|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print August 6, 2002
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 10.1152/ajprenal.00163.2002
Submitted on April 29, 2002
Accepted on July 25, 2002
1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alan{at}nephron.med.cornell.edu.
A mathematical model of the rat collecting duct (CD) is used to examine the effect of delivered load of bicarbonate and non-bicarbonate buffer on urinary acidification. Increasing the delivered load of HCO-3 produces bicarbonaturia, and, with luminal carbonic anhydrase absent, induces a disequilibrium luminal pH and a post- equilibration increase in urine pCO2. At baseline flows, this disequilibrium disappears when luminal carbonic anhydrase rate coefficients reach 1% of full catalysis. The magnitude of the equilibration pCO2 depends upon the product of urinary acid phosphate concentration and the disequilibrium pH. Thus, although increasing phosphate delivery to the CD decreases the disequilibrium pH, the increase in urinary phosphate concentration yields an overall increase in post-equilibration pCO2. In simulations of experimental HCO-3 loading in the rat, model predictions of urinary pCO2 exceed the measured pCO2 of bladder urine. In part, the higher model predictions for urinary pCO2 may reflect higher urinary flow rates and lower urinary phosphate concentrations in the experimental preparations. However, when simulation of CD function during HCO-3 loading acknowledges the high ambient renal medullary pCO2 (DuBose, 1982), the predicted urinary pCO2 of the model CD is yet that much greater. This discrepancy cannot be resolved within the model, but requires additional experimental data, namely concomitant determination of urinary buffer concentrations within the tubule fluid sampled for pCO2 and pH. This model should provide a means for simulating formal testing of urinary acidification, and thus for examining hypotheses regarding transport defects underlying distal renal tubular acidosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Weinstein A mathematical model of distal nephron acidification: diuretic effects Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1353 - F1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moret, M. H. Dave, N. Schulz, J. X. Jiang, F. Verrey, and C. A. Wagner Regulation of renal amino acid transporters during metabolic acidosis Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): F555 - F566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Weinstein A mathematical model of rat collecting duct I. Flow effects on transport and urinary acidification Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): F1237 - F1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Weinstein A mathematical model of rat collecting duct III. Paradigms for distal acidification defects Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): F1267 - F1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |