AJP - Renal  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F323-F334, 2008. First published March 26, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00050.2008
0363-6127/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/2/F323    most recent
00050.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, M.

INVITED REVIEW

Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in renal pathophysiology: Janus faces

Masanori Kitamura

Department of Molecular Signaling, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 
A number of pathophysiological insults lead to accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and cause ER stress. In response to accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins, cells adapt themselves to the stress condition via the unfolded protein response (UPR). For the cells, UPR is a double-edged sword. It triggers both prosurvival and proapoptotic signals. ER stress and UPR may, therefore, be involved in a diverse range of pathological situations. However, currently, information is limited regarding roles of ER stress and UPR in the renal pathophysiology. This review describes current knowledge on the relationship between ER stress and diseases and summarizes evidence for the link between ER stress/UPR and renal diseases.

apoptosis; homeostasis


THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM (ER) is the subcellular entrance for a number of secretory and structural proteins as well as the site of biosynthesis for steroids, cholesterol, and other lipids. It provides a unique environment for appropriate protein folding, assembly, and disulfide bond formation, leading to production of functional, mature proteins. It is known that homeostasis in the ER is monitored and maintained via a coordinated adaptive program, so-called the unfolded protein response (UPR). A number of pathophysiological insults lead to accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER and cause ER stress. These include hypoxia, nutrient (glucose) deprivation, alterations in the redox balance, changes in calcium homeostasis, failure of posttranslational modifications, and increases in general protein synthesis (56). In response to accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins, cells adapt themselves to the stress condition via UPR; i.e., attenuation of general translation, induction of ER chaperones and foldases, and activation of ER-associated degradation (ERAD) to eliminate immature proteins. When the stress is beyond the capacity of the compensatory machinery, however, cells undergo apoptosis. Previous reports suggested that ER stress and UPR may be involved in a diverse range of pathological situations including hypoxia and ischemia, viral infection, neurodegenerative disorders, drug-induced tissue injury, and metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus (48, 56). However, information is limited regarding roles of ER stress and UPR in the renal pathophysiology. This article describes current knowledge on the relationship between ER stress and diseases and summarizes evidence for the link between ER stress/UPR and kidney diseases.

UPR and Cell Fate

ER stress is defined as accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER, which induces a coordinated adaptive program, UPR. Three major transducers for sensing ER stress have been identified on the membrane of the ER; i.e., RNA-dependent protein kinase-like ER kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and inositol-requiring ER-to-nucleus signal kinase 1 (IRE1). Activation of PERK leads to phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2{alpha} (eIF2{alpha}), which causes general inhibition of protein synthesis. In response to ER stress, 90-kDa ATF6 (p90ATF6) transits to the Golgi where it is cleaved by site-1 protease (S1P) and site-2 protease (S2P), yielding an active transcription factor, 50-kDa ATF6 (p50ATF6). Similarly, activated IRE1 catalyzes removal of a small intron from the mRNA of the gene encoding X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). This splicing event creates a translational frameshift in XBP1 mRNA to produce an active transcription factor. Active p50ATF6 and XBP1 subsequently bind to the ER stress response element (ERSE) and the UPR element (UPRE), leading to expression of target genes including an ER chaperone 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78; also called Bip) and ERAD factors involved in degradation of unfolded proteins. These pathways are generally regarded as prosurvival UPR (120) (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress through 3 major transducers: RNA-dependent protein kinase-like ER kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and inositol-requiring ER-to-nucleus signal kinase 1 (IRE1). Activation of PERK leads to phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2{alpha} (eIF2{alpha}), which causes general inhibition of protein synthesis. In response to ER stress, 90-kDa ATF6 (p90ATF6) transits to the Golgi where it is cleaved by site-1 protease (S1P) and site-2 protease (S2P), yielding an active transcription factor, 50-kDa ATF6 (p50ATF6). Similarly, activated IRE1 catalyzes removal of a small intron from the mRNA of the gene encoding X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). This splicing event creates a translational frameshift in XBP1 mRNA to produce an active transcription factor. Active p50ATF6 and XBP1 subsequently bind to the ER stress response element (ERSE) and the UPR element (UPRE), leading to expression of target genes encoding ER chaperones and ER-associated degradation (ERAD) factors involved in degradation of unfolded proteins.

 
During the UPR, however, death signals, as well as survival signals, may also be transduced (50). For example, activation of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway causes general inhibition of translation, whereas selectively induces a transcription factor ATF4. Consequently, ATF4 induces expression of proapoptotic CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-homologous protein (CHOP) [also called growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein 153 (GADD153)] through activation of the amino acid response element (AARE). The ATF6 pathway and the IRE1 pathway may also induce expression of CHOP (64). ER stress activates caspase-12 (or caspase-4 in humans) localized at the ER membrane through an interaction with IRE1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), leading cells to undergo apoptosis. The IRE1-TRAF2 interaction also allows for recruitment and activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) and downstream c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which is involved in a variety of proapoptotic signaling (50). These pathways have been considered as proapoptotic UPR (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Induction of proapoptotic UPR by ER stress. Activation of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway induces a transcription factor ATF4. Consequently, ATF4 induces expression of proapoptotic CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-homologous protein (CHOP) through activation of the amino acid response element (AARE). The ATF6 pathway (and the IRE1 pathway) may also induce expression of CHOP via activation of ERSE. ER stress activates caspase-12 (or caspase-4 in humans) localized at the ER membrane through an interaction with IRE1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), leading cells to undergo apoptosis. The IRE1-TRAF2 interaction also allows for recruitment and activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) and downstream c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which is involved in a variety of proapoptotic signaling.

 
The three UPR branches initiated by PERK, ATF6, and IRE1 can be involved in prosurvival and proapoptotic signaling. How the UPR integrates its cytoprotective and proapoptotic outputs to select cell fates is unknown. Recently, however, Lin et al. (57) suggested a model by which distinct combinations of individual UPR determine cell fates during ER stress. They showed that activity of IRE1 and ATF6 is attenuated by persistent ER stress. In contrast, PERK signaling, including translational inhibition and induction of CHOP, is maintained even in the chronic phase. When IRE1 activity is sustained artificially, cell survival is enhanced, suggesting a causal link between cell fates and duration of UPR (57). In this model, the initial combined activation of PERK, ATF6, and IRE1 produces cytoprotective outputs such as reduced translation, enhanced protein folding capacity in the ER, and clearance of unfolded proteins, along with proapoptotic outputs such as induction of CHOP. Cytoprotective outputs outweigh proapoptotic outputs in this early phase. This phase provides a "window of opportunity" for cells to readjust their ER to cope with stress. If these steps fail to reestablish homeostasis, IRE1 signaling and ATF6 signaling are attenuated, resulting in an imbalance in which proapoptotic outputs outweigh prosurvival outputs (57).

Evaluation of ER Stress

Evaluation and monitoring of ER stress are required for investigation of molecular events involved in ER stress-related pathophysiologies. Based on the above-mentioned knowledge on UPR, several methods have been used for assessment of ER stress. Expression of endogenous biomarkers, e.g., GRP78 and CHOP, is most commonly used for this purpose (52, 64). Phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2{alpha}, cleavage of ATF6 and procaspase-12, and splicing of XBP-1 mRNA have also been used as endogenous indicators for ER stress (72, 104). Alternatively, reporter assays using the ERSE combined with lacZ or luciferase have been used for monitoring ER stress (27, 66). However, these systems require extraction of RNA or protein and do not allow for continuous or successive monitoring of ER stress in living cells and animals. Use of green fluorescence proteins may be useful for this purpose (38), but it is still not competent for quantitative, successive assessment of ER stress in internal organs of living animals (133).

Another means to evaluate ER stress is through the use of a secreted reporter protein. Secretory proteins enter the subcellular pathway through the ER. In the ER, the proteins are folded into native conformation and undergo a multitude of posttranslational modifications. Only correctly folded proteins are exported to the Golgi apparatus. Based on this current knowledge, perturbation of ER function (i.e., ER stress) can be monitored using certain secreted reporter proteins. We recently reported that ER stress-responsive secreted alkaline phosphatase (ES-TRAP) serves as a sensitive, quantitative biomarker for ER stress (30). In vitro, activity of ES-TRAP secreted by transfected cells is attenuated in response to ER stress independent of its transcriptional regulation. This phenomenon is observed in a wide range of cell types triggered by various ER stress inducers with high sensitivity and selectivity (30). We also generated transgenic mice systemically expressing ES-TRAP and provided evidence for its usefulness for real-time monitoring of ER stress in animals (29, 30). Using these in vitro and in vivo systems, it is feasible to monitor ER stress continuously in living cells and animals by simple sampling of culture medium or small amounts of serum (~5 µl). Recently, similar systems have been developed for continuous monitoring of ER stress in culture cells using secreted luciferases as indicators (5, 28). It is based on the fact that, like ES-TRAP, extracellular activity of secreted luciferase is markedly suppressed under ER stress conditions. However, in contrast to ES-TRAP, activity of secreted luciferase is significantly interfered in the presence of serum, especially serum albumin, as we previously reported (31). The secreted luciferase-based system may not be applicable for in vivo evaluation of ER stress.

Dark Side of UPR

UPR and apoptosis. UPR is known to trigger several pathways to apoptosis. The first is the Ca2+-mediated signaling pathway. ER stress causes conformational changes and/or oligomerization of proapoptotic Bak and Bax at the ER membrane (137), leading to release of Ca2+ from the ER. It activates calpain in the cytosol, which cleaves procaspase-12 to mature caspase-12 in the ER (85) (Fig. 2). Activated caspase-12 then initiates a caspase cascade through cleavage of procaspase-9 and procaspase-3 and causes consequent apoptosis (70). Downregulation of Bcl-2 transcription by ER stress-induced CHOP may also be involved in the induction of apoptosis (67). Of note, CHOP-deficient cells are resistant to ER stress-induced apoptosis (136). Another important pathway involved in the ER stress-initiated apoptosis is the IRE1-TRAF2-ASK1-JNK pathway. Indeed, IRE1{alpha}-deficient fibroblasts are impaired in JNK activation by ER stress, and dominant-negative TRAF2 inhibits activation of JNK by IRE1 (115). In this pathway, formation of an IRE1-TRAF2-ASK1 complex is essential for activation of JNK by ER stress (76).

UPR and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and NF-{kappa}B. In general, ER stress is known to activate mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases and NF-{kappa}B and thereby to induce cellular activation. UPR has the ability to activate stress kinases including JNK and p38 MAP kinase via the IRE1-ASK1 pathway (105). Similarly, UPR activates NF-{kappa}B through multiple mechanisms, possibly, via the IRE1 pathway (34, 46) and/or the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway (13, 40). For example, in response to ER stress, I{kappa}B kinase (IKK) forms a complex with IRE1{alpha} through the adapter protein TRAF2, and ER stress-induced activation of NF-{kappa}B is impaired by knockdown or knockout of either IRE1{alpha} or TRAF2 (34, 46). Other reports also showed that phosphorylation of eIF2{alpha} is necessary and sufficient to activate NF-{kappa}B (13, 40), but the molecular mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated.

Light Side of UPR

UPR and cell survival. As described, in response to ER stress, cells adapt themselves to the stress condition via attenuation of general translation, induction of ER chaperones and foldases, and activation of ERAD to eliminate immature proteins. ER stress causes induction of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway, resulting in general inhibition of translation. In response to ER stress, activated ATF6 and XBP1 bind to ERSE and/or UPRE, leading to expression of ER chaperones including GRP78 and induction of ERAD factors. These pathways contribute to survival of cells under ER stress conditions (50).

UPR and cell differentiation. UPR provides not only prosurvival signals but also a wide spectrum of physiological signals. Individual branches of UPR have specialized roles in developmental and metabolic processes. For example, UPR is required during differentiation of some professional cells including plasma cells, pancreatic β cells, hepatocytes, osteoblasts, and myocytes (74, 120).


PLASMA CELL. During differentiation of B lymphocytes into plasma cells, UPR drives biogenesis of the ER and takes an essential part in the differentiation of B cells (100). In particular, the IRE1-XBP1 branch of UPR plays a crucial role. It is based on the facts that 1) IRE1-deficient B cells do not differentiate into plasma cells in vitro (134), 2) XBP1-deficient B cells fail to differentiate into plasma cells in vivo (98), and 3) ectopic expression of the spliced form of XBP1 restores immunoglobulin production in XBP1-deficient B cells in vitro (37).


PANCREATIC β CELL. PERK is an eIF2 protein kinase highly expressed in the pancreas. Deletion of PERK results in progressive loss of pancreatic β cells in both mice and humans (12, 23). PERK-deficient mice show defect in β cells and develop diabetes (23). In humans, mutations in the PERK gene cause Wolcott-Rallison syndrome which manifests as an infantile-onset, insulin-requiring diabetes (12). Furthermore, eIF2-knock-in mice in which all eIF2 kinases are dysregulated develop severe β cell dysfunction before birth (103).


HEPATOCYTE. Both IRE1- and XBP1-deficient mice exhibit hypoplastic fetal livers. In XBP1-null hepatocytes, cell growth is severely affected, and apoptosis is accelerated (97). PERK-deficient mice also show defect in hepatocytes (23), indicating that multiple branches of UPR are required for normal development of hepatocytes.


OSTEOBLAST. ATF4 induced by the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway regulates the onset of osteoblast differentiation, type I collagen synthesis, osteoblast-specific gene expression, and terminal differentiation of osteoblasts (125). Mice and humans deficient in the PERK gene have same abnormality of the bone trabeculae as that in ATF4-deficient mice (12, 135).


MYOCYTE. A previous report demonstrated activation of caspase-12 and induction of GRP78 and CHOP during differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts into myocytes (74). In this process, ATF6, but not other ER stress transducers, is activated and contributes to myocyte differentiation. Furthermore, induction of ER stress by tunicamycin or thapsigargin enhances myofiber formation (73), confirming the role of UPR in the differentiation of myoblasts.

ER Stress and Pathologies

Neurodegenerative disorder. Neurons are sensitive to protein aggregates, and a number of previous reports suggested that ER stress is involved in neurodegenerative disorders (18). For example, ER stress is caused in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease, and PERK and caspase-4 are activated in the onset of this disease (33, 84). Parkinson's disease is another extensively studied neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by a loss of dopaminergic neurons. Several previous reports suggested the link between ER stress and Parkinson's disease. For example, expression of ER chaperones is upregulated in the brain of patients with this disease (9), and Parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxins 6-hydroxydopamine and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium trigger UPR and consequent death of dopaminergic neurons (32). Involvement of ER stress in the pathogenesis of other neurodegenerative disorders has also been proposed by some investigators. Those include polyglutamine diseases, prion diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and GM1 gangliosidosis (132).

Diabetes mellitus. Type 1 diabetes is the most common autoimmune disease affecting almost 20 million people worldwide. This disease is thought to be caused by destruction of pancreatic β cells by autoreactive T cells. The link between ER stress and type 1 diabetes mellitus has been suggested by several investigators. For example, in Akita diabetic mice, ATF6 and XBP1 pathways are constitutively active in pancreatic β cells (78). PERK-deficient mice show symptoms characteristic of type 1 diabetes mellitus (23), and mice with a homozygous mutation at the eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation site show the similar pathological feature (102, 135). Furthermore, the onset of diabetes is delayed in CHOP-deficient mice (87).

ER stress may also be involved in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The insulin resistance and hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes are accommodated by an increase in proinsulin translation. Under this condition, UPR is activated, and prolonged activation of UPR may cause β cell death. A previous report showed that overexpression of 150-kDa oxygen-regulated protein (ORP150), an ER chaperone, in the liver of obese diabetic mice significantly improves insulin resistance and ameliorates glucose tolerance. Conversely, expression of antisense ORP150 in the liver of normal mice decreases insulin sensitivity, suggesting that ER stress plays a crucial role in the insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes (75). Consistent with this result, a recent report suggested usefulness of chemical chaperones for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (91). In this report, the authors showed that treatment of obese and diabetic mice with 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA), a chemical chaperone that stabilizes protein conformation and improves folding capacity of the ER, resulted in normalization of hyperglycemia, restoration of systemic insulin sensitivity, resolution of fatty liver disease, and enhancement of insulin action in liver, muscle, and adipose tissues (91).

Ischemic injury. Hypoxia and nutritional deprivation cause ER stress. Because of this reason, ER stress is an important pathogenic factor that triggers ischemic injury. For example, cerebral ischemia induces ER stress in neurons and activates UPR including the ATF6, IRE1, and PERK pathways (99), leading to CHOP-mediated apoptosis of neurons (108). Ischemia also induces ER stress in the heart, leading to degeneration of cardiomyocytes (4). Previous reports showed that overexpression of ORP150 ameliorates ischemic injury of several organs including the brain, kidney, and heart (2, 6, 110).

Cancer. Hypoxia is a common feature of malignant tumors with resistance to therapy and poor prognosis (17). Hypoxia induces ER chaperones including GRP78 and GRP94 (56). Upregulation of ER chaperones is observed in a variety of tumors, and expression of ER chaperones increases resistance of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Conversely, antisense-mediated inhibition of GRP78 sensitizes tumors to hypoxia, and in vivo inhibition of GRP78 also attenuates growth of tumors (17). In addition, UPR also induces the multidrug resistance gene MDR and thereby mediates drug resistance of tumor cells (55).

Autophagy is a lysosomal catabolic process involved in recycling of cellular components and maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Induction of autophagy may be linked to tumor survival by supporting its adaptation to hypoxic and malnutritional microenvironments (62). Recent reports elucidated that ER stress can induce autophagy (79, 131). This process may be another possible mechanism by which tumor cells acquire resistance to apoptosis through UPR.

UPR may also contribute to tumor growth in other ways, e.g., through induction of angiogenesis. Some previous reports showed that ER stress triggers expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent inducer of angiogenesis under hypoxia (1, 90). ER stress-inducible ORP150 facilitates correct processing and secretion of VEGF (89, 90). UPR thus contributes to tumor growth not only via protection of tumor cells from apoptosis but also via VEGF-mediated promotion of angiogenesis.

Atherosclerosis. One of the risk factors for atherosclerosis is accumulation of homocysteine, an intermediate product during the metabolism of sulfur amino acids. Previous reports showed that homocysteine induces ER stress that activates sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) in vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells (118). Activation of SREBPs causes increased expression of genes responsible for biosynthesis and intracellular accumulation of cholesterol/triglyceride. The homocysteine-triggered gene expression is inhibited by overexpression of ER chaperone GRP78 (118), indicating a direct role of ER stress in the activation of the cholesterol/triglyceride biosynthesis and acceleration of atherosclerosis.

Inflammation. ER stress has the potential to activate NF-{kappa}B in the acute phase (92). As described, UPR triggers activation of NF-{kappa}B through the IRE1-TRAF2 pathway (34, 46) and/or the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway (13, 40). It is therefore not surprising that ER stress causes some types of inflammation. A recent report showed that intestinal epithelial cells from mice and humans with inflammatory bowel diseases exhibit activation of UPR evidenced by upregulation of GRP78. The authors showed that increased GRP78 plays a crucial role in the activation of NF-{kappa}B via binding to IKK (107). ER stress may also be involved in autoimmune inflammation including rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune myositis (71, 124). Recently, we reported that systemic inflammatory responses caused by lipopolysaccharide are associated with upregulation of GRP78 in various organs including the lung, liver, kidney, spleen, and heart (30).

Viral infection. Infection by a wide range of viruses including hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, flavivirus, Borna disease virus, and Moloney murine leukemia virus induces ER stress, possibly because of synthesis of various viral proteins (132). UPR triggered by viral infection may contribute to local inflammation and facilitate the cells to undergo apoptosis, leading to hepatic injury, carcinogenesis, and neurodegeneration (132).

Mechanical stress-induced injury. It has been reported that ER stress may be involved in mechanical stress-related pathologies. For example, pressure overload by aortic constriction induces expression of ER chaperones and ER stress-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes in vivo (82). The similar pathological mechanism may also be involved in the injury of the urinary bladder suffered from outlet obstruction. We recently reported that outlet obstruction induces expression of ER stress markers, GRP78 and CHOP, in the bladder. It was associated with induction of markers for mechanical stress and hypoxia. In the bladder subjected to outlet obstruction, apoptosis was induced in the epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells, and in vivo administration with a chemical chaperone 4-PBA significantly attenuated apoptosis in the bladder (101).

Bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder is a common mood disease in which patients have recurrent episodes of mania and depression. Recent investigations suggested possible involvement of UPR in this disease. Genetic linkage studies and microarray analysis indicated that aberrant expression and/or function of XBP1 and GRP78 may be a risk factor for bipolar disorder (43, 44). Interestingly, mood-stabilizing drugs popularly used for the treatment of bipolar disorder can correct impaired function of XBP1 and increase expression of ER chaperones including GRP78 and GRP94 (44, 106).

ER Stress and Kidney Disease

Glomerular disease. Glomerular diseases are developed by various causes, but little is known about involvement of ER stress in glomerular injury. However, recent investigations suggest roles of ER stress in some types of glomerular disorders, especially proteinuric diseases caused by injury of podocytes.


CONGENITAL NEPHROTIC SYNDROME. Congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (CNF) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by massive proteinuria. The gene responsible for this disease encodes a podocyte-specific membrane protein, nephrin, the principal component of the slit diaphragm (49). More than 60 different mutations have been identified in patients with CNF, and the most common mutations are missense mutations resulting in single amino acid substitutions. A previous study showed that the majority of the missense mutations lead to protein misfolding and consequent retention of the mutants in the ER (60). Liu et al. (61) reported that a chemical chaperone 4-PBA rescues the mutants of nephrin to be transported to the plasma membrane to function similarly to the wild-type nephrin.

Mutation in podocin, a prohibitin homology domain protein that is also localized at the slit diaphragm, is another common cause of hereditary nephrotic syndrome in humans. The NPHS2 gene encoding podocin is linked to the autosomal recessive type of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Ohashi et al. (80) reported that the R138Q mutant of podocin, one of the most common missense mutations in the NPHS2 gene, is retained in the ER, suggesting that trafficking of the mutant podocin is disturbed. Treatment of the cells with chemical chaperones including glycerol, trimethylamine-N-oxide, and dimethylsulfoxide elicits cellular redistribution of R138Q podocin to the plasma membrane (80).

These results suggest a role of ER stress in some congenital nephrotic syndrome. Interestingly, Fujii et al. (19) reported that glucocorticoid, the most popular therapeutic agent for nephrosis, may exert an anti-proteinuric effect via facilitation of intracellular trafficking of nephrin under an ER stress condition. They found that glucose starvation evokes ER stress and formation of hypoglycosylated nephrin that is retained in the ER. Dexamethasone rescues the impaired trafficking and promotes synthesis of fully glycosylated nephrin.


MEMBRANOUS NEPHROPATHY. Passive Heymann nephritis in rodents is a model of membranous nephropathy in humans. In this model, complement C5b-9 induces injury of glomerular podocytes, resulting in proteinuria. Cybulsky et al. (11) reported that exposure of cultured podocytes to C5b-9 increases GRP78 and GRP94 mRNAs and proteins. Knockdown of GRP78 via antisense GRP78 enhances complement-dependent injury of cultured podocytes. In vivo, glomerular GRP78 and GRP94 proteins are upregulated in proteinuric rats with passive Heymann nephritis, and pretreatment of the rats with tunicamycin to induce GRP78 and GRP94 reduces proteinuria (11). The same group also showed that complements induce phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2{alpha} and that PERK and eIF2{alpha} phosphorylation is enhanced in glomeruli of rats with Heymann nephritis. Fibroblasts from PERK-deficient mice are more susceptible to complement-mediated cytotoxicity, suggesting a prosurvival role of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} branch of UPR (10). These results suggested that complement-induced podocyte injury in vitro and in vivo is associated, possibly mediated by ER stress, and that ER stress may be involved in the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy. Using immunohistochemical staining, Bek et al. (7) recently reported upregulation of CHOP in podocytes of proteinuric human kidneys (membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and minimal change nephropathy) as well as kidneys of rats with puromycin nephrosis, a model of minimal change nephropathy.


ISCHEMIC INJURY. Using an in vitro model of ischemia-reperfusion (2-deoxyglucose plus antimycin A followed by glucose re-exposure), Cybulsky et al. (10) reported that podocytes subjected to ischemia-reperfusion exhibit phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2{alpha}. They also found that PERK-deficient fibroblasts are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion-triggered cellular death, indicating an anti-apoptotic role of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} branch of UPR in ischemic injury of podocytes.


HOMOCYSTEINE-INDUCED INJURY. Hyperhomocysteinemia is regarded as a critical risk factor in the progression to end-stage renal diseases. Recent reports suggested a possibility that hyperhomocysteinemia may directly act on glomerular cells to induce glomerular dysfunction and consequent glomerulosclerosis (128). For instance, Yi et al. (127) reported progression of podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis in hyperhomocysteinemic rats. It is known that ER stress is considered as an important mechanism that causes several pathologies, especially vascular injury, in hyperhomocysteinemia (86, 118). ER stress caused by hyperhomocysteinemia is possibly involved in glomerular injury and glomerulosclerosis.

Tubular disease. Acute renal failure is caused by a variety of triggers including hypoxia/ischemia, heavy metal intoxication, sepsis, and nephrotoxic agents such as antibiotics, anticancer agents, immunosuppressants, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In general, acute renal failure is characterized by tubular cell damage, apoptosis, and/or necrosis. In particular, apoptosis is thought to play a prominent role in the development of tubular injury during acute renal failure (114).


ISCHEMIC INJURY. Montie et al. (68) reported that cardiac arrest-induced ischemia and subsequent reperfusion cause phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2{alpha} in the rat kidney, especially in tubular epithelial cells. This observation indicates that renal ischemia-reperfusion induces ER stress, activates UPR, and causes cellular damage in the renal tubules. Bando et al. (6) provided another evidence for the crucial role of ER stress in renal ischemic injury. They found that renal tissues from patients with acute renal failure display strong induction of the ER chaperone ORP150. In a rodent model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury, ORP150 is induced in the kidney, principally in the renal tubules. Cultured tubular cells exposed to hypoxia display induction of ORP150. Tubular cells transfected with ORP150 exhibit resistance to hypoxic stress, whereas knockdown of ORP150 by antisense ORP150 makes the cells susceptible to hypoxic cell death (6). Furthermore, transgenic mice overexpressing ORP150 are resistant to renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. In contrast, mice with lower levels of ORP150 show enhanced ischemic injury (6). These data suggest a key role for ER stress in the ischemic renal tubular injury.


HEAVY METAL INTOXICATION. Several heavy metals induce renal tubular injury. One of the most famous examples is the nephrotoxicity of cadmium. Environmental exposures to cadmium via drinking water, foods, and cigarette smoke cause accumulation of this metal in a variety of organs, especially in the kidney (36). A typical example is Itai-itai disease in Japan, in which cadmium poisoning was caused via prolonged ingestion of industrially polluted water and rice. A characteristic clinical feature of Itai-itai disease is renal insufficiency manifested by tubular injury and dysfunction (77). Previous investigations suggested that toxic effects of cadmium on the tubules are caused through several mechanisms, e.g., structural alterations in junctional complexes (disruption of tight and gap junctions) and cellular death caused by oxidative stress (39, 111). In addition to these mechanisms, we and others (58, 129) recently reported a pathological role of ER stress in cadmium-induced apoptosis of tubular cells. We found that cadmium elicits ER stress in tubular cells in vitro and in vivo and consequently causes apoptosis. Overexpression of ER chaperone GRP78 or ORP150 suppresses cadmium-triggered apoptosis. In response to cadmium, activation of the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway, the ATF6 pathway, and the IRE1-XBP1 pathway is induced. In LLC-PK1 cells, the ATF6 pathway and the IRE1 pathway were mainly proapoptotic via induction of CHOP, activation of XBP1, and consequent phosphorylation of JNK. In contrast, the PERK-eIF2{alpha} pathway was anti-apoptotic and counteracted the effects of proapoptotic UPR (129). Interestingly, ER stress is triggered not only by cadmium but also by several other nephrotoxic metals (129), indicating a possibility that the similar mechanism is generally involved in metal-induced renal injury.

Previous studies indicated involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cadmium-induced renal tubular injury. For example, exposure of LLC-PK1 cells to cadmium causes generation of ROS, which is associated with a decrease in glutathione levels and consequent cellular death (20, 96). Another report showed that cadmium-triggered apoptosis of tubular cells is inhibited by an antioxidant (112). Recently, we demonstrated that cadmium-induced ER stress is inhibited by antioxidants (130). In contrast, suppression of ER stress does not attenuate cadmium-triggered oxidative stress, suggesting that ER stress is downstream of oxidative stress (130). We also found that O2bullet is selectively involved in cadmium-triggered, ER stress-mediated apoptosis through activation of the ATF6-CHOP and IRE1-XBP1 pathways (130).


ANTICANCER AGENT. Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent used for the treatment of various solid tumors. Despite its therapeutic effectiveness, its nephrotoxic side effects significantly limit the clinical use. Cisplatin has multiple intracellular effects including direct cytotoxicity via generation of ROS, activation of MAP kinases, and induction of inflammation and fibrogenesis via generation of cytokines (126). In particular, ROS have been considered as important mediators for cisplatin-induced tubular injury. Liu and Baliga (59) showed that, in cisplatin-treated tubular cells, cleavage of procaspase-12 precedes that of caspases-3 and -9. They also showed that transfection with anti-caspase-12 antibody significantly attenuates cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, ER stress preconditioning to induce ER chaperones is effective for attenuation of cisplatin cytotoxicity in tubular cell lines including LLC-PK1, NRK-52E, and HEK293 cells (93). These results suggest that ER stress and consequent activation of caspase-12 play a pivotal role in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Indeed, Peyrou et al. (94) recently provided in vivo evidence for the involvement of ER stress in cisplatin-induced renal injury. They showed that, after administration with cisplatin in rats, activation of the XBP1 pathway and cleavage of procaspase-12 are observed in the kidney.


NSAID. A previous report showed that certain NSAIDs cause ER stress in gastric mucosal cells (113). Recently, we also found that indomethacin, but not other NSAIDs tested, induces ER stress in murine podocytes (83). It is known that NSAIDs exert nephrotoxicity (65), and ER stress may underlie the nephrotoxic effects of NSAIDs. Indeed, Lorz et al. (63) reported that paracetamol (also known as acetaminophen) induces apoptosis of tubular epithelial cells, which is correlated with upregulation of CHOP and cleavage of procaspase-12.


IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT. Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK506), improve allograft survival in organ transplantation. However, chronic allograft dysfunction is the major hindrance to long-term graft survival, and nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors may be one of the major factors responsible for chronic allograft dysfunction (119). Justo et al. (42) reported that tubular cell apoptosis induced by CsA is associated with induction of CHOP. We found that, in renal tubular cells, CsA and FK506 cause upregulation of endogenous and exogenous indicators for ER stress. The induction of ER stress by these agents is reversible and observed similarly in several other nonimmune cells. Systemic administration with CsA into mice also causes rapid, significant induction of ER stress in the kidney (16). Furthermore, Peyrou and Cribb (93) reported that ER stress preconditioning is effective for decreasing the toxicity of CsA in tubular cell lines including LLC-PK1, NRK-52E, and HEK293 cells. These results suggest a role of ER stress in the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors.


ANTIBIOTIC. Aminoglycosides are major nephrotoxic antibiotics that cause tubular injury. The toxicity of aminoglycosides is related to their uptake by proximal tubular cells and disruption of metabolism of anionic phospholipids, especially phosphoinositides (45). Jin et al. (41) reported that geneticin causes cleavage of m-calpain and procaspase-12 in NRK cells, indicating involvement of ER stress. Peyrou et al. (93) reported that ER stress preconditioning is effective for decreasing the toxicity of gentamicin in LLC-PK1 cells. They also showed that, after administration with gentamicin in rats, activation of the XBP1 pathway and cleavage of procaspase-12 are induced in the kidney (94).


NEPHROTOXIC CYSTEINE CONJUGATE. Nephrotoxic cysteine conjugate (NCC) such as S-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl)-L-cysteine (TFEC) generates reactive acylating species in the proximal tubules and is used to induce injury of renal tubules in vitro and in vivo. Previous reports showed that ER stress preconditioning prevents NCC-induced toxicity in LLC-PK1 cells. For example, Asmellash et al. (3) reported that ER stress preconditioning protects the proximal tubular cells against a subsequent challenge with TFEC. Furthermore, they also showed that attenuation of GRP78 expression by antisense GRP78 abrogates the protective effect, indicating that ER stress is involved in the NCC-induced injury of renal tubular cells.


PROTEINURIA-ASSOCIATED INJURY. Chronic proteinuria is considered as a pathogenic factor in tubulointerstitial damage. Ohse et al. (81) reported that viability of tubular cells decreases after exposure to bovine serum albumin. It is associated with induction of ER chaperones including GRP78 and ORP150 and activation of caspase-12. Furthermore, they also demonstrated that upregulation of ER stress indicators as well as activation of caspase-12 are observed in proximal tubules of experimental proteinuric rats. These results indicate that renal tubules exposed to high albumin concentrations exhibit ER stress, which may result in tubular injury.


AGING-RELATED TUBULOINTERSTITIAL DAMAGE. Tubulointerstitial damage is observed in a variety of chronic kidney diseases. Kimura et al. (51) generated an ER stress-sensitive knock-in mouse that expresses a mutant GRP78 in which the retrieval sequence to the ER is deleted. The heterozygous transgenic mice showed accelerated tubulointerstitial lesions during aging. Furthermore, tubulointerstitial damage caused by chronic protein overload was also accelerated in the transgenic mice.

ER Stress and Physiological Event: Renal Development and Hormonal Response

As described, UPR plays an important role in the development of professional cells including plasma cells, pancreatic β cells, hepatocytes, osteoblasts, and myocytes (102). Currently, information is limited regarding whether and how ER stress and UPR are involved in the renal development, but a previous report showed that expression of GRP78 is induced in developing metanephric kidneys (95). Further investigation will be required to clarify developmental significance of this observation.

Vasopressin regulates water and solute transport in the renal collecting duct. Using a proteomic analysis, van Balkom et al. (116) reported that subcutaneous infusion of vasopressin in Brattleboro rats causes induction of GRP78 in the inner medullary collecting ducts, implying a possible involvement of UPR in the physiological action of vasopressin.

ER Stress and Oxidative Stress

We recently reported that ROS including O2bullet and ONOO cause ER stress in renal proximal tubular cells (130). Consistent with this result, some previous reports also indicated that ER stress may be involved downstream of oxidative stress. For example, in brain tumor cells, geldanamycin (an inhibitor of 90-kDa heat shock protein) causes expression of GRP78 via a ROS-dependent mechanism (54). In vascular endothelial cells, ONOO causes modest increases in GRP78 and GRP94 proteins (15). In the ischemic brain, induction of ATF4 and CHOP is attenuated in transgenic mice and rats overexpressing superoxide dismutase (26). Currently, it is unclear how ROS induce ER stress. Previous reports showed that oxidative stress causes inhibition of Ca2+-ATPase (47, 69). One possibility is that ROS cause depletion of calcium stores in the ER via inhibition of Ca2+-ATPase (117). Another possibility is that ROS may cause ER stress through generation and accumulation of oxidatively modified, abnormal proteins. Unfolded proteins may also be accumulated in the ER through ROS-induced functional perturbation of ER foldases and/or chaperones (8). Interestingly, Hung et al. (35) reported that ER stress preconditioning confers resistance to subsequent H2O2-induced injury in renal tubular epithelial cells. Stable transfection of the cells with antisense RNA targeting GRP78 sensitized the cells to the H2O2-induced injury, suggesting that UPR-induced GRP78 is involved in the self-defense of the cells against oxidative stress. They also found that 1) ERK and JNK are transiently phosphorylated in response to H2O2, 2) ER stress-preconditioned cells have more ERK and less JNK phosphorylation, 3) inhibition of JNK or activation of ERK protected cells against toxicity of H2O2, and 4) antisense RNA targeting GRP78 attenuated ERK activation and JNK phosphorylation following exposure to H2O2 (35). Thus, the ER stress response modulates the balance between the ERK and JNK signaling pathways and may be involved in the regulation of MAP kinases by oxidative stress.

Nitric oxide (NO) is another multifunctional molecule involved in a variety of pathophysiological processes including regulation of blood vessel dilatation, immune responses, and neurotransmission. It is known that ER stress is caused by NO, and consequent induction of CHOP is involved in NO-induced apoptosis (21). For example, induction of UPR including activation of ATF6 and expression of CHOP is observed in cells exposed to NO, and cells from CHOP-deficient mice show resistance to NO-induced apoptosis (22, 87). Although molecular mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated, disturbance of Ca2+ homeostasis may be implicated in NO-induced ER stress (88, 123). It is because NO inhibits sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase by tyrosine nitration within the channel-like domain (122).

ROS and NO are involved in a wide range of cellular events in the kidney under various pathophysiological circumstances. The fact that ER stress can be elicited by ROS and NO raises a possibility that ER stress and UPR can also be involved in a variety of renal pathophysiologies.

ER Stress and Inflammatory Response

Several previous reports showed that ER stress causes activation of inflammation-related transcription factor NF-{kappa}B (13, 34, 40, 46). Under ER stress, IRE1{alpha} binds to the IKK complex and activates NF-{kappa}B by promoting degradation of I{kappa}Bs. Moreover, IRE1{alpha} binds to TRAF2 and ASK1, leading to activation of IKK (121). Because of this reason, to date, the proinflammatory aspect of ER stress has been emphasized. However, we recently reported that preceding ER stress may blunt subsequent activation of NF-{kappa}B. We found that, in glomerular podocytes and mesangial cells, expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and inducible NO synthase in response to TNF-{alpha} is abrogated by UPR-inducing agents K-7174 and geranylgeranylacetone (GGA) (25, 109). The suppression of gene expression by these agents was associated with suppression of NF-{kappa}B activation. Induction of UPR by other inducers of ER stress also reproduces the suppressive effects of K-7174 and GGA on NF-{kappa}B and NF-{kappa}B-dependent genes (25, 109). These results indicated a possibility that, although ER stress activates NF-{kappa}B in the early phase, consequent UPR suppresses cellular responses to subsequent inflammatory stimuli in the later phase.

Molecular mechanisms involved in the anti-inflammatory potential of UPR are largely unknown. However, we found that A20, one of major negative regulators for NF-{kappa}B, is induced by ER stress, suggesting a possible involvement of this molecule in the blunted responses to inflammatory stimuli under ER stress conditions (24). Currently, it is unclear how A20 is induced by ER stress, but previous reports showed that expression of A20 is regulated by NF-{kappa}B (53). The induction of A20 by ER stress may be mediated by the early, transient activation of NF-{kappa}B.

In the TNF-{alpha} signaling, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), TNFR1-associated death domain (TRADD), TNFR-interacting protein (RIP), and TRAF2 are essential for NF-{kappa}B activation. The initial event in TNF-{alpha}-induced activation of NF-{kappa}B is the ligand-induced formation of a multimeric TNFR1 complex. Formation of this TNF/TNFR1 complex causes its interaction with the adaptor protein TRADD and recruits TRAF2 and RIP into the signaling complex. TRAF2 then recruits the IKK complex, leading to activation of IKK by RIP (14). Recently, Hu et al. (34) reported that, in thapsigargin (inhibitor of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase)- or tunicamycin (inhibitor of protein glycosylation)-treated cells, TNFR1, TRADD, and RIP proteins are maintained at the same levels as those in untreated cells, whereas the level of TRAF2 protein is selectively downregulated. The decrease in TRAF2 protein is not due to transcriptional suppression or increased turnover of mRNA but due to enhanced protein degradation. The blunted responses of NF-{kappa}B to TNF-{alpha} under ER stress may be caused by downregulation of TRAF2.

Although ER stress may induce proinflammatory molecules via activation NF-{kappa}B in the early phase, consequent ER stress response may suppress cellular activation in the later phase. It may play a role in halting progression of acute inflammation and in leading to its subsidence. Currently, molecular mechanisms underlying the "Janus faces" of UPR in the regulation of NF-{kappa}B are unclear, but the mechanism for the biphasic regulation of cell fates by UPR, described in the section of UPR and Cell Fate, may also explain the biphasic action of UPR on NF-{kappa}B.

Future Perspective: Unanswered Questions

Accumulating evidence suggests roles of ER stress and UPR in a wide range of renal pathophysiologies. The current knowledge on the relationship between ER stress and the kidney was summarized in Table 1. However, the majority of previous studies provided only phenomenological evidence, e.g., induction of ER stress markers under particular pathophysiological situations. Extensive investigation will be required to examine how ER stress and UPR contribute to particular renal pathophysiologies. ER stress/UPR has Janus faces. It is essential to disclose not only its dark side (pathological significance) but also its light side (developmental and physiological significance) in the kidney. In particular, binary roles of ER stress in inflammatory responses and oxidative stress-induced injury should be clarified in the future. In addition, there are almost no reports regarding roles of ER stress in endothelial function and tubulointerstitial injury in the kidney. Similarly, no information is available regarding kidney-specific ER chaperoning systems. Answering these unanswered questions should be our next targets of investigation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in kidney disease

 


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Kitamura, Dept. of Molecular Signaling, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, Univ. of Yamanashi, Shimokato 1110, Chuo, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan (e-mail: masanori{at}yamanashi.ac.jp)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abcouwer SF, Marjon PL, Loper RK, Vander Jagt DL. Response of VEGF expression to amino acid deprivation and inducers of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 2791–2798, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Aleshin AN, Sawa Y, Kitagawa-Sakakida S, Bando Y, Ono M, Memon IA, Tohyama M, Ogawa S, Matsuda H. 150-kDa oxygen-regulated protein attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 38: 517–525, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Asmellash S, Stevens JL, Ichimura T. Modulating the endoplasmic reticulum stress response with trans-4,5-dihydroxy-1,2-dithiane prevents chemically induced renal injury in vivo. Toxicol Sci 88: 576–584, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Azfer A, Niu J, Rogers LM, Adamski FM, Kolattukudy PE. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress response during the development of ischemic heart disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H1411–H1420, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Badr CE, Hewett JW, Breakefield XO, Tannous BA. A highly sensitive assay for monitoring the secretory pathway and ER stress. PLoS ONE 2: e571, 2007.
  6. Bando Y, Tsukamoto Y, Katayama T, Ozawa K, Kitao Y, Hori O, Stern DM, Yamauchi A, Ogawa S. ORP150/HSP12A protects renal tubular epithelium from ischemia-induced cell death. FASEB J 18: 1401–1403, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bek MF, Bayer M, Müller B, Greiber S, Lang D, Schwab A, August C, Springer E, Rohrbach R, Huber TB, Benzing T, Pavenstädt H. Expression and function of C/EBP homology protein (GADD153) in podocytes. Am J Pathol 168: 20–32, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Brunet S, Thibault L, Lepage G, Seidman EG, Dubé N, Levy E. Modulation of endoplasmic reticulum-bound cholesterol regulatory enzymes by iron/ascorbate-mediated lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 28: 46–54, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Conn KJ, Gao W, McKee A, Lan MS, Ullman MD, Eisenhauer PB, Fine RE, Wells JM. Identification of the protein disulfide isomerase family member PDIp in experimental Parkinson's disease and Lewy body pathology. Brain Res 1022: 164–172, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Cybulsky AV, Takano T, Papillon J, Bijian K. Role of the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response in glomerular epithelial cell injury. J Biol Chem 280: 24396–24403, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cybulsky AV, Takano T, Papillon J, Khadir A, Liu J, Peng H. Complement C5b-9 membrane attack complex increases expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in glomerular epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 277: 41342–41351, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Delepine M, Nicolino M, Barrett T, Golamaully M, Lathrop GM, Julier C. EIF2AK3, encoding translation initiation factor 2-{alpha} kinase 3, is mutated in patients with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome. Nat Genet 25: 406–409, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Deng J, Lu PD, Zhang Y, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Sonenberg N, Harding HP, Ron D. Translational repression mediates activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B by phosphorylated translation initiation factor 2. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10161–10168, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Devin A, Lin Y, Yamaoka S, Li Z, Karin M, Liu Z. The {alpha} and β subunits of I{kappa}B kinase (IKK) mediate TRAF2-dependent IKK recruitment to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1 in response to TNF. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3986–3994, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dickhout JG, Hossain GS, Pozza LM, Zhou J, Lhotak S, Austin RC. Peroxynitrite causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human vascular endothelium: implications in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 2623–2629, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Du S, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K, Kasai A, Okamura M, Shimada T, Yao J, Takeda M, Sawada N, Paton AW, Paton JC, Kitamura M. Novel, anti-inflammatory potential of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus (FK506) via induction of unfolded protein response (Abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 18: F-PO587, 2007.
  17. Feldman DE, Chauhan V, Koong AC. The unfolded protein response: a novel component of the hypoxic stress response in tumors. Mol Cancer Res 3: 597–605, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Forman MS, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. "Unfolding" pathways in neurodegenerative disease. Trends Neurosci 26: 407–410, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Fujii Y, Khoshnoodi J, Takenaka H, Hosoyamada M, Nakajo A, Bessho F, Kudo A, Takahashi S, Arimura Y, Yamada A, Nagasawa T, Ruotsalainen V, Tryggvason K, Lee AS, Yan K. The effect of dexamethasone on defective nephrin transport caused by ER stress: a potential mechanism for the therapeutic action of glucocorticoids in the acquired glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 69: 1350–1359, 2006.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Gennari A, Cortese E, Boveri M, Casado J, Prieto P. Sensitive endpoints for evaluating cadmium-induced acute toxicity in LLC-PK1 cells. Toxicology 183: 211–220, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Gotoh T, Mori M. Nitric oxide and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26: 1439–1446, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gotoh T, Oyadomari S, Mori K, Mori M. Nitric oxide-induced apoptosis in RAW 264.7 macrophages is mediated by endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway involving ATF6 and CHOP. J Biol Chem 277: 12343–12350, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Harding HP, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Jungries R, Chung P, Plesken H, Sabatini DD, Ron D. Diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in perk–/– mice reveals a role for translational control in secretory cell survival. Mol Cell 7: 1153–1163, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Hayakawa K, Hiramatsu N, Okamura M, Yamazaki H, Yao J, Paton AW, Paton JC, Kitamura M. Acquisition of anergy to proinflammatory cytokines in nonimmune cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress response: a mechanism for subsidence of inflammation. J Immunol. In press.
  25. Hayakawa K, Hiramatsu N, Okamura M, Yao J, Paton AW, Paton JC, Kitamura M. Blunted activation of NF-{kappa}B and NF-{kappa}B-dependent gene expression by geranylgeranylacetone: involvement of unfolded protein response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 365: 47–53, 2008.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Hayashi T, Saito A, Okuno S, Ferrand-Drake M, Dodd RL, Chan PH. Damage to the endoplasmic reticulum and activation of apoptotic machinery by oxidative stress in ischemic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25: 41–53, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. He H, McColl K, Distelhorst CW. Involvement of c-Fos in signaling grp78 induction following ER calcium release. Oncogene 19: 5936–5943, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Hewett JW, Tannous B, Niland BP, Nery FC, Zeng J, Li Y, Breakefield XO. Mutant torsinA interferes with protein processing through the secretory pathway in DYT1 dystonia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 7271–7276, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hiramatsu N, Kasai A, Du S, Takeda M, Hayakawa K, Okamura M, Yao J, Kitamura M. Rapid, transient induction of ER stress in the liver and kidney after acute exposure to heavy metal: evidence from transgenic sensor mice. FEBS Lett 581: 2055–2059, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Hiramatsu N, Kasai A, Hayakawa K, Yao J, Kitamura M. Real-time detection and continuous monitoring of ER stress in vitro and in vivo by ES-TRAP: evidence for systemic, transient ER stress during endotoxemia. Nucleic Acids Res 34: e93, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hiramatsu N, Kasai A, Meng Y, Hayakawa K, Yao J, Kitamura M. Alkaline phosphatase vs. luciferase as secreted reporter molecules in vivo. Anal Biochem 339: 249–256, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Holtz WA, O'Malley KL. Parkinsonian mimetics induce aspects of unfolded protein response in death of dopaminergic neurons. J Biol Chem 278: 19367–19377, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hoozemans JJ, Veerhuis R, Van Haastert ES, Rozemuller JM, Baas F, Eikelenboom P, Scheper W. The unfolded protein response is activated in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 110: 165–172, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Hu P, Han Z, Couvillon AD, Kaufman RJ, Exton JH. Autocrine tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} links endoplasmic reticulum stress to the membrane death receptor pathway through IRE1{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B activation and downregulation of TRAF2 expression. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3071–3084, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hung CC, Ichimura T, Stevens JL, Bonventre JV. Protection of renal epithelial cells against oxidative injury by endoplasmic reticulum stress preconditioning is mediated by ERK1/2 activation. J Biol Chem 278: 29317–29326, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. IPCS. Cadmium. Environmental Health Criteria 134, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1992.
  37. Iwakoshi NN, Lee AH, Vallabhajosyula P, Otipoby KL, Rajewsky K, Glimcher LH. Plasma cell differentiation and the unfolded protein response intersect at the transcription factor XBP1. Nat Immun 4: 321–329, 2003.[CrossRef]
  38. Iwawaki T, Akai R, Kohno K, Miura M. A transgenic mouse model for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Med 10: 98–102, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Jeong SH, Habeebu SS, Klaassen CD. Cadmium decreases gap junctional intercellular communication in mouse liver. Toxicol Sci 57: 156–166, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Jiang HY, Wek SA, McGrath BC, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Cavener DR, Wek RC. Phosphorylation of the {alpha} subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 is required for activation of NF-{kappa}B in response to diverse cellular stresses. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5651–5663, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Jin QH, Zhao B, Zhang XJ. Cytochrome c release and endoplasmic reticulum stress are involved in caspase-dependent apoptosis induced by G418. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 1816–1825, 2004.[Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Justo P, Lorz C, Sanz A, Egido J, Ortiz A. Intracellular mechanisms of cyclosporin A-induced tubular cell apoptosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 3072–3080, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Kakiuchi C, Ishiwata M, Nanko S, Kunugi H, Minabe Y, Nakamura K, Mori N, Fujii K, Umekage T, Tochigi M, Kohda K, Sasaki T, Yamada K, Yoshikawa T, Kato T. Functional polymorphisms of HSPA5: possible association with bipolar disorder. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 336: 1136–1143, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Kakiuchi C, Iwamoto K, Ishiwata M, Bundo M, Kasahara T, Kusumi I, Tsujita T, Okazaki Y, Nanko S, Kunugi H, Sasaki T, Kato T. Impaired feedback regulation of XBP1 as a genetic risk factor for bipolar disorder. Nat Genet 35: 171–175, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Kaloyanides GJ. Antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9, Suppl 4: 130–134, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Kaneko M, Niinuma Y, Nomura Y. Activation signal of nuclear factor-{kappa}B in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress is transduced via IRE1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2. Biol Pharm Bull 26: 931–935, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Kaplan P, Babusikova E, Lehotsky J, Dobrota D. Free radical-induced protein modification and inhibition of Ca2+-ATPase of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biochem 248: 41–47, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Kaufman RJ. Orchestrating the unfolded protein response in health and disease. J Clin Invest 110: 1389–1398, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  49. Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, Ruotsalainen V, Morita T, Nissinen M, Herva R, Kashtan CE, Peltonen L, Holmberg C, Olsen A, Tryggvason K. Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein-nephrin-is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1: 575–582, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Murakami S. Role of the unfolded protein response in cell death. Apoptosis 11: 5–13, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Kimura K, Jin H, Ogawa M, Aoe T. Dysfunction of the ER chaperone BiP accelerates the renal tubular injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 366: 1048–1053, 2008.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Kozutsumi Y, Segal M, Normington K, Gething MJ, Sambrook J. The presence of malfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum signals the induction of glucose-regulated proteins. Nature 332: 462–464, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  53. Krikos A, Laherty CD, Dixit VM. Transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor {alpha}-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by {kappa}B elements. J Biol Chem 267: 17971–17976, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Lai MT, Huang KL, Chang WM, Lai YK. Geldanamycin induction of grp78 requires activation of reactive oxygen species via ER stress responsive elements in 9L rat brain tumour cells. Cell Signal 15: 585–595, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Ledoux S, Yang R, Friedlander G, Laouari D. Glucose depletion enhances P-glycoprotein expression in hepatoma cells: role of endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Cancer Res 63: 7284–7290, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Lee AS. The glucose-regulated proteins: stress induction and clinical applications. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 504–510, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Lin JH, Li H, Yasumura D, Cohen HR, Zhang C, Panning B, Shokat KM, Lavail MM, Walter P. IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response. Science 318: 944–949, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Liu F, Inageda K, Nishitai G, Matsuoka M. Cadmium induces the expression of Grp78, an endoplasmic reticulum molecular chaperone, in LLC-PK1 renal epithelial cells. Environ Health Perspect 114: 859–864, 2006.[Web of Science][Medline]
  59. Liu H, Baliga R. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated caspase-12 mediates cisplatin-induced LLC-PK1 cell apoptosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1985–1992, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Liu L, Done SC, Khoshnoodi J, Bertorello A, Wartiovaara J, Berggren PO, Tryggvason K. Defective nephrin trafficking caused by missense mutations in the NPHS1 gene: insight into the mechanisms of congenital nephrotic syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 10: 2637–2644, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Liu XL, Doné SC, Yan K, Kilpeläinen P, Pikkarainen T, Tryggvason K. Defective trafficking of nephrin missense mutants rescued by a chemical chaperone. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1731–1738, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Lorin S, Codogno P, Djavaheri-Mergny M. Autophagy: a new concept in cancer research. Bull Cancer 95: 43–50, 2008.[Web of Science][Medline]
  63. Lorz C, Justo P, Sanz A, Subirá D, Egido J, Ortiz A. Paracetamol-induced renal tubular injury: a role for ER stress. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 380–389, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Ma Y, Brewer JW, Diehl JA, Hendershot LM. Two distinct stress signaling pathways converge upon the CHOP promoter during the mammalian unfolded protein response. J Mol Biol 318: 1351–1365, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  65. Maniglia R, Schwartz AB, Moriber-Katz S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory nephrotoxicity. Ann Clin Lab Sci 18: 240–252, 1988.[Abstract]
  66. Mao C, Dong D, Little E, Luo S, Lee AS. Transgenic mouse model for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress in vivo. Nat Med 10: 1013–1014, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  67. McCullough KD, Martindale JL, Klotz LO, Aw TY, Holbrook NJ. Gadd153 sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress by downregulating Bcl2 and perturbing the cellular redox state. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1249–1259, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Montie HL, Kayali F, Haezebrouck AJ, Rossi NF, Degracia DJ. Renal ischemia and reperfusion activates the eIF2{alpha} kinase PERK. Biochim Biophys Acta 1741: 314–324, 2005.[Medline]
  69. Moreau VH, Castilho RF, Ferreira ST, Carvalho-Alves PC. Oxidative damage to sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase AT submicromolar iron concentrations: evidence for metal-catalyzed oxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 25: 554–560, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  70. Morishima N, Nakanishi K, Takenouchi H, Shibata T, Yasuhiko Y. An endoplasmic reticulum stress-specific caspase cascade in apoptosis. Cytochrome c-independent activation of caspase-9 by caspase-12. J Biol Chem 277: 34287–34294, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Nagaraju K, Casciola-Rosen L, Lundberg I, Rawat R, Cutting S, Thapliyal R, Chang J, Dwivedi S, Mitsak M, Chen YW, Plotz P, Rosen A, Hoffman E, Raben N. Activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in autoimmune myositis: potential role in muscle fiber damage and dysfunction. Arthritis Rheum 52: 1824–1835, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  72. Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA, Yuan J. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-β. Nature 403: 98–103, 2003.[CrossRef]
  73. Nakanishi K, Dohmae N, Morishima N. Endoplasmic reticulum stress increases myofiber formation in vitro. FASEB J 21: 2994–3003, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Nakanishi K, Sudo T, Morishima N. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling transmitted by ATF6 mediates apoptosis during muscle development. J Cell Biol 169: 555–560, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Nakatani Y, Kaneto H, Kawamori D, Yoshiuchi K, Hatazaki M, Matsuoka TA, Ozawa K, Ogawa S, Hori M, Yamasaki Y, Matsuhisa M. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in insulin resistance and diabetes. J Biol Chem 280: 847–851, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Nishitoh H, Matsuzawa A, Tobiume K, Saegusa K, Takeda K, Inoue K, Hori S, Kakizuka A, Ichijo H. ASK1 is essential for endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced neuronal cell death triggered by expanded polyglutamine repeats. Genes Dev 16: 1345–1355, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Nogawa K. Itai-itai disease and follow-up studies. In: Cadmium in the Environment, edited by Nriagu JO. New York: John Wiley and Son, 1981, p. 1–37.
  78. Nozaki J, Kubota H, Yoshida H, Naitoh M, Goji J, Yoshinaga T, Mori K, Koizumi A, Nagata K. The endoplasmic reticulum stress response is stimulated through the continuous activation of transcription factors ATF6 and XBP1 in Ins2+/Akita pancreatic β cells. Genes Cells 9: 261–270, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Ogata M, Hino S, Saito A, Morikawa K, Kondo S, Kanemoto S, Murakami T, Taniguchi M, Tanii I, Yoshinaga K, Shiosaka S, Hammarback JA, Urano F, Imaizumi K. Autophagy is activated for cell survival after endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9220–9231, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Ohashi T, Uchida K, Uchida S, Sasaki S, Nihei H. Intracellular mislocalization of mutant podocin and correction by chemical chaperones. Histochem Cell Biol 119: 257–264, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  81. Ohse T, Inagi R, Tanaka T, Ota T, Miyata T, Kojima I, Ingelfinger JR, Ogawa S, Fujita T, Nangaku M. Albumin induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in renal proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int 70: 1447–1455, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  82. Okada K, Minamino T, Tsukamoto Y, Liao Y, Tsukamoto O, Takashima S, Hirata A, Fujita M, Nagamachi Y, Nakatani T, Yutani C, Ozawa K, Ogawa S, Tomoike H, Hori M, Kitakaze M. Prolonged endoplasmic reticulum stress in hypertrophic and failing heart after aortic constriction: possible contribution of endoplasmic reticulum stress to cardiac myocyte apoptosis. Circulation 110: 705–712, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Okamura M, Takano Y, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K, Kasai A, Yao J, Kitamura M. Suppression of cytokine response in podocytes by indomethacin: involvement of unfolded protein response (Abstract). Proc BMB: 4P-0584, 2007.
  84. Onuki R, Bando Y, Suyama E, Katayama T, Kawasaki H, Baba T, Tohyama M, Taira K. An RNA-dependent protein kinase is involved in tunicamycin-induced apoptosis and Alzheimer's disease. EMBO J 23: 959–968, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  85. Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B, Nicotera P. Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 552–565, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  86. Outinen PA, Sood SK, Pfeifer SI, Pamidi S, Podor TJ, Li J, Weitz JI, Austin RC. Homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and growth arrest leads to specific changes in gene expression in human vascular endothelial cells. Blood 94: 959–967, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Oyadomari S, Koizumi A, Takeda K, Gotoh T, Akira S, Araki E, Mori M. Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated diabetes. J Clin Invest 109: 525–532, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  88. Oyadomari S, Takeda K, Takiguchi M, Gotoh T, Matsumoto M, Wada I, Akira S, Araki E, Mori M. Nitric oxide-induced apoptosis in pancreatic β cells is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10845–10850, 2006.[CrossRef]
  89. Ozawa K, Kuwabara K, Tamatani M, Takatsuji K, Tsukamoto Y, Kaneda S, Yanagi H, Stern DM, Eguchi Y, Tsujimoto Y, Ogawa S, Tohyama M. 150-kDa oxygen-regulated protein (ORP150) suppresses hypoxia-induced apoptotic cell death. J Biol Chem 274: 6397–6404, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Ozawa K, Tsukamoto Y, Hori O, Kitao Y, Yanagi H, Stern DM, Ogawa S. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by oxygen-regulated protein 150, an inducible endoplasmic reticulum chaperone. Cancer Res 61: 4206–4213, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Ozcan U, Yilmaz E, Ozcan L, Furuhashi M, Vaillancourt E, Smith RO, Görgün CZ, Hotamisligil GS. Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science 313: 1137–1140, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Pahl HL, Baeuerle PA. A novel signal transduction pathway from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus is mediated by transcription factor NF-{kappa}B. EMBO J 14: 2580–2588, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  93. Peyrou M, Cribb AE. Effect of endoplasmic reticulum stress preconditioning on cytotoxicity of clinically relevant nephrotoxins in renal cell lines. Toxicol In Vitro 21: 878–886, 2007.[Medline]
  94. Peyrou M, Hanna PE, Cribb AE. Cisplatin, gentamicin, and p-aminophenol induce markers of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the rat kidneys. Toxicol Sci 99: 346–353, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  95. Plisov SY, Ivanov SV, Yoshino K, Dove LF, Plisova TM, Higinbotham KG, Karavanova I, Lerman M, Perantoni AO. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition in the developing metanephric kidney: gene expression study by differential display. Genesis 27: 22–31, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  96. Prozialeck WC, Lamar PC. Effects of glutathione depletion on the cytotoxic actions of cadmium in LLC-PK1 cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 134: 285–295, 2005.
  97. Reimold AM, Etkin A, Clauss I, Perkins A, Friend DS, Zhang J, Horton HF, Scott A, Orkin SH, Byrne MC, Grusby MJ, Glimcher LH. An essential role in liver development for transcription factor XBP-1. Genes Dev 14: 152–157, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  98. Reimold AM, Iwakoshi NN, Manis J, Vallabhajosyula P, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Gravallese EM, Friend D, Grusby MJ, Alt F, Glimcher LH. Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP1. Nature 412: 300–307, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  99. Rissanen A, Sivenius J, Jolkkonen J. Prolonged bihemispheric alterations in unfolded protein response related gene expression after experimental stroke. Brain Res 1087: 60–66, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  100. Rush JS, Sweitzer T, Kent C, Decker GL, Waechter CJ. Biogenesis of the endoplasmic reticulum in activated B lymphocytes: temporal relationships between the induction of protein N-glycosylation activity and the biosynthesis of membrane protein and phospholipid. Arch Biochem Biophys 284: 63–70, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  101. Sawada N, Yao J, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K, Araki I, Takeda M, Kitamura M. Involvement of hypoxia-triggered endoplasmic reticulum stress in outlet obstruction-induced apoptosis in the urinary bladder. Lab Invest In press.
  102. Scheuner D, Mierde DV, Song B, Flamez D, Creemers JW, Tsukamoto K, Ribick M, Schuit FC, Kaufman RJ. Control of mRNA translation preserves endoplasmic reticulum function in beta cells and maintains glucose homeostasis. Nat Med 11: 757–764, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  103. Scheuner D, Song B, McEwen E, Liu C, Laybutt R, Gillespie P, Saunders T, Bonner-Weir S, Kaufman RJ. Translational control is required for the unfolded protein response and in vivo glucose homeostasis. Mol Cell 7: 1165–1176, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  104. Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutat Res 569: 29–63, 2005.[Web of Science][Medline]
  105. Sekine Y, Takeda K, Ichijo H. The ASK1-MAP kinase signaling in ER stress and neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Mol Med 6: 87–97, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  106. Shao L, Sun X, Xu L, Young LT, Wang JF. Mood stabilizing drug lithium increases expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in primary cultured rat cerebral cortical cells. Life Sci 78: 1317–1323, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  107. Shkoda A, Ruiz PA, Daniel H, Kim SC, Rogler G, Sartor RB, Haller D. Interleukin-10 blocked endoplasmic reticulum stress in intestinal epithelial cells: impact on chronic inflammation. Gastroenterology 132: 190–207, 2007.[Medline]
  108. Tajiri S, Oyadomari S, Yano S, Morioka M, Gotoh T, Hamada JI, Ushio Y, Mori M. Ischemia-induced neuronal cell death is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway involving CHOP. Cell Death Differ 11: 403–415, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  109. Takano Y, Hiramatsu N, Okamura M, Hayakawa K, Shimada T, Kasai A, Yokouchi M, Shitamura A, Yao J, Paton AW, Paton JC, Kitamura M. Suppression of cytokine response by GATA inhibitor K-7174 via unfolded protein response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 360: 470–475, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  110. Tamatani M, Matsuyama T, Yamaguchi A, Mitsuda N, Tsukamoto Y, Taniguchi M, Che YH, Ozawa K, Hori O, Nishimura H, Yamashita A, Okabe M, Yanagi H, Stern DM, Ogawa S, Tohyama M. ORP150 protects against hypoxia/ischemia-induced neuronal death. Nat Med 7: 317–323, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  111. Thevenod F. Nephrotoxicity and the proximal tubule. Insights from cadmium. Nephron Physiol 93: 87–93, 2003.
  112. Thevenod F, Friedmann JM, Katsen AD, Hauser IA. Upregulation of multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein via NF-{kappa}B activation protects kidney proximal tubule cells from cadmium- and reactive oxygen species-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 275: 1887–1896, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Tsutsumi S, Gotoh T, Tomisato W, Mima S, Hoshino T, Hwang HJ, Takenaka H, Tsuchiya T, Mori M, Mizushima T. Endoplasmic reticulum stress response is involved in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 11: 1009–1016, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  114. Ueda N, Kaushal GP, Shah SV. Apoptotic mechanisms in acute renal failure. Am J Med 108: 403–415, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  115. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, Ron D. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science 287: 664–666, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. van Balkom BW, Hoffert JD, Chou CL, Knepper MA. Proteomic analysis of long-term vasopressin action in the inner medullary collecting duct of the Brattleboro rat. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F216–F224, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. Viner RI, Hühmer AF, Bigelow DJ, Schöneich C. The oxidative inactivation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase by peroxynitrite. Free Radic Res 24: 243–259, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  118. Werstuck GH, Lentz SR, Dayal S, Hossain GS, Sood SK, Shi YY, Zhou J, Maeda N, Krisans SK, Malinow MR, Austin RC. Homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress causes dysregulation of the cholesterol and triglyceride biosynthetic pathways. J Clin Invest 107: 1263–1273, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  119. Williams D, Haragsim L. Calcineurin nephrotoxicity. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 13: 47–55, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  120. Wu J, Kaufman RJ. From acute ER stress to physiological roles of the unfolded protein response. Cell Death Differ 13: 374–384, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  121. Xu C, Bailly-Maitre B, Reed JC. Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions. J Clin Invest 115: 2656–2664, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  122. Xu KY, Huso DL, Dawson TM, Bredt DS, Becker LC. Nitric oxide synthase in cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 657–662, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  123. Xu W, Liu L, Charles IG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide induces coupling of mitochondrial signalling with the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Nat Cell Biol 6: 1129–1134, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  124. Yamasaki S, Yagishita N, Tsuchimochi K, Nishioka K, Nakajima T. Rheumatoid arthritis as a hyperendoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation disease. Arthritis Res Ther 7: 181–186, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  125. Yang X, Matsuda K, Bialek P, Jacquot S, Masuoka HC, Schinke T, Li L, Brancorsini S, Sassone-Corsi P, Townes TM, Hanauer A, Karsenty G. ATF4 is a substrate of RSK2 and an essential regulator of osteoblast biology; implication for Coffin-Lowry syndrome. Cell 117: 387–398, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  126. Yao X, Panichpisal K, Kurtzman N, Nugent K. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: a review. Am J Med Sci 334: 115–124, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  127. Yi F, dos Santos EA, Xia M, Chen QZ, Li PL, Li N. Podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis in hyperhomocysteinemic rats. Am J Nephrol 27: 262–268, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  128. Yi F, Li PL. Mechanisms of homocysteine-induced glomerular injury and sclerosis. Am J Nephrol 28: 254–264, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  129. Yokouchi M, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K, Kasai A, Takano Y, Yao J, Kitamura M. Atypical, bidirectional regulation of cadmium-induced apoptosis via distinct signaling of unfolded protein response. Cell Death Differ 14: 1467–1474, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  130. Yokouchi M, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K, Okamura M, Du S, Kasai A, Takano Y, Shitamura A, Shimada T, Yao J, Kitamura M. Involvement of selective reactive oxygen species upstream of proapoptotic branches of unfolded protein response. J Biol Chem 283: 4252–4260, 2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  131. Yorimitsu T, Nair U, Yang Z, Klionsky DJ. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers autophagy. J Biol Chem 281: 30299–30304, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  132. Yoshida H. ER stress and diseases. FEBS J 274: 630–658, 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
  133. Yoshiuchi K, Kaneto H, Matsuoka TA, Kohno K, Iwawaki T, Nakatani Y, Yamasaki Y, Hori M, Matsuhisa M. Direct monitoring of in vivo ER stress during the development of insulin resistance with ER stress-activated indicator transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 366: 545–550, 2008.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  134. Zhang K, Wong HN, Song B, Miller CN, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ. The unfolded protein response sensor IRE1{alpha} is required at 2 distinct steps in B cell lymphopoiesis. J Clin Invest 115: 268–281, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  135. Zhang P, McGrath B, Li S, Frank A, Zambito F, Reinert J, Gannon M, Ma K, McNaughton K, Cavener DR. The PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2 {alpha} kinase is required for the development of the skeletal system, postnatal growth, and the function and viability of the pancreas. Mol Cell Biol 22: 3864–3874, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  136. Zinszner H, Kuroda M, Wang X, Batchvarova N, Lightfoot RT, Remotti H, Stevens JL, Ron D. CHOP is implicated in programmed cell death in response to impaired function of the endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev 12: 982–995, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  137. Zong WX, Li C, Hatzivassiliou G, Lindsten T, Yu QC, Yuan J, Thompson CB. Bax and Bak can localize to the endoplasmic reticulum to initiate apoptosis. J Cell Biol 162: 59–69, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Pallet, D. Anglicheau, and E. Thervet
Autophagy is an adaptative mechanism against endoplasmic reticulum stress
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 13, 2009; (2009) gfp518v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kitamura
Induction of the unfolded protein response by calcineurin inhibitors: a double-edged sword in renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; (2009) gfp516v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Kitamura
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Glomerulonephritis: The Bad Guy Turns Good?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1871 - 1873.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Shimada, N. Hiramatsu, K. Hayakawa, S. Takahashi, A. Kasai, Y. Tagawa, M. Mukai, J. Yao, Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, and M. Kitamura
Dual suppression of adipogenesis by cigarette smoke through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2009; 296(4): E721 - E730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/2/F323    most recent
00050.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.