|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Bioengineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States; Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology and Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States; Department of Medical Physiology
Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sudi{at}pubhealth.ku.dk.
Proximal tubular pressure shows periodic self-sustained oscillations in normotensive rats, but highly irregular fluctuations in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Although we have suggested that the irregular fluctuations in SHR represent low dimensional deterministic chaos in tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) they could also arise from other mechanisms such as intrinsic instabilities in preglomerular vessels, or inputs from neighboring, coupled nephrons. To test this possibility we applied a parameter estimation procedure to a model of TGF where a stochastic process was added to represent mechanisms not included explicitly in the model. In its deterministic version the model can have chaotic dynamics arising from TGF. The model introduces random fluctuations into a parameter which determines the gain of tubuloglomerular feedback. The model shows a rich variety of dynamics ranging from low dimensional deterministic oscillations and chaos to high dimensional random fluctuations. To fit the data from normotensive rats the model introduces only a small variation in the feedback gain and its estimates of that gain agree well with experimental values. These results support the use of the deterministic model of nephron dynamics in normotensive rats. In contrast, the irregular tubular pressure fluctuations in SHR were best described by a model dominated by random parameter fluctuations. The results point to the failure of simple mathematical models of nephron dynamics adequately to describe processes that are important for the observed irregular tubular pressure fluctuations, and the need to consider other factors, such as differences in vascular function or nephron-nephron interactions, in further work on this problem.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. H. Chon, Y. Zhong, L. C. Moore, N. H. Holstein-Rathlou, and W. A. Cupples Analysis of nonstationarity in renal autoregulation mechanisms using time-varying transfer and coherence functions Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): R821 - R828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |