AJP - Renal Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F585-F594, 2008. First published June 18, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90273.2008
0363-6127/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/2/F585    most recent
90273.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Laping, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Laping, N. J.

An excitatory role for peripheral EP3 receptors in bladder afferent function

Xin Su, Erin S. R. Lashinger, Lisa A. Leon, Bryan E. Hoffman, J. Paul Hieble, Scott D. Gardner, Harvey E. Fries, Richard M. Edwards, Jun Li, and Nicholas J. Laping

Department of Urology, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 28 April 2008 ; accepted in final form 12 June 2008


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The excitatory roles of EP3 receptors at the peripheral afferent nerve innervating the rat urinary bladder have been evaluated by using the selective EP3 antagonist (2E)-3-{1-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl}-N-[(4,5-dichloro-2-thienyl)sulfonyl]-2-propenamide (DG-041). The bladder rhythmic contraction model and a bladder pain model measuring the visceromotor reflex (VMR) to urinary bladder distension (UBD) have been used to evaluate DG-041 in female rats. In addition, male rats [spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), Wistar-Kyoto (WKY), and Sprague-Dawley (SD)] were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium, and primary afferent fibers in the L6 dorsal root were isolated for recording the inhibitory response to UBD following intravenous injection of DG-041. Intravenous injection of DG-041 (10 mg/kg), a peripherally restricted EP3 receptor antagonist, significantly reduced the frequency of bladder rhythmic contraction and inhibited the VMR response to bladder distension. The magnitude of reduction of the VMR response was not different in the different strains of rats (SD, SHR, and WKY). Furthermore, quantitative characterization of the mechanosensitive properties of bladder afferent nerves in SHR, WKY, and SD rats did not show the SHR to be supersensitive to bladder distension. DG-041 selectively attenuated responses of mechanosensitive afferent nerves to UBD, with strong suppression on the slow-conducting, high-threshold afferent fibers, with equivalent activity in the three strains. We conclude that sensitization of afferent nerve activity was not one of the mechanisms of bladder hypersensitivity in SHR. EP3 receptors are involved in the regulation of bladder micturition and bladder nociception at the peripheral level.

EP3; viscermotor reflex; bladder rhythmic contraction; bladder distension; afferent nerve


SENSATION ASSOCIATED WITH the urinary bladder is conveyed primarily by pelvic and hypogastric nerves, by which the signal is relayed to the central nervous system (CNS). Most afferent fibers innervating the musculature of the bladder body pass through the pelvic nerve, whereas the majority of afferent endings in the bladder submucosa are derived from the hypogastric nerve (41), suggesting that the afferent fibers in the pelvic and hypogastric nerves have different roles, signaling mechanical stimulation (e.g., bladder distension) and chemical stimulation (e.g., inflammation), respectively (20, 22, 30, 34). Bladder distension is a natural mechanical stimulus to evoke sensations such as fullness, urgency, and pain while the literature suggests a complex regulatory role of prostaglandins (PGs) in multiple aspects of urinary bladder physiology/pathophysiology.

PGE2, one of the principal PGs, is synthesized in urothelium and detrusor smooth muscle (19, 24, 25, 27) as well as in neurons and glial cells (18, 23) and is released in response to various physiological (e.g., bladder distension) and pathological (e.g., mediators of inflammation) stimulation. PGE2 interacts with four EP receptor subtypes (EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4) (23).

PGE2 has been detected at a high level in the urine of overactive bladder patients and may contribute to the clinical pathophysiology of bladder hypersensitivity (12, 13). Intravesical administration of PGE2 induces bladder overactivity in animals by activation of sensory bladder afferent neurons (9, 18, 29, 31). Furthermore, the reduction of PG formation by cyclooxygenase inhibitors has demonstrated in vivo efficacy in hyperactive bladder models (1, 8, 11, 39). Based on studies in EP3 receptor-deficient mice, this subtype has been reported to mediate the inflammatory nociceptive response to peritoneal irritation (42).

The role of EP3 receptors in the regulation of afferent nerve activity from the urinary bladder has not been studied. To evaluate the peripheral role of EP3 receptors in bladder afferent functions, a peripherally limited EP3 receptor antagonist, (2E)-3-{1-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl}-N-[(4,5-dichloro-2-thienyl)sulfonyl]-2-propenamide (DG-041; see Ref. 44), was tested on the micturition reflex in a bladder rhythmic contraction model and on bladder pain sensation by measurement of visceromotor reflex (VMR) and cardiovascular (pressor) responses to noxious urinary bladder distension (UBD).

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) exhibits bladder hypersensitivity (26, 33). One mechanism for this hypersensitivity could be an enhanced afferent limb of the micturition reflex pathway. The mechanism of sensitized afferent nerve activity in the SHR is based on an increased production of nerve growth factor by bladder smooth muscle (2, 33). This induces enlargement of bladder sensory neurons (3) and sensitization of the bladder afferent nerve activity (5). However, an increase in sensitivity of the primary afferent fibers to mechanical stimulation has not been documented in the SHR. Indeed, using the VMR response to noxious UBD as a measure of bladder afferent signal transmission, the SHR did not present a sensitized bladder phenotype (16).

In addition to the physiological examination of the bladder afferent/detrusor function in SHR, pharmacological responses of SHR to tool compounds targeting afferent pathways or detrusor muscle provide an alternative way to study the mechanism of bladder hypersensitivity in the SHR. For example, β3-adrenoceptor activation results in an enhanced relaxation of bladder smooth muscle in the SHR but fails to change VMR and pressor responses to UBD, indicating the importance of the altered detrusor/efferent function in the SHR (16). Thus it is interesting to compare bladder afferent activity between SHR and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and to evaluate the effect of antagonism of EP3 receptors by DG-041 on the VMR response to UBD and the afferent responsiveness in SHR and their nomotensive controls (WKY).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals (King of Prussia, PA).

Gene expression by TaqMan study. Rats were anesthetized initially with 3% isoflurane and killed by exanguination. The dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) at level L6/S1 and T13/L1 and bladders were removed immediately and kept at –80°C. Tissues were homogenized in Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and after phase separation with chloroform. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Any genomic DNA contamination was removed using DNase I (Ambion, Austin, TX). RNA samples were judged to be free of genomic DNA by no amplification in a standard TaqMan assay using 10 ng of RNA and β-actin (ACTB) primer/probe oligonucleotides. The RNA was quantified using Ribogreen RNA quantitation reagent (Invitrogen) and converted to cDNA by reverse transcription utilizing the High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The equivalent of 10 ng mRNA/well was arrayed into 384-well plates using a Biomek FX robot (Beckman Coulter), and quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using a 7900HT Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems) in a 5-µl reaction volume. TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2x; Applied Biosystems) and universal PCR conditions recommended by the manufacturer were followed. The mRNA expression of EP3 receptors and three spice variants (EP3A, D14869 [GenBank] ; EP3v1, NM012704; and EP3C, D16443 [GenBank] ) were studied. All primers and probes (6-carboxyfluorescein, tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine) are listed in Table 1. To normalize the data, samples were scaled relative to each other by the geometric mean of the set of valid housekeeping genes for that sample. Each data point was then expressed as the ratio of housekeeping gene abundance in the sample to the average of that in all samples and marked invalid if it had statistically inconsistent behavior to the other housekeeping genes in those samples with similar tissue types. The housekeeping genes used were ACTB, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and cyclophillin (peptidylpropyl isomerase A), and the data was floored at a relative abundance of 30.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Primers of Taqman study

 
Pharmacokinetic studies. At least 3 days before the start of the study, three rats received surgically implanted femoral vein and arterial catheters for infusion of DG-041 (1 mg/kg with a volume of 4 ml/kg in 16% Cavitron and 3.2% dimethyl sulfoxide, over a 30-min infusion) and blood sampling. Blood (0.25 ml) was drawn at predetermined time points, up to 2 h, postdosing in lithium heparin-containing tubes. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at –20°C before mass spectral analysis.

The rat brain-to-blood ratio of DG-041 was also studied. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (3%) and dosed with DG-041 (10 mg/kg iv). Arterial blood (0.4 ml) was drawn every 15 min postdose in lithium heparin-containing tubes. Rats then were killed by exanguination. The rat brain was removed and placed in a preweighed container for homogenization, followed by the addition of 2 ml/g acetonitrile to obtain a threefold final dilution. The brain tissues were then homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer and centrifuged. The supernatants were transferred and stored at –20°C before analysis.

Quantification of DG-041 was performed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) detection. Samples were thawed, plasma proteins were precipitated with 200 µl of 95:5 acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid in water, containing an appropriate mass spectral internal standard, and the resulting mixture was vortex mixed for 2 min followed by centrifugation for 30 min at >2,000 g. With the use of a sensitive and selective LC/MS/MS method on an HTS PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland) coupled to a Sciex API5000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems), samples were analyzed for quantitative concentrations of DG-04. Analytical standards (1–2,500 ng/ml) were prepared in rat plasma or brain homogenate to ensure accurate calibration of the mass spectrometer for each biological matrix.

In vivo bladder rhythmic contraction. Female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200–300 g (n = 17) were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane during surgery. Anesthetized rats were maintained with a hot water-circulating heating pad underneath during the studies and were killed upon completion of experimental procedures by an intravenous overdose of pentobarbital sodium (120 mg/kg; Vortech Pharmaceuticals, Dearborn, MI).

One jugular vein was cannulated with polyethylene tubing for intravenous administration of urethane and DG-041. A cannula (PE-50) was placed in the bladder via the urethra, and the urethra was ligated to ensure an isovolumetric bladder. Upon completion of surgical procedures, slow intravenous infusion of urethane (1.2 g/kg, ethyl carbonate; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was given over 15 min. Saline bladder infusion procedures were begun 30 min after the final dose of urethane.

The urethral cannula was connected with a T connector and linked with a low-volume transducer (model MLT0380D; ADInstrument, Colorado Springs, CO). The signal was amplified through a direct current (DC) amplifier (ADInstrument, ML119). The other end of the T connector was linked to a 20-ml syringe with a perfusion pump. For the pharmacological study on bladder rhythmic contraction, the saline infusion in bladder was at a rate of 50 µl/min to induce micturition reflex (here defined as bladder contraction with intensity >10 mmHg). The infusion rate was then lowered to 10 µl/min until three to five rhythmic bladder contractions were established; the infusion was then terminated. The vehicle or test compound was administered after a 15-min control period. Following administration, bladder rhythmic contractions were recorded for 20–30 min. Two parameters of the bladder rhythmic contraction were evaluated (frequency/interval and amplitude). The mean controls were calculated by the average of readouts during the last 5-min interval of the control period. The effects of compounds were calculated by the mean response in every 5-min period after injection (16).

In vivo VMR and pressor responses to urinary bladder distension. Female rats (SD, n = 23; SHR, n = 13; WKY, n = 11) were anesthetized initially with 3% isoflurane. Cannulas for intravenous administration and for bladder distension were implanted as described above. To measure blood pressure, the right carotid artery was catheterized with PE-50 tubing. The arterial catheter was linked with a low-volume transducer (ADInstrument; MLT0380D), and signal was amplified through a DC amplifier (ADInstrument; ML119). The bladder catheter was also linked to a bladder distension control device. The bladder was distended with saline by regulating air inflow into a Mariott bottle from a valve interface distension control device (University of Iowa, Bioengineering, B482C-1; see Ref. 37). Two needle electrodes were sutured in the oblique abdominal musculature just above the inguinal ligament. Abdominal contractions were quantified by action potentials of electromyographic activity. Action potentials were initially amplified through a low-noise alternating current (AC) differential amplifier (ADInstrument; EC4-400), processed using the AD data acquisition program (PowerLab 16/30, ML880). Raw action potentials of myoelectric activities, bladder pressure, and blood pressure were displayed on-line continuously. All data were analyzed off-line using the ADInstrument power lab program (Chart 8).

Following completion of the surgical preparation, isoflurane anesthesia was reduced until flexion reflex response could be evoked by pinch of the foot without spontaneous escape behaviors (~1% isoflurane).

For UBD, all rats received a series of at least six phasic bladder distensions at 60 mmHg for 30 s at 3-min intervals to evaluate response stability to repeated bladder distension. The compound or vehicle was administered only after four consistent responses were elicited and given 2 min before the onset of distension.

The electromyographic activity was integrated and calculated as the area under the curve. The VMR response to the stimulus was defined as the increase in electromyographic activity during UBD from the baseline activity before each response. Pressor response was quantified as the peak change in mean arterial pressure during UBD compared with the average level during a baseline period immediately before UBD. Following compound administration, response was modified to the percentile of mean control response: the average of four UBD responses before compound treatment.

Afferent nerve recording. Male rats weighing 400–500 g (16 SD, 12 SHR, and 10 WKY) were used for this study. Rats were anesthetized initially with pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) at a dose of 40–45 mg/kg ip and maintained thereafter with supplementary intravenous doses of pentobarbital sodium (5–10 mg·kg–1·h–1). The trachea was cannulated to provide artificial ventilation with room air. For injecting drugs, a catheter was passed to the descending aorta via the left common carotid artery. The femoral artery and vein were catheterized for measurement of arterial pressure and administration of pentobarbital sodium, respectively.

The lower abdomen was exposed by a 3- to 4-cm-long incision laterally at the left flank. The urinary bladder was emptied and catheterized (PE-100) through the fundus. As described above, for UBD, the bladder catheter was connected to a saline bottle from a distension control device. The urethra was ligated close to its entry to the penis, and urine was evacuated constantly via the fundic catheter. The left testis, vas deferens, and seminal vesicle were tied and removed. The prostate lobe was reflected laterally to access the major pelvic ganglion and pelvic nerve. The pelvic nerve was isolated from the surrounding fatty tissues, and a pair of Teflon-coated stainless steel wires stripped at the tips were wrapped around the pelvic nerve and sealed with nonreactive silicone gel (Wacker Silicone, Adrian, MI). The lumbosacral spinal cord was exposed by laminectomy (T13-S1), and the rat was suspended from thoracic vertebra and ischia with spinal clamps. The dorsal skin was reflected lateral and tied to make a pool for mineral oil. The dura membrane was removed carefully, and the spinal cord was covered with warm (37°C) mineral oil.

The left L6 dorsal root was identified and decentralized at its entry to the spinal cord. Recordings were made from the distal cut end of the central processes of dorsal root fibers. A length of nerve fiber was draped over a black microbase plate immersed in warm mineral oil. The dorsal root then was split into thin bundles, and a fine filament was teased from the bundle to obtain a single unit. Electrical activity of the single unit was recorded monopolarly by placing the teased fiber over one arm of a bipolar silver-silver chloride electrode; a fine strand of connective tissue was placed across the other pole of the electrode. Action potentials were monitored continuously by analog delay and displayed on a storage oscilloscope after initial amplification through a low-noise AC differential amplifier (Neurolog NL104; Digitimer). The bandpass filter was set between 0.5 Hz and 5 kHz. Action potentials were processed through a window discriminator and counted (1-s bin width) on-line using the spike2/CED 1401 program (CED, Cambridge, UK). Peristimulus time histograms, urinary bladder, and blood pressure were displayed on-line.

Pelvic nerve input to the L6 dorsal root was identified first by electrical stimulation of the pelvic nerve (10.5-ms square wave pulse at 3–8 mA). Fibers were classified on the basis of their conduction velocities; those with conduction velocities <2.5 m/s were considered unmyelinated C-fibers, and those with conduction velocities >2.5 m/s were considered thinly myelinated A-fibers. The organ innervated was identified by response to brief phasic UBD (60 mmHg, 2–3 s). If a fiber responded to UBD, a stimulus-response function (SRF) to phasic isotonic distending pressures of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 mmHg, 30 s each at 3-min intervals, was determined. The effects of DG-041 or mexiletine were tested on responses of UBD-sensitive afferent fibers (60 mmHg UBD), by intravenous bolus injection followed by 0.1 ml saline, 2 min before bladder distension. DG-041 was administered intravenously at 10 mg/kg in 30 µl. Mexiletine was injected in a cumulative dosing paradigm. In some experiments, mexiletine was injected 1 h after testing DG-041 if DG-041 failed to change the afferent response.

The resting activity of a fiber was counted for 60 s before distension, and the response to a stimulus was determined as the increase in discharge during distension (30 s) over its resting activity. A SRF to graded UBD was plotted for each individual unit, and a least-squares regression line was obtained from the linear part of the SRF. The regression line then was extrapolated to the ordinate (representing distension pressure) to estimate the response threshold.

Data analysis. All data were expressed as means ± SE. Results were analyzed with Student's t-test or ANOVA with repeated measures by Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Compounds. DG-041 (mol wt 592.326) was synthesized by the Department of Medicinal Chemistry, GlaxoSmithKline. For intravenous administration, DG-041 was dissolved in 30 µl polyethylene glycol (PEG)-400. Mexiletine hydrochloride (mol wt 215.72) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in saline.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Gene expression by quantitative PCR. The three housekeeping genes (ACTB, GAPDH, and cyclophilin) were expressed in a stable manner to each other across all of the samples, allowing for proper normalization. The localization of mRNA of EP3 receptors in rat bladder and DRG normalized to the mean of housekeeping genes is shown in Fig. 1. The mRNA expression levels of EP3A and EP3v1 were high in bladder, and mRNA of EP3C was high in DRG and brain. A similar expression pattern was observed in SHR and WKY rats (data not shown). Overall, the EP3 receptors were abundant in all tissues, bladder, and neurons.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Localization of message for EP3 receptors and EP3 receptor splice variants in bladder and neurons. Nos. of samples are indicated within each bar.

 
Pharmacokinetic studies. DG-041 has pharmacokinetics suitable for in vivo studies in rats. Following intravenous infusion of 1 mg/kg DG-041 over 30 min (n = 3), the maximal concentration was 957 ± 164 ng/ml, the half-time for the elimination phase was 103 ± 26 min, and systemic plasma clearance is 30.4 ± 4.5 ml·min–1·kg–1. DG-041 had a volume of distribution approximately equal to total body water, 0.78 ± 0.29 l/kg. In another group of rats, at 15 min post-10 mg/kg bolus injection (n = 4), the plasma level was 4.39 ± 1.22 µg/ml. At the same time point, the brain level of DG-041 was much lower than blood levels, yielding a brain-to-blood ratio of 0.027 ± 0.004 (n = 4).

Effect of intravenous administration of DG-041 on the micturition reflex. Intravenous administrations of vehicle (PEG-400) did not produce significant changes in bladder rhythmic contractions. The administration of DG-041 produced an inhibition of the bladder rhythmic contraction, reducing frequency or eliminating the contraction ("disappearance" of contractions). The disappearing intervals were 9.03 ± 1.28 min (5 out of 6 rats) and 9.72 ± 1.89 min (4 out of 5 rats) at 3 and 10 mg/kg, respectively.

If the contractions were not abolished, their amplitude was not reduced by DG-041. Figure 2, C and D, summarizes the effect of DG-041 on bladder rhythmic contraction following intravenous administration.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effect of DG-041 on volume-induced rhythmic bladder contraction in the anesthetized rat. Typical experimental records showing the effects of intravenous administration ({uparrow}) of vehicle [polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400, A] and DG-041 (10 mg/kg, B) on bladder rhythmic contraction (mmHg). Time course for the effect of vehicle and DG-041 on the frequency (C) and the amplitude (D) of volume-induced contractions following iv administration. The responses are represented as a percentage of control (%control), where the baseline response before administration is defined as 100%. The significance of differences between the test and control values was determined by ANOVA test.

 
Effect of intravenous administration of DG-041 on nociceptive responses to bladder distension. Figure 3, A and B, demonstrates typical examples of intravenous administration of vehicle and DG-041 on both VMR and pressor responses to noxious UBD at 60 mmHg. Intravenous administration of DG-041 produced a significant inhibition of both VMR and pressor responses to UBD. The maximal inhibition occurred at 2 and 5 min postinjection. Figure 3, C and D, summarizes the effects of DG-041 on the VMR response and the pressor response to UBD following intravenous injection.


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Effect of DG-041 on responses to noxious urinary bladder distension (UBD, 60 mmHg, 30 s in 3 min) in the anesthetized rat. Typical experimental recording of the visceromotor reflex (VMR) response (trace on top, mV) and the pressor response (traces on bottom, mmHg) of iv administration ({uparrow}) of vehicle (PEG-400, A) and DG-041 (100 nmol, B). Time course for the effect of iv administration of vehicle and DG-041 on VMR (C) and pressor (D) responses to UBD. The responses are represented as %control, where the baseline response before administration of drugs is defined as 100%. The significance of differences between the test and control values was determined by ANOVA test.

 
The inhibition by DG-041 (10 mg/kg iv) on the VMR response to UBD was compared in three strains of rats (SD, SHR, and WKY). DG-041 produced an equal degree of inhibition on the mean VMR response 5 min postinjection (Fig. 4A).


Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of iv administration of vehicle (PEG-400) and DG-041 on the VMR response to UBD (30 s in 3 min) in anesthetized rats. A: effect of DG-041 on the mean VMR response 5 min postinjection to UBD (60 mmHg) in Sprague-Dawley (SD), spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. The responses are represented as %control, where the baseline response before administration of drugs is defined as 100%. B: responses of the VMR to UBD at 20, 40, and 60 mmHg before and after iv administration of vehicle and DG-041. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001. The significance of difference between vehicle and DG-041 value was determined by nonpaired Student's t-test.

 
In another group of SHR, responses to three steps of UBD were evaluated in a staircase matter before and after DG-041 (10 mg/kg iv). DG-041 tended to produce stronger inhibition of the response to 60 mmHg UBD than that to 40 mmHg UBD (Fig. 4B).

Effect of DG-041 on response of afferent nerve to bladder distension. A total of 44 mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers in the L6 dorsal root were identified by electrical stimulation of the pelvic nerve and UBD (16 from SHR, 12 from WKY, and 16 from SD). The proportions of myelinated and unmyelinated afferent fibers in SHR, WKY, and SD rats were similar (Table 2). Most of the afferent nerves exhibited an ongoing discharge as we have previously described (30, 34) with similar mean frequencies in three strains. All fibers were characterized for responses to graded intensities of UBD (5–80 mmHg) and exhibited an increased response to increasing pressures of UBD. The response patterns of afferent fibers from SHR were significantly different from those of WKY rats (P < 0.05), but not from SD rats. Afferent fibers from WKY rats exhibited a relatively low mean response threshold and high response magnitude. The mean SRFs are plotted in Fig. 5A. The linear regression analysis of response threshold to the conduction velocity (CV) of afferent fibers did not reveal a correlation between those two parameters (Fig. 5B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Summary and comparison of mechanosensitive pelvic afferent fibers in SHR, WKY, and SD rats

 

Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Stimulus-response functions of pelvic nerve afferent fibers to graded intensities of UBD (5–80 mmHg, 30 s in 3 min, A). The response threshold and the conduction velocity of afferent fibers did not correlate (B).

 
The effects of a bolus injection of vehicle (PEG-400; n = 8, SHR; n = 4, WKY; n = 12, SD) or/and DG-041 (10 mg/kg; n = 10, SHR; n = 9, WKY; n = 9, SD) were tested on the responses to noxious UBD (60 mmHg, 30 s). Figure 6 illustrates responses of a C afferent nerve (CV: 1.63 m/s, response threshold: 26 mmHg) before and after receiving DG-041. Vehicle solution did not attenuate the response of this afferent nerve. However, DG-041 produced an immediate reduction of response following injection. The inhibition lasted for >20 min. However, DG-041-induced inhibition was not observed in some other afferent nerves and was not significantly different comparison with the vehicle control in each group, probably due to variability in sensitivity to inhibition. We found no apparent difference in drug effects on afferent fibers from SHR, WKY, or SD rats. Thus the data from the three groups were pooled. An unpaired t-test analysis reveals a significant different response following vehicle and DG-041 application (P = 0.04) in the pooled data group (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, the magnitude of the inhibition correlated well with response threshold and conduction velocities of afferent fibers. The afferent nerves with high response thresholds (Fig. 7B) and low conduction velocities (Fig. 7C) tended to be inhibited by DG-041 (P < 0.05). The inhibition of afferent response was not dependent on the control response frequencies (P > 0.05, Fig. 7D).


Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Examples of effects of vehicle (PEG-400) and DG-041 (10 mg/kg iv) on responses of a pelvic nerve afferent fiber to UBD (60 mmHg, 30 s in 3 min). A: responses of the fiber are illustrated as peristimulus time histograms in 0.01-s bandwidth before and after DG-041 (shadow area). Phasic distending pressure is presented below. B: time course for the effect of iv administration of vehicle and DG-041 on responses of the fiber to UBD.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Inhibition by DG-041 on responses of all afferent fibers from SD, SHR, and WKY rats to UBD (60 mmHg, 30 s in 3 min). A: mean inhibition of responses to UBD (as %control) by DG-041 was significantly different from that by vehicle (P = 0.04, nonpaired Student's t-test). The inhibition correlated well with response thresholds (B) and conduction velocities (C) of afferent fibers but was not dependent on the control response frequencies (D).

 
Mexiletine dose-dependently attenuated responses of mechanosensitive afferent fibers to noxious UBD. A total of 19 fibers was studied from SD, SHR, and WKY rats; 5 were A{delta} and 14 were C-fibers. We found no apparent difference in drug effects on any of these subgroups. The mean ID50 values in SD, SHR, and WKY rats were 9.24 ± 1.46 (6.31–12.17) mg/kg, 7.38 ± 2.37 (1.62–13.14) mg/kg, and 9.53 ± 1.32 (6.81–12.26) mg/kg, respectively. There were no differences in the slopes of the dose-response functions, being –0.13 ± 0.04, –0.14 ± 0.07, and –0.12 ± 0.07, respectively. Figure 8 summarizes the dose-response functions of mexiletine on responses of afferent nerve innervating bladders from SD, SHR, and WKY rats.


Figure 8
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Dose-dependent inhibition by sodium channel blocker mexiletine on responses of pelvic nerve afferent fibers to UBD (60 mmHg, 30 s in 3 min). Mean inhibition of responses to UBD are expressed as %control. There were no apparent differences in effects of DG-041 in SD, SHR, and WKY rats.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study evaluated the role of peripheral EP3 receptors on bladder afferent function in the rat. Systemic administration of the peripherally limited EP3 receptor antagonist DG-041 inhibited volume-induced rhythmic bladder contraction and the VMR response to bladder distension. The ability of DG-041 to inhibit bladder nociception was confirmed by directly recording afferent nerve activity. Responses of mechanosensitive bladder afferent nerves to UBD were inhibited, with strong suppression on the slow-conducting, high-threshold afferent fibers. In addition, we quantitatively characterized the mechanosensitive properties of bladder afferent nerves in SHR, WKY, and SD rats. Compared with the other rat strains, the mechanosensitive afferent nerves of SHR were not more sensitive to bladder distension, nor were they more sensitive to inhibition by DG-041. This argues against afferent sensitization as a mechanism for bladder hyperactivity in the SHR.

The pelvic afferent nerve was recorded from the L6 dorsal root, since 84% of the pelvic afferent fibers from the lower urinary tract enter the spinal cord via the L6 dorsal root and a smaller fraction enters in S1 (43). The present study shows that the mechanosensitive pelvic afferent fibers in the L6 dorsal root from SHR, WKY, and SD rats have the proportion of unmyelinated afferent fibers and exhibit ongoing resting activity, similar to observations in SD rats (30, 34, 43). We defined the response threshold by extrapolation but did not separate to the "high threshold" or "low threshold" afferents due to small sample size and the lack of clear criteria to differentiate the groups. As we reported previously in SD rats (32), response thresholds of the afferent fibers did not correlate with conduction velocities. Unexpectedly, afferents from WKY rats had a lower response threshold and a higher response magnitude. In contrast, the SRFs of mechanosensitive afferent nerves were not enhanced in SHR compared with SD rats. This is consistent with our previous study where a sensitized afferent signal was not detected in SHR as measured by the VMR response to bladder distension (16). In addition, inhibition by DG-041 of the VMR response and afferent response to UBD in SHR was not enhanced. The SHR detrusor showed decreased compliance and was more sensitive to inhibition by β3-adrenoceptor activation (16). If an afferent mechanism is involved in the hypersensitivity in SHR, mechanisms targeting afferent nerves, like an EP3 receptor antagonist, would be expected to be more effective against the responses to UBD, although the pathological mechanism of hypersensitivity is not necessarily linked to an altered pharmacology. However, DG-041 did not produce an enhanced inhibition on bladder nociception in the SHR. Thus both physiological and pharmacological arguments do not support afferent sensitization in the SHR.

DG-041 (10 mg/kg iv) inhibited the bladder rhythmic contraction frequency and often temporarily eliminated the rhythmic voiding contractions. Compounds targeting the bladder afferent pathway often produce this effect (6, 7, 17, 40). "Shutdown" of bladder rhythmic contraction reflects an increased threshold for induction of contractions and an increased bladder capacity in the conscious cystometrographic study (17). Because DG-041 is unlikely to achieve effective concentrations in the CNS following systemic administration, its effects are probably due to the inhibition of EP3 receptors located on peripheral neurons or detrusor muscle. DG-041 failed to change the amplitude of the rhythmic bladder contractions; thus, detrusor functions might not be modulated by an EP3 receptor antagonist. On the other hand, we found mRNA for the EP3A and EP3v1 splice variants to be highly expressed in bladder, either detrusor muscle or urothelium. Unfortunately, DG-041 does not differentiate different EP3 splice variants (X. Su, C. W. Wu, D. M. Morrow, and J. P. Jaworski, unpublished observations). Thus inhibition of detrusor muscle contraction cannot be conclusively ruled out. A more selective subtype antagonist could be useful for further clarifying the mechanism of EP3 receptors in bladder function.

The action of an EP3 receptor antagonist on bladder afferent nerves was demonstrated by the inhibitory effect of DG-041 on the VMR response to bladder distension and is consistent with the high expression of EP3 receptor mRNA in primary sensory neurons. The effect of DG-041 on bladder compliance was not measured, but such an effect would not contribute to the antinociceptive activities, since we have demonstrated that an increase in bladder compliance did not change the readout of VMR and pressor responses (16). Thus the antinociceptive effect of DG-041 is predominantly due to inhibition of receptors located on peripheral neurons. It should be noted that the voiding-associated abdominal wall response (4) is triggered by urethra afferent nerve for the physiological voiding (32). It differs from the passive VMR response to noxious bladder distension (60 mmHg), which corresponds to pain sensation. Whether the voiding-associated VMR response contaminates the nociceptive VMR response to 60 mmHg bladder distension should be further investigated.

To further test the interpretations drawn from the VMR experiments, direct effects of DG-041 on the afferent nerve firing were examined. As expected, DG-041 inhibited the response of afferent fibers to bladder distension. This could result from an action at the sensory endings, axon or cell bodies, where the mRNA for EP3 receptors has been detected. The beneficial effects of EP3 antagonism for the inhibition of bladder afferent nerve activity concur with previous studies of hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with the cutaneous pain model (10). It is known that intravesical administration of PGE2 enhances the micturition reflex (9) and that this effect is mediated in part by lowering the threshold of capsaicin-sensitive bladder afferent nerves (18). PGE2 has been reported to sensitize peripheral terminals of small-diameter, high-threshold, primary afferent fibers to thermal, chemical, and mechanical stimuli (14, 15, 21, 28). In the present study, we have demonstrated for the first time that an antagonist, DG-041, attenuated the response of afferent nerves to bladder distension, selectively on high-threshold and low-conductivity afferent nerves. In contrast, a nonselective sodium channel blocker inhibited responses of all pelvic afferent fibers to visceral organ distensions to the same degree. The nonselective inhibition of afferent activity by sodium channel blockade was reported in our previous studies (35, 36). Accordingly, the inhibition of afferent nerves innervating the urinary bladder by an EP3 antagonist may be more selective for nociceptors and therefore safer for therapeutic intervention. Whether the sites of action of DG-041 are on myenteric and submuscosal plexus neurons or on interstitial cells with their associated visceral sensation requires further investigation. Both studies, the rhythmic contraction and the VMR response, require bladder overdistensions. Further investigation of EP3 antagonists in conscious cystometry will highlight the role of EP3 receptors in basal urodynamics under conditions of physiology or pathology of bladder overactivity.

In summary, we found that mechanosensitive afferent hypersensitivity is not the mechanism of the hypersensitive bladder in SHR. We also have demonstrated for the first time that EP3 receptors are involved in the regulation of the micturition reflex and bladder nociception by an action on afferent nerves and hence added further evidence for the potential usefulness of EP antagonists in the treatment of urgency or pain associated with bladder dysfunction.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to Dr. Tim Westfall for helpful comments.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: X. Su, Dept. of Urology, GlaxoSmithKline, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406-0939 (e-mail: xin.2.su{at}gsk.com)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Angelico P, Guarneri L, Velasco C, Cova R, Leonardi A, Clarke DE, Testa R. Effect of cyclooxygenase inhibitors on the micturition reflex in rats: correlation with inhibition of cyclooxygenase isozymes. BJU Int 97: 837–846, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Clemow DB, Spitsbergen JM, McCarty R, Steers WD, Tuttle JB. Altered NGF regulation may link a genetic predisposition for hypertension with hyperactive voiding. J Urol 161: 1372–1377, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Clemow DB, McCarty R, Steers WD, Tuttle1 JB. Efferent and afferent neuronal hypertrophy associated with micturition pathways in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neurourol Urodyn 16: 293–303, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Cruz Y, Downie JW. Abdominal muscle activity during voiding in female rats with normal or irritated bladder. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290: R1436–R1445, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dmitrieva N, McMahon SB. Sensitisation of visceral afferents by nerve growth factor in the adult rat. Pain 66: 87–97, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Dray A, Metsch R. Inhibition of urinary bladder contractions by a spinal action of morphine and other Opioids. J Exp Pharmacol Ther 231: 254–361, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hisamitsu T, De Groat WC. The inhibitory effect of opioid peptides and morphine applied intrathecally and intracerebroventricularly on the micturition reflex in the cat. Brain Res 298: 51–65, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Hu VY, Malley S, Dattilio A, Folsom JB, Zvara P, Vizzard MA. COX-2 and prostanoid expression in micturition pathways after cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284: R574–R585, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ishizuka O, Mattiasson A, Andersson KE. Prostaglandin E2-induced bladder hyperactivity in normal, conscious rats: involvement of tachykinins? J Urol 153: 2034–2038, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Kassuya CAL, Ferreira J, Claudino RF, Calixto JB. Intraplantar PGE2 causes nociceptive behaviour and mechanical allodynia: the role of prostanoid E receptors and protein kinases. Bri J Pharmacol 150: 727–737, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Khalaf IM, Ghoneim MA, Elhilali MM. The effect of exogenous prostaglandins F2 alpha and E2 and indomethacin on micturition. Br J Urol 53: 21–28, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Kim JC, Park EY, Hong SH, Seo SI, Park YH, Hwang TK. Changes of urinary nerve growth factor and prostaglandins in male patients with overactive bladder symptom. Int J Urol 12: 875–880, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Kim JC, Park EY, Seo SI, Park YH, Hwang TK. Nerve growth factor and prostaglandins in the urine of female patients with overactive bladder. J Urol 175: 1773–1776, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Kumazawa T, Mizumura K, Koda H. Involvement of EP3 subtype of prostaglandin E receptors in PGE2-induced enhancement of the bradykinin response of nociceptors. Brain Res 632: 321–324, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Kumazawa T, Mizumura K, Koda H, Fukusako H. EP receptor subtypes implicated in the PGE2-induced sensitization of polymodal receptors in response to bradykinin and heat. J Neurophysiol 75: 2361–2368, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Leon LA, Hoffman BE, Gardner SD, Laping NJ, Evans C, Lashinger ESR, Su X. Effects of the β3-adrenergic receptor agonist CL-316243 on bladder micturition reflex in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Exp Phar Thera 326: 178–185, 2008.[CrossRef]
  17. Leonardi A, Guarneri L, Poggesi E, Angelico P, Velasco C, Cilia A, Testa R. N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-nitrophenyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide: a novel pre- and postsynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor antagonist active on the lower urinary tract. J Exp Pharmacol Ther 299: 1027–1037, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Maggi CA, Giuliani S, Conte B, Furio M, Santicioli P, Meli P, Gragnani L, Meli A. Prostanoids modulate reflex micturition by acting through capsaicin-sensitive afferents. Eur J Pharmacol 145: 105–112, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Masunaga K, Yoshida M, Inadome A, Iwashita H, Miyamae K, Ueda S. Prostaglandin E2 release from isolated bladder strips in rats with spinal cord injury. Int J Urol 13: 271–276, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Mitsui T, Kakizaki H, Matsuura S, Ameda K, Yoshioka M, Koyanagi T. Afferent fibers of the hypogastric nerves are involved in the facilitating effects of chemical bladder irritation in rats. J Neurophysiol 86: 2276–2284, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mizumura K, Minagawa M, Tsujii Y, Kumazawa T. Prostaglandin E2-induced sensitization of the heat response of canine visceral polymodal receptors in vitro. Neurosci Lett 161: 117–119, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Moss NG, Harrington WW, Tucker MS. Pressure, volume, and chemosensitivity in afferent innervation of urinary bladder in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R695–R703, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F. Prostanoid receptors: structures, properties, functions. Physiol Rev 79: 1193–1226, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Park JM, Yang T, Arend LJ, Schnermann JB, Peters CA, Freeman MR, Briggs JP. Obstruction stimulates COX-2 expression in bladder smooth muscle cells via increased mechanical stretch. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 276: F129–F136, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Park JM, Yang T, Arend LJ, Smart AM, Schnermann JB, Briggs JP. Cyclooxygenase-2 is expressed in bladder during fetal development and stimulated by outlet obstruction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F538–F544, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Persson K, Pandita RK, Spitsbergen JM, Steers WD, Tuttle JB, Andersson KE. Spinal and peripheral mechanisms contributing to hyperactive voiding in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1366–R1373, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pinna C, Zanardo R, Puglisi L. Prostaglandin-release impairment in the bladder epithelium of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol 388: 267–273, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Schaible HG, Schimdt RF. Excitation and sensitization of fine articular afferents from cat's knee joint by prostaglandin E2. J Physiol 403: 91–104, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Schröder A, Newgreen D, Andersson KE. Detrusor responses to prostaglandin E2 and bladder outlet obstruction in wild-type and Ep1 receptor knockout mice. J Urol 172: 1166–1170, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Schüssler B. Comparison of the mode of action of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and sulprostone, a PGE2-derivative, on the lower urinary tract in healthy women. A urodynamic study. Urol Res 18: 349–352, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Shea VK, Cai R, Crepps B, Mason JL, Perl ER. Sensory fibers of the pelvic nerve innervating the rat's urinary bladder. J Neurophysiol 84: 1924–1933, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Smith PP, Smith CP, Boone TB, Somogyi GT. Is abdominal wall contraction important for normal voiding in the female rat? (Abstract) BMC Urology 7: 5, 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Spitsbergen JM, Clemow DB, McCarty R, Steers WD, Tuttle JB. Neurally mediated hyperactive voiding in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Brain Res 790: 151–159, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Su X, Sengupta JN, Gebhart GF. Effects of opioids on mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the urinary bladder of the rat. J Neurophysiol 77: 1566–1580, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Su X, Gebhart GF. Effects of tricyclic antidepressants on mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the rat colon. Pain 76: 105–114, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Su X, Joshi SK, Kardos S, Gebhart GF. Sodium channel blocking actions of the {kappa}-opioid receptor agonist U50,488 contribute to its visceral antinociceptive effects. J Neurophysiol 87: 1271–1279, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Su X, Ridel ES, Leon LA, Laping NJ. Pharmacologic evaluation of pressor and visceromotor reflex responses to bladder distension. Neurourol Urodyn 27: 249–253, 2008a.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Su X, Leon LA, Laping NJ. Role of spinal Cav2.2 and Cav21 ion channels in bladder nociception. J Urol 179: 2464–2469, 2008b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Takagi-Matsumoto H, Ng B, Tsukimi Y, Tajimi M. Effects of NSAIDs on bladder function in normal and cystitis rats: a comparison study of aspirin, indomethacin, and ketoprofen. J Pharmacol Sci 95: 458–465, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Testa R, Guarneri L, Angelico P, Velasco C, Poggesi E, Cilia A, Leonardi A. Effect of different 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype antagonists on the micturition reflex in rats. BJU Int 87: 256–264, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Uemura E, Fletcher TF, Bradley WE. Distribution of lumbar and sacral afferent axons in submucosa of cat urinary bladder. Anat Rec 183: 579–587, 1975.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Ueno A, Matsumoto H, Naraba H, Ikeda Y, Ushikubi F, Matsuoka T, Narumiya Sugimoto YS, Ichikawa Oh-ishi SA. Major roles of protanoid receptors IP and EP3 in endotoxin-induced enhancement of pain perception. Biochem Pharmacol 62: 157–160, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Vera PL, Nadelhaft I. Conduction velocity distribution of afferent fibers innervating the rat urinary bladder. Brain Res 520: 83–89, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Zegar S, Tokar C, Enache LA, Rajagopol V, Zeller W, O'Connell M, Singh J, Muellner FW, Zembower DE. Development of a scalable process for DG-041, a potent EP3 receptor antagonist, via tandem heck reactions. Organic Proc Res Dev 11: 747–753, 2007.[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
X. Su, L. A. Leon, C. W. Wu, D. M. Morrow, J.-P. Jaworski, J. P. Hieble, E. S. R. Lashinger, J. Jin, R. M. Edwards, and N. J. Laping
Modulation of bladder function by prostaglandin EP3 receptors in the central nervous system
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F984 - F994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/2/F585    most recent
90273.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Laping, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, X.
Right arrow Articles by Laping, N. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.