AJP - Renal Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (September 12, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00101.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/F1433    most recent
00101.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Webb, D. J.
Submitted on February 27, 2007
Accepted on August 31, 2007

Fractional urinary excretion of endothelin-1 is reduced by acute ETB receptor blockade

Jane Goddard1, Neil R Johnston1, Allan D Cumming1, and David J. Webb1*

1 Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.j.webb{at}ed.ac.uk.

Evidence suggests that urinary excretion of endothelin-1 (ET-1) reflects renal ET-1 production, and is independent of systemic ET-1 activity. The influence of ET receptors on urinary ET-1 excretion has not been studied in man, yet peri-tubular ETB receptors are abundant within the kidney. We have studied the effects of acute ETA and ETB receptor blockade with BQ-123 and BQ-788 respectively on urinary ET-1 excretion in a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in 16 subjects with a wide range of GFRs (15-152ml/min). Plasma ET-1 concentrations (pET-1) and urinary ET-1 excretion rate (uET-1) at baseline correlated inversely with GFR (R2=0.18 and 0.36 respectively, P<0.01). However, changes in pET-1 after ET receptor antagonism were not related to changes in uET-1 (R2=0.007, P=0.18). pET-1 increased only after BQ-788, alone or in combination with BQ-123, consistent with ETB receptor mediated clearance of ET-1 from the circulation. uET-1 was reduced only after BQ-788 alone (-4.7pg/min (SD5.5), P<0.01). Because BQ-788 also reduced GFR, fractional excretion of ET-1 (FeET-1) was calculated. FeET-1 fell after BQ-788 alone (-41% (SD26%), P<0.01) or in combination with BQ-123 (-40% (SD29%), P<0.01). FeET-1 was not altered by placebo or BQ-123 alone. In conclusion, urinary ET-1 excretion does not appear to relate to the pool of plasma ET-1. Because of the short duration of this study, it is unlikely that ET receptor blockade had significant effects on renal ET-1 production. Therefore, the reduction in FeET-1 after ETB blockade appears to indicate that renal excretion of ET-1 is at least partly facilitated by ETB receptor activation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.