AJP - Renal Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F526-F532, 2007. First published May 16, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00052.2007
0363-6127/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/F526    most recent
00052.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W., Jr.

Vasopressin-induced nitric oxide production in rat inner medullary collecting duct is dependent on V2 receptor activation of the phosphoinositide pathway

Paul M. O'Connor and Allen W. Cowley, Jr.

Department of Physiology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Submitted 1 February 2007 ; accepted in final form 14 May 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We previously reported that arginine vasopressin (AVP) stimulates the production of nitric oxide (NO) in inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) via activation of V2 receptors (V2R) and the mobilization of intracellular Ca2+. The aim of this study was to determine the pathway(s) through which this response is mediated. IMCDs were dissected from male Sprague-Dawley rats and intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and NO production were measured using a fluorescence imaging system. AVP (100 nmol/l) produced a rapid increase [Ca2+]i of 381 ± 78 nmol/l that was followed by a significant increase of NO production (166 ± 61%). The specific nonpeptide V2R antagonist OPC31260 (1 µM), but not the V1R antagonist OPC21268 (1 µM), inhibited the increase in [Ca2+]i (up to 91 ± 5%) and abolished the NO response to AVP. Both the phospholipase C inhibitor U73112 [GenBank] (3 µM) and the inositol (1,4,5) tri-phosphate 3 receptor blocker 2-APB (75 µM) reduced the peak [Ca2+]i response to AVP (by 65 ± 9 and 59 ± 15%, respectively) and abolished the NO response. Although forskolin (100 µM; an activator of adenylyl cyclase) elicited a moderate increase in [Ca2+]i, neither preincubation with the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor 2'-5'-dideoxyadenosine (50 µM) nor the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor PKA14-22 (100 µM) significantly inhibited peak [Ca2+]i in response to AVP. IMCD [Ca2+]i responses to AVP were reduced by 72 ± 8% when incubated in Ca2+-free media and could be completely abolished by preincubation with the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin. We conclude that AVP-induced NO production in IMCD is dependent on V2R activation of the phosphoinositide pathway and the mobilization of Ca2+ from both intracellular and extracellular pools.

antidiuretic hormone; calcium; kidney; signal transduction; rats


SUSTAINED PHYSIOLOGICAL INCREASES in arginine vasopressin (AVP) result in only a transient reduction of medullary blood flow (MBF) (6), expansion of extracellular fluid volume (26), and elevation of arterial pressure (1, 6, 21, 26, 28). When renal medullary nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity is reduced, however, even small elevations in circulating AVP produce sustained reductions of MBF and persistent hypertension (29). Medullary NO production may help prevent medullary ischemia and protect from AVP-induced hypertension when circulating levels of AVP are high. Nephron NOS activity is highest in inner medullary collecting duct segments (IMCD) (33) and the mRNA for V2R is present only in tubules such as IMCD but not in the renal vasculature (19), indicating that renal medullary NO production in response to AVP may be primarily mediated by IMCD (18). There is evidence that administration of the V2 receptor (V2R)-selective peptide agonist dDAVP alone results in increased medullary NO production while administration of the selective V1R agonist [Phe2,Ile3,Orn8]-vasopressin does not (20). These observations indicate that AVP stimulates medullary NO production via activation of vasopressin V2-like receptors.

We recently reported that AVP stimulates the production of NO in IMCD and that this is dependent on the mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ (18). The classical pathway by which AVP stimulates Ca2+ mobilization in most cell types is via V1aR activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and subsequent release of Ca2+ from inositol (1,4,5) tri-phosphate (IP3)-sensitive intracellular stores (10). IMCD, however, may not express V1aR protein (7) and the V2R peptide agonist dDAVP is equipotent to AVP in eliciting calcium mobilization in IMCD (18) suggesting V2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in these cells. V2R activation of adenylyl cyclase and cAMP has been reported to increase intracellular Ca2+ in IMCD, a response that appears to depend in part on influx of extracellular Ca2+ secondary to activation of EPAC (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) by cAMP and the opening of as yet unidentified membrane ion/Ca2+ channels (36). A second pathway through which V2R activation may mobilize Ca2+ in IMCD has also been suggested by observations that when highly expressed in cell lines, V2R are capable of coupling to PLC which could stimulate release of Ca2+ from IP3-sensitive intracellular stores (38). Furthermore, some evidence indicates that AVP may stimulate IP3 hydrolysis by activation of the oxytocin or V2R-like V1bR in IMCD (17, 30). Therefore, multiple signaling pathways may contribute to V2R-like mediated NO production in IMCD. However, to date the intracellular signaling cascades by which AVP stimulates NO production in IMCD remain unclear. The present study was designed to determine whether multiple signaling pathways capable of mobilizing Ca2+ are active within IMCD and to determine the importance of each of these pathways toward AVP-induced NO production.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental animals. Studies used male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150–300 g (Harlan, Madison, WI) maintained ad libitum on water and a standard pellet diet (Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO) in the Animal Resource Center of the Medical College of Wisconsin. All protocols were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.

Preparation of IMCD. Isolation of IMCDs was performed as described previously (18). Briefly, rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg ip) and the left kidney was perfused with 10 ml of HBSS (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) with 20 mmol/l HEPES buffer adjusted to pH 7.40 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 3 ml/min. The left kidney was then excised and cut sagitally for the removal of the inner medulla, which was microdissected under a Leica M3Z stereomicroscope to remove a single layer of collecting ducts. The thin layer of tissue containing IMCD was placed on a glass coverslip coated with the tissue adhesive Cell-tak (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) for fluorescence imaging. The experimental buffer was HBSS with 20 mmol/l HEPES and 1 mmol/l L-arginine (Sigma) adjusted to pH 7.40.

Fluorescence detection. Fluorescence measurements were made using a Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope with a x60 water immersion (numerical aperture 1.2) objective lens. The signal was detected using a high-resolution digital camera (Photometrics Cascade 512B Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ). Excitation was provided by a Sutter DG-4 175-W xenon arc lamp (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) that allowed high-speed excitation wavelength switching. For the experiments, coverslips were placed in an imaging chamber (maintained at 37°C) mounted on the stage of the inverted microscope that allowed the superfusion of the experimental buffer and buffer containing agonists/antagonists. Five to fifteen cells were selected within each IMCD to quantify changes in fluorescent intensity of Fura-2 AM and DAF-FM dyes using Metafluor imaging software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA).

Intracellular Ca2+ measurement in IMCD. The IMCDs isolated on coverslips were incubated in 5 µmol/l fura-2 AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 60 min at room temperature and then washed to remove excess dye. Pluronic F127 (Molecular Probes) was used to dissolve the fura-2 AM dye to prevent dye compartmentalization upon loading. The coverslips were again incubated in the experimental buffer for 15 min before the experiments. Fura-2 fluorescent signal was stimulated by dual-wavelength excitation at 340 and 380 nm. A 510/40-nm band pass emission filter was used to collect fura-2 signals at 1-s intervals. Ratios between the fluorescence intensity stimulated by 340/380-nm excitation were calculated and the excitation intensity was adjusted on the DG-4 to minimize fura-2 fluorescence bleaching and to balance 340/380 excitation intensities.

Intracellular Ca2+ concentration Formula was calibrated from maximum and minimum fura-2 signals at the end of each experiment. Specifically, the tissue bath solution was exchanged to 5 µmol/l of the Ca ionophore 4-bromo-A23187 (Molecular Probes) with 2.5 mmol/l Ca2+ in the experimental buffer to establish maximum, and to Ca2+-free experimental buffer with 100 µmol/l EGTA (Sigma) and 5 µmol/l of 4-bromo-A23187 to establish minimum fura-2 signals. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration was calculated as equation 1

Formula 1(1)
where Kd is the dissociation constant of fura-2, R is the actual ratio of intensities at excitation wavelengths 340 and 380 nm, Rmax and Rmin are the maximal and minimal fura-2 ratios in the presence and absence of Ca2+, and F is the ratio of fura-2 intensities at 380 nm in the presence and absence of Ca2+. Kd of fura-2 at 37°C was 224 nM as reported (11).

NO measurement in IMCD. IMCDs were incubated on coverslips in 10 µmol/l of the NO-specific dye DAF-FM (Molecular Probes) for 60 min at room temperature and then washed and incubated for another 15 min in the experimental buffer. DAF-2 was excited at 480 nm and collected through a 535/40-nm band pass emission filter at 3-s intervals. At the end of the experimental protocol, the superfusion solution was exchanged with 20 µmol/l of the NO donor DETA-NONOate (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) to act as a positive control and to ensure the DAF-2 dye was not saturated at the end of the experiment.

Solutions. OPC21268 and OPC31260 were obtained from Otsuka (Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan). AVP, 2'-5'-dideoxyadenosine, dibutryl-cAMP, PKA14-22, U73122 [GenBank] , 2-aminoethyl-diphenylborinate (2-APB), forskolin, ryanodine, thapsigargin, EGTA, and L-arginine were obtained from Sigma. 2'-5'-Dideoxyadenosine, dibutryl-cAMP, PKA14-22, U73122 [GenBank] , 2-APB, ryanodine, thapsigargin, and DAF-2FM were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma) before being added to experimental buffer.

Data analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Peak intracellular Ca2+ responses to agonists (peak [Ca2+]i) were calculated as equation 2

Formula 2(2)
Where [Ca2+]i(control) is the mean [Ca2+]i (nmol/l) in the 300 s preceding addition of AVP and Max [Ca2+]i (nmol/l) is the maximum value obtained with 200 s after exchange of the buffer solution with experimental buffer solution containing either of the agonists, AVP, forskolin, or dibutryl-cAMP.

Changes in the rate of production of NO in isolated IMCD [{Delta} slope (% control)] were calculated as equation 3

Formula 3(3)
Where (slope DAF intensity control buffer) is the slope of DAF fluorescence intensity in the 300 s before exchange of the superfusate buffer solution with buffer solution containing AVP and (slope DAF intensity experimental buffer) is the slope of DAF fluorescence intensity during the 300 s after exchange of the buffer solution with solution containing AVP.

A one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test was applied to the data. The level required to reach significance was P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Measurement of intracellular [Ca2+] in IMCD in response to AVP. Baseline [Ca2+]i in IMCD averaged 85 ± 24 nM before stimulation with AVP. During the period before AVP stimulation, rhythmic fluctuations in [Ca2+]i were commonly observed (Fig. 1). Stimulation with 100 nmol/l AVP produced a statistically significant peak increase in [Ca2+]i of 381 ± 78 nmol/l (n = 11) ~25 s after stimulation. Following this peak increase, [Ca2+]i returned to baseline levels over the next 150–200 s.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Representative example of the effect of arginine vasopressin (AVP) on inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and nitric oxide (NO) production. X-axis, time (s); y-axis (left), [Ca2+]i determined from calibrated Fura-2 signal (see MATERIALS AND METHODS); y-axis (right), DAF-FM fluorescents intensity (NO production) arbitrary units (AU); dark line, [Ca2+]i determined from 7–8 regions of interest within a single IMCD; gray line, DAF-FM fluorescents intensity determined from 7–8 regions of interest within a single IMCD; arrow indicates time of exchange of control bath solution with solution containing AVP (100 nmol/l). Note [Ca2+]i and DAF-FM fluorescents intensity data obtained from separate experiments.

 
Effect of the nonpeptide V1R and V2R antagonists OPC31260 and OPC21268 on peak [Ca2+]i response to 100 nmol/l AVP. Preincubation of IMCD with the specific nonpeptide V2R antagonist OPC31260 [pKi 6.36 nM (34); 300 and 1,000 nmol/l] significantly inhibited peak [Ca2+]i in response to 100 nmol/l AVP (–54 ± 9 and –91 ± 5%, respectively; n = 5) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2). In contrast, incubation of IMCD with the specific nonpeptide V1 receptor antagonist OPC21268 [pKi 140 nM (35); 300 and 1,000 nmol/l] had no effect on peak [Ca2+]i responses to AVP (n = 5; Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effect of the specific nonpeptide V2 receptor antagonist OPC31260 and V1 receptor antagonist OPC21268 on peak increase in [Ca2+]i in response to 100 nM AVP. Data are means ± SE. Y-axis, peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP [% of peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP in the absence of inhibitors (381 ± 78 nmol/l)]; x-axis, dose of inhibitor (nmol/l). Horizontal dotted line represents 100% response; open bars represent OPC21268 (pKi 140 nM); filled bars represent OPC31260 (pKi 6.36 nM). *Significant difference from peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP (P < 0.05).

 
Effect of inhibitors/activators of known V1R/V2R receptor signaling pathways on peak AVP response. To determine the AVP-induced signaling pathways involved in Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD (see Fig. 3), a number of inhibitors/activators of known V1R and V2R intracellular signaling pathways were tested.


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. A: peak increase in [Ca2+]i in IMCD in response to AVP in the presence of inhibitors/activators of known V1/V2 receptor signaling pathways. B: peak increase in [Ca2+]i in IMCD in response to AVP in the presence of inhibitors of cellular Ca2+ mobilization. Data are means ± SE. Y-axis, peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP [% of peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP in the absence of inhibitors (381 ± 78 nmol/l)]; x-axis, inhibitor. Horizontal dotted line represents 100% response; hatched bars represent activators of known vasopressin receptor signaling pathways (administered in the absence of AVP); open bars represent inhibitors of known vasopressin receptor/Ca2+ intracellular signaling pathways; vertical line separates activators/inhibitors of adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositide pathways. *Significant difference from peak response to 100 nmol/l AVP (P < 0.05). #Stimulated a response significantly difference from control period (P < 0.05). 8-butryl-cAMP, membrane-permeable cAMP analog; forskolin, activator of cAMP; PKA14-22, inhibitor of protein kinase A; 2'-5'-dideoxyadenosine, inhibitor of adenylyl-cyclase; U73122, inhibitor of phopholipase C; 2-APB, inhibitor of IP3R activation; ryanodine, inhibitor of Ca2+ release from ryanodine-sensitive stores; thapsigargin, Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor; 0 extracellular Ca2+, buffer solution contains 0 mM Ca2+.

 
Known V1R signaling pathway inhibitors. Preincubation of inner medullary tissue strips with the PLC inhibitor U73112 [GenBank] (3 mM) significantly inhibited peak [Ca2+]i responses to AVP (100 nmol/l) by 65 ± 6% compared with AVP alone (n = 5; Fig. 3A). Blockade of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptor with 2-APB (75 mM) also reduced AVP (100 nmol/l)- stimulated peak [Ca2+]i responses by 59 ± 15% (n = 5) compared with AVP alone (Fig. 3A).

Known V2R signaling pathway activators/inhibitors. The addition of the membrane-permeable cAMP analog dibutryl-cAMP (100 mM) did not increase [Ca2+]i. Forskolin (30 µM; an activator of adenylyl cyclase activity) resulted in only a small increase in [Ca2+]i equivalent to 14 ± 3% of that of the response to 100 nmol/l AVP alone (n = 5; Fig. 3A). Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase with 2'-5'-dideoxyadenosne (50 µM) had no effect on either baseline [Ca2+]i or the peak [Ca2+]i response to 100 nmol/l AVP (Fig. 3A). Preincubation of IMCD with PKA14–22, an inhibitor of protein kinase A, did not significantly affect peak [Ca2+]i responses to 100 nmol/l AVP (Fig. 3). Incubation of IMCD tissue strips in Ca2+-free media (n = 5) or with ryanodine (100 mM; n = 5), which inhibits sacroplasmic Ca2+ release from ryanodine-sensitive stores, reduced peak [Ca2+]i responses to 100 nmol/l AVP (by 72 ± 8 and 42 ± 16%, respectively; Fig. 3B). Depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores with the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (5 mM; n = 5) completely abolished the [Ca2+]i responses to AVP (Fig. 3B).

Production of NO by IMCD in response to AVP. NO production by IMCD was measured using the intensity of DAF-FM fluorescence. Exchange of the control buffer solution with buffer solution containing 100 nmol/l AVP resulted in an increase in NO production in IMCD of 166 ± 6% [indicated by an increase in the slope of DAF-2 fluorescence intensity/time (equation 3); Fig. 4; n = 6] compared with baseline. The increase in NO production in IMCD following addition of 100 nmol/l AVP was sustained for the length of recording (400 s; Fig. 1). No change in the rate of NO production by IMCD was observed following exchange of the buffer solution alone (vehicle) or with buffer containing 1 nmol/l AVP (n = 6; Fig. 4). Preincubation of tissue strips with the V2R antagonist OPC31260 (1,000 nmol/l) had no effect on baseline NO production but inhibited the NO response to AVP (100 nmol/l; Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Changes in NO production (DAF-FM fluorescents intensity) in IMCD in response to AVP alone or in the presence of inhibitors of the phosphoinositide pathway and V2R. Data are means ± SE. Y-axis, response to agent (% of control period); x-axis, agent. *Significant difference from vehicle response (P < 0.05). OPC31260, V2R receptor inhibitor; U73122, inhibitor of phopholipase C; 2-APB, inhibitor of IP3R activation.

 
Effect of inhibitors of the phosphoinositide signaling pathway on NO responses to AVP in IMCD. To determine whether the phosphoinositide pathway may be involved in AVP-stimulated production of NO by IMCD, tubules were incubated with inhibitors of PLC and IP3 for 400 s before administration of 100 nmol/l AVP. There was no significant difference in the basal rate of NO production or baseline fluorescent intensity measured before administration of AVP between untreated IMCD and IMCD incubated with inhibitors of the phosphoinositide signaling pathway. Preincubation of IMCD with the PLC inhibitor U73122 [GenBank] (3 µM), however, completely abolished the NO response to 100 nmol/l AVP compared with vehicle (HBBSH-L-Arg; n = 6; Fig. 4). Similarly, incubation of IMCD with the IP3 receptor blocker 2-APB (75 mM) also completely abolished the NO response to 100 nmol/l AVP (n = 6; Fig. 4).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The primary findings of this study are that multiple pathways appear to be capable of stimulating Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD following V2R activation, but activation of the phosphoinositide pathway is specifically required for AVP-stimulated NO production (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Diagrammatic representation of proposed pathway whereby AVP stimulates NO production in IMCD. AVP binds to the V2R activating both adenylyl cyclase (AC) and phospholipase C (PLC). PLC hydrolyzes inositol triphosphate (IP3) stimulating release of Ca2+ from IP3R-sensitive sacroplasmic reticulum (SR) stores. Ca2+ influx from as yet unidentified membrane Ca2+ channels and from ryanodine (RyR)-sensitive stores also appears to contribute to the AVP-induced intracellular calcium increase [Ca2+]i. Increased [Ca2+]i then activates NOS [presumably via calmodulin (24)] stimulating IMCD NO production.

 
Role of the V2R in AVP-stimulated NO production. We used in vivo microdialysis techniques to determine that administration of the V2R-selective peptide agonist dDAVP alone stimulates an increased medullary NO production in the rat kidney (20). Since the mRNA for V2R is present only in tubules such as IMCD but not in the renal vasculature (19), and NOS activity is also highest in IMCD (33), we proposed that the increased rate of renal medullary NO production observed in response to AVP is mediated primarily by IMCD (18). In a subsequent in vitro study using isolated IMCD, we were able to demonstrate that NO production increased in these tubular segments in response to activation of V2R and that this response was dependent on the mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ (18). One novel observation of the present study is that inhibition of V2R inhibited both Ca2+ mobilization and NO production in IMCD (Figs. 2 and 4).

Evidence that the phosphoinositide pathway contributes to V2R activation of Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD. It is well-known that AVP activates adenylyl cyclase via V2Rs (5, 10, 31) and V2R activation of adenylyl cyclase has been reported to increase intracellular Ca2+ in IMCD (7), a process that has recently been reported to be dependent on cAMP-mediated activation of Epac (36). In addition to activation of adenylyl cyclase, when expressed in high concentration in cell lines, V2R have also been demonstrated to be capable of coupling to PLC (38). In the current study, the specific PLC inhibitor U73122 [GenBank] (13, 16, 22, 37) and the IP3R blocker 2-APB (15, 25) were used to determine the possible contribution of phosphoinositide pathway signaling to V2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization and NO production in IMCD. While previous studies suggested the possibility that multiple signaling pathways may be linked to V2R in IMCD (3), there is no direct evidence for this (4, 9). The current study provides the first direct evidence that activation of the phosphoinositide pathway participates in V2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in these nephron segments.

Measuring IP3 in cultured rat IMCD cells, Teitelbaum (30) was unable to demonstrate any evidence that AVP can elicit IP3 production in IMCD via activation of V2R. The current study is the first to use the selective PLC inhibitor U73122 [GenBank] to determine the role of the phosphoinositide pathway in AVP-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization in freshly isolated IMCD. AVP-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD was inhibited by both compounds indicating that under the conditions used in the current study, phosphoinositide pathway activation is a major contributor to V2R-induced Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD. The differences in our findings compared with others could involve the dose of AVP used, the use of freshly isolated vs. cultured cells, the sensitivity of the IP3 assay, or specificity of receptor antagonists used.

Ca2+ pools contributing to AVP-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD. Release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and influx of Ca2+ across the basolateral membrane both appear to contribute to the increase in [Ca2+]i observed in IMCD in response to stimulation by AVP. Ca2+ responses to AVP could be completely abolished by preincubation of the tissue with the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin indicating that release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores was required for AVP-induced Ca2+ mobilization (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, however, in Ca2+-free media the peak [Ca2+]i response to AVP was reduced by 72 ± 8% suggesting influx of extracellular Ca2+ also contributed to the response to AVP (Fig. 3B). These results are in agreement with those of Champigneulle et al. (3) who demonstrated an apparent increase in permeability of the basolateral membrane of rat IMCD to extracellular Ca2+ in response to 10 nM AVP.

Role of cAMP in V2R-mediated Ca2+ mobilization and NO production in IMCD. Our data indicate that activation of adenylyl cyclase is unlikely to be the primary pathway by which Ca2+ is mobilized in response to activation of the V2R in IMCD (Fig. 3A). An increase in [Ca2+]i was observed, however, following addition of a selective activator of adenylyl cyclase (forskolin) supporting previous observations that cAMP is capable of eliciting Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD. However, peak [Ca2+]i was only 14 ± 3% of that elicited by AVP alone (Fig. 3A).

Our finding that cAMP is unlikely to be responsible for the increase in [Ca2+]i observed in IMCD following stimulation of AVP is in agreement with several published reports (3, 12, 27) with a notable exception. Chou et al. (5) reported that addition of 100 µM of the cAMP analog dibutryl-cAMP elicited Ca2+ mobilization in freshly isolated IMCD and that this response was proportional to that induced by AVP alone. They also reported that responses to AVP could be completely abolished by preincubation with ryanodine and that responses to AVP were unaffected by extracellular Ca2+ concentration (5), findings not supported by the results of the current study. An explanation for our contrasting results may be related to the dose of AVP used to elicit Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD, 100 nM AVP being used to elicit maximal Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD in the current study, whereas concentrations between 0.1 and 1 nM were used by Chou et al. (5). PLC activation and Ca2+ mobilization may inhibit intracellular cAMP production in IMCD (2). Since our results demonstrate that stimulation of V2-like receptors can activate at least 2-s messenger signaling pathways involved in calcium mobilization in IMCD, it is possible that the phosphoinositide pathway was activated in the current study and that this inhibited cAMP-mediated Ca2+ mobilization normally observed at lower levels of AVP stimulation. In support of this concept, Champigneulle et al. (3) demonstrated that the magnitude of the Ca2+ response of IMCD to AVP is dose dependent with maximal stimulation occurring at agonist concentrations of ~5 nM.

V2R-mediated NO production in IMCD. While in preliminary studies we were able to observe increased IMCD [Ca2+]i in response to 1 nM AVP, we chose a dose of 100 nM AVP as we found that maximal stimulation of IMCD Ca2+ mobilization was required to stimulate reproducible and detectable increases in the rate of increase of DAF-FM fluorescent intensity in response to AVP. It remains to be determined whether the pathways that act to stimulate NO production in IMCD in vitro underlie the in vivo production of NO in response to AVP. It is clear, however, that infusion of AVP at nonpressor doses, which produced plasma AVP levels within the physiological range, stimulate NO production in the renal medulla of conscious rats (6, 8, 29).

While our data indicate that activation of phophoinositide signaling is required to stimulate detectable increases in NO production in IMCD in response to V2R activation, we cannot exclude the possibility that smaller increases in peak [Ca2+]i stimulated by other signal transduction pathways such as activation of cAMP are also capable of stimulating NO production in IMCD. Although no detectable increase in DAF-FM was observed in response to maximal stimulation by AVP during blockade of phophoinositide signaling, it is possible a small increase in NO production occurred that was below the detection limits of the fluorescent indicator used. However, we believe that this is unlikely since DAF-FM is a highly sensitive indicator of cellular NO production and is capable of detecting NO levels down to 3 nM (14). Additionally, large increases in [Ca2+]i are required to fully activate calmodulin-dependent NOS, so small Ca2+ transients elicited by nonphosphoinositide pathways may not have been sufficient to increase IMCD NO production significantly (24).

Possible role of non-V2R-mediated phophoinositide signaling toward AVP-stimulated NO production in IMCD. Both oxytocin receptors and V1bR have been reported to activate the PLC/IP3 cascade and mobilize Ca2+ in IMCD in response to stimulation with AVP (23, 30), so it is possible that activation of one or both of these receptors could mediate NO production in IMCD in response to stimulation by AVP rather than activation of V2R per se. However, the specific nonpeptide V2R antagonist OPC31260 has both a poor affinity for V1bR (pKi < 1000,000 nM)34) and is a poor antagonist of the oxytocin receptor (32). Thus the observation that OPC31260 inhibited peak [Ca2+]i in IMCD in the current study is not consistent with significant V1bR or oxytocin receptor activation of phophoinositide signaling in IMCD. While the exact nature of the receptor remains unclear, the results of the current study indicate that the specific nonpeptide V2R antagonist OPC31260 was able to inhibit more than 90% of the increase in [Ca2+]i observed following administration of AVP. These observations are consistent with previous reports obtained using peptide agonists/antagonist indicating V2R or some as yet unidentified subtype of the V2R underlies AVP-induced Ca2+ mobilization in IMCD (3, 17, 18).

Physiological significance. In conclusion, the results of the current study provide the first direct evidence that V2R-like receptors are capable of activating phophoinositide second messenger signaling pathways in IMCD to mobilize Ca2+ and that activation of this pathway is required to stimulate NO production in isolated IMCD. We speculate that this signaling pathway may provide a mechanism by which the vasoconstrictive effects of AVP on the medullary circulation may be offset by paracrine signaling of NO between IMCD and the medullary vasa recta, thereby protecting the renal medulla from reductions in MBF and preventing the development of hypertension when circulating levels of AVP are high. Further studies will be required to fully elucidate the biological significance of this pathway in vivo.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-29587 and HL-49219.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Otsuka Pharmaceutical Japan for generously providing OPC31260 and OPC21268 used in these studies.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. W. Cowley, Jr., Dept. of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (e-mail: Cowley{at}mcw.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bartter FC, Schwartz WB. The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Am J Med 42: 790–806, 1967.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Breyer MD, Ando Y. Hormonal signaling and regulation of salt and water transport in the collecting duct. Annu Rev Physiol 56: 711–739, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Champigneulle A, Siga E, Vassent G, Imbert-Teboul M. V2-like vasopressin receptor mobilizes intracellular Ca2+ in rat medullary collecting tubules. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 265: F35–F45, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chou CL, Rapko SI, Knepper MA. Phosphoinositide signaling in rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F564–F572, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chou CL, Yip KP, Michea L, Kador K, Ferraris JD, Wade JB, Knepper MA. Regulation of aquaporin-2 trafficking by vasopressin in the renal collecting duct. J Biol Chem 275: 36839–36846, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cowley AW Jr, Skelton MM, Kurth TM. Effects of long-term vasopressin receptor stimulation on medullary blood flow and arterial pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1420–R1424, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ecelbarger CA, Chou CL, Lolait SJ, Knepper MA, DiGiovanni SR. Evidence for dual signaling pathways for V2 vasopressin receptor in rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 270: F623–F633, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Franchini K, Cowley AW Jr. Sensitivity of the renal medullary circulation to plasma vasopressin. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 271: R647–R653, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Garg LC, Kapturczak E. Stimulation of phophoinositide hydrolysis in renal medulla by vasopressin. Endocrinology 127: 1022–1027, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Greenberg A, Verbalis JG. Vasopressin receptor antagonists. Kidney Int 69: 2124–2130, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescent properties. J Biol Chem 260: 3440–3450, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ishikawa S, Okada K, Saito T. Arginine vasopressin increases cellular free calcium concentration and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate production in rat renal papillary collecting tubule cells in culture. Endocrinology 123: 1376–1384, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jin W, Lo TM, Loh HH, Thayer SA. U73122 inhibits phopholipase C-dependent calcium mobilization in neuronal cells. Brain Res 11: 237–243, 1994.
  14. Kojima H, Urano Y, Kikuchi K, Higuchi T, Hitara Y, Nagano T. Fluorescent indicators for imaging nitric oxide production. Angew Chem Int Ed 38: 3209–3212, 1999.[CrossRef]
  15. Kukkonen JP, Akerman KE. Orexin receptors couple to Ca2+ channels different from store-opertated Ca2+ channels. Neuroreport 12: 2017–2020, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Lui P, Hopfner RL, Xu YJ, Gopalakrishnan V. Vasopressin-evoked [Ca2+]i responses in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 34: 540–546, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Maeda Y, Han JS, Gibson CC, Knepper MA. Vasopressin and oxytocin receptors coupled to Ca2+ mobilization in rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 265: F15–F25, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mori T, Dickout JG, Cowley AW Jr. Vasopressin increases intracellular NO concentration via Ca2+ signaling in inner medullary collecting duct. Hypertension 39: 465–469, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Park F, Mattson DL, Skelton MM, Cowley AW Jr. Localization of the vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors within the renal cortical and medullary circulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R243–R251, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Park F, Zou AP, Cowley AW Jr. Arginine vasopressin-mediated stimulation of nitric oxide with the rat renal medulla. Hypertension 32: 896–901, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pawlowski CM, Eicker NM, Ball LM, Mangiapane ML, Fink GD. Effect of circulating vasopressin on arterial pressure regulation in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 257: H209–H218, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sabaiter N, Richard P, Dayanithi G. Activation of multiple intracellular transduction signals by vasopressin in vasopressin-sensitive neurons of the rat supraoptic nucleus. J Physiol 513: 699–710, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Saito M, Tahara A, Sugimoto T, Abe K, Furuichi K. Evidence that atypical vasopressin V2 receptor in inner medulla of kidney is V1B receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 401: 289–296, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Schmidt HH, Pollock JS, Nakane M, Forstermann U, Murad F. Ca2+/calmodulin-regulated nitric oxide synthases. Cell Calcium 13: 427–434, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Shibukawa Y, Suzuki T. Ca2+ signaling mediated by IP3-dependent Ca2+ releasing and store-operated Ca2+ channels in rat odontoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 18: 30–38, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Smith MJ Jr, Cowley AW Jr, Guyton AC, Manning RD. Acute and chronic effects of vasopressin on blood pressure, electrolytes, and fluid volumes. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 237: F232–F240, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Star RA, Nonoguchi H, Balaban R, Knepper MA. Calcium and cyclic adenosine monophosphate as second messengers for vasopressin in the rat inner medullary collecting duct. J Clin Invest 81: 1879–1888, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Szczepanska-sadowska E, Stepiakowski K, Skelton MM, Cowley AW Jr. Prolonged stimulation of intrarenal V1 vasopressin receptors results in sustained hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 267: R1217–R1225, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Szentivanyi M, Park F, Maeda CY, Cowley AW Jr. Nitric oxide in the renal medulla protects from vasopressin-induced hypertension. Hypertension 35: 740–745, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Teitelbaum I. Vasopressin-stimulated phophoinositide hydrolysis in cultured rat inner medullary collecting duct cells is mediated by the oxytocin receptor. J Clin Invest 87: 2122–2126, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Verbalis JG. Vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists. J Mol Endocrinol 29: 1–9, 2002.[Abstract]
  32. Wargent ET, Burgess WJ, Laycock JF, Balment RJ. Seperate receptors mediate oxytocin and vasopressin stimulation of cAMP in rat inner medullary collecting duct cells. Exp Physiol 84: 17–25, 1999.[Abstract]
  33. Wu F, Park F, Cowley AW Jr, Mattson DL. Quantification of nitric oxide synthase activity in microdissected segments of the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F874–F881, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Yamamura Y, Nakamura S, Itoh S, Hirano T, Onogawa T, Yamashita T, Yamada Y, Aoyama KTM, Kotosai K, Ogawa H, Yamashita H, Kondo K, Tominaga M, Tsujimoto G, Mori T. OPC-41061, a highly potent human vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist: pharmacological profile and aquaretic effect by single and multiple oral dosing in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 287: 860–867, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yamamura Y, Ogawa H, Chihara T, Kondo K, Onogawa T, Nakamura S, Mori T, Tominaga M, Yabuuchi Y. OPC-21268, an orally effective, nonpeptide vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist. Science 252: 572–574, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Yip KP. Epac-mediated Ca2+ mobilization and exocytosis in inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F882–F890, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Zheng L, Paik WY, Cesnjaj M, Balla T, Tomic M, Catt KJ, Stojilkovic SS. Effects of the phopholipase-C inhibitor, U73122, on signaling and secretion in pituiitary gonadotrophs. Endocrinology 136: 1079–1088, 1995.[Abstract]
  38. Zhu X, Gilbert S, Birnbaumer M, Birnbaumer L. Dual signaling potential is common among Gs-coupled receptors and dependent on receptor density. Mol Pharmacol 46: 460–469, 1994.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. M. O'Connor, L. Lu, C. Schreck, and A. W. Cowley Jr.
Enhanced amiloride-sensitive superoxide production in renal medullary thick ascending limb of Dahl salt-sensitive rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F726 - F733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/F526    most recent
00052.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowley, A. W., Jr.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.