AJP - Renal Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (December 6, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00265.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/5/F1177    most recent
00265.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison-Bernard, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bivona, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrison-Bernard, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bivona, B. J.
Submitted on June 30, 2005
Accepted on December 1, 2005

Efferent arterioles exclusively express the subtype 1A angiotensin receptor: Functional insights from genetic mouse models

Lisa M. Harrison-Bernard1*, Christopher J. Monjure2, and Benjamin J. Bivona2

1 Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA; Department of Physiology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
2 Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lharris{at}lsuhsc.edu.

Angiotensin (Ang) type 1A receptor null (AT1A-/-) mice exhibit reduced afferent arteriolar (AA) constrictor responses to AngII compared to wild-type (WT) mice, while efferent arteriolar (EA) responses are absent (Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 284:538-545, 2003). In the present study, the renal arteriolar constrictor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and/or AngII were determined in blood perfused juxtamedullary nephrons from kidneys of AT1A-/-, AT1B-/-, and WT mice. Baseline AA diameters were not different (13.1±0.9 vs 12.6±0.9 µm; n=7, 8); however, EA diameters were significantly larger (17.3±1.4 vs 11.7±0.4 µm; n=10, 8) in AT1A-/-compared to WT mice, respectively. NE (0.1-1 µM) produced similar constriction of AA (-40±8 vs -51±6%; 1µM) and EA (-29±6 vs -38±3%; 1 µM) of AT1A-/- and WT mice. Baseline AA (13.5±0.7 vs 14.2±0.9 µm; n=9, 10) and EA (15.4±1.0 vs 15.0±0.7 µm; n=11, 9) diameters, and AngII (0.1-10nM) constrictor responses of AA (-25±4 vs -31±5%; 10nM) and EA (-32±6 vs -35±7%; 10nM) were similar in AT1B-/- and WT mice, respectively. AngII constrictions were eliminated by AT1 receptor blockade (4 µM Candesartan). Taken together, our data demonstrate that AA and EA responses to NE are unaltered in the absence of AT1A receptors, and AngII responses remain intact in the absence of AT1B receptors. Therefore, we conclude that both AT1A and AT1B receptors are functionally expressed on the AA, while the EA exclusively expresses the AT1A receptor subtype.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.