AJP - Renal Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (August 8, 2001). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.0144.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/1/F59    most recent
0144.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H
Right arrow Articles by Shesely, E. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H
Right arrow Articles by Shesely, E. G

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print August 8, 2001
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 10.1152/ajprenal.0144.2001
Submitted on May 10, 2001
Accepted on August 1, 2001

Renal Baroreceptor-Stimulated Renin in the eNOS Knockout Mouse

William H Beierwaltes1*, D'Anna L Potter1, and Edward G Shesely1

1 Hypertension and Vascular Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wbeierw1{at}hfhs.org.

The role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) in renal baroreceptor stimulation of renin was tested comparing endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) deficient mice with C57BL/6J (C57) controls. We measured blood pressure and renal blood flow (RBF), and plasma renin concentration (PRC) in inactin-anesthetized mice. Blood pressure in eNOS knockout mice was higher than in controls (100 ± 3 vs. 86 ± 1 mmHg, respectively; p <0.001), but RBF was similar (1.71 ± 0.06 vs. 1.66 ± 0.09 ml/min/100 mg kw, respectively), so that RVR was also higher in the knockouts (59.81 ± 2.07 vs. 51.81 ± 2.66 RU, respectively; p <0.025). PRC was similar (8.24 ± 1.57 in eNOS knockout vs. 7.10 ± 1.19 ng/ Ang I/ml/hr in C57). NOS inhibition with L-NAME in C57 controls increased blood pressure (from 85 ± 2 to 106 ± 1 mmHg, p<0.001) and decreased RBF (from 1.66 ± 0.09 to 1.08 ± 0.02; p <0.005), but L-NAME had no effect in eNOS knockout mice. When renal perfusion pressure was reduced in C57 controls to 55 mmHg, PRC increased from 6.6 ± 0.9 to 14.5 ± 1.9 µg/ml/hr (p <0.025), but this response was blocked by L-NAME. However, in eNOS knockouts, reduced renal perfusion pressure increased PRC from 7.6 ± 1.4 to 15.0 ± 2.8 µg/ml/hr (p <0.001). Thus, in the chronic absence of eNOS, blood pressure was elevated, but RBF was normal. Additionally, the absence of eNOS did not modify baroreceptor-stimulated renin, suggesting that eNOS-derived NO does not directly mediate this renin-regulating pathway.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. J. Mullins, M. A. Bailey, and J. J. Mullins
Hypertension, Kidney, and Transgenics: A Fresh Perspective
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 709 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. Castrop, F. Schweda, D. Mizel, Y. Huang, J. Briggs, A. Kurtz, and J. Schnermann
Permissive role of nitric oxide in macula densa control of renin secretion
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): F848 - F857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. A. Ortiz and J. L. Garvin
Cardiovascular and renal control in NOS-deficient mouse models
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): R628 - R638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.