AJP - Renal AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (February 7, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00273.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/1/F236    most recent
00273.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. D.
Submitted on July 4, 2005
Accepted on January 27, 2006

Automated Method for the Isolation of Collecting Ducts

R. Lance Miller1, Ping Zhang1, Tong Chen2, Andreas Rohrwasser2, and Raoul D. Nelson1*

1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2 Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Raoul.Nelson{at}hsc.utah.edu.

The structural and functional heterogeneity of the collecting duct presents a tremendous experimental challenge requiring manual microdissection, which is time consuming, labor intensive, and not amenable to high throughput. To overcome these limitations we developed a novel approach combining the use of transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the collecting duct with large particle based flow cytometry to isolate pure populations of tubular fragments from the whole collecting duct (CD), or inner medullary (IMCD), outer medullary (OMCD) or connecting segment/cortical collecting duct (CNT/CCD). Kidneys were enzymatically dispersed into tubular fragments and sorted based on tubular length and GFP intensity using large particle based flow cytometry or Complex Object Parametric Analyzer Sorter (COPASTM). A LIVE/DEAD assay demonstrates that the tubules were greater than 90% viable. Tubules were collected as a function of fluorescent intensity and analyzed by epifluorescence and phase microscopy for count accuracy, GFP positivity, average tubule length, and time required to collect 100 tubules. Likewise, mRNA and protein from sorted tubules was analyzed for expression of tubule segment-specific genes using quantitative real-time RT-PCR and immunoblotting. The purity and yield of sorted tubules was related to sort stringency. Four to six replicates of 100 collecting ducts (9.68 ± 0.44 to 14.5 ± 0.66 cm or 9.2 ± 0.7 mg tubular protein) were routinely obtained from a single mouse in under an hour. In conclusion, large particle based flow cytometry is fast, reproducible, and generates sufficient amounts of highly pure and viable collecting ducts from single or replicate animals for gene expression and proteomic analysis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. V. Hofmeister, R. A. Fenton, and J. Praetorius
Fluorescence isolation of mouse late distal convoluted tubules and connecting tubules: effects of vasopressin and vitamin D3 on Ca2+ signaling
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): F194 - F203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.