schliebe, R. Strotmann, K. Busse, D. Mitschke, H. Biebermann, L. Schomburg, J. Kohrle, J. Bar, H. Rompler, J. Wess, et al. V2 vasopressin receptor deficiency causes changes in expression and function of renal and hypothalamic components involved in electrolyte and water homeostasis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1177 - F1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Lee, H.-J. Choi, J.-S. Lim, J.-H. Earm, B.-H. Lee, I.-S. Kim, J. Frokiaer, S. Nielsen, and T.-H. Kwon A novel method of ligand peptidomics to identify peptide ligands binding to AQP2-expressing plasma membranes and intracellular vesicles of rat kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): F300 - F309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O'Neill, J. Lebeck, P. B. Collins, T.-H. Kwon, J. Frokiaer, and S. Nielsen Aldosterone-mediated apical targeting of ENaC subunits is blunted in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1546 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Seigneux, J. Nielsen, E. T. B. Olesen, H. Dimke, T.-H. Kwon, J. Frokiaer, and S. Nielsen Long-term aldosterone treatment induces decreased apical but increased basolateral expression of AQP2 in CCD of rat kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F87 - F99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Lee, I.-K. Song, K.-J. Jang, J. Nielsen, J. Frokiaer, S. Nielsen, and T.-H. Kwon Increased AQP2 targeting in primary cultured IMCD cells in response to angiotensin II through AT1 receptor Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): F340 - F350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nielsen, T.-H. Kwon, J. Frokiaer, M. A. Knepper, and S. Nielsen Lithium-induced NDI in rats is associated with loss of {alpha}-ENaC regulation by aldosterone in CCD Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): F1222 - F1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |