AJP - Renal Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (January 14, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90521.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/6/F1239    most recent
90521.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hewitson, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hewitson, T. D.
Submitted on August 28, 2008
Revised on December 19, 2008
Accepted on January 7, 2009

RENAL TUBULOINTERSTITIAL FIBROSIS: COMMON BUT NEVER SIMPLE

Tim David Hewitson1*

1 Royal Melbourne Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tim.hewitson{at}mh.org.au.

Regardless of etiology, all patients with chronic renal disease show a progressive decline in renal function with time. Fibrosis, so-called scarring, is a key cause of this pathophysiology. Fibrosis involves an excess accumulation of extracellular matrix (primarily composed of collagen) and usually results in loss of function when normal tissue is replaced with scar tissue. While recent major advances have led to a much better understanding of this process, many problems remain. We for instance know little about why some wounds heal and others scar, and little about how many putative anti-fibrotic agents work. This review discusses recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of tubulointerstitial fibrosis, focusing on the regulation and role of the myofibroblast in this process, the role of recently recognised endogenous anti-fibrotic factors, controversy surrounding the effects of metalloproteinases, and the opportunities presented by new treatment strategies that abrogate and may even reverse fibrosis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.