AJP - Renal AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (July 22, 2003). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00178.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/5/F938    most recent
00178.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khraibi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khraibi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, D.
Submitted on May 7, 2003
Accepted on July 14, 2003

Role of Nitric Oxide in the Natriuretic and Diuretic Responses in Pregnant Rats

Ali A. Khraibi1*, Tianzheng Yu1, and Daiyi Tang1

1 Department of Physiological Sciences, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: khraibaa{at}evms.edu.

Normal pregnancy is characterized by sodium and water conservation and an increase in plasma volume, yet the natriuretic and diuretic responses to acute saline volume expansion (VE) are intact in pregnant rats. Nitric oxide (NO) has been suggested to play a role in renal and cardiovascular adaptations to normal pregnancy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the role of NO in the natriuretic and diuretic responses to VE during pregnancy. Infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 15 mg/kg bolus followed by 500 µg/kg/min continuous infusion) was utilized to inhibit NO synthesis. Nine groups of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were studied. Nonpregnant (NP-VE, n=7), midterm pregnant (MP-VE, n=8), and late-term pregnant (LP-VE, n=7) SD groups that underwent VE alone after a control period; NP-L-NMMA (n=7), MP-L-NMMA (n=8), and LP-L-NMMA (n=7) SD groups that were infused with L-NMMA after a control period; and another three groups of SD rats (NP-VE-L-NMMA, n=8; MP-VE-L-NMMA, n=7; and LP-VE-L-NMMA, n=12) that underwent simultaneous VE and L-NMMA infusion (VE-L-NMMA) after a control period. {Delta}FENa was 7.22±1.03% for NP-VE, 9.89±1.85% for NP-L-NMMA, and 17.66±1.85% for NP-VE-L-NMMA (P<0.05 vs. NP-VE and NP-L-NMMA); 6.61±1.07% for MP-VE, 7.99±1.92% for MP-L-NMMA, and 10.24±1.91% for MP-VE-L-NMMA (NS vs. MP-VE and MP-L-NMMA); 8.20±1.92% for LP-VE, 8.09±0.70% for LP-L-NMMA, and 7.57±1.11% for LP-VE-L-NMMA (both NS vs. LP-VE and LP-L-NMMA). Renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure (RIHP) increased in all groups studied from control to experimental periods; however, the change in RIHP ({Delta}RIHP) was significantly greater in all nonpregnant groups as compared to pregnant groups with similar experimental intervention (i.e. VE, L-NMMA, or VE- L-NMMA). In conclusion, the natriuretic and diuretic responses to volume expansion and L-NMMA infusion were additive in nonpregnant, but not in pregnant rats indicating a possible lower ability of pregnant rats to respond to combined significant natriuretic and diuretic stimuli.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.