AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (May 14, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00070.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/1/F253    most recent
00070.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.
Submitted on February 7, 2008
Accepted on May 12, 2008

The roles of PINCH-2 in regulation of glomerular cell shape change and fibronectin matrix deposition

Xiaohua Shi1, Hong Qu1, Matthias Kretzler2, and Chuanyue Wu1*

1 Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: carywu{at}pitt.edu.

The PINCH-1-ILK-{alpha}-parvin (PIP) complex plays important roles in regulation of glomerular cell behavior, including podocyte shape change, apoptosis and mesangial fibronectin matrix deposition. In this study, we show that PINCH-2, a protein that is structurally related to PINCH-1 but encoded by a different gene, is co-expressed with PINCH-1 in podocytes. Treatment of podocytes with TGF-{beta}1 elevated the level of PINCH-2, resulting in increased association of PINCH-2 with ILK and {alpha}-parvin and concomitantly displacement of PINCH-1 from the PIP complex. To gain insights into the functional consequences of elevated PINCH-2 expression, we overexpressed PINCH-2 in podocytes by infection with an adenovirus encoding PINCH-2. Overexpression of PINCH-2 resulted in displacement of PINCH-1 from the PIP complex and compromised podocyte spreading. The PINCH-2-mediated displacement of PINCH-1, however, did not prompt apoptosis. Interestingly, the effect of PINCH-2 on podocyte spreading depends on differentiation status, as overexpression of PINCH-2 in podocytes that were not fully differentiated did not alter cell spreading. Finally, we show that overexpression of PINCH-2 in mesangial cells resulted in displacement of PINCH-1 from the PIP complex but impaired neither mesangial cell spreading nor fibronectin matrix deposition. These studies suggest that PINCH-2 can substitute for PINCH-1 in at least certain processes in glomerular cells (e.g., podocyte survival signaling and mesangial fibronectin matrix deposition), albeit an aberrantly high level of PINCH-2 may contribute to TGF-{beta}1-induced alteration in podocyte shape modulation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.