|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antagonist 1D11 in Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction
1 Institute for Pediatric Urology-Dept. of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College,, New York, New York, United States
2 Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
3 The Genzyme Corporation, Framingham, Massachusetts, United States
4 Institute for Pediatric Urology-Dept. of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dfelsen{at}med.cornell.edu.
In unilateral ureteral obstruction [UUO] the kidney is characterized by increased fibrosis and apoptosis. Both Transforming Growth Factor-
[TGF-
] and Angiotensin II [ANG II] have been implicated, and ANG II may mediate its effects through TGF-
. Previous studies demonstrated amelioration of renal damage when either TGF-
or ANG II has been individually targeted. In this study, we sought to determine whether combining 1D11 [ monoclonal antibody to TGF-
] and an ACE inhibitor, enalapril, would be more effective in UUO than either individual treatment, as has been shown in diabetic and glomerulonephritic models. Rats underwent UUO and were given either control monoclonal antibody, 1D11 or enalapril , or 1D11/enalapril combination, for 14 days. Kidneys were harvested and examined for fibrosis [trichrome; collagen (real time PCR, Sircol assay) and Fibroblast specific protein (FSP-1) expression (immunohistochemistry), apoptosis [TUNEL], macrophage infiltration [immunohistochemistry] and TGF-
expression [real time PCR and tubular localization with immunohistochemistry]. UUO was found to induce fibrosis, apoptosis, macrophage infiltration and TGF-
expression in the obstructed kidney. Administration of either 1D11 or enalapril individually significantly decreased all these changes; when 1D11 and enalapril were combined, there was little additive effect, and the combination did not provide full protection against damage. The results demonstrate that, for the most part, combination therapy is not additive in UUO. This could be due the continued presence of a physical obstruction or to biochemical differences between UUO and other renal disease models. Furthermore, it suggests that other targets may amenable to pharmacologic manipulation in UUO.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Kassiri, V. Defamie, M. Hariri, G. Y. Oudit, S. Anthwal, F. Dawood, P. Liu, and R. Khokha Simultaneous Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Tumor Necrosis Factor Activation and Cross-talk Cause Aberrant Remodeling Response and Myocardial Fibrosis in Timp3-deficient Heart J. Biol. Chem., October 23, 2009; 284(43): 29893 - 29904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Mizuguchi, J. Chen, S. V. Seshan, D. P. Poppas, H. H. Szeto, and D. Felsen A novel cell-permeable antioxidant peptide decreases renal tubular apoptosis and damage in unilateral ureteral obstruction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): F1545 - F1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Boor, K. Sebekova, T. Ostendorf, and J. Floege Treatment targets in renal fibrosis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3391 - 3407. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |