|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Medicine/Nephrology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
2 Division of Nephrology 691/111L, W. Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Med Ctr, Los Angeles, California, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ikurtz{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
When approaching the analysis of disorders of acid-base balance, physical-chemists, physiologists, and clinicians, tend to focus on different aspects of the relevant phenomenology. The physical-chemist focuses on a quantitative understanding of proton hydration and aqueous proton transfer reactions that alter the acidity of a given solution. The physiologist focuses on molecular, cellular, and whole organ, transport processes that modulate the acidity of a given body fluid compartment. The clinician emphasizes the diagnosis, clinical causes, and most appropriate treatment of acid-base disturbances. Historically, two different conceptual frameworks have evolved among clinicians and physiologists for interpreting acid-base phenomena. The traditional or bicarbonate-centered framework relies quantitatively on the Henderson-Hasselbalch (H-H) equation whereas the Stewart or strong ion approach utilizes either the original Stewart equation or its simplified version derived by Constable. In this review, the concepts underlying the bicarbonate-centered and Stewart formulations are analyzed in detail emphasizing the differences in how each approach characterizes acid-base phenomenology at the molecular level, tissue level, and in the clinical sphere. A quantitative comparison of the equations that are currently used in the literature to calculate [H+] is included in order to clear up some of the misconceptions that currently exist in this area. Our analysis demonstrates that: 1) while the principle of electroneutrality plays a central role in the strong ion formulation, electroneutrality per se does not dictate a specific [H+] and 2) the strong ion and bicarbonate-centered approaches are quantitatively identical; however, only the bicarbonate-centered approach reflects the underlying mechanistic acid-base phenomenology.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rastegar Clinical Utility of Stewart's Method in Diagnosis and Management of Acid-Base Disorders Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1267 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Nguyen, L. Kao, and I. Kurtz Calculation of the equilibrium pH in a multiple-buffered aqueous solution based on partitioning of proton buffering: a new predictive formula Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): F1521 - F1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Maciel Severe metabolic alkalosis due to the combination of unmeasured cations and hypochloraemia in a patient with gastroparesia and frequent emesis BMJ Case Reports, May 18, 2009; 2009(may18_1): bcr0920081011 - bcr0920081011. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |