|
|
||||||||
1National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; and 3Institute of Physiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Submitted 13 February 2007 ; accepted in final form 3 May 2007
Loop diuretics like furosemide have been shown to cause renal vasodilatation in dogs and humans, an effect thought to result from both a direct vascular dilator effect and from inhibition of tubuloglomerular feedback. In isolated perfused afferent arterioles preconstricted with angiotensin II or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, furosemide caused a dose-dependent increase of vascular diameter, but it was without effect in vessels from NKCC1/ mice suggesting that inhibition of NKCC1 mediates dilatation in afferent arterioles. In the intact kidney, however, furosemide (2 mg/kg iv) caused a 50.5 ± 3% reduction of total renal blood flow (RBF) and a 27% reduction of superficial blood flow (SBF) accompanied by a marked and immediate increase of tubular pressure and volume. At 10 mg/kg, furosemide reduced RBF by 60.4 ± 2%. Similarly, NKCC1/ mice responded to furosemide with a 45.4% decrease of RBF and a 29% decrease of SBF. Decreases in RBF and SBF and increases of tubular pressure by furosemide were ameliorated by renal decapsulation. In addition, pretreatment with candesartan (2 mg/kg) or indomethacin (5 mg/kg) attenuated the reduction of RBF and peak urine flows caused by furosemide. Our data indicate that furosemide, despite its direct vasodilator potential in isolated afferent arterioles, causes a marked increase in flow resistance of the vascular bed of the intact mouse kidney. We suggest that generation of angiotensin II and/or a vasoconstrictor prostaglandin combined with compression of peritubular capillaries by the expanding tubular compartment are responsible for the reduction of RBF in vivo.
renal blood flow; superficial blood flow; candesartan; decapsulation; tubular pressure; NKCC1 knockout
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Peti-Peterdi, I. Toma, A. Sipos, and S. L. Vargas Multiphoton Imaging of Renal Regulatory Mechanisms Physiology, April 1, 2009; 24(2): 88 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Kim, C. Eisner, R. Faulhaber-Walter, D. Mizel, S. M. Wall, J. P. Briggs, and J. Schnermann Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in NKCC1-deficient mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1230 - F1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Iliescu, R. Cazan, G. R. McLemore Jr., M. Venegas-Pont, and M. J. Ryan Renal blood flow and dynamic autoregulation in conscious mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F734 - F740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just and W. J. Arendshorst A novel mechanism of renal blood flow autoregulation and the autoregulatory role of A1 adenosine receptors in mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1489 - F1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |