AJP - Renal Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294: F1336-F1341, 2008. First published April 9, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00574.2007
0363-6127/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/6/F1336    most recent
00574.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. Z. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. Z. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. A.

Renal hemodynamic effect of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition in young men and women with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus

David Z. I. Cherney,1 James W. Scholey,1 Rania Nasrallah,2 Maria G. Dekker,3 Cameron Slorach,4 Timothy J. Bradley,4 Richard L. Hébert,2 Etienne B. Sochett,3 and Judith A. Miller1

1Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, Divisions of 3Endocrinology and 4Cardiology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto; and 2Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Kidney Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 20 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 1 April 2008


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In experimental studies, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)-derived vasodilatory prostaglandins play a more prominent role in arterial vasoregulation in females. The gender-dependent effect of COX2 modulation in humans with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) is unknown. Accordingly, we examined the renal hemodynamic role of prostaglandins by assessing the response to COX2 inhibition in young men and women with type 1 DM. We also used a graded ANG II infusion to determine whether gender-based differences were mediated by effects of COX2 inhibition on the renin angiotensin system (RAS). We hypothesized that COX2 inhibition would be associated with preferential vasoconstriction in women and would augment their response to ANG II. Baseline renal function and the response to an ANG II infusion were assessed during clamped euglycemia, and again after COX2 inhibition (200 mg celecoxib daily for 14 days) in 12 men and 9 women after 1 wk on a controlled protein and sodium diet. COX2 inhibition was associated with increases in filtration fraction (P = 0.045) and renal vascular resistance and a decline in renal blood flow (P = 0.04) in women compared with men. Before COX2 inhibition, women exhibited a decline in glomerular filtration rate in response to ANG II. COX2 inhibition abolished this effect, whereas the response was not altered in men. In summary, COX2 inhibition was associated with hemodynamic effects that differed based on gender. The ANG II response suggests that with uncomplicated type 1 DM, prostaglandins may contribute to RAS-mediated gender differences. Our results are consistent with experimental data suggesting augmented female prostanoid dependence.

gender; cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition; type 1 diabetes mellitus; glomerular filtration rate; angiotensin II


RENAL HEMODYNAMIC ABNORMALITIES associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) (26, 30) include increased intraglomerular capillary pressure and hyperfiltration (2, 10, 12). The cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of these abnormalities. In experimental models of DM, renal COX2 expression is augmented in the presence of hyperglycemia, leading to the increased production of vasodilatory prostaglandins. The possible role of COX2 in the mediation of the characteristic renal hemodynamic abnormalities is underscored by the finding that COX2 inhibition resulted in an amelioration of the hyperfiltration state (21) and an alleviation of proteinuria (34, 40) in animal models of DM. We also recently demonstrated that, in the same cohort of subjects with type 1 DM (8), COX2 inhibition reduces, but does not correct, hyperfiltration in subjects whose baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is ≥135 ml·min–1·1.73 m–2. COX2 inhibition also mediates important hemodynamic effects through blockade of the intrarenal renin angiotensin system (RAS) (5, 7, 39, 42). COX2-RAS interactions are of particular importance in the context of DM, since both of these pathways may be activated in this condition (2, 15, 21).

In experimental studies, COX2-derived vasodilatory prostaglandins play a more prominent role in arterial vasoregulation in females in that female animals exhibit higher plasma prostanoid levels and are more sensitive to their inhibition compared with males (3, 13, 33), an effect that may be estrogen mediated (3, 13, 18, 36). Whether or not this augmented dependence exists in women with type 1 DM is currently not known. Previous studies from this laboratory (9, 27, 28) have defined gender differences in RAS function. Accordingly, our goals for the current study were to determine if there are gender differences in the renal and peripheral hemodynamic response to COX2 inhibition, and in intrarenal COX2-RAS interactions.

We therefore compared the renal hemodynamic responses to COX2 inhibition during clamped euglycemic conditions in men and women with uncomplicated type 1 DM. We used an ANG II infusion to probe the intrarenal RAS before and after COX2 inhibition. Based on previous observations in animal models (3, 33), we hypothesized that women would experience an exaggerated renal hemodynamic response to COX2 inhibition compared with men, suggesting a greater dependence on COX2 for the maintenance of normal renal function. We further hypothesized that COX2 inhibition would augment the effect of ANG II in women (27) because of increased dependence on vasodilatory prostaglandins. We studied subjects without clinical evidence of diabetic nephropathy during clamped euglycemia to remove any confounding effect of proteinuria, renal functional impairment, or hyperglycemia (9).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects. Participants who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were asked to participate: duration of type 1 DM >5 yr, age ≥16 yr, Tanner Stage 4–5 puberty, normoalbuminuria [albumin excretion rate (AER) <20 µg/min on 2/3 overnight urine collections obtained during the month before study], normal clinic blood pressure, no microvascular disease, and absence of chronic illness other than treated hypothyroidism or mild asthma. The Research Ethics Board at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada) approved the protocol. All patients and/or their parents gave informed consent. Twenty-one adolescents and young adults with type 1 DM were eligible to participate.

Protocol and evaluations. The prestudy dietary preparation of our subjects has been published previously (8). Females were studied during the low-estrogen follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (8). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all subjects 1 day before admission to the hospital, as previously described in other studies from this laboratory (29). ABPM was performed one time before COX2 inhibition and again after 14 days of COX2 inhibition before readmission to the hospital.

Euglycemic (blood glucose 4–6 mmol/l) conditions were maintained for ~10 h preceding and during all investigations by a modified glucose clamp technique, as described previously (29). After their baseline study was complete, subjects were prescribed COX2 inhibition (200 mg celecoxib orally/day) for 14 days and were then similarly studied.

Subjects were admitted to the Clinical Investigation Unit at the Hospital for Sick Children the evening before each day of the study, and the renal hemodynamic function studies were performed the following morning, as described previously (8, 29). In brief, after blood for inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) blank was collected, a priming infusion containing 25% inulin (60 mg/kg) and 20% PAH (8 mg/kg) was administered. Thereafter, inulin and PAH were infused continuously at a rate calculated to maintain their respective plasma concentrations constant at 20 and 1.5 mg/dl. Subjects remained supine at all times. After a 90-min equilibration period, blood was collected for inulin, PAH, and hematocrit (Hct). Blood was further collected every 30 min for 60 min, and GFR and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were estimated by steady-state infusion of inulin and PAH according to the calculation method described by Schnurr et al. (35).

A solution of ANG II (51.2 µg/vial; Clinalfa, Läufelfingen, Switzerland) was prepared by dissolving the diluent in normal saline to produce a concentration of 100 µg/ml. Normal saline (22 ml) was then added to 0.22 ml ANG II solution to produce a concentration of 400 ng/ml. ANG II was infused at two doses, 1 and 3 ng·kg–1·min–1, for 30 min each. Subjects remained supine at all times. Blood was collected one time during each ANG II infusion period for Hct, inulin, and PAH. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at the midpoint of each infusion. A further collection of blood was obtained at the end of the ANG II infusion, after a 30-min recovery period. The graded ANG II infusion was performed before and again after 14 days of COX2 inhibition.

Sample collection and analytical methods. Blood samples collected for inulin and PAH determinations were immediately centrifuged at 3,000 revolutions/min for 10 min at 4°C. Plasma was separated, placed on ice, and then stored at –70°C before the assay. Inulin and PAH were measured in serum by colorimetric assays using anthrone and N-(1-naphthy)ethylenediamine, respectively. The mean of two baseline clearance periods represent GFR and ERPF, expressed per 1.73 m2. Filtration fraction (FF) was determined as the ratio of GFR to ERPF. Renal blood flow (RBF) was calculated by dividing the ERPF by (1 – Hct). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was derived by dividing the MAP by the RBF. All renal hemodynamic measurements were adjusted for body surface area. We measured circulating ANG II, renin, and aldosterone and urinary prostanoids as described previously (8).

Urinary AER was determined from three timed overnight urine collections. Urinary albumin concentration was determined by immunoturbidimetry (44). HbA1C was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed on the basis of gender. Results are presented as means ± SE. Between-group comparisons of all parameters at baseline were made using parametric methods (unpaired t-test). Within-subject and between-group differences in the response to COX2 inhibition and ANG II were determined by repeated-measures ANOVA. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS (SPSS for graduate students, version 14.0).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Baseline characteristics. Twelve male and nine female subjects fulfilled the criteria for the study. At baseline, the two groups were similar in age, DM duration, body mass index, body surface area, AER, and HbA1C (Table 1). Age ranges were 16.2–23.3 yr in men and 16.2–21.8 yr in women. No differences in renal hemodynamic parameters or humoral RAS mediators (Table 2) were present at baseline. In men, ABPM revealed daytime, nighttime, and 24-h systolic blood pressures of 124 ± 3 114 ± 2, and 120 ± 2, respectively. In women, these values were lower (114 ± 2, 106 ± 2, and 112 ± 2 mmHg, P < 0.05). Diastolic daytime, nighttime, and 24-h blood pressures in men (69 ± 2, 60 ± 1, and 66 ± 1 mmHg, respectively) were similar to those in women (69 ± 2, 62 ± 1, and 67 ± 2 mmHg, respectively). Baseline renal hemodynamic function was similar in men and women (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline characteristics by gender

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Mean systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to COX2 inhibition by gender

 
Response to COX2 inhibition. After COX2 inhibition, daytime systolic pressure in women rose from 114 ± 1 to 121 ± 4 mmHg (P < 0.05), whereas ABPM diastolic blood pressures did not change in either group and systolic pressures remained stable in men (data not shown). Nighttime and 24-h systolic blood pressure also rose in women (106 ± 2 to 111 ± 4 and 112 ± 2 to 114 ± 2 mmHg), but these changes were not significant.

Women exhibited a rise in FF after COX2 inhibition (P = 0.045) (Table 2, Fig. 1), a result that was not seen in men (between-group FF difference, P = 0.019). The between-group changes in ERPF (P = 0.023) and RBF (P = 0.025) were also significantly different, with a fall in these parameters in women compared with men (Table 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Effect of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) inhibition on filtration fraction (FF) in men and women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) (means ± SE). *P ≤ 0.05 vs. baseline. §P ≤ 0.05 vs. response in men.

 
Response to ANG II before and after COX2 inhibition. Before COX2 inhibition, women exhibited a decline in GFR that was significantly different compared with men at the 1 ng·kg–1·min–1 infusion level (P = 0.002) and the 3 ng·kg–1·min–1 level (P = 0.006) (Figs. 2 and 3 and Tables 3 and 4). The ANG II-induced rise in RVR was also significantly greater in women compared with men (P = 0.018). COX2 inhibition abolished the gender-based differences in the renal response to ANG II so that GFR was maintained during the ANG II infusion in women after COX2 inhibition. Men exhibited no significant change in GFR in response to ANG II before or after COX2 inhibition.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR; ml·min–1·1.73 m–2) in response to ANG II in men with type 1 DM (means ± SE).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Change in GFR (ml·min–1·1.73 m–2) in response to ANG II in women with type 1 DM (means ± SE).*P ≤ 0.05 vs. baseline. §P ≤ 0.05 vs. response pre-COX2 inhibition.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Mean systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to ANG II before and after COX-2 inhibition in men

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Mean systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to ANG II before and after COX-2 inhibition in women

 
Impact of COX2 inhibition on humoral RAS mediators and prostaglandin metabolites. COX2 inhibition was associated with numerical reductions in RAS mediators in both groups, although these changes were not statistically significant (Tables 3 and 4). By enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, COX2 inhibition was associated with numerical decreases in PGE [1.9 ± 0.3 decrease to 1.3 ± 0.3 pg/l, P = not significant (NS)] and PGI (0.8 ± 0.1 decrease to 0.6 ± 0.1 pg/l, P = NS) and thromboxane B2 (TXB2) metabolites (0.8 ± 0.1 decrease to 0.4 ± 0.2 pg/l, P = NS). With the use of mass spectrometry, at baseline, PGE levels were higher in men than women (Table 5), whereas levels of other prostanoids were similar. COX2 inhibition was associated with significant declines in PGE levels in men. In women, COX2 inhibition was associated with numerical, nonsignificant declines in PGE, PGD, and PGI (P = 0.06 for PGD and PGI).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Mean urinary excretion of prostanoids

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental models have suggested that females are more dependent on vasodilatory prostaglandins to maintain normal renal hemodynamic function and blood pressure, and to avoid vasoconstriction compared with males (3, 13, 33). This increased effect of vasodilatory prostaglandins in women may be estrogen mediated (3, 13, 18, 36). Whether this augmented effect of selective COX2 inhibition on renal hemodynamic function exists in women with type 1 DM is unknown. Accordingly, we studied the hemodynamic response to COX2 inhibition in a well-characterized cohort of young women with uncomplicated type 1 DM compared with a similar group of young men (4, 11, 17, 23, 31, 32). In a second set of experiments, we probed the effect of COX2 inhibition on intrarenal RAS activity with an ANG II infusion. Our major findings were that: 1) COX2 inhibition resulted in a significant increase in FF and declines in ERPF and RBF in women compared with men. 2) COX2 inhibition abolished the ANG II-mediated decline in GFR in women, resulting in a pattern similar to the response in men.

COX2 is constitutively expressed in the kidney and undergoes inducible expression in inflammatory states (16, 25). In animal models of DM, augmented COX2 activity has been associated with renal hyperfiltration (21, 22). Conversely, COX2 inhibition diminishes intraglomerular hypertension in experimental models through the blockade of vasodilatory prostaglandins, thereby reducing hyperfiltration (21), proteinuria, and glomerulosclerosis (40, 41, 43). Isoform nonspecific COX1/COX2 (14) inhibitors can reduce the urinary excretion of vasodilatory prostaglandins in humans with type 1 DM (15, 38), and we recently demonstrated that specific COX2 inhibition partially reduces hyperfiltration in our cohort of subjects with type 1 DM during clamped euglycemia and hyperfiltration (8).

Because vasodilatory prostaglandin synthesis can be increased by estrogen in a variety of animal models (3, 13, 18, 36), some investigators have suggested that females are more dependent on these prostaglandins to maintain vasodilatation compared with males (3, 13, 33). For example, female salt-sensitive rats exhibit a greater systemic hypertensive effect compared with males after inhibition of vasodilatory prostaglandins such as PGE, suggesting that these vasodilatory factors mediate the normal protection against hypertension that is typical of these female animals (3, 36). Although controversial, this upregulatory effect of estrogen on prostaglandin function may be mediated through ANG-(1-7) (13). Other investigators have suggested that females derive greater cardiovascular protection from prostaglandins through the interaction of estrogen with cytosolic/nuclear receptors that trigger long-term genomic effects (33), such as the inhibition of smooth muscle proliferation and the stimulation of endothelium-dependent mechanisms of vascular relaxation. These include but are not limited to nitric oxide-cGMP, prostacyclin-cAMP, and hyperpolarization-related pathways (33). Moreover, endothelium-independent effects of sex hormones may act through the inhibition of the signaling mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle contraction such as intracellular calcium and protein kinase C (33). Based on these observations, women may therefore depend on prostaglandins for the maintenance of normal vascular tone and blood pressure.

Our first major finding was that, in response to COX2 inhibition, women exhibited a significant renal hyperfiltration response, reflected by a rise in FF after COX2 inhibition. The rise in FF, with the associated numerical decreases in RBF and ERPF, suggest a COX2 inhibition-mediated postglomerular vasoconstrictive effect in women. This may have been due to either celecoxib-mediated inhibition of vasodilators (such as prostacyclin) or the activation of vasoconstrictors such as thromboxanes or ANG II. Activation of thromboxanes seems unlikely, since previous animal studies have demonstrated significant reductions, not increases, in vasoconstrictive thromboxane levels using selective COX2 inhibition (20, 21), which is consistent with the numerical reductions that we observed. Although the effect of COX2 inhibition on thromboxane production is controversial in human studies (6, 24, 25), our findings are consistent with a loss of glomerular vasodilators, since we observed numerical reductions in PGE, PGD, and PGI metabolite levels and a numerical fall in thromboxane production. Loss of glomerular vasodilators may therefore underlie the postglomerular vasoconstrictive effect that we observed after COX2 inhibition in women. As further supportive evidence for augmented sensitivity to COX2 inhibition in women, we observed an increase in daytime systolic blood pressure on ABPM in this group. One possible explanation for this is a systemic reduction in vasodilators, leading to a hypertensive response, which has been observed in experimental models (3, 13, 18, 36).

Our second major observation was that, after COX2 inhibition, the ANG II infusion was associated with the maintenance of GFR in women, consistent with equivalent vasoconstrictive activity in the pre- and postglomerular vascular compartments. One explanation for the renal effect of ANG II before COX2 inhibition in women is based on the concept of the greater baseline prostaglandin activity in this group, which is typically preglomerular. Under these circumstances, COX2-derived vasodilators are maximally active and cannot mitigate the vasoconstrictive action of ANG II, leading to a predominant preglomerular vasoconstrictive effect and a decline in GFR. After COX2 inhibition, however, COX2-derived vasodilators are relatively depleted (3, 13, 33). This may eliminate the glomerular polarity in the activity of vasodilators, resulting in a more even distribution of ANG II-mediated arteriolar vasoconstriction throughout the renal microcirculation and the maintenance of GFR. An alternative speculative explanation that could explain the response to ANG II in women is that COX2 inhibition may have blocked intrarenal RAS mediators (7, 37, 42), leading to glomerular ANG II type 1 receptor upregulation and greater ANG II sensitivity.

This study has important limitations. The sample size was small, which may have limited our ability to detect significant differences in some parameters such as changes in prostaglandin levels after COX2 blockade. This was of particular importance in women, in whom the P value failed to reach significance, likely in part due to the small sample size. We attempted to minimize the effect of the small sample size by utilizing homogeneous study groups and by careful prestudy dietary preparation. We attempted to minimize the effect of variations in estrogen on renal hemodynamic and RAS function in female subjects by only studying those who were nonusers of oral contraceptive medications, and only during the follicular (low estrogen) phase of the menstrual cycle. We also decreased variability by using a study design that allowed each subject to act as his/her own control. Finally, because of ethical considerations at our institution, we were not permitted to study a healthy control group of adolescents. Our results therefore only pertain to humans with type 1 DM.

In summary, our results demonstrate that women with type 1 DM have a greater dependence on vasodilatory prostaglandins to maintain normal renal and peripheral blood vessel function compared with men. Furthermore, COX2-dependent factors may counteract the effect of ANG II in the renal microcirculation to a greater degree in women than in men with uncomplicated type 1 DM, so that COX2 inhibition eliminates gender-based differences in the response to ANG II that we have observed previously.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by an operating grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (to E. B. Sochett and J. A. Miller). D. Z. I. Cherney was supported by funding from The Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training Program [sponsored by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Kidney Foundation of Canada, and Canadian Society of Nephrology] and the Clinician Scientist Program at the University of Toronto. J. W. Scholey is the CIHR/AMGEN Canada Kidney Research Chair at the University Health Network, University of Toronto.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the nurses in the Clinical Investigation Unit, Hospital for Sick Children, and in particular Maria Maione for invaluable assistance with the protocol. We also thank the Morrow Laboratory (Nashville, TN) for providing the mass spectrometric analysis of urine samples.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. A. Miller, Toronto General Hospital, 585 Univ. Ave., 8N-846, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2N2 (e-mail: judith.miller{at}utoronto.ca)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ahmed SB, Kang AK, Burns KD, Kennedy CR, Lai V, Cattran DC, Scholey JW, Miller JA. Effects of oral contraceptive use on the renal and systemic vascular response to angiotensin II infusion. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 780–786, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Anderson S, Jung FF, Ingelfinger JR. Renal renin-angiotensin system in diabetes: functional, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological correlations. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 265: F477–F486, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bayorh MA, Socci RR, Eatman D, Wang M, Thierry-Palmer M. The role of gender in salt-induced hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 23: 241–255, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Breyer JA, Bain RP, Evans JK, Nahman NS Jr, Lewis EJ, Cooper M, McGill J, Berl T. Predictors of the progression of renal insufficiency in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and overt diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. Kidney Int 50: 1651–1658, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Castrop H, Schweda F, Schumacher K, Wolf K, Kurtz A. Role of renocortical cyclooxygenase-2 for renal vascular resistance and macula densa control of renin secretion. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 867–874, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Catella-Lawson F, McAdam B, Morrison BW, Kapoor S, Kujubu D, Antes L, Lasseter KC, Quan H, Gertz BJ, FitzGerald GA. Effects of specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 on sodium balance, hemodynamics, and vasoactive eicosanoids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 735–741, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cheng HF, Wang JL, Zhang MZ, Miyazaki Y, Ichikawa I, McKanna JA, Harris RC. Angiotensin II attenuates renal cortical cyclooxygenase-2 expression. J Clin Invest 103: 953–961, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Cherney D, Miller J, Scholey J, Bradley T, Slorach C, Curtis J, Dekker M, Nasrallah R, Hébert R, Sochett E. The effect of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition on renal hemodynamic function in humans with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes In press.
  9. Cherney DZ, Sochett EB, Miller JA. Gender differences in renal responses to hyperglycemia and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetes. Kidney Int 68: 1722–1728, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Chiarelli F, Cipollone F, Romano F, Tumini S, Costantini F, di Ricco L, Pomilio M, Pierdomenico SD, Marini M, Cuccurullo F, Mezzetti A. Increased circulating nitric oxide in young patients with type 1 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria: relation to glomerular hyperfiltration. Diabetes 49: 1258–1263, 2000.[Abstract]
  11. Coonrod BA, Ellis D, Becker DJ, Bunker CH, Kelsey SF, Lloyd CE, Drash AL, Kuller LH, Orchard TJ. Predictors of microalbuminuria in individuals with IDDM. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetes Care 16: 1376–1383, 1993.[Abstract]
  12. Craven PA, Caines MA, DeRubertis FR. Sequential alterations in glomerular prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis in diabetic rats: relationship to the hyperfiltration of early diabetes. Metabolism 36: 95–103, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Eatman D, Wang M, Socci RR, Thierry-Palmer M, Emmett N, Bayorh MA. Gender differences in the attenuation of salt-induced hypertension by angiotensin (1-7). Peptides 22: 927–933, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Esmatjes E, Fernandez MR, Halperin I, Camps J, Gaya J, Arroyo V, Rivera F, Figuerola D. Renal hemodynamic abnormalities in patients with short term insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: role of renal prostaglandins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60: 1231–1236, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gambardella S, Andreani D, Cancelli A, Di Mario U, Cardamone I, Stirati G, Cinotti GA, Pugliese F. Renal hemodynamics and urinary excretion of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha and thromboxane B2 in newly diagnosed type I diabetic patients. Diabetes 37: 1044–1048, 1988.[Abstract]
  16. Hennan JK, Huang J, Barrett TD, Driscoll EM, Willens DE, Park AM, Crofford LJ, Lucchesi BR. Effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition on vascular responses and thrombosis in canine coronary arteries. Circulation 104: 820–825, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jacobsen P, Rossing K, Tarnow L, Rossing P, Mallet C, Poirier O, Cambien F, Parving HH. Progression of diabetic nephropathy in normotensive type 1 diabetic patients. Kidney Int Suppl 71: S101–S105, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Jun S, Chen Z, Pace M, Shaul P. Estrogen upregulatescyclooxygenase-1 gene expression in ovine fetal pulmonary artery endothelium. J Clin Invest 102: 176–183, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Kang AK, Miller JA. Effects of gender on the renin-angiotensin system, blood pressure, and renal function. Curr Hypertens Rep 4: 143–151, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Komers R, Anderson S, Epstein M. Renal and cardiovascular effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Am J Kidney Dis 38: 1145–1157, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Komers R, Lindsley JN, Oyama TT, Schutzer WE, Reed JF, Mader SL, Anderson S. Immunohistochemical and functional correlations of renal cyclooxygenase-2 in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest 107: 889–898, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Lee SH, Woo HG, Baik EJ, Moon CH. High glucose enhances IL-1beta-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Life Sci 68: 57–67, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Mangili R, Deferrari G, Di Mario U, Giampietro O, Navalesi R, Nosadini R, Rigamonti G, Spezia R, Crepaldi G. Arterial hypertension and microalbuminuria in IDDM: the Italian Microalbuminuria Study. Diabetologia 37: 1015–1024, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. McAdam BF, Byrne D, Morrow JD, Oates JA. Contribution of cyclooxygenase-2 to elevated biosynthesis of thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin in cigarette smokers. Circulation 112: 1024–1029, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. McAdam BF, Catella-Lawson F, Mardini IA, Kapoor S, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Systemic biosynthesis of prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: the human pharmacology of a selective inhibitor of COX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 272–277, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Miller JA. Impact of hyperglycemia on the renin angiotensin system in early human type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1778–1785, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Miller JA, Anacta LA, Cattran DC. Impact of gender on the renal response to angiotensin II. Kidney Int 55: 278–285, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Miller JA, Cherney DZ, Duncan JA, Lai V, Burns KD, Kennedy CR, Zimpelmann J, Gao W, Cattran DC, Scholey JW. Gender differences in the renal response to Renin-Angiotensin system blockade. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2554–2560, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Miller JA, Curtis JR, Sochett EB. Relationship between diurnal blood pressure, renal hemodynamic function, and the renin-angiotensin system in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 52: 1806–1811, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Miller JA, Floras JS, Zinman B, Skorecki KL, Logan AG. Effect of hyperglycaemia on arterial pressure, plasma renin activity and renal function in early diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond) 90: 189–195, 1996.[Medline]
  31. Muhlhauser I, Bender R, Bott U, Jorgens V, Grusser M, Wagener W, Overmann H, Berger M. Cigarette smoking and progression of retinopathy and nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 13: 536–543, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Orchard TJ, Dorman JS, Maser RE, Becker DJ, Drash AL, Ellis D, LaPorte RE, Kuller LH. Prevalence of complications in IDDM by sex and duration. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study II. Diabetes 39: 1116–1124, 1990.[Abstract]
  33. Orshal JM, Khalil RA. Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R233–R249, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sanchez PL, Salgado LM, Ferreri NR, Escalante B. Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition on renal function after renal ablation. Hypertension 34: 848–853, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Schnurr E, Lahme W, Kuppers H. Measurement of renal clearance of inulin and PAH in the steady state without urine collection. Clin Nephrol 13: 26–29, 1980.[Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Sullivan JC, Sasser JM, Pollock DM, Pollock JS. Sexual dimorphism in renal production of prostanoids in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension 45: 406–411, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Traynor TR, Smart A, Briggs JP, Schnermann J. Inhibition of macula densa-stimulated renin secretion by pharmacological blockade of cyclooxygenase-2. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 277: F706–F710, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Viberti GC, Benigni A, Bognetti E, Remuzzi G, Wiseman MJ. Glomerular hyperfiltration and urinary prostaglandins in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 6: 219–223, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Wang JL, Cheng HF, Harris RC. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition decreases renin content and lowers blood pressure in a model of renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 34: 96–101, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wang JL, Cheng HF, Shappell S, Harris RC. A selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor decreases proteinuria and retards progressive renal injury in rats. Kidney Int 57: 2334–2342, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Wang JL, Cheng HF, Zhang MZ, McKanna JA, Harris RC. Selective increase of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in a model of renal ablation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275: F613–F622, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Wolf K, Castrop H, Hartner A, Goppelt-Strube M, Hilgers KF, Kurtz A. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the macula densa. Hypertension 34: 503–507, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Yao B, Xu J, Qi Z, Harris RC, Zhang MZ. Role of renal cortical cyclooxygenase-2 expression in hyperfiltration in rats with high-protein intake. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F368–F374, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Zatz R, Meyer TW, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Predominance of hemodynamic rather than metabolic factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic glomerulopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 5963–5967, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/6/F1336    most recent
00574.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. Z. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, D. Z. I.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.