|
|
||||||||
1Nephrology-Hypertension Division, 2Stein Institute for Research on Aging, and 3Bioengineering Institute, University of California, School of Medicine, and San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California; and 4Department of Physiology, Mayo Graduate School, Rochester, Minnesota
Submitted 23 August 2007 ; accepted in final form 7 January 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30%. cADP-ribose (cADPR) regulates RyR channel activity. Concurrent infusion of agmatine with the cADPR blocker 8-bromo-cADPR (2 µM) prevents the increase in filtration rate. Furthermore, direct activation of the RyR channel with ryanodine at agonist concentrations (5 µM) increases SNGFR, and, like agmatine, this increase is prevented by administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, a nonselective NOS blocker. We demonstrate that agmatine does not elicit ADPR cyclase activity in vascular smooth muscle membranes and does not directly affect RyR calcium channel responses using sea urchin egg homogenates. These results imply interplay between endothelial cell cADPR/RyR/Ca2+/NO and the cADPR/RyR/Ca2+ pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells in arterioles in the regulation of kidney filtration rate. In conclusion, we show that agmatine-induced effects require activation of cADPR and RyR calcium release channels for NO generation, vasodilation, and increased filtration rate. ryanodine; agmatine; glomerular filtration rate; nitric oxide
The best known of calcium release mechanisms involves the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) pathway via channels in the endoplasmic and sarcoplasmic reticula (2, 28). The IP3 calcium release mechanism is generally associated with the action of various vasoconstrictors but can also be activated by hormones that induce vasodilatation. A second important intracellular calcium release mechanism involves calcium-induced calcium release from intracellular stores. Ryanodine receptor (RyR) channels release calcium by this mechanism. These channels are composed of at least three subtypes distributed throughout skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle, and a variety of adapted muscles in other tissues. Type 1 RyR channels are expressed predominantly in skeletal muscle, type 2 in cardiac muscle, and type 3 in other muscular tissues and brain (29). IP3 and RyR channels are both unique in that they are very large channels. The RyR channel is composed of four 560-kDa proteins that interact with FK-binding protein, a prolyl isomerase that is known to interact with certain immunosuppressive agents, FK-506, and rapamycin (28, 29). Blockade of the IP3 receptor does not prevent calcium transients universally, suggesting that the RyR channel participates in the process.
cADP-ribose (cADPR), a cyclic nucleotide derived from NAD, functions as an endogenous regulator of the RyR channel (13, 23). The action of cADPR appears to be, at least in part, through increasing the sensitivity of the RyR channel to calcium. Glomerular extracts, mesangial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells have all exhibited high ADPR cyclase activity (4, 7, 49). Significant ADPR cyclase activity in the kidney demonstrated by these and other publications imply the presence of RyR receptors (4, 10, 43, 49). Several mammalian cell systems are responsive to ryanodine and agonists such as caffeine that operate through the RyR channel. Presently, RyR channels have been described in preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells, i.e., kidney afferent arterioles, glomerular mesangial cells, human embryonic kidney cells, the kidney epithelial cell line LLC-RK1, and endothelial cells (5, 8–10, 12, 24, 32, 39, 45, 49). We have also examined RyR channels in isolated afferent arterioles from kidneys and found mRNA for types 1 and 2 RyR channels by PCR (unpublished observations).
The current study was designed to determine whether vasodilatory effects of agmatine within the kidney are mediated by activity of the RyR channel. We assessed whether blockade of cADPR activity could modify the vasodilatation induced by agmatine. Because NO has been demonstrated as a permissive cofactor for vasodilatation (35), the question was raised as to whether NO may have some role in maintaining the activity of the RyR channel as a necessary requirement for agmatine-induced vasodilatation. The current studies examine these issues within the kidney microvasculature.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nephron microperfusion studies. These experiments utilize the urinary space of surface glomeruli for microperfusion. The studies involve a control period of 10 min, a perfusion period of 10 min, and a recovery period of 10 min in which the impact of perfused substances on nephron filtration rate was evaluated (26). The late proximal tubule associated with surface glomeruli was localized by injection of a dilute dye in isotonic NaCl-NaHCO3 in the urinary space. At the end of each of three periods (control, perfusion, and recovery periods), a 2.5- to 3-min collection of tubular fluid from the late proximal tubular segment was obtained proximal to a tubular oil block. The tubule proximal to the oil block was vented to the surface fluid after each collection. Therefore, by design, tubular fluid did not enter the Loop of Henle and distal tubule. This means that changes in fluid and NaCl delivery to the macula densa could not have influenced tubuloglomerular feedback activity and SNGFR. Six-micrometer tip pipettes connected to one or two Hampel nanoliter microperfusion pumps were inserted in the urinary space of test nephrons. In inhibitor studies, 8-bromo-cADPR (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), a blocker of cADPR activity, contained in the pump pipette was infused at 2 µM concentrations throughout all three periods (7). Agmatine (Sigma-Aldrich) administration (1 µM) was tested during the perfusion period followed by a recovery period in either the presence or absence of 8-bromo-cADPR. Reagent concentrations in the urinary space were computed from a Hampel pump rate of 5 nl/min and the known ambient SNGFR. Three period time controls were also performed with no agents infused. The effects of 8-bromo-cADPR were also evaluated after a control period in separate studies. In other studies, the effects of 5 µM ryanodine (Sigma-Aldrich) in the second perfusion period were tested by perfusion either in the presence or in the absence of continuous inhibition of NOS by the systemic administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). We also evaluated the effects of 8-bromo-cGMP (Sigma-Aldrich) perfusion alone on nephron filtration rate. The micropuncture data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA.
Effects of agmatine on ADPR cyclase. To evaluate ADPR cyclase enzyme activity, we analyzed the membrane fraction from primary cultures of rat vascular smooth muscle cells. These cells were derived from rat abdominal aorta explant outgrowths, as described by de Toledo et al. (7). ADPR cyclase activity was determined by using the NAD analog nicotinamide guanine dinucleotide and measuring its conversion to fluorescent cGDP-ribose in a spectrofluorometer (3). We examined the direct effects of agmatine on ADPR cyclase activity in this system.
Effects of agmatine on the function of the RyR calcium channel. Homogenates were prepared from sea urchin eggs of lytechinus pictus suspended in a medium containing 2 U/ml of creatine kinase, 4 mM phosphocreatine, 1 mM ATP, 3 µg/ml oligomycin, and 3 µg/ml of antimycin (4, 13). Incubation with 3 µM fluo 03 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was performed at 17°C for 3 h. Fluo 3 fluorescence was monitored at 490 nm excitation and 535 nm emission in a 250-µl cuvette. A spectrofluorometer was used to assess the effects of agmatine on calcium fluorescence. Calcium-induced fluorescence was measured after 100 nM cADPR was added to the homogenates and after the addition of 1 mM agmatine followed by cADPR.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30% increase in single nephron filtration rate during the experimental microperfusion period with a prompt return in the postperfusion recovery period (Fig. 1A). (Control SNGFR was 37 ± 4 nl/min and 44 ± nl/min during agmatine, P < 0.01). Concurrent infusion of 8-bromo-cADPR (2 µM), a blocker of cADPR activity, completely prevented the effects of agmatine on SNGFR. In separate studies, we demonstrated that 8-bromo-cADPR exerted no effects on SNGFR during normal control conditions [35 ± 4 to 36 ± 4 nl/min, not significant (NS)]. Time controls without any agent also showed no change in SNGFR (37 ± 2, 38 ± 2, and 34 ± nl/min, NS). In addition, we tested the agonist effects of ryanodine (5–6 µM) during the microperfusion experimental period. This dose of ryanodine significantly increased nephron filtration rate by
15% with a prompt recovery during the postinfusion period (31 ± 2 to 36 ± 3 nl/min to 30 ± 2, P < 0.002). Systemic infusion of L-NMMA, a nonselective NOS blocker, completely prevented the ryanodine effects on SNGFR (Fig. 1B). The results with L-NMMA are consistent with those obtained previously with agmatine (35), demonstrating a NOS dependence of the effects of both agmatine and ryanodine. Of note, systemic infusion of L-NMMA alone does not change GFR or SNGFR in our hands. Moreover, L-NMMA infused during the control, experimental, and recovery periods produced no changes in SNGFR when compared with the untreated controls, which is consistent with our earlier results (6, 35).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present studies, blockers of cADPR prevented the agmatine-induced increase in SNGFR. We have also demonstrated that ryanodine, in low, agonist-level doses, increases SNGFR. Interestingly, these effects, like with agmatine, were also eliminated by prior treatment with nonselective NOS inhibitors. Receptor-dependent generation of NO by agmatine has been demonstrated in endothelial cells via a calcium-dependent mechanism (20, 30). In human umbilical vein endothelial cells, 10 µM agmatine significantly increases NO synthesis. This activation is effectively blocked by rauwolscine, an
2-adenoreceptor blocker (20). In cultured bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells, agmatine-stimulated NO generation is inhibited by idazoxan, implying imidazoline receptor involvement (30). In this report, 8-bromo-cADPR, a cADPR inhibitor, suppresses in vivo NO generation by agmatine. Bradykinin also elicits an increase in cADPR activity accompanied by activation of the RyR channel, intracellular calcium mobilization, and NO generation in coronary artery endothelial cells (51). Conversely, activation of cADPR and RyR in afferent arteriolar preparations by ANG II, oxidative stress, or calcium entry via calcium-gated calcium channels results in vasoconstriction (8, 9, 11). This increase in the cADPR/RyR/Ca2+ axis with resultant vasoconstriction is also observed in coronary artery smooth muscle cells in response to superoxide, in mesangial cells administered ANG II (12, 50), and with in vivo administration of ANG II via the renal artery (40). Thus, activation of cADPR/RyR/Ca2+ gives rise to vasoconstriction in vascular smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells, and yet activation of this pathway in endothelial cells generates NO and vasodilation. Here we demonstrate that agmatine does not affect ADPR cyclase activity in vascular smooth muscle preparations.
Polyamines can directly affect RyR channel activity, as shown in sea urchin egg preparations (3), and may be endogenous regulators of the channel (3, 23). Because agmatine is a polyamine analog, we investigated its effects in sea urchin egg homogenates, a preparation rich in RyR channels. We show that, unlike polyamines, agmatine does not directly activate calcium release from RyR stores nor augment the effects of cADPR calcium release in this system. Overall, it is likely that agmatine does not act upon vascular smooth muscle cells to either influence cyclase activity or directly influence the RyR channel in these cells. These results are compatible with a receptor-mediated endothelial cell response to agmatine (20, 30) and not to effects on the vascular smooth muscle cell component or a direct effect on the RyR channel itself.
The kidney maintains a high intracellular concentration of agmatine, whereas the plasma contains only
2 µM (25). A question then arises as to the initial target cell for the agmatine effects observed, given this method of administration. Clearly, the design of the nephron protocols excluded a significant effect on proximal tubular reabsorption or directly on macula densa cells, thereby affecting tubuloglomerular feedback activity to contribute to changes in SNGFR since all studies were conducted during zero flow and NaCl delivery in the Loop of Henle and distal tubule. We concluded that this experimental approach of urinary space infusion with late proximal collections was preferable to other in vivo assessments, since this method focuses the candidate cells to those near the glomerular vasculature. Intrarenal artery infusions of agents cannot completely exclude tubular reabsorptive or tubuloglomerular feedback effects on nephron filtration rate, blood flow, and renal vascular resistance (40). How then do the agents infused in the urinary space, agmatine, ryanodine, etc., access their target cells? The results of this in vivo study have not completely answered this question directly. Rosivall and colleagues (34) have recently shown that the most distal portion of the afferent arteriole, one-third to one-half the length, is characterized by a highly fenestrated endothelium, and the urinary space is often in close proximity to this vessel and the adjacent extraglomerular mesangial cells. As stated, agmatine can activate receptors on endothelial cells that may generate NO via ryanodine and cyclic ADPR-dependent mechanisms (20, 30), yet, as shown here, agmatine does not activate Ca2+ release from vascular smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, we find that administration of the RyR agonist ryanodine by an identical route does not result in vasoconstriction, as would be expected by vascular smooth muscle cell involvement, but rather NO-dependent vasodilation. The anatomic relationship described could permit an agmatine effect via actions on endothelial cells.
A highly pertinent issue relates to the question of interaction of NO, and its signal transduction pathways, with the cADPR/RyR channel system. Some internal contradictions arise on the role of NO in this system. Although NO mobilizes calcium from intracellular stores in tissues and sea urchin eggs and elevates cADPR levels (36, 44, 47), it has also been shown to inhibit cyclase activity in coronary vascular smooth muscle cells (48). Competitive inhibitors of ADPR cyclase and cADPR prevent the calcium-mobilizing actions of NO (46, 47). It would appear that NO induces a positive feedback loop that could result in continuous RyR calcium channel activation and further stimulation of NOS. However, NO may act at several steps in the ADPR cyclase/RyR channel complex. In porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells, Kannan and coworkers (21) demonstrated that the RyR channel responses to caffeine were blunted by prior exposure to nitro donors. NO donors also inhibit induction of cADPR and intracellular calcium in vascular smooth muscle cells, resulting in vasodilation. 8-Bromo-cADPR or antagonistic concentrations of ryanodine attenuate this effect (48). These effects of NO may be explained, at least in part, by the complex array of cysteines present in the RyR channel that are subject to nitrosylation and oxidation (1, 37, 38). Our unexpected results with L-NMMA suppression of ryanodine activation of the RyR channel suggest ryanodine activation of the endothelial cell RyR/Ca2+ axis gives rise to NO generation, resulting in inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell cADPR/RyR/Ca2+, vasodilation, and increased filtration rate. In aggregate, these studies indicate that NO exerts permissive activity in the cell that may be necessary for the normal function and activation of the RyR channel. Results from the current studies support such a concept.
Because vasodilation by agmatine requires NO generation, we performed studies to determine if cGMP plays a role in this effect. In addition, there is some support in the literature to suggest that cGMP might interact with the ADPR cyclase or with cADPR generation (14, 18). An overall summary of a complex literature is that cGMP and NO may exert either positive or negative effects on RyR channels, and this is probably cell-type dependent (19). Alternatively, reduction of intracellular calcium, as produced by NO on the cADPR/RyR/Ca2+ pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells (48), can give rise to vasodilation independent of cGMP (16, 21). In the current study, large concentrations of 8-bromo-cGMP, a stable cGMP analog, produced no increase in nephron filtration rate when infused in the urinary space of surface glomeruli. Although this result does not exclude a role for cGMP in agmatine-induced vasodilatation, it does suggest that large doses of cGMP do not duplicate the effects of agmatine or ryanodine administered by an identical route. In total, both agmatine and ryanodine induce calcium release and generate NO to increase SNGFR. NO can affect neighboring cells by diffusion and may induce a positive feedback loop in those cells that could result in further RyR calcium channel activation and stimulation of NOS, as described above. Calcium could also travel to networks of interconnecting cells, thus also expanding beyond the immediate area of the initial agmatine/ryanodine responsive cell. 8-Bromo-cGMP, on the other hand, would be restricted in its actions to cells within Bowman's capsule. Our results are suggestive of autocrine and paracrine cellular networking in the regulation of glomerular filtration.
This is the first in vivo study to demonstrate vasodilatation in response to biological agents in the kidney that require the participation of the ADPR cyclase/RyR channel system. These results, in conjunction with prior publications, suggest that NOS blockade is capable of inhibiting the biological agents, either agmatine or agonist concentrations of ryanodine, from increasing SNGFR. Our in vitro results show that this vasodilatory axis is unlikely confined to vascular smooth muscle cells. It must involve a second or primary cell that is responding to agmatine and generating NO by mechanisms that involve cyclic ADPr and ryanodine channel mechanisms. That NO generation is required for the response, and a cGMP analog does not invoke a similar response, supports the impression that two cells may be involved in this process. This adds complexity to a system in which NO is known to somehow maintain the function of the ryanodine calcium channel and now introduces the concept that activation of ryanodine calcium release can generate NO, likely from endothelial cells. These studies do not definitely prove participation of endothelial cells, since in vivo studies make such judgments difficult, a fact shared by other in vivo attempts to define actions of vasoactive compounds. We propose that agmatine and ryanodine effects require normal intracellular NOS activity to maintain RyR channels responsive to calcium-induced activation (37), thereby allowing the interplay between the endothelial cADPR/RyR/Ca2+/NO response and the resultant suppression of afferent arteriole cADPR/RyR/Ca2+ and vasodilation. We conclude that the renal effects of agmatine, an arginine metabolite, require activation of the RyR channel and NO generation to produce increased filtration rate.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L. Thai and W. J. Arendshorst Mice lacking the ADP ribosyl cyclase CD38 exhibit attenuated renal vasoconstriction to angiotensin II, endothelin-1, and norepinephrine Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): F169 - F176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Thai and W. J. Arendshorst ADP-ribosyl cyclase and ryanodine receptors mediate endothelin ETA and ETB receptor-induced renal vasoconstriction in vivo Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): F360 - F368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |