AJP - Renal AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F1056-F1065, 2002. First published July 2, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00052.2002
0363-6127/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/5/F1056    most recent
00052.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiBona, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sawin, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiBona, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sawin, L. L.
Vol. 283, Issue 5, F1056-F1065, November 2002

Effect of renal nerve stimulation on responsiveness of the rat renal vasculature

Gerald F. DiBona and Linda L. Sawin

Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa College of Medicine and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

When the renal nerves are stimulated with sinusoidal stimuli over the frequency range 0.04-0.8 Hz, low (<= 0.4 Hz)- but not high (>= 0.4 Hz)-frequency oscillations appear in renal blood flow (RBF) and are proposed to increase responsiveness of the renal vasculature to stimuli. This hypothesis was tested in anesthetized rats in which RBF responses to intrarenal injection of norepinephrine and angiotensin and to reductions in renal arterial pressure (RAP) were determined during conventional rectangular pulse and sinusoidal renal nerve stimulation. Conventional rectangular pulse renal nerve stimulation decreased RBF at 2 Hz but not at 0.2 or 1.0 Hz. Sinusoidal renal nerve stimulation elicited low-frequency oscillations (<= 0.4 Hz) in RBF only when the basal carrier signal frequency produced renal vasoconstriction, i.e., at 5 Hz but not at 1 Hz. Regardless of whether renal vasoconstriction occurred, neither conventional rectangular pulse nor sinusoidal renal nerve stimulation altered renal vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine and angiotensin. The RBF response to reduction in RAP was altered by both conventional rectangular pulse and sinusoidal renal nerve stimulation only when renal vasoconstriction occurred: the decrease in RBF during reduced RAP was greater. Sinusoidal renal nerve stimulation with a renal vasoconstrictor carrier frequency results in a decrease in RBF with superimposed low-frequency oscillations. However, these low-frequency RBF oscillations do not alter renal vascular responsiveness to vasoconstrictor stimuli.

renal sympathetic nerves; renal blood flow; oscillations


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
G. F DiBona
Dynamic analysis of patterns of renal sympathetic nerve activity: implications for renal function
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2005; 90(2): 159 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. Malpas, S.-J. Guild, R. Evans, and G. F. DiBona
Responsiveness of the Renal Vasculature: Relating Electrical Stimulation to Endogenous Nerve Activity Is Problematic
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): F594 - F596.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online